Bad Movies

Pointless, debilitating, and tediously moronic. This movie lacks the one thing that is usually imperative in a comedy, humor. Betwixt the endless fart jokes, puke gags, titty-twisters, and mindless stupidity, I found nothing that even resembled a movie. This film, is quite honestly the worst I have ever seen in my entire life.

Rob Schneider is probably the best character in the film, which, isn't saying anything at all. He just doesn't have as many stupid gags and discusting jokes as the rest of the mindless cast of imbeciles. David Spade has never been worse, and I wonder just what forced him to be in this picture. Jon Heder, is not close enough to his character in "Napoleon Dynamite" to like him, and not far enough away to think he is trying something new. Instead he is stuck in the middle of the two, making the whole movie all the more painful. The rest of the supporting cast is just as severely unintelligent and witless.

I am not sure if the cast could be good in the roles or not, as the script is so mind-boggling terrible, it is hard to discern one nonsensical scene from the next. Past all that, the movie tries to have a heart, and it failed miserably.

The direction wasn't quite as bad as the rest of the movie. Then again, what is? The direction was fair at best, leaving me hating the entire thing more than I ever thought possible.

This film fails on every account possible. There is nothing in here that is even remotely interesting, and often times it is really offensive. The whole movie was so incredibly rude and crude, if I wasn't watching it to write this review, I would have turned it off five minutes in. There you have it, the review for the worst movie I have ever seen.

One of the most perverted movies I have ever seen in my life. It discusts me how the movie-makers would, after making thousands of sexual jokes and who knows what else, could try to add some kind of moral theme to it. What is the world coming to. Seriously, those who enjoyed this movie should be shot, not just once, but 87 times with one of Burts elephant guns (from tremors). What a vile place the world is coming to. NO STARS FOR ME is the real rating I give it.

This movie is one of the biggest wastes of my life that I have ever watched. It isn't funny. I never even thought about laughing once. Jim Carrey is simply not funny.

Not only was I not amused through all of it, at times I was terribly discusted by the content of the movie. Some of the content of this movie should never have to be viewed. Some of this content only a complete pervert could have invented. This movie is just plain wrong.

The plot, I admit, could have been interesting, and even funny. The real reason this movie doesn't work, is Jim Carrey, plain and simple.

Wow, for a movie that is supposed to be a comedy, I found myself saying "what?!" more often then my mouth opened to let out a chuckle. I decided after a while that I would stop trying to make sense of the crap that was dished out to me, and at least try to finish the movie...which was both painful and tedious.

Interesting idea that really became one of the biggest mess ups in cinema history. I have no doubt that the same people who loved this movie would also enjoy Ace Ventura, which is one of the worst movies that I have ever seen.

Tim Burton might be a genius, but some of his earlier stuff is excruciatingly hard to watch. The perfect example of how annoying actors, ridiculous plots, and trying to put out a effects movie before its time can really go the wrong way. Lets just say it is one of the worst movies I have seen in a long time.

Mark Cox is right this movie is total crap and very weird. Don't waste your time, though, you probably already have.

If this was supposed to be a horror, I won't believe it. If it was supposed to be a comedy, I think the joke was on them. It answers the age old question. How horrible does a movie have to be for America to love it? Usually, it has to have a lot of special effects, action, limited story, potty humor or other equally as unfunny or rude "comedy", and sexed up action heroes for Americans to enjoy it, at least nowdays. So, I can't quite understand why they seem to like it at all, because it has none of those, and also not much of anything else.

It isn't funny, it isn't scary, it isn't fun, it isn't psychological, entertaining, realistic, or intersting. It really is terrible, in scripting, acting, direction, story, etc. I can't understand why anyone would even consider watching it after they have seen the atrocity once. It blows my mind.

This has got to be one of the worst movies ever made. It is so incredibly ridiculous and moronic that it really defeats the purpose of trying to be a comedy. In fact, I kept wondering when the whole ordeal would be over, as it seemed to run on for hours.

The characters are stupid, the story is stupid and gains stupidity with every wasted minute, the comedy is so un-funny I wanted it to be over in the first ten minutes. My intellegence was drained so much, that after all of the days and weeks after the viewing, I still couldn't think straight.

What a waste of my time, what a waste of the world's time, what a waste of film, what a waste. This movie reckless, pointless, idiotic, and is terribly directed and acted. I never thought that we could put out such a bad movie, but I was proved wrong. Not good, not good at all.

Wow this movie was like really horrible. Almost as hard to watch, as it is to saw your own leg off with a butter knife...which I don't recommend that you try, by the way. What this movie really makes you want to do, is give up on the movie industry in general. It is the most ridiculous, horribly acted, horribly written eyesore that I have seen in a while. It took real courage to actually finish this piece of crap. Good Gravy! What is the world coming too.

I am trying to decide which of the girls was the worst "actress" but heck, its a toss up. What a waste of my life. Good grief!

This movie was painful. Watching movies, especially comedies should bring me happiness, this movie almost made me want to give up on life...in general.

I came into the movie with no real interest, I simply wanted to see what "flim-maker" Jared Hess would make after his very successful cult movie "Napoleon Dynamite", which for some reason I enjoyed despite the fact that it had nothing going for it. Napoleon was merely a freak of nature, something that never should have caught on, as the quality of acting, scripting, and most obvious, the direction, is some of the worst that I have ever seen in my entire life.

The theater was small, but had a few various groups spread throughout it, groups that for some reason that I couldn't decipher, were laughing uproariously whenever Jack Black would do...anything. So, what I assume is that the audience simply think that Jack Black is funny, not what he is doing onscreen, which I thought was everything but funny. Jack Black is a funny man, I am not going to deny that, but watching him in Nacho Libre was about as humorous and painful as sawing my own arm off.

The story of the film is very similar to Napoleon, in that there is not really a defined plot. It is really a bunch of random disjointed scenes that finally end with some kind of eventual unsatisfying resolution.

Beyond the fact that there is not a single humorous moment in Nacho Libre, the direction is exactly as horrible as it was in Napoleon. I can't stand to see shots and scenes that are so over-used and so discustingly piled on eachother....I won't take it anymore. Jared Hess is an ongoing joke. He should give up now before he makes a bigger fool of himself. We all have our callings in life, Hess needs to find his.

If this movie was trying to be fun, it failed. If it was trying to be entertaining it failed. If it were trying to be wise, insightful, thoughtful, or interesting, it failed. If it was trying to be racist and disrespectful it more than likely suceeded.

This movie was rated PG-13 for non-stop ninja action. If the action were realistic and entertaining, I could understand this rating, but as it stands, I have no clue why it received the rating. The only reason that I can see for the rating would be for the harsh and ridiculous treatment that is shown to the Native-Americans in this movie. I really felt like this movie was very disrespectful to Native-Americans, and that did not make me happy.

Besides that, the stupid plot, ludicrous fighting, million-plus crotch shots, and poor acting, move this movie in to the hall of fame, for the worst movies ever made. There really is nothing good to report about this movie. It simply is a movie that either should never have been made, or been locked up so the world would not have to endure such a roaring atrocity.

Not good, not good at all. While the first movie was not good either, this movie is just plain aweful. The jokes are horrible, the plot stupid, the whole idea is not well done at all. I am at a loss when I try to understand why anyone would submit themselves to this crap more then once. In short...NO...just no.

Definitely one of the worst films ever made, Xanadu, fails at every attempt it makes to become a good film. Psychedelic, ridiculous, and annoying are usually not the words that I would use to describe good cinema, but for some reason they keep coming to mind after watching this mindless absurdity.

After scene after scene of psychotomimtic agony fills the screen, and I become closer and closer to losing rational thought. The story is one that could actually be good if done right. Too bad this manure pile of a movie got it wrong.

Random bursts of song and even a cartoon scene seem odd and awkwardly placed. My mind somehow withstood the stupidity, though I will never quite understand how. Close to as bad as the rest of the movie is the horrible acting of Michael Beck as Sonny Malone, and don't even get me started on Olivia Newton-John.

One of the better parts of the movie is actor Gene Kelly, who's one reminiscent scene seems like it came out of a good movie.

Something about it seems like it had potential to be good. I haven't thought of what it is though. Altogether a really bad movie.

One of the stupidest movies that I have ever seen in my life. It gives a whole new definition of a bad movie. The whole thing is annoying, ridiculous and unintelligent. It lacks charm. I don't understand how some people could watch this and actually enjoy in. I do not recommend seeing this movie.

This movie is plain stupid. The direction is some of the worst I have ever seen. Will Ferrell never ceases to get on my nerves. The plot is ridiculous, as one would expect from a Will Ferrel film, but the thing that really kills this movie hardcore, is the obsolete direction by Jon Favreau, whos jump from television to film by making "Elf" should have ended his career, in my opinion.

Now, if you don't care about the decideably terrible direction, which I deem impossible after watching the horrific frenzy of shots, then the story is still pitiful and at most times dumb.

But the worst thing about this movie, is in fact the acting of Will Ferrell, which, like Adam Sandler, is exactly the same as any other movie he has ever been in, with one slight difference, he makes his character slightly more gay (in the old sense of the word).

So, if you want a ridiculous adventure, that has horrible direction, and another weak performance by the one the world seems to judge as so funny, then this is the movie for you.

I must say, I have never been more uninterested in a movie in my entire life. The life of the fire-man apparently is more exciting in real life than it is on screen. Heavens! I was bored to tears. I almost couldn't watch it any longer.

The life of a fire-man is full of well, fighting fires, and I was forced to see fire after fire after fire. I didn't care after the first fire, so one can only imagine how I felt after they kept coming and coming.

The flashback approach at this movie is really one of the weaker ones that I have ever seen, and it held next to no emotional value. Random characters kept dying, people that I was apparently supposed to have some kind of attatchment to, but the movie failed to make me care about them. Maybe I wasn't supposed to care about them, in that case, the rest of the fire-fighters were supposed to care about them, but I didn't see that on screen either.

This movie just fails. It fails because it isn't interesting. If fails because I don't care. It fails because I feel like I wasted my time. Phoenix is weak in this movie, and Travolta is downright atrocious. I will never understand why people still think that Travolta can act. He just can't.

What a clever idea spoiled by....well...everything. Besides the glimmer of a good idea somewhere in the background, there is nothing that is even good about this movie. Honestly it is one of the worst movies, that isn't a "so bad it's good" movie, that I have ever seen.

It fails in too many ways to mention, so I will only mention a few of them. One, the love story, which merely consists of a pervy man, played by Christopher Reeve, who sees a picture of a dead woman on the wall of the hotel, and stares at it for a long time. Then he decides to learn everything about her... ! ... Then, he finds a book at her house with a guy who belives it time travel, he talks to that guy, and the guy says, "Oh yeah, you can time travel...if you really really want it." Oh my! Of course the pervert wants to, and he does. There is a word for a person like that: STALKER! Anyway he finds her, and all of a sudden after a few awkwardly placed, acted, and scripted scenes, she is ready to say "I love you" and jump in bed with the man. OH MY WORD!

Two, the scripting. It is really poorly scripted. It essentially feels awkward and unrealistic the entire way through. I cannot help that think George Lucas could have done a better job writing this love story, which is saying a lot after the rubbish we had to endure in "Attack of the Clones."

Three, the conflict between Reeve and the Plummer, who plays essentially the "bad guy" who would get in the way of Reeve and Seymour's "love", is terribly executed. Man, that guy needs to teach his thugs how to tie ropes.

Oh my heavens! Why did they make this horrible movie? Tell me now! I am really interested to know. This movie just didn't work. A mound of debris so thick, the original idea was lost in all of the refuse.

I might have laughed once or twice, but surely it was out of pity. If Robin Williams wanted his career to be a joke, he really pulled it off in this distasteful comedy. The humor was too crude at some points, too awkward at some points, and too unfunny at most points. It was simply a horribly constructed, poorly executed, flat, detestable, unattractive abomination.

If I really wanted to see Robin Willams completely covered in crap, believe me, I would have enjoyed this film. It is really a distasteful film. It's humor is just not very funny. Besides all of that this film tries to have a touching ending where everyone is happy, and I suppose, the audience is meant to feel good inside. It did an okay job at that actually, but it wasn't worth the journey to reach that point.

It is really a big waste of time, this movie. I wouldn't waste your money or your time with this one, unless, like me you want to review it, in the hope that someone will listen and never have to see it for themselves. Ebert and Roeper are right, this is one of 2006's worst movies.

A Disney Channel Original movie with a better budget. The acting and direction are really bad. It is a wonder that this movie ever made it to theaters.

When is Hilary going to figure out that she isn't a good actor. When is she going to figure out that she is a washed up disney channel star who was turned into a teenaged pop sensation? I don't understand why people still enjoy her. As far as I am concerned, I can't understand how she is still making movies.

Another question to consider when watching this movie is, what the crap is Data doing here? I myself was a little confused at why he would do this movie.

I have never had too much good to say about women directors. I'm not being sexest when I say that I have never seen a movie directed by a women that was well done. It is just a fact. I haven't, however, seen too many movies directed by women, so I can't be too sure there isn't a good one out there. I shall await the day.

There is one thing that Material Girls, New York Minute, and Confessions have in common, a women director. Three crappy teen movies, all with women directors, I could be on to something here...

The one thing I enjoyed above all others about this movie was that both Brandon Beemer and Ty Hodges from Suits on the loose were back together in a movie.

The plot of Material Girls was just too confused and uninteresting that I couldn't help but wonder why I was still watching. In fact I still don't know why or how I finished it.

I did see this movie and now regret ever doing so. It was basically, crap. Nothing in it was particularly intesting, and nothing in it was as enjoyable as the series, which isn't very enjoyable. In short, it had nothing going for it.

I will never understand how Lohan can still be making movies. They are so bad that no one can stand to watch them, and yet they keep being made. The bizzare flash backs and awkward direction by Sara Sugerman do nothing to help this movie.

The whole thing is one big trash heap that keeps building higher and higher, then at the end, it has a few bearable moments, and then finishes with more trash. With only a few scenes that stand out and an ending that makes you think Lohan was trying to showcase her singing talent...which really doesn't exsist, this film fails in every way possible.

The whole mess just seems to get more and more awkward the entire way through, then tries to end with a message, which doesn't feel right after having to endure the whole mindless tedium. Beyond all of that, lies the equally as confused acting from Lohan.

A waste of time, a waste of space, a waste of brainpower. The only word I can even think about calling this film...is a waste.

I don't like it. It had some funny quotable parts, but those end up getting overused and are no longer funny. Did I mention not liking Andrew Adamson?

There is nothing good to report about this movie. It is really a horrible movie. I wouldn't recommend it, as it isn't well made at all. Out of all of the superhero movies that are made, this is by far the worst one that I have seen.

I can't believe that they call this a movie. It is horrible. I hate Will Ferrell, he isn't a good actor. He is one of those actors with only one character to speak of. The whole thing just seemed stupid. I like Nichole Kidman, but this is a sorry excuse for a movie, I am sorry.

A good example of bad cinema, but not, however, the kind that is so bad that it is good. This movie is just simply bad. The fights, the direction are just bad. What really I thought was lame, was that the one character they were setting up to live the entire way through, died. Who does that? Anyway if you wanted a good ending after all of the crap, I'm sorry you won't be getting one, they wrote the good one out of the script...sorry.

As classic as this movie might have been, as well casted as this movie might have been, this movie is nothing but one-hundred minutes of wasted screen time. The movie must have failed the test of time, because you don't see me praising it. Frightfully dull, annoyingly dry, and indescribably uninspiring are the choice words I would use to describe this movie.

The boredom sets in about thirty seconds into the movie, and doesn't leave until the movie is over. Even the chase sequence in which the whole tiresome movie was building to, is discustingly repetitious and surprisingly lifeless, due partially to the fact that during the whole ride not even a whisper of music is heard. Though the movie was released in 1969, I am pretty sure that they new how to put in music during a chase scene, but why didin't they I wonder.

Even the attempts at humor, were boring and awkward. The main reason humor is introduced in an action movie, is to liberate the tension gained from an action sequence. This movie needed no so called "tension releaser" as even in the midst of the chase I was fighting for consiousness.

I expected better, there is no doubt about it. All I received, however, was an unispiring, tedious picture, that wasted the talents of Michael Caine.

I didn't like it enough to want to write a review about it. But I didn't hate it enought to want to write a horrible review about it. It was just pointless. What a waste of my time.

I wish it were more entertaining. Really I do. It is unbearably mediocre through most, and really bad in some other areas. Clockstoppers is a pretty bad Nickelodeon movie that would probably have been better if it had never been made. They just couldn't make me care enough.

If they were trying to make a good movie, they weren't quite there. If they were trying to make a Bad/Good movie, they weren't close enough. It was just dull and uninspired. If I were to design a watch that could speed me up to a speed fast enough to make others look like they were standing still, I would have included waterproof as one of the specifications.

Not good...

While I could see where the director was going with the comic-book style wipes and transitions, I really don't think that it worked in the movie.

But, what really got me was the extreme and rather pointless fighting. It is why many comic book movies have failed. A lot of violence just because it is the Hulk, doesn't interest me at all. In fact one of the only things that I enjoyed was the character of Jennifer Connelly, which really added to the film. Unfotunately, not enough to make my even somewhat enjoy this tedious adaptation of the Hulk.

From the director of the Lord of the Rings trilogy Peter Jackson comes a remake of the 1933 movie King Kong. It starts out fairly well, and holds the interest fairly well until about the middle of the film, where the story gets duller and more mundane. It is way overdone, action should be used much more sparingly...I was not interested in a huge 30 minute t-rex fight, nor was I interested in a lengthy bug war, but after all of that the film still goes on leaving the viewer quite BORED. I think that one of the things that the movie really suffers from is that it tried to be too much like the original. After all of the huge lenghty action scenes, you realize that King Kong still hasn't been to New York yet, by this time I was incredibly bored...but it just kept going. The acting is fairly well done by most of the characters (Jack Black included) and the visuals were also well done. Too bad that is not all a movie needs, or this movie would get five-stars from me. In short, too much, to long, too boring...not worth seeing in my opinion.

OH MY FLIPPIN' HECK! I can't say that this is a good movie without the lie police attacking me and turning me in. The whole movie was completely ridiculous. I must say this is one of the worst movies I have seen in a while. The whole plot was ridiculous.

The fact that the little group of survivors could be saved from a storm that can literally freeze someone instantly by keeping a tiny fire burning is ridiculous. The fact that Quaid survived the trip to New York is also ridiculous. The fact that the wolves didn't freeze to death....grrrr....but what really makes me feel that this movie wasted my life is that it was just a big set up for a Public Service Announcement...YAY! That wasn't a waste of time... GOOD GRAVY, save your money, but more importantly, save your time.

Wow, nothing in this movie could save it from utter downfall, nothing could save it from being a "hilarious" movie. Hilarious being used in the most sarcastic way possible. I have never thought Amanda Bynes had much talent when it comes to acting, but this movie proves it. She can't pull off being a character of her own sex, why in the world would she try to be a man? Despite the title, Bynes is so far from "The Man" it's not even funny. In fact, at most points it was really hard to watch her pretend to act.

This is just the type of movie that preteen girls will love, partially for Channing Tatum, and partially because it is just one of the categories of crap that Americans seem to always enjoy. I personally prefer movies that are soo bad that they are good, a lot of Americans seem to think just plain crappy is fine too.

So, though the general public might disagree, I am willing to admit that this movie does not work, and I am quite content with that.