For once the plot made me pleasantly confused. And it was overall pretty ahead of its time so kudos for that. [edit] I watched it again recently and liked it even more. You know what they say: it takes time to fall in love to great masterpieces (or something like that).
Not the greatest silent film but it deserves all other credit for its visually beautiful look and the making of the old adultery theme more captivating.
Stark, emotionally draining and surprisingly graphic. The music fits perfectly and the simplicity affects you more than you would think but that may not be for everyone. Lots of close ups.
An excellent portrayal of both the murderer's mind and the mob's reaction to the horrible events. Hauntingly beautiful camera work and Peter Lorre is amazing.
Bette Davis is some interesting actress, I want to see more of her movies. The character's nastiness just jumps out of the screen while the doctor is more subtle and quiet. Not the most impressing movie as a whole, though.
Quite good adaptation of the book but the story almost lost its appeal. Garbo wasn't exactly what I visioned Camille would be, Robert Taylor was perfect.
The more time goes by the more I think this version is too sappy. Sure, the two lovers were meant to be together but why put aside the cruelty of Heathcliff. Too tame...
Fantastic. The first Chaplin movie for me. We watched couple of scenes in our history class when I was 13 but seeing this now completely was worth it. Lots of funny moments and the speech in the end was powerful and captivating.
A more subtle thriller and I actually preferred this over some more action packed one. The moments of doubt are depicted well and the atmosphere when a murderer comes into a small town.
Liked Chaney's performance but it wasn't enough to carry this another weak sequel of Dracula. The scene where the count moves across the swamp is pretty nice.
Epic fail. Goodbye horror, enter efforts of explaining supernatural with science. The three characters in one movie could have been executed so much better.
Sure, it has some unintentionally comical parts but it's also wonderfully dream-like. Big screen does it most justice, afterwards you think you've dreamt the whole thing. Besides, I prefer this kind of version of Beauty and the Beast (father stealing a rose etc).
My first film noir so because of that I can't really compare it to others. The actors apart from Bendix seemed very wooden and didn't take advantage of their emotions at all. The plot wasn't that exciting either.
Without a doubt Monty was the most interesting character but the fact that they changed the book's homosexual into Jewish was disappointing. Otherwise pretty decent.
The appearance of real silent movie stars is always unforgettable. This was a different film noir, more of my taste. Intense and dramatic with great performances.
Couple of thoughts about the credibility of the plot came to my mind but I enjoyed it. The end with the carousel crash is great and the murder scene is very well done.
Oh yes. Brando's performance is intense (comparing to Leigh who managed to irritate me, I guess her style wasn't my cup of tea) and everything just kept me wide awake and glued to the screen. Heat makes everybody crazy ;P
I kind of liked this. Ok, the book had more passion and the colours of the movie hurt my eyes not to mention the wooden performance of Herrer but I liked this.
Why haven't I seen this before? It was hilarious and the ending scene just cracked me up. Truly one of the best comedies and which deserves the title "favourite movie".
All actors are excellent and the subject is very relevant even today. The part where the Bible is challenged is clever, especially when the movie is based on a true story.