BLOOD & GUTS!

Exorcist II was awful, but the third was surprisingly enjoyable. Clearly nothing compared to the first, but still a good watch.

They just don't make 'em like this anymore.

Bruce Campbell is the master of cheesy catch phrases.

There really was no need for a sequel, but I'm sure glad they made it anyway. This one is slightly better than the first.

Bloody hilarious! Bruce Campbell is one of a kind.

I love this movie to death! It really does have everything going for it. This is the prime example of how horror films should be made. Up the humour! Up the gore! Forget trying to scare the audience.

BRAINSSSSS!!!!!!!!!!!!

I cannot believe my eyes. A decent horror remake. Somebody pinch me.

Romero never disappoints. He is the king of zombie films!

I simply adore the story! Horror films really don't get much better than this. The remake is shameful compared to the original.

Well, if it isn't another classic horror movie. Freddy is one of my favourite horror villains.

One of the better modern horror films. They're finally going back to the basics. Humour & gore.

This movie terrified me as a child. Silly to watch now, but at the age of five, no thank you!

Say what you will, but I happen to love it! I liked the reference to Ed Wood's "Glen or Glenda" - Hilarious!

This movie was amazing! I didn't expect to enjoy it at all. What a lovely surprise.

Rob Zombie pays homage to classic 70s-80s horror flicks. I thought he did an excellent job. Bill Moseley was a nice touch.

I only had hateful things to say about this movie the first time I saw it. However, I decided to give it another watch and found it absolutely amazing! It may have been due to the fact that I missed the first five - ten minutes or so. I can't seem to get into a movie when I miss the very beginning.

I was totally surprised by this. The cop was a little off putting at first. The ending was fantastic!

This is probably the funniest of them all. The way he grants the wishes are always so hilarious!

Good ole' corny horror!

It definitely had an old 70s horror flick vibe to it. Really worth watching.

Corny? Yes. Entertaining? Absolutely!

It is what it is. Everyone's seen it. Not amazing, but certainly a classic. I sort of wish they never started this. It has spawned so many ridiculous sequels.

What a twisted movie. Cronenberg has captured my heart with this one.

David Cronenberg is one of the most original filmmakers on the face of the planet!

Completely predictable, but I really did enjoy it.

I thought it was quite original.

Masterful.

Total classic.

I honestly would have shit my pants watching this as a kid.

Tobe Hooper has really lost his touch.

Possibly the slowest horror film ever made.

To be honest, I was rather disappointed. The first 10 minutes or so was intense, (even gave me chills), but it went downhill after that. I did enjoy certain elements; mainly the gore, and the scene where Robert Carlyle turns into a zombie, but the plot was just ridiculous. '28 Days Later' is ten times better than '28 Weeks Later.' They canned the story and simply added a lot more action, which works for some people I suppose. I'm not going to lie though. It was entertaining. I was just expecting more, that's all. - The soundtrack is excellent!

I had absolutely no desire to watch this, and expected it to bomb big time. The only reason I did see it was because it was free on my television. To be honest, it wasn't nearly as awful as I had imagined. A mindless, entertaining flick aimed directly at teenagers. Sure, at times it became rather cheesy, and the acting was quite bad, but I still did enjoy it. It's definitely one of those "so bad it's good" movies. It really reminded me of a David DeCoteau film, only with a much larger budget.

Clearly not Cronenberg's best, but a fine film nonetheless. Granted, the acting was dreadful.

It had potential. I liked the basic story, but I couldn't really get into it. I'm sure the original Japanese version is much better.

Sometimes I just enjoy a good "B" movie.

A better cast would have made this film more enjoyable for me. Gary Oldman was great though.

Absolutely no thought went into this. It was almost like the writers were being forced into adding the little details that explained certain things about the characters. Take the guy in the wheelchair for example. He gets shot in one knee, so the sheriff tells Leatherface to saw it off. But you notice how in the other film he has both legs gone. Hmmmm, how does this happen I wonder? "Balance." He must be balanced off. So, naturally, Leatherface saws off the other leg as well. OH. MY. GOD. Now, I did laugh at this, but only because it was a completely brainless effort.

The special effects are second to none!

Not one of those "so bad it's good" movies. Just plain old bad. And to think it was based on a Stephen King story. Way to ruin a good thing.

Dare I say it? I walked into Saw IV with exceptionally low expectations, and was astounded to find that it actually wasn't too bad. Now, it's not like I'm going to be shouting this from the rooftops or anything, but the fact of the matter is, I did enjoy it. What's peculiar is that I am by no means one of those extreme Saw fanatics! I absolutely detested the second one, and the third was tolerable, but the fourth is, without a doubt, the only good Saw film since the first! Some of the flashbacks are completely unnecessary, and even begin to make me feel stupid. It's like they assume that the audience is not capable of comprehending the simplest of things, or that we do not remember anything about the previous Saw films. On a more positive note, the opening autopsy scene was beautiful, and I really did like the fact that Saw III and Saw IV take place at roughly the same time. The editing was a bit shitty though, especially towards the end. Can't say I was too keen on that new detective feller either. Police officers always make for really annoying characters on the big screen. I was very pleased to see that Donnie Wahlberg did not have much on-screen time! I'll be honest; I was a little concerned when I saw that he was in it. The less we see of that man in cinema, the better. I have nothing against the rest of the cast of Saw IV. It was actually quite nice to see Justin Louis playing a role in this film. He was brilliant in the Canadian television series, Durham County, that was on earlier this year. Anyhow, I do sense a need for Saw V, but I really wish this franchise would have been over and done with by now. I suppose I'm just not a hardcore SAW fan. That's not to say I won't watch the V and VI installments, because I am pretty sure that I will. Alas, they clearly have me wrapped around their little finger.

This was exactly what I wanted it to be! A mindless slasher flick with some super cheesy moments! Just like the good ol' days! It's not meant to be scary or intelligent. Just fun! Everyone's brain needs a rest every now and again! The slasher genre should be proud of this lovely little addition! There should be more gay slasher flicks anyway!

I fucking LOVE this movie!!!
I have not seen a film since The Exorcist that has genuinely creeped me out the way [Rec] did. Definite props on the realism! This is horror in its utmost raw and unadulterated form!

*sigh* I'd like to see Herbert West succeed. Just once!

Oh my God, where do I begin? Clive Barker is a damn fine storyteller, but this is a super weak attempt at translating his work to film. Definitely have to give Buhler props for turning an original story into a painfully generic piece of shit! I'll admit, I was into it for a little while. There was a pretty decent amount of blood and guttiwuts, but the characters were all so fucking dull! That is, except for Vinnie Jones, who muttered one single, solitary word throughout the entire film, and yet, still remained the most intriguing character of them all. So, basically the cast is shit. (Not including Roger Bart, of course, whose screen time was cut far too short). For the record, I CANNOT STAND BRADLEY COOPER!!! He is so irritating. I just want to punch him in the face. And Leslie Bibb, whom I haven't actually seen in anything before (and hopefully never will again), was annoying as fuck!

Okay, so the movie was a pretty big disaster, but the story was interesting. I found that it kind of dragged on at times though, and I even think it would have worked better as a short film.

It was still worth the watch, at least.