1994

I honestly can't see why people find this funny. Jim Carrey takes his comedy too far. not enough of a point and just too many disapointing jokes thrown into 87 minutes. i almost turned off the TV while watching this. just doesn't have enough steady direction. it was too focused on Carrey bringing humor to the screen that every other aspect was ignored here. and such revolting acting.

This was an inspirational film. Tom Hanks brings his best performance here. I'm always so impressed with this ever time I watch it. There's so much movement and energy occurring throughout this film.

a terrible movie with so much potential wated. Bad idea, interesting drama, but it seemed more like a cheesey comedy than anything else

This is one of the few, rare spectacles of all the Disney productions. How it describes a story was planned so precise and was told in a very unique way. Quite the detailed adventured. The cinematography was fascinating. The environment and coloring and just all of it?s stunning visuals in general, had such creativity carved in it. Not to mention the music. The placement and tone was brilliant.

I didn't expect much from this anyway. The buzz of it being an instant classic and a rare gem to view was the only enticement for me to see this. I was let down by the buzz. I disagree with every positive reaction Pulp Fiction received. Shortly defined, it's one of the most overrated films to be screened.

Quentin Taranatino's second film is a 3-story collaboration of hitmen. As those they lend their service to the top dog of L.A. - Marcellus Wallace (Rhames) - they encounter a miracle, tragedy, and a robbery at a diner. But that's only one of three stories being told. Vincent Vega (Travolta) is also assigned to help entertain his boss' wife (Thurman), and to top it all off, Butch Coolidge (Willis) is Marcellus' next target from a lost bet made on a rigged fight.

My biggest doubt of Pulp Fiction may be the screenplay and certainly the direction. Let me just lay it out - my problem was Tarantino himself. He has the adult charisma in his films, but lacks a meaning. Honestly, I was waiting so long to see where this movie was going, and it ended nowhere. The era of Tarantino is solely surrounding a gangster's personality; the aggression, flair, ruthlessness. But how it's presented is off scale, which blind sights the public. There's no specific flow, but they may be the way it was intended.

This way of stroy telling hasn'y been done like this before, which makes it unique, even with an original screenplay. The number one flaw that wrecked this film phememonon for me; the dialog.

The dialog is what kept this movie rolling on through. Its the talk that seems real and ordinary for us to hear, typical small talk, but that's not what I want to pay $7 to to be apart of.

[more will come soon...]