Marvel Films

"Iron Man? That's kinda catchy."

Kicking off 2008's summer season of flicks, Iron Man is a Marvel movie that is fun, exciting, colourful and action-packed. This is the reason why we go to the movies: to be entertained. Iron Man successfully delivers on that front; however it fails at providing anything more than just a good slice of entertainment.

On the one hand there are mind-blowing special effects, breath-taking action sequences and a fantastic dosage of humour. But unfortunately the film is standard and clichéd.

Robert Downey Jr. plays billionaire Tony Stark who has inherited his father's industry that produces high-tech weaponry supplied to the army. In Afghanistan Stark is brought along to demonstrate his latest creation. After he is attacked by a group of terrorists, Stark realises that his company's weapons can easily fall into the wrong hands and be used against the people that it was built to protect. While in Afghanistan he builds a technologically advanced suit of armour that can be used as an ultimate weapon. He escapes captivity and upon his return to America he ceases the company's production of weapons because of the shocking images he witnessed over in the Middle East. Trying to come to terms with his past he uncovers a sadistic plot with global implications. In his expansive home he singularly constructs an even more impressive suit of armour that he dons; vowing to protect the American people as the enigmatic superhero Iron Man.

For me, Robert Downey Jr. is Iron Man. He fits the character perfectly. His performance is charismatic, charming and engaging. I think Robert got everything perfected. I must compliment the screenwriter for giving him an enormous amount of witty dialogue that is occasionally quite hilarious. Because of his personal troubles over the years I am glad that Robert finally exploded back into action. This role will be career-changing for the man.

Unfortunately I wasn't particularly fond of many other members of the cast. Face it: someone like Gwyneth Paltrow does not fit into a movie like this. She's the standard clichéd woman protagonist; perfect body and good looks. From recent memory I can't remember a leading lady that didn't come from the long list of fit, perfectly built women who seem to steal all of these roles. Paltrow didn't bring a lot of intensity to her role. During the climactic battle I was groaning at her cardboard performance. Terence Howard wasn't that bad. The trailers didn't show too much of the actor. I can't say I was sceptical about him, but I was never excited that he was going to be featured. At times Howard was impressive. However, there were other occasions when I just couldn't stand the man.

Director Jon Favreau did an exceptional job. I will be completely frank here: I had no idea Jon was in the director's chair until a few months before release. Since this is the man who brought us films like Zathura and Elf he hasn't had much experience with blockbusters. Instead he's just done kiddie stuff. I was not exactly flattered that he was at the helm. I am thankful that he did his job correctly. The action scenes are intense and the dialogue never lets you feel bored.

On the other hand I had my reservations about the script. It's very formulaic and clichéd. I felt like I was watching Spider-Man or Fantastic Four with altered locations and characters. Every Marvel movie is going to follow this formula, but I really wish that they would develop a new one. There were also factual impossibilities aplenty and lots of predictability. Because it's a summer popcorn action flick we can easily dismiss these, though. Of course with these things present it will never be brilliant.

I had no complaints about the special effects. They were incredible.

Iron Man is fun, action-packed and impressively created. We go to the movies to be entertained, and this is a textbook example of simple entertainment. Recommended. Stay until the end of the credits.

"As far as I'm concerned, that man's whole body is property of the U.S. army."

The first stab at a cinematic incarnation of the Marvel superhero The Incredible Hulk was Ang Lee's excruciatingly ponderous, self-indulgent 2003 production simply titled Hulk. The central criticism of Lee's original film is that it's too thoughtful and slow to deliver the popcorn goods. It was also a glacial pure drama that contained an atrocious final reel. Needless to say, Lee's Hulk received a negative reception.

During initial development for 2008's The Incredible Hulk the film was planned as a sequel. Eventually it materialised into a total reboot of the cinematic Hulk franchise. The filmmakers promised it'd be more of an action-oriented blockbuster. While marginally superior to its forerunner, The Incredible Hulk is anything but incredible. It's disappointingly rushed, disjointed and fluffy. The sub-standard outcome of this flick has left me starving for a decent cinematic rendering of the Marvel superhero. Hollywood has yet to produce a truly iconic and memorable film featuring the big green guy.

Bruce Banner (Norton) was in a laboratory accident, poisoning him with gamma radiation that damaged his cells and unleashed the unbridled force of rage inside him. Whenever Bruce gets angry, he transforms into the big green guy known as The Hulk. Bruce flees his home, cutting off a life he knew and the woman he loves: Betty Ross (Tyler). He lives life off the grid, constantly on the move to evade the obsessive pursuit of the US military that seeks to capture him and brutally exploit his power. Bruce works to find a cure for his genetic disorder, eventually travelling back to America to track down a certain "Mr. Blue" (Nelson) who has been Bruce's anonymous consultant for months.
Enter British military specialist Emil Blonsky (Roth) who yearns for the power possessed by Bruce Banner. Needless to say, he develops into a Hulk-like character and a climactic showdown ensues.

The Incredible Hulk skips an extensive origins tale. Zak Penn's screenplay opts to show Bruce Banner's back-story during the opening credits. It's a straightforward five-minute montage effectively conveying the story so far. This is an example of the script doing something correctly. In fact, in the first 20 minutes the film never strikes an incorrect note. The characters are given a fitting introduction and the script moves at a desirable pace. Instead of verbal exposition, Penn's script shows the story through visuals and even a brief conversation via computer. Beyond these opening 20 minutes, the script is immediately downgraded into cheese territory. Initially the film established a "less is more" approach, shrouding Banner and his alter ego in a cloud of secrecy. It's more intriguing and it provides a heightened degree of momentum. This approach, though, is soon jettisoned in order for the action to start. The Incredible Hulk then becomes nothing but a string of destruction, undermined by the dreadfully phoney CGI and zero depth. The film's structure is incoherent and jumpy. Choppy editing and uniformly corny dialogue are also key problems.

The Incredible Hulk is the ideal cinematic representation of The Hulk for those desiring lots of action. The climax runs for approximately 10 minutes. Throughout the film there's adequate mayhem to keep one entertained. By all means, it is moderately entertaining. It's more fun than Ang Lee's 2003 picture. But where Lee's film succeeds (i.e. some thoughtful dialogue) this film fails. Ironically, where Lee's film fails (i.e. action) this film succeeds. If a harmonious blend of these two films was created we'd have the definitive Hulk adventure.

Towards the end of the film's post-production period there was much discussion regarding the running time. The studio were pressuring for a film running at under two hours. Norton lobbied furiously for more characterisation and back-story, and general dialogue. As this was a summer blockbuster and the studio had more power, the film was trimmed down to its 110-minute length. 70 minutes were reportedly removed during the editing process. It's so painfully obvious that this is a longer film that's been far too compressed. The structure doesn't flow correctly. Various bridge scenes appear to be missing. The worst offender is Bruce Banner easily travelling from Guatemala to California with no money, official documents and his face plastered on every government watch list. A bulk of the film appears half-baked and underdone. Characters even disappear, such as Betty's current boyfriend who seems to be simply tossed aside upon Bruce's return. The removed 70 minutes could've redeemed The Incredible Hulk. Extended version please!!

However, a number of the scenes present in the final product are quite awful. The worst scene in the entire film is an unnecessarily cheesy sequence during which The Hulk and Betty sit outside a cave at night in the pouring rain. It feels shamelessly copied from Peter Jackson's King Kong. It's a tender, corny scene to establish the love shared by Betty and Bruce. It comes off as a waste of time.

In tradition with most Hollywood action fluff, the final climactic battle is all special effects and epicness without a shred of brains. Even after a few minutes of the battle people still appear to be running away from the action. Some civilians are even shown to be tossed around in the mayhem. Surely a few dozen people were killed, yet there's never an ounce of sentimentality towards them. Lots of cars blow up, lots of buildings are destroyed, and lots of people are killed. Millions of dollars worth of damage is inflicted without any backlash. It's all to make the most exhilarating viewing...and it doesn't even do that. The Incredible Hulk suffers from awful visual effects. The climactic action scene exhibits mortifying phoneyness, mirroring a video game cut-scene. Everything from the helicopters to the environment looks absurdly unconvincing. It's extremely off-putting due to the lack of polish in the CGI. It's been five long years since Lee's 2003 film, and director Leterrier was playing with a massive budget, but the special effects looks pathetically unfinished. The final battle sequence of Lee's film was nothing short of amazing (probably the best thing about the entire movie). The special effects were particularly stunning. In the case of The Incredible Hulk, though, the sweeping Hulk movement is accounted for, but the clarity is lacking. The creature lacks vital crispness. With the inclusion of such awful CGI it felt as if someone was tapping me on the shoulder, whispering "Hey, you're just watching a movie". The gift of total immersion is discarded, and it's very hard to get into. I'd give up all the thunderous explosions that litter this film for a single scene of awe. For a film titled "Incredible", the computer-generated Hulk is anything but.

Performances are generally below standard. Edward Norton is a gross miscast. I've enjoyed him in several other movies (dramas like Fight Club, 25th Hour, etc) but as Bruce Banner he doesn't fit. Eric Bana was a far superior Bruce simply because he looked the part as both the big green dude and the scrawny scientist dude. Norton's appearance isn't sufficiently utilised for the CG creation of The Hulk as well. It looks as if his appearance was completely disregarded for the Hulk's computer generated image.
Liv Tyler is emotionless and stiff. While sharing scenes with Norton or William Hurt, she's abjectly outclassed. Her delivery is flat and without emotion. We're never convinced she and Banner are former lovers or that they still have feelings for one another as it's not conveyed well enough.
Tim Roth is the only actor capable of bestowing the film with what it truly needed. He's a sublime villain for sure. His part deserves further expansion.

I rather hated Ang Lee's 2003 Hulk and yearned for a better movie. While The Incredible Hulk was in development I prayed for an antidote to suppress the damage caused by Lee's prior film. As it is, this reboot of the film franchise is an incredible failure (pardon the pun). It's more fun and enjoyable, and it's an easier viewing experience, but it's too nonsensical, fluffy and corny with special effects that look incomplete and cartoonish. The first 20 minutes are terrific, as are the final few minutes. In between there ain't much to get excited about. It's intense, fun and somewhat entertaining, but it's much too flawed.

"Become the animal. Embrace the other side."

Let's face it: we pay to see summer movies for the explosions, the fight scenes and the action in general. They aren't required to engage us on a cerebral level; they merely offer an abundance of action during which we're required to suspend our disbelief. X-Men Origins: Wolverine, however, is definitive proof that a plateful of action is not enough to create a satisfying summer movie. For a film to attain the status of an excellent popcorn-munching cinematic experience, it's required to pay at least some attention to narrative coherence and character arcs, not to mention the action has to occur in an actual context. In Wolverine, the action sequences just...happen. To arrive at an action sequence, one has to suffer through badly-paced scenes of trite dialogue and terrible acting. Plot holes also flourish, logic is quickly discarded, and it leaves too many things unexplained. Instead of a deep character study, X-Men Origins: Wolverine is merely an action film masquerading as something more. There's no human drama (ala Spider-Man) or witty dialogue (like Iron Man). Even the other X-Men movies had a political resonance to them which isn't retained here. This is Hack Filmmaking 101!

X-Men Origins: Wolverine was ostensibly a labour of love for poor Hugh Jackman who also served as producer, but unfortunately his efforts didn't pay off. About a month before the film's scheduled release, an incomplete workprint was leaked online. As it turns out, though, this leak was the best thing to happen to the film industry during 2009. Those eagerly anticipating the movie (this reviewer included) were given the opportunity to see how awful it truly is. Fox immediately attempted to cover their blunder by claiming footage from the reshoots was missing from the workprint (fourteen minutes in total, apparently). Curiously, closer to the release date, Fox's story changed: ten minutes of reshoots are missing from the workprint version, and these ten new minutes are replacing ten particular minutes which have been removed from the final cut. However, the workprint was indeed the final cut sans finished special effects, sound effects and music. The alleged "missing footage" never existed...it was a lie manufactured by Fox in a frantic attempt to convince audiences to go see the completed movie. But those deceptive chairmen at Fox couldn't manufacture a lie to cover one particular fact: Wolverine is completely beyond salvation. No amount of reshooting could salvage this mess. Nothing short of a total remake - with a completely new script and plotline, and a bunch of new actors - could rescue this awful film.

In a failed attempt to distance the franchise from 2006's X-Men: The Last Stand, Fox green-lit this prequel instead of another sequel. Wisely, Wolverine was selected as the focus of this first origins adventure...yet this motion picture fails to illuminate the breadth of Wolverine's tale. His back-story is complex and lavish, traversing over many centuries and veering off into numerous sub-plots (and countries), all the while navigating through various relationships with an assortment of characters. This is all condensed into about 105 minutes, and it falls apart in less than a fraction of that time. No-one cares about where Wolverine got his jacket - a Wolverine-centric spin-off following the main character kicking butt in Japan would have been far better!

The film opens in Canada in 1845 (which is very strange, considering Canada wasn't established 'til 1867) when a young James Howlett first discovers his bone claw abilities. A few deaths occur, and James goes on the run with his half-brother Victor. This prologue, however, is very rushed; it's more confusing than compelling. Following this, a montage is presented as Wolverine and Sabretooth (Jackman and Schreiber, respectively) fight alongside each other in every major U.S. war. Never mind that it's impossible for these two to always be assigned to the same unit, as this indiscretion is reasonably minor compared to the other sins of logic to be found within. For instance, they're also Canadian... I guess no-one checked their papers when they enlisted in the U.S. Army...

After their experiences in Vietnam, the brothers are recruited by William Stryker (Huston) to be part of a team of mutants assigned to carry out missions in third world countries. Off-tangent sub-plots then appear in abundance; the main one concerning Wolverine seeking revenge after his lady friend meets with a violent end. Some betraying also occurs, more mutants are introduced, and this culminates in an endlessly silly climax. Instead of one solid plot, Wolverine is merely a tonne of sub-plots mashed together.

"All the horrible things in your life... Your father, the wars, I can make all this go away. You can live knowing that the woman you loved was hunted down, or you can join me. I promise you will have your revenge."

It's hard to begin detailing exactly what's wrong with this movie, because the truth is, it's just about everything. X-Men Origins: Wolverine is a disaster of monumental proportions.

The first major problem is the screenplay. It's a string of well-worn clichés we've seen a million times before - including not one, but two "don't do it, you'll be just as bad as him" moments as well as a conventional, cheesy, embarrassing romance subplot which concludes on the most clichéd note possible. Dialogue is another issue: it's AWFUL! I have no idea what's worse; the dreadful dialogue or the abysmal way the actors disperse it. The script also skims through crucial character development and more or less eschews Wolverine's origins entirely. If it's truly an "origins" tale as advertised, where are the explanations? When initially introduced to baby Wolverine, he's already a mutant with bone claws. How did he get them? The best we can assume is his biological father was a mutant, although the implication is irritatingly vague. These things are brushed aside in a hurry in order to dive straight into the action. The screenwriters never considered, however, that an audience needs a reason to care for the characters that are stuck in the midst of the action (only small-minded, ADD-inflicted individuals will overlook this). Another thing regarding the action: virtually all of the characters are invincible, which jettisons all hope of any emotional investment with them. When Wolverine and Sabretooth battle pointlessly over and over again, we know neither of them will die and the fight will conclude with them just walking away. Why should we care?

Wolverine is never given an opportunity to come to terms with his mutations. Even after his skeleton is coated with Adamantium, he's automatically cool with it all...except for the customary "looking at self in mirror while testing abilities" (TM) scene which lasts one or two minutes. Another major gripe: the name "Logan" is never justified. In the original comics, Wolverine was a Samurai and he was given the name Logan. In this muddled mess of a movie, the name Logan just...appears. We have no idea where it came from...he's just named Logan for no reason, and other characters mysteriously pick this up.

Neither does the script justify why Sabretooth becomes Wolverine's sworn enemy. Reasons for other happenings in the story - such as Sabretooth killing a perfectly harmless mutant, and beginning a Watchmen-style elimination of all mutants in his former team - also never become clear.

"I'm coming for blood. No code of conduct, no law."

The script is beset with absolutely preposterous moments. Like there's a high profile facility on the mysterious "Island", and Wolverine is able to simply stroll through the front doors. No security? No locks? And when mutants are escaping, a grand total of four armed men try to stop them. The cages containing the mutants are also just metal wire fences. Some mutants have powers to cut through these wires easily, like Cyclops who can slice through bricks. On top of this, Stryker is so dumb he decides to erase Wolverine's memory after coating the guy's skeleton with Adamantium, making him indestructible. Characters also pop up at the most appropriate time (an entrance from a particular character during the final showdown is embarrassingly terrible and way too convenient...it will elicit groans). Wolverine is beleaguered with logic problems, primarily from the "Why don't you just...?" variety and the "That's just totally stupid / What the fuck?!" range (like the aforesaid examples). One should suspend their disbelief for a comic book movie, but this takes things to the next level. It's worse than your usual brainless summer actioner. The film's concluding 10 minutes in particular are absolutely retarded. On top of this, the continuity of the entire series is wrecked. Certain conversations in the other X-Men films now make no sense (like Stryker telling Wolverine he gave him claws when in reality Stryker just strengthened the claws).

A plethora of infamous Marvel characters are dispatched not long after their introductions. Virtually every single character is flat; appearing in name-only form to entice fans. Deadpool's treatment is most heartbreaking. Perhaps Ryan Reynolds was behind the workprint leak after he viewed the incomplete version and realised the gross misuse of Deadpool. The character's appearance is no more than a cameo. Don't get too attached to other much-hyped characters such as The Blob, John Wraith, Agent Zero and Bolt, as (like Deadpool) their appearances amount to a mere cameo. Team X is formed at the film's beginning, but after a brief first mission Wolverine has a stroke of moral conscience and leaves the group. Why Wolverine and Sabretooth are so willing to join Stryker in the first place is a mystery. Due to the rushed nature of the opening twenty minutes, there's no way we can get emotionally attached to the characters. A lot of potential is wasted.

Most jarringly, this film clearly wants to be separate from the comics as it takes a separate path, yet if you're not acquainted with all these Marvel characters you won't care about those who appear and won't understand what they're doing here. The story isn't deep enough to provide the uninitiated with requisite information about everything (the title of 'Team X' isn't even mentioned...if it was it certainly wasn't a memorable moment), and it isn't loyal enough to satiate the fanboys.

Director Gavin Hood previously helmed 2007's Rendition as well as Tsotsi (which won an Oscar for Best Foreign Language Feature in 2006). Hood's inability to direct a genuinely enjoyable and resonant motion picture surfaces here again. Wolverine is a concatenation of action movie clichés, not just from the hackneyed screenplay but also the selection of shots. Like a shot of the protagonist setting off an explosion and walking in slow motion towards the camera, as well as the customary situation of the hero walking away from the bad guy he's decided not to kill, only to turn back slowly as said bad guy dramatically reveals something.

The action sequences are frequently marred by slo-mo shots, whereas other action sequences can't be enjoyed because of the invincibility of the characters, and as for the others...there's no context. An action scene involving Wolverine taking down a helicopter is admittedly awesome to watch, but within the story it makes no sense. Stryker is trying to kill the creature he just created at great expense, and sends his right-hand man to do the job...knowing fully well that bullets made of Adamantium are the only thing that can take down Wolverine. That's just the first of many irreverent action sequences. Others include a boxing match between Wolverine and The Blob that happens for no reason, and even a large-scale battle against Gambit - a mutant who's actually on the same side! For the climax, an unfinished genetically enhanced weapon is unleashed upon Wolverine, when once again Stryker has a full gun of Adamantium bullets at his disposal...and nothing else can kill the (anti)hero. Nothing in this film deals with the immortal characters in a meaningful or interesting way, and no amount of impressive fight choreography can provide the action with genuine tension. The special effects are also quite shonky, and an appearance of a CGI Patrick Stewart is absurdly unconvincing. The pacing, as well, is awful, as spaces between the action sequences are unforgivably sluggish, and this is due to Hood's incompetent direction. Bring back Bryan Singer!

Hugh Jackman has endless charisma as an actor, but his performance here is hamstrung by the badly drawn character. Wolverine is meant to be a badass anti-hero, but he's toned down for the sake of toy sales and the target audience. All Jackman does is strike poses and deliver dismal dialogue. Meanwhile, Liev Schreiber just alternates between sassy one-liners and open-mouthed rage. Luckily, Schreiber is actually a brooding villain, even if his motivations are never explored.

Ryan Reynolds is good as swordsman Wade Wilson (a.k.a. Deadpool), but he's lost far too early into the movie. His screen-time is exasperatingly brief, as is that of Dominic Monaghan whose character of Bolt has an appealing sadness. Taylor Kitsch is a soulless Gambit with a terrible, false accent. Perhaps Lost's Josh Holloway would've made a better Gambit (he was offered the chance to briefly appear in X-Men: The Last Stand as the character, but declined). Not worth mentioning anyone else, as they're all forgettable, especially Danny Huston who isn't at all sinister as Stryker.

X-Men Origins: Wolverine eventually turns into a confusing hodgepodge of uninspired, clichéd fight scenes and loud explosions. The other X-Men films focused on Wolverine at certain times, and he was more or less the central character. You'd think this "origins" tale would, ya know, reveal his origins...but it doesn't! It's just an action film with Wolverine at its core and mutants surrounding him, not unlike the other X-Men flicks. As a whole the film feels very rushed - it's too short to be considered an epic Marvel feature. The action is occasionally impressive, granted, but the whole falls below the sum of its parts. Good action does not mean an excellent movie.

All superhero films are advertisements for their merchandising departments, but Wolverine is more obvious than most, with product placement substituting compelling characters and an engaging storyline. Combined with limp direction and unimaginative special effects, and there's little to recommend. Even Jackman's natural charisma can't rise above the material...but he sure can strike a pose, doing so in every action sequence to ensure the toy department have a field day. No longer will people have to refer to the Spider-Man 3 fiasco - now Wolverine will be the target of conversations concerning bad Marvel movies. Even Brett Ratner's X-Men: The Last Stand is more enjoyable.