Worst

Instead of laughing I felt more depressed. I never thought I'd feel that way from watching a Mike Meyers movie. I weep for the future of comedy. This was really very bad.

What a terrible action flick. There is one funny aspect to this film and it's the indian that constantly pops up talking some strange gibberish. The fights scenes, even the one on the side of a mountain, were such a fucking mess that it was hilarious! One of the worst, worst, worst films I've seen so far!!!

The beginning had me laughing and then he gets to America, sleeps with some guys mom, wants be a hairdresser, sleeps with a lot of old ladies, uh, some how gets the girl in the end. I don't know. It didn't have me laughing so much in the later parts in the film. The first 15 were funny, but the rest became meanspirited and boring.

An opportunity for a reboot made me thinking 'it can be possible'. I left disappointed. Instead of starting out with a brand new story they go for the same rinse and repeat material by (if you noticed) craming parts 1, 2 & 3 into the movie. One of the worst of 2009.

The beginning is great, but the middle and the ending wasn't. It becomes a complete waste of time. It's a long movie too! I feel bad for the people who saw this in the theater. The story just didn't work. I mean what's the point of a man aging backwards? Is it to tell us something that we already know about life and death? Or is it to show that if a person aging forwards is no different from a person aging backwards? I think the real problem was Benjamin being born old first. It should've been him already old and aging backwards. Makes more sense, but then who cares?

Curiosity would be the reason why I caught this on TNT late last night. The film goes nowhere and none of it is thrilling. When we find out who the killer is it feels almost like a slap to our stupidness because it is so obvious. I loved how dumb the ending was that I'm going to give this odd movie a star and a half.

Weird movie. The acting is awful. The soundtrack is very good.

Kym returns home to her sister's, Rachel, wedding. When she arrives she is treated like she might destroy everything. She doesn't. Instead it brings back tension into the family, reminding them of a certain tragedy that Kym was involved in. Also there is a wedding rehearsal, a long ass one to be exact, followed by a bunch of stupid arguments that will give you a headache. When the film ends it ends on a light note, but I would've loved to have seen an Epilogue of about 5 years later because I DID NOT CARE ABOUT THE WEDDING!! I wanted more character interaction. Hathaway does a beautiful job at being a mess. Dewitt's acting was boring. Bill Irwin should've been given an oscar because he plays a great part as the father that I wanted to give him a hug. Debra Winger was alright and Jon Demme's direction was super. I just didn't give a shit about the wedding and it bothered the hell out of me because THAT IS ALL THAT IT IS ABOUT. There is a tragic element to the story concerning why everyone doesn't like Kym and that just gets glossed over because it's about, well, Rachel Getting Married. That's it.

The main character is boring. Simply boring. The narration feels like somebody reading the book it's based on. Also the whole idea has a familiar ring to it. If you are interested than see it for Mena Suvari and Peter Sarsgaard. They were very good in their roles.

Overly provocative and disturbing. The characters are all dislikeable and a plot is nowhere to be found. If the point of the movie was to show how crappy life is for a teenager in today's generation well it was already done with a little movie called 'Kids'. Larry Clark has done better and this isn't one of his best.

Visually beautiful, but a waste of time. Classic case of style over substance. Too bad.

A horror film of such slow scares and zero ideas except for the most simplistic kind.

Where's the funny?

A very boring vampire movie.

This wasn't very good. I'll just leave it at that.

Too much crying. The plot is all over the place. It never sticks to one cohesive thing. Not a good sequel.

I don't imagine a sequel to be coming anytime soon. The effects were cool, but the chemistry between Cage and Mendes doesn't work. The script could've used some tinkering because at times it tries too hard.

If you love the Fantastic 4 you'll love this movie. I didn't.

Kind of has this dead air about it which at times makes you laugh, but you wonder why.

El Crapo. Takes the gold for worst comedy.

A self indulgent coming of age film that tries very hard to be something else, something profound. Too bad.

Lots of blowing up stuff and stupid stuff with cars that turn into robots and it's very long which is annoying and I hear that the sequel is the worst ever and I'm going to be checking it out on July 3rd because it sounds hilarious with effects!

Probably one of the best comedies of the year. Not only is this film so bad it's sooooo fucking looooooongggg!!!! Why?! (Shrugs) I don't know. Glad I saw a bootleg copy because paying to see this would make me angry after I saw it. I did have a laugh at the absurdness of what was going on. It is prime gold in being a complete mess and then some. Megan Fox is hot, but so is Jessica Biel, Jennifer Aniston, Kirsten Dunst, Angelina Jolie, Amy Adams, Rose Mcgowan, etc. Great effects! I just wish it wasn't soo stupid and tried to be atleast cool and collected in it's storytelling because the story is a FUCKING MESS!

One good shot where Arnold is suppose to be hanging like christ down an alleyway after just getting bitch slapped by satan was a rather awesome shot. The editing is terrible in this movie. The story revolves around the whole Y2K hysteria by subtracting it and replacing a doomsday scenario where SATAN is going to take over the world in the year 2000. When the film was released in theaters before 2000 you could sort of say that the film predicted that nothing was going to happend on New Years. A bad movie way ahead of it's time. Not.

I thought this film was going to be funny. It doesn't have those moments where you chuckle. I did like one scene and it was when Matt Damon mistakes a girl for a boy. The rest is all caught up in it's mystical world of witches, wolves and toads. Not Gilliam's best.

Awful with lots of sex. That's it.

It's like watching two people trying to decide whether they should date even though they already have sex. Very dumb movie.

The colors and costumes are great. The soundtrack is crap. Kirsten Dunst does a subpar job at being Antoinette. Coppola tried to do something different. You can say it works, but I can't help and wonder what a film like this will be remembered as 10 years from when it was released. Will it be remembered for being historically accurate? Or will it be remembered for being that film about Maria Antoinette because it has all those pop songs in it? I think Sofia was trying to pull an Amadeus out of this film.

Yep. Bob Dylan isn't there. He is everywhere. I think. Has some interesting moments, but they're clouded by so much arty bullshit. I was impressed, I'll admit it, but that was it. I didn't feel like I knew Bob Dylan any better and if that was the point than I wasted my time on what I thought was a bio-pic. I guess you have to be very, very familiar with Dylan to understand him. I guess. (confused expression).

Disturbing and Dirty. That's how I would describe the ending. It made me feel icky. As for the film as a whole, I wouldn't recommend it unless you like Julianne Moore.

Watch the original. It is SOOOO much better than this painfully awkward remake.

This film isn't about Madea, but about the characters Joshua and Candy. That's very deceiving.

Is this art? I can't say it is, but I'm sure other people might. I felt bad for humanity after watching this movie. That's all I gotta say.

The whole twilight saga is for teenage girls. Kind of like how Star Wars is for geeky guys. The next time your loveable Twilight girlfriend makes fun of you for collecting Star Wars memorabila just remember to show her your vampire teeth and she'll remember why she started dating you in the first place. Every girl wants to date a vampire especially if they look like Robert Pattinson. Now if you excuse me, I have to bite my girlfriend for telling me I watch too many movies. I'm just kidding I don't like Star Wars that much except for Empire Strikes Back.

Sadly boring and bad. I wouldn't watch this again.

Tries to be like Titanic. Why have a love story and why make this film over 3 hours? Were they trying to get a best picture oscar out of this crap? It plays like a disgrace to those who died at Pearl Harbor. A major disappointment.

Hard to summarize because of it's lack of any sort of growth. I think the main character will eventually be more mature after breaking up with Sara. He will meet somebody else. I could understand his struggle, but there was no need for it. I could've been doing something better with my time than watching this film.

A smug, crude, angry, not funny "satire" wanna be that plays like a late night soft core porno flick with political commentary sprawling every which way in that 2nd act. Oh, the sex scenes are funny though, but they play like Meg Ryan's "I'll have what she's having" scene in When Harry met Sally.

The ending makes everything feel like a joke. I was really into this film from the start and into the middle. I was really liking it until THAT fucking ending. It really ruined it for me and made me angry.

Where are the vampires? Are they just the shallow characters? It made perfect sense that this was just going to be one of those audience awareness pictures where we know more than what the characters on the screen do. I knew they were going to be shallow during the whole duration of the film because they never change. I may need to read the book because it's probably better than this shitty adaptation.

A predictable sci/fi movie. I've seen many films that are exactly like this and I can imagine it'll be on the syfy channel pretty soon.

Extremely pointless movie for which I had the opportunity to see. I do give it credit for being a film that is set out to be terrible to begin with I mean look at the title.

Not sure what the point is of raping a deadgirl who turns out to be a zombie is going to do for you as entertainment. If you love your necrophilia type of movies then you'll love this one. I will admit that it does fit perfectly and nicely so in the disturbing genre. Overall, I just don't care to see something like this again.

Okay. I got curious. I watched about an hour of this film until I realized I need to stop. It's much like the show except in movie form with a few surprises. I didn't see how it ended, but could assume that it was a happy ending for Carrie Bradshaw and her team of "sophisticated" friends. What I didn't care for, and never did even when the show was on, is how overly shallow the characters are. It's hard to care for them when you already know that they'll always be on top in the end. That's what makes the show and the movie very pointless.

I only saw this because Thora Birch was in it. Even she couldn't help this film.

The worst King Kong remake. That's just my opinion.

The story didn't grab me. It just wasn't interesting enough. It's too bad because the material had great potential to be something great.

A very grueling process in extreme horror. I can see why the UK banned this film because it is just a series of violence happening to an innocent couple. It's fake and I know this, but have a narrative to this madness. It doesn't really work when all it is is just "torture" being shot on film. If you like watching people getting tortured and raped then this film is for you.

It annoyed me when the story tried to be two things at once, an indie "comedy" and a lifetime drama. It gave me a headache. The film does have a sort of interesting premise and you'd think it might be funny here and there, but I hardly laughed at any of it. It's more depressing to watch. I felt bad for the two main characters. They're good people who just lost their way in life, but what depressed me even more is how they never talked about death. I mean they're cleaning up crime scenes and the thought of death or anything concerning what they were doing never crosses their mind. It was like they just were doing it for the money and to start their own successful business. I don't know. There wasn't much of a movie here that couldn't be saved by two very good actresses.

Backstabbing, celebrity anger toward their fame, infidelity, and comedians. That's pretty much Funny People. A 136minute film about George Simmons who is expecting to die from a blood disorder instead eventually doesn't turning the tables on his once was profound way of looking at things goes right back to his usual self with the high hopes of being with the one that got away, played by Leslie Mann. She does a good job, subpar at best. It's really Sandler who outdoes himself here. At times I almost believed he was his character George Simmons because he wasn't playing his usual Adam Sandler-esque self. Don't get me wrong, he does, but it's more to the bone and that impressed me with his skill. Much more so than in Punch Drunk Love. Now, this film has some funny and touching moments and there was one particular scene at George Simmons home where he ends going into a rage at how everything sucks because of his new treatment that he's getting on his blood disorder. He flies off into a tangent in this scene which really stood out in my opinion. I loved the dialogue in that scene. The rest of the film deals with him and Seth Rogen who is taken under Simmons wing to write some jokes. Along the way Rogen's character grows more into his status as a comedian. As for the film as a whole I really got bored. It was disappointing because you think it's going somewhere and in the end it doesn't. That's it. So what was the point? It's a really nicely made film with some okay character developement, but no pay off that left wanting to watch it again. If I had to Recommend anyone to see this I'd tell them to see it for Sandler's performance because you're not gonna get anything else better than that.

Nature could've been the cause of Gainsbourg's behavior, but I'm still not very clear on whether that was the case because of the title. Are women the antichrist? Is that what Lars was trying to say? Kind of like a Tarantino film, the movie is split into chapters of Grief, Pain, Dispair and The Three Beggars. There is also a prologue, shot in black and white and a epilogue also in black and white. Lots of sexual violence, psycho babble and misogynistic too.

Starts out good, but the last half wasn't. The boy who plays Cage's son is very annoying. As a science fiction film it stands as that, but as a end of the world film? I never felt that.

It's a bit difficult to make art out of sex because when you look at sex you think: I want to be part of that! This film is just a bunch of director's artistic way of showing sex on the screen. Nice try, but it's nothing interesting unless you have a fascination about sex.

I couldn't watch the rest because it's too tedious and obvious in it's attempt to combine Eraserhead meets Repulsion.

Two people meet and have sex. They meet and have sex. The woman has a strange growth on her back. This goes on for a while until she bites him where he ends up getting the same growth on his back as well. You don't get much out of this film. It's from the same director as 'Zero' and I think his favorite movie is Eraserhead. I wouldn't be surprised.

Gallo has done better than this if you look at Buffalo 66'. Much is very left open to interpretation, but the ending gives too much away. Literally. Everything else up to the point of actual fellatio still makes me wonder could it have been THAT necessary since everything wasn't improving along the way. He's haunted by his lost love, Daisy. He meets women who remind him of her. Then at a hotel he lets out his intense frustration over something she did by simply masturbating to the thought of her. It's implied while Daisy is going down on him. You can tell by the way he never removes his hand from his brown bunny. The film has no entry and no resolution. It's just about a man who psychologically can't improve his life after Daisy's death. So, in the end, he drives and drives and drives. That's it.

A cross between Thelma & Louise meets Natural Born Killers except more sexually explicit and violent.

This pairing of Pacino and De Niro worked best in Heat. This film plays more like a slasher cop movie and funny at times especially Carla Gugino who plays a sexy nympho.

This film annoyed me because it tries to balance out the serious aspect to Sandler's grief by adding in a strange subplot to Cheadle's character who keeps distancing himself from one of his patients, played by Saffron Burrows, who wants to give him a blowjob. Why is this even in the film? What purpose does it have? Also I think Mike Binder tried to distance him from the story concerning Sandler's character by including Cheadle's because Cheadle's character really doesn't help the film, it only keeps us more at distance. It's heartbreaking to see a man who lost his family to 9/11, but inserting it into a story of typical Hollywood proportions made me think of Oscar night. Nice way to capitalize on 9/11 Mr. Binder. Really nice.

Strange, strange movie. Mirren is the stepmother to Gooding's character and they are both hitmen. Dorff's character wants the both of them to kill his pregnant wife played by Vanessa Ferlito. When they are about to do so, she goes into labor and I'm pretty sure you can see where the rest of it will go. They help her out with the child and, yes, Dorff's character catches on that his wife is still alive and decides to find and kill them all, pretty much. What makes this film strange though is the sex scenes which are funny and they add nothing to the plot except for the one scene where Gooding shoots Mirren in the head once she reaches an orgasm. This was due to her dying wish since her character has cancer. I don't know what else to say about the film in it's favor because it's awful and would be best viewed with that in mind.

I don't know. Seeing one of the Sprouse brothers dress up like a girl and then gets raped by Marilyn Manson was blehhhhh. Going into this you'll see no resolution and since the book was eventually found out to be false it feels not important to see this film unless you are a fan of Asia Argento.

An odd experiment that doesn't go anywhere.

An older man refuses the sexual advances of a teenage girl which makes her angry. So, she decides to destroy his life. Funny and creepy.

Very predictable, but the one thing that is really ghostly is the comedy. It never felt hilarious and it was almost distant. I guess one saving grace would be Emma Stone. She was funny, but slightly so.

This entry in the Hellraiser series is a laughable one. The acting is terrible except from Doug Bradley as Pinhead who is always awesome. The direction is scatter shot and each scene doesn't exactly relate well to the last scene especially when our main character is running down a deserted street in the city and is being chased by the cinobites.

Something is telling me I should've watched Part 2 instead. I guess I'll never learn.

How does a film like this get made? Seriously.

Jacqueline Lovell has starred in a few schlocky erotic films like Femalien, Lolida 2000, The Keys to Sex and Hideous! In this film she plays Loretta who is married to the muscle bound Howard, but prefers to have sex with Lance, an old flame. During their sex-making, they talk A LOT to each other. Loretta loves to talk dirty and loves it when Lance refers to her as Scarlett from Gone with the Wind. They have lots and lots of sex. To be honest I think most of the film is based on those sex scenes alone just to get you to watch the movie.

Now since I got that out the way I might as well tell you about the 'Head of the Family'. They are called the Stackpools and the head one is Myron who loves to experiment on people to find answers. He controls his siblings through his, well, giant brain. One night Lance witnesses something from this family and decides to blackmail them, thinking he could get some money for him and Loretta.

His plans go awry and soon him and Loretta are in Myron's Laboratory where Loretta does a very bad acting job at trying to sweet talk her way out. Myron doesn't care and wants her to star in a play about Joan of Arc.

For some reason, the film then just eventually ends with Loretta marrying Otis, one of the Stockpool siblings. She's doing it for money.

This is a very bizarre film with lots of sex scenes which I think were ment to be in there since Jacqueline admitted publicly that she suffered from Nymphomania at the time. One of the weirdest films ever.

This one lost it's imagination. It tries. Oh, it so desperately tries, but fails. Ripley is trapped at a maxium security facility where there are no weapons. (insert laugh here). She has to battle, once again, with an Alien with a group of inmates who look and sound like a lost monty python skit. They run around, trying to out run the Alien during much of the film, calling out each other's name and cussing so much that if there were such a thing as over cussing these guys would win a gold medal.

What the film lacks is what will make you gain in how depressing it all is to sit and watch nothing but extreme close ups and quick editing. I think what Fincher was trying to do was practice out his own style before hitting it big with se7en. There isn't much to be lost in this film though if you look at it as part of the franchise. It has it's story which is more about ending the franchise....or so we thought when Alien Resurrection came out.

The ending in this film makes me laugh knowing that a 4th Alien movie was made. Because thinking that Ripley has sacrificed herself and to be then brought back so many years later just makes you wish that some sequels never existed.

Oh, before I forget, there's also an odd angle on the story concerning abortion. It's well hidden in the subtext of the film or that could just be a coincidence.

The tale of Barry B. Benson is one of such stupidity. A Bee just graduated from college and doesn't like the idea of sticking to one job which is making honey. So, he leaves the hive where he's almost killed until a sweet florist named Vanessa saves him.

He talks to Vanessa, she listens and is okay with the fact that she's talking to a Bee. Actually, nobody seems to really care about the phenomenon. When Vanessa and Barry are in a grocery store Barry notices honey on sale. This is when the story takes a literally odd and preachy turn which really got on my nerves.

With this new discovery of people buying honey, Barry sets out to sue the human race for what he calls stealing. When Barry actually wins the case all the honey is sent back to all the bee hives in the world. This isn't a good thing considering that the bee's in Barry's hive have now gotten lazy and the population of plants and trees have started dying. Even the fruit isn't doing so well either.

So what does Barry do? Well, he reverses the process and before you know it you just watched a history lesson on bees and their honey.

Overrated tale that is more annoying than entertaining.