User Comments for 10,000 B.C.


  • karthu1993
    April 8, 2009
    not good as i expected. ending has to be improved.
  • rbevanx
    December 6, 2008
    Terrible film how I managed to watch 50 mins of it amazes me.
  • brandonmachew
    November 15, 2008
    This film is the worst...I HOPE I never have to see it again. :-[ Love Brandon.
  • reckoning
    September 18, 2008
    IT SUKED!!!!!
  • eyenofiong
    August 19, 2008
    Well, i think the story line is a little bit poor.
  • sjcole4
    August 9, 2008
    Okay you know what? I refuse to believe anyone thought this was a good movie, even after seeing some 4 and 5 star ratings on here. I don't hate it just because of its historical inaccuracy. I hate it because it is AWFUL! And don't try telling someone if they take it for what it is (entertainment)it will be good. Because IT IS NOT GOOD even taken on that level! It's BORING if you look at it like that. This is by far the worst movie of 2008. I can't trust your taste in movies if you like this. I will tell you all this...if you thought this was a good movie...WATCH MORE MOVIES!!!
  • perfectgentlemn
    July 20, 2008
    Ouch!!, Visually stunning, but story was weak, predictable & boring, just a hollywood cash grab. Not worth the watch, very disappointed. :'-(
  • babbiehope
    July 19, 2008
    This Film Is The Best I Want To Seee It Agan =] Love Hope x
  • crazyravikiran
    July 18, 2008
    i love this movie
  • samanthaseaotter
    July 14, 2008
    Wow, was this a waste of time, energy and money. I do rely on movies to have a degree of historical accuracy - what bothers me is that some people will take this as truth.

    Besides the acting, which was astonishingly bad.

    And the poster had nothing to do with anything.

    and the two leads seemed awfully clean and beautiful for such rough times.

    and... well, I could go on forever like this. But mostly it was just plain BAD.
  • pooglywoogly
    June 26, 2008
    is there a marilyn manson song at the end of the movie during the credits? and if so what's it called?
  • aoddball416
    June 18, 2008
    Hey Great Animal 3-D Effects :)
  • brandonmachew
    May 27, 2008
    Con't.
    raptor birds surviving the ice age?Lady give your head a shake.This movie takes place in the ice age mountins,The tropical jungle,& in Egypt.What?near cave people with english accents?Oh & culturally diverse people..all in the same region,& villains that strangley resemble Arabs (US War on terror)I can forgive historic inaccuracies if the plot were more original,but I can't forgive plagerism.Too many obvious scenes from other movies: The Ten commandments,300, Clan of the Cave bear, Jurasic Park,Appocalypto,to name just a few.This movie took me to a different place, & that place was the Gong show. ANYONE WHO HASN'T VIEW THIS MOVIE:DON'T.Save your money for a better movie.Sure go on leave history to the professors and the thinking public,& leave cheezy movies like this shiny,yet empty attenmpt at a blockbuster epic to the air heads.I can do slap stick,I can handle cheeze just not in this saturation.These up & comers eh?..up & comers as guest stars on celeb squares,& Surreal Life
  • brandonmachew
    May 27, 2008
    Sessyranger, & SuperRed, I am not talking through my rear end, I think it is important look at the over all quality of the movie. Any given movie should contain a mix of the following ingredients: ORIGINALITY, a good plot, and some degree of logic, & yes, entertainment value plays a key role. When there is cheesy, & blantantly obvious plagerized sections from a variety of movies, a movie then becomes a formula. successful movie + successful movie= SUPER SUCCESSFUL MOVIE..we the buying public then become pons, blind, mindless sheep, fish biting at the shiny thing being shown to us. I won't let that happen to me. I stand by my review. Sessyranger, I don't think you are one to dictate who is talking through their rear ends, since it seems as though you can barely spell.Trying to make us critical thinkers seem intellectually insufficient holds less water when you can't spell. SuperRed, your arguments have some valid points, however it appears to me that you have given into sensationalism
  • ImmortalDisciple
    May 7, 2008
    Lambs to the slaughter....just follow the sheep.
    Don't label something even remotely close to Earth history if you're going to shred it to nothing but fantasy or pure speculation.
    Dramatic license is one thing but films like this should be given their proper place in the bargain basket.
    Why don't we make a movie called The Holocaust and have the French exterminating the Geramns while the French have already conquered most of the world.
    Same principle and a damn funny one, yet scary at the same time.
    The sky's the limit on you're imagination and in the gutter on your intelligence.
  • reelgeezers
    April 29, 2008
    There is a great review of this movie by two old school Hollywood veterans who are smart and funny. Check it out on YouTube
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QO2duyingE8
  • sessyranger
    April 28, 2008
    isnt accurate....?
    hu cares its a great movie...!
    ur talkin tru ur rear end....!
    lol
  • jeffidiyah
    April 15, 2008
    giant dodo birds...
  • SuperRed
    April 14, 2008
    Stop complaining that this "wasn't" or "isn't"accurate. That's what the history channel is for!
    Movies are suppossed to take you other places.Places you could never dream of.It's supposed to be fun and entertaining!10,00 B.C. does that. I would never have been able to see the first farmers,or how the pyramids "could" have been built.Movies are all about the directors interpretation,just like a painting is an artists. You don't have to like the movie,but don't ruin it for other people.
  • SuperRed
    April 14, 2008
    Frankly, I don't care if this isn't "historically" accurate,like some people say.are you guys History professors?
    I'm pretty sure Roland Emmerich didn't just one day say," Lets make a movie that is set in ancient times completely full of action,drama, hot new up-and-coming young actors,completely full of BS,and make it a Blockbuster hit." No people. He didn't.He made The Day After Tomorrow. He takes his work very seriously. The only thing that he said wasn't accurate in an HBO inside look was the raptor birds.They wanted something cool and to cause a thrill so they added them.Though if you look it up the raptor birds were only one era beofore when our 10,00 B.C. movie says they are ,so why wouldn't they may have survived and adapted in that little area? There is a temple underwater off the island of Yonaguni that is said to have been built before the last ice age,or before 10,000 B.C.. Anything is possible people.Scientist are still learning everyday about our history.
  • ruth2217
    April 10, 2008
    yea d movie was ok...
  • gloryapoorva
    April 9, 2008
    great movie....lot of action and adventure
  • mohammadaming
    April 5, 2008
    sallllllllllllam be tamame irooooniha
  • amt1991
    March 30, 2008
    Those Mammoths were no where to be found in Deserts, & they were not used to built Pyramids, & Pyramids were not existed till 2500 BC,this Movie's making History up side down..... XD
  • ImmortalDisciple
    March 23, 2008
    LOL.
    It seems nowadays movies are being made just to be made without thought or substance, just to take advantage of the current technology in CGI effects.
    Woolly Mammoths, in the desert mind you, helping to build pyramids which didn't exist until around 2600 B.C.
    WTF!
    They might as well have had a Brontosaurus helping to build the Library of Alexandria and Nazis helping in the construction of the Berlin Wall. Hope you see where I'm going with this.
    Now if this had been History Of The World Part II by Mel Brooks then we'd have something here.
    I have no desire to see this as it appears to be nothing more than eye candy, much like 300 was.
    Oh, BTW, what language are the characters speaking? I'm guessing perfect English just like in 300.

Details


10,000 B.C. Summary