Andrew Wilde, Anthony Benson, Cyril Cusack

Flixster Users

71% liked it

46,994 ratings

R, 1 hr. 53 min.

Directed by: Michael Radford

Release Date: December 14, 1984

Invite friends to see

DVD Release Date: March 4, 2003

Stats: 2,304 reviews

Get movie widget Recommend it Add to Favorites

Your Rating



clear rating
Share on: Facebook Twitter

Flixster Reviews (2,304)


  • August 30, 2009
    Not aging gracefully as films from the same time period (Bladerunner, for example is still pristine) ... but still works as a dystopian warning.
  • June 8, 2009
    Concerning 1984, I hope the book is better than the movie. I will say for the movie that John Hurt and Richard Burton (in his last role) were amazing. Roger Deakins' cinematography was also top-notch to go along with a great soundtrack. I remember very little of the book (my last...( read more) and only attempt to make it through was junior year of high school) but I remember that it took the time to explain things the movie didn't bother with. I get the impression that you'd get the most out of the movie if you've read the book. I was kind of sick when I watched 1984 so I don't know if I was just generally out of it when I say the movie jumped around or if its just a crappy adaptation of the script. Either way its not a wasted watch...
  • May 31, 2009
    I read the book just a couple of weeks before watching the movie and I was, well...disappointed. I found the Orwell's vision terrifying yet exhilarating but the language of the book is tiring and I ultimately found myself not caring about the characters. For some reason, all char...( read more)acters (and mainly Winston and Julia who are after all, the leads) lack the "human" factor -their humanity is shaky and you can't believe in their motives. Maybe that occurs naturally because of the theme of the book, but what is the point of following a story where the characters aren't appealing?

    So, I was hoping that the movie would provide me with what the book was lacking. But of course, because it is George Orwell we're talking about, the screenwriter and director's intervention was minimal to none. Thus, it was like reading the book all over again. The performances are splendid -John Hurt and Richard Burton simply have that unprecedented talent you hardly meet today. The movie is silently powerful and makes you wonder and get angry. But again, the same problem I had here was the one I had in the book: I didn't care at all for the characters. It's nearly impossible to feel compassion or even sympathy for them. And that's the major spoiler for me. It's worth watching by all means, but I wasn't impressed. If I had to choose a film of the sort to watch, I'd go for Fahrenheit 451.
  • May 29, 2009
    From the opening shot of "Nineteen Eighty Four" the viewer is plunged right into the hellhole of Oceania and the ultimate totalitarian nightmare. Whilst the year 1984 may be long past us, the essential themes of George Orwell's best known work still remain as timely and as releva...( read more)nt as ever.

    Winston Smith (John Hurt) is a drone worker in the Bureau of Information, and his job is to edit the news in accordance with the needs of the governing Party (which is in continual, seemingly endless war with Eurasia and other opposing states). He must also refer to the dictionary of Newsspeak, which is the government's language for the distribution of information.

    He lives in a world where there is no escape from the authority of the government who regiment the every thought and deed of their subjects. The Party is steadily working on a way to outlaw the concept of the family and the idea of conception. This is done to eradicate Thoughtcrime and guarantee the worker's total devotion to the Party and its leader, Big Brother.

    Winston abides by this (recording his increasingly ambiguous thoughts about society in a hidden, handwritten diary) until he encounters Julia (Suzanna Hamilton), a strange young women with rebellious ideas, to whom he develops a powerful attraction. But their passionate, forbidden relationship cannot escape the all-seeing eyes of Big Brother.....

    Screenwriter Jonathan Gems has a done a terrific job with the script. He successfully translates Orwell's ideas to the screen with great clarity. Micheal Radford directs with subtlety around the greasy sets and crumbling locations (the picture was filmed in and around the very area in which Orwell set his novel).

    The performances from the chief principals are very strong. John Hurt is excellent as Winston, bringing a subtle and considerate approach to the character. Particularly disturbing is his final scenes, as he becomes gaunt and disfigured through government torture. Suzanna Hamilton is gentle and quirky as Julia and "Rab C Nesbitt" actor Gregor Fisher appears as Winston's ill-fated friend, Parsons.

    Veteran actor Richard Burton lends a cold charisma to government enforcer O'Brien and he too excels in the film's final moments, as he coolly and sadistically tortures Winston, subjecting him to severe physical pain to subdue him, casually pulling a tooth out of his rotting mouth, then exposing him to the horrors of Room 101, all the while exhorting obedience to the Party and love to Big Brother.

    The strong relevance of the concepts of "Nineteen Eighty Four" should not be underestimated. Whilst the term "Big Brother" is now synonymous with the ridiculous "reality" TV shows of the same name, others like the Two Minutes Hate (in which the workers are coerced, through a two-minute broadcast, into hating the enemies of the state); the idea of a government waging a perpetual war to advocate "peace" (especially relevant in the aftermath of September 11) as well as the editing of news and the abuse of language in order to suit the needs of government and disguise its true agendas are ideas that are chillingly present in today's society.

    All of this is powerful and thought-provoking stuff, and helps to make "Nineteen Eighty Four" an accurate and powerful rendering of a still very timely piece of work.
  • March 20, 2008
    Grim and very loyal adaptation of the novel. Highly recommended, and a film I believe is a must see film for those who wish to engage in political thought, although it is not a film to watch if you plan to remain cheerful. It's quite depressing viewing.

    I have no particular prob...( read more)lem with the contribution The Eurythmics made to the soundtrack, but I would certainly like to see the film with the score by Dominic Muldowney intact.
  • November 1, 2009
    The book was sooooo much better, but the movie wasn't bad, it doesn't leave out any of the important stuff, it just doesn't convey the same kind of terror that has become synonymous with the title.
  • October 28, 2009
    the book was better, but still amazing
  • October 22, 2009
    Although I haven't finished the book, from what I've read (which is most of it), it is a fairly close adaptation to it and serves the book justice. I think it gets a little muddled and disoriented throughout the first 2/3 sporadically, but the final third act of the movie more th...( read more)an makes up for it, with a strong performance by Richard Burton and probably John Hurt's best performance, especially during that last act. Sure the ending isn't exactly perfect and some of the appeal of the book is lost along the way as the movie progresses, it's one hell of an experience and definitely one of the better book adaptations I've seen in a while.
  • October 10, 2009
    No introduction necessary.
  • September 27, 2009
    I can understand why George Orwells 1984 had such an impact when the novel was first published considering the international context after the II WW, but personaly I didn't like the style of the book and the symbolism I've found it quite easy to grasp. Also, I don't think is ...( read more)really as innovating as it may seem, Evgheni Zamiatin novel "We" is a proof in that direction.
    So after reading the novel a while ago, I had recently the opportunity to see the movie as well, so ...I saw it and, after seeing it, I can honestly say this is one of the best book adaptation (in my oppinion), the atmosphere is right, the acting- impressive but, the movie is faulty because the book is faulty as well.

Critic Reviews


No recent reviews.

Comments


This board looks lonely. Be the first to talk about "1984 (Nineteen Eighty-Four)" !

Critic ratings and reviews powered by RottenTomatoes.com

Fresh (60% or more critics rated the movie positively)

Rotten (59% or fewer critics rated the movie positively)

Official Trailer

More Like This


Click a thumb to vote on that suggestion, or add your own suggestions.

  • Donnie Darko
    Donnie Darko (30%)
  • Children of Men
    Children of Men (62%)
  • Equilibrium
    Equilibrium (75%)
  • Blade Runner
    Blade Runner (100%)

Facts


No facts approved yet. Be the first

1984 (Nineteen Ei... : Watch Free on TV


1984 (Nineteen Eighty-Four) Trivia


  • What film was based on the book 1984?  Answer »
  • What movie has the famous tagline "Big Brother is Watching You"?  Answer »
  • True or False: The movie "Nineteen Eighty-Four" was filmed in the year 1984 and some of the scenes were shot on actual dates noted in Winston Smith's diary from the novel of the same name.  Answer »
  • Big Brother, one of the best reality shows on British TV, the idea came from which film, based on the novel by George Orwelle?  Answer »

Movie Quizzes


No quizzes for 1984 (Nineteen Eighty-Four). Want to create one?

Recent News


No recent headlines. Got one?

Most Popular Skin