2012
2012 (2009)

Roland Emmerich delivers another large-scale disaster picture with 2012, a Sony Pictures Entertainment production detailing the year when many ancient scribes predicted that the world would end, with John Cusack, Chiwetel Ejiofor, Danny… More

Directed By:
Rated: PG-13
Running Time:
Release Date: March 2, 2010
Add Your Rating
Rotten Tomatoes™
Critic Score
39%
Flixster
User Score
47%



Critic Score: 39% Rotten Tomatoes™ Critic Reviews

Consensus: Roland Emmerich's 2012 provides plenty of visual thrills, but lacks a strong enough script to support its massive scope and inflated length.

Lisa Schwarzbaum
Entertainment Weekly

Cusack, with his one-of-the-guys face and his nice way with child actors, does creditable work as an Average American Dad trying to put things right.

Full review…
Joshua Rothkopf
Time Out New York

The worst sins of dialogue are visited upon the wonderfully soulful Chiwetel Ejiofor, who has to remind creepy government types that those massive high-tech arks are for all of us, not just the rich and powerful.

Full review…
David Keyes
Cinemaphile.org

...seriously, how often do we want to escape into worlds that are hell-bent on ravaging our sense of security with invading aliens and furious natural disasters?

Full review…
Laremy Legel
Film.com

2012 is the rare case of a bad film that I'm nevertheless obliged to recommend you see.

Full review…
A.O. Scott
At the Movies

Even though this movie's running time of two and a half hours is about one hour too long, there's still some pretty cool disaster stuff on the way.

Full review…
Will Leitch
Deadspin

You cannot say, in the terms of the life and career that Emmerich has built for himself, this is not the apex of his work. The world blows up. The world blows up a lot. The world blows up fantastically. There are worst quests in life.

Full review…
Sara Vilkomerson
New York Observer

2012 is reminiscent of yesteryear '80s shlock-tastic blockbusters -- total popcorn entertainment with ridiculous dialogue and impossible situations and special effects that will boggle the brain for a good two-plus hours.

Full review…
Anthony Lane
New Yorker

2012 is so long, and its special effects are at once so outrageous and so thunderously predictable, that by the time I lurched from the theatre I felt that three years had actually passed and that the apocalypse was due any second.

Full review…
Ali Gray
TheShiznit.co.uk

Emmerich favours hoisting his camera high and dry to give audiences the best panoramic view, but it removes all tension from proceedings - you're always at a safe distance.

Full review…
More reviews for 2012

Flixster Audience Score: 47% Flixster User Reviews
John Manard
I loved every second of this over the top completely ridiculous movie. But than again I like end of the world flicks. A movie with a group of good actors and I… More
Wildaly M
I suppose the general idea behind the film was noble, but why did they have to write such a crappy story for it. It's a given to say that the visual… More
Anthony Lawrie
I like a big disaster film and they don't get much bigger (or disastrous) than 2012. Roland Emmerich has the big budget and the computer know-how to create… More
Eugene Bernabe
Visually breathtaking in every shape and form, indeed, but the film's lack of impact and delivery combined with the lengthy duration doesn't capture… More
Nikhil Nandu
I got bored incredibly fast. It has fascinating visual effects. And that is where it stops. There are serious issues of race and class struggle that start to… More
Joe McCall
at least michael bay tries.

More Like This