28 Days Later

report broken trailer
< Previous Trailer  |   Add to My Scrapbook  |   Next Trailer >
28 Days Later

82% Liked It
liked it

28 Days Later

Alex Palmer, Bindu De Stoppani, Brendan Gleeson, Christopher Eccleston, Cillian Murphy

After breaking into a primate research facility, a group of animal rights activists discover caged chimps chained up before banks of screens displaying horrifying, violent images. Ignoring the warning...( read more  read more... )s of the terrified researcher who maintains that the chimps are infected, they begin to free the animals and are immediately subjected to a bloody attack from the enraged creatures. Twenty-eight days later, Cycle courier Jim awakes from a coma in the deserted intensive care unit of a London hospital. He wanders out into a church where he finds dead bodies piled in heaps on the chapel floor. A sudden explosion from a makeshift bomb heralds the arrival of fellow "survivors" Selina and Mark. They take Jim to safety and explain to him that this infection is transmitted by blood and overwhelms the infected victim with a murderous rage within seconds. Britain has been overrun, and they have no way of knowing if it has spread worldwide. Their only hope of survival may lie in the hands of a Manchester group of soldiers, as they claim to have the "answer" to infection and invite any survivors to join them at their blockade. Faced with no practical alternative, the group sets out northwards, unaware that the worst is yet to come.

Id: 10866369

Do you want to see this movie?

My Friends Said...

28 Days Later Recent Reviews

Register or sign-in to see your friends' reviews !

Recent Reviews

28 Days Later Recent Reviews
  • 76Majikat
    December 22, 2009
    76Majikat
    Written by Alex Garland, Directed by Danny Boyle and starring Cillian Murphy, this film is much better than I gave it credit for first time around. A realistic feel to an apocalyptic world, wiped out by the virus carrying ?infected?. The scenes of empty streets have a real time...( read more) stopping effect and the film itself leads to many thought provoking moments.
  • DrZeek
    October 5, 2009
    DrZeek
    Mark: What's your name?
    Jim: Jim.
    Mark: I'm Mark. This is Selena. Ok, Jim. I've got some bad news.

    A modern day zombie movie...well they're not technically zombies, they're infected. A quality take on the genre, with stylish, digi cam direction from Danny Boyle and good cha...( read more)racters. Very watchable, although it doesn't shine so well in the third act.

    The beginning of this film is particularly interesting and well handled. Jim, played by Cillian Murphy, awakens from a coma in an abandoned hospital. He soon realizes he is completely alone. The film then gives us empty streets of London, subtle music queues slowly creeping in, and the use of digital camera to provide a great isolated feel for Jim.

    Jim eventually comes across others still living in London. While some are regular scared people, the rest are infected victims of a virus, causing them to attack with no purpose and kill anything in their path. The film eventually turns into a road film of sorts, as a group travels to find any sort of safe haven.

    Jim: No, no. No, see, this is a really shit idea. You know why? Because it's really obviously a shit idea.

    Like all good zombie movies, it's not about the zombies, but about its characters and the reactions to their situation and how to deal with it. The lack of a true social structure, how people arrive at their true nature, and testing the hopes that people have left are all the kind of factors that play into this film. It doesn't have Romero style social commentary, but the handling of isolation and despair works well.

    This movie introduced the new style of "sprinting zombies" where they run, they slide, they hit humans and take a bite. New rules to the genre are always welcome, if handled effectively, and here, ones involving how to kill or become one of the infected lead to good scenes of tension.

    Danny Boyle, tackling yet another completely different genre, does a good job at creating a look for this film. The dark atmosphere, chaotic editing style of infected attacks, and solid horror film pacing is handled well. The use of digital camera makes the situations presented more effective, as does the very good soundtrack, which is now being used quite a bit in various movie trailers.

    As is a constant problem with Boyle's screenwriting collaborator Alex Garland, the stories third act has issues. Although the film plays out well enough, especially after repeated viewings, one can't help but wish there were other possible resolutions or places to take this concept.

    It's a good movie overall, made better by a unique presentation from Danny Boyle's direction, and solid work from the lead actors.

    Selena: He was full of plans. Have you got any plans, Jim? Do you want us to find a cure and save the world or just fall in love and fuck? Plans are pointless. Staying alive is as good as it gets.
  • SirPant
    September 24, 2009
    SirPant
    Nice to have a zombie film set in London, went a bit rubbish at the end though. Early scenes are a total rip off of the comic 'Zenith' that was realised in the early 90's in 2000AD and also the Day of the Triffids.
  • stopitgoaway
    August 25, 2009
    stopitgoaway
    Perhaps I'm a little biased. After all, this is set in the city I live and work in, and seeing Oxford Street and Piccadilly Circus, which I pass by every morning and which are usually teeming with crowds of people, completely empty was enough to send shivers down my spine. Usuall...( read more)y when you watch a movie like this it's located in some nondescript Midwestern village, which makes it easy to detach yourself from the events unfolding on screen. But seeing them occur in the place you call home is something that gives it an entirely new sense of reality, and one I was previously unaccustomed to.

    Still, judging 28 Days Later entirely on its merit as a film, it's easy to arrive at the conclusion that it's a fantastic achievement, as well as a coming-of-age of sorts for director Danny Boyle; I can't say the MTV-inspired vanity of The Beach, or the self-consciously trendy posturing of Trainspotting appealed to me, and to my shame I initially expected 28 Days Later to be given a similar treatment. Thankfully, my fears proved unfounded, discarded straight after a opening sequence which is at once effortless and fearsome. The rest of the movie was a joy. A terrifying joy, but a joy nonetheless.

    It's true that sometimes minimalism can be more effective than overblown bravado, and it's definitely true for this movie. It's the scenes of complete silence which get to you the most; an entire metropolis empty. The grainy picture serves to add a documentary-style quality to the film, which makes the whole situation seem almost too real to bear. Definitely a wise choice to film this on digital video.

    You will occasionally meet people who thought 28 Days Later wasn't 'scary' or 'gory' enough. These are the same people who will tell you that 2001 was 'boring', or that Memento was 'confusing'. Ignore them. Others didn't understand the purpose of the second half, or were confused by its change of pace, feeling that it distracted from the movie as a whole. However, I personally regard the second half as very important because, as another reviewer pointed out, it makes a very succinct point: What is scarier, the end of the world, or having the world repopulated by maniacs? That, I think, is where the real Horror of 28 Days Later lies.

    28 Days Later, like the Romero zombie flicks of yore, is ultimately an allegory of the days we are living in, an age in which we are constantly confronted with violence by the media (much like the ape right at the start of the film), where violence begets violence, and humanity faces an uncertain future. I applaud Danny Boyle's bravery in making 28 Days Later because he undoubtedly took a big commercial risk when the majority of the cinema-going public might prefer escapism to words of caution. Remember, Rage is a human-made disease. Quite the allegory there.

    Like most great masterpieces of their time, 28 Days Later has been misunderstood by a considerable amount of people. I have no doubt it will go down in history as a classic, the one movie which perfectly sums up the confused era we are living in. And even if you didn't like it, it would be advisable to give 28 Days Later another chance; it's a haunting experience when looked at from the right angle. Danny Boyle has many years left in him, I hope he'll continue making more movies like this.
  • kenstachnik
    April 18, 2009
    kenstachnik
    An extremely effective horror film. The digital cinematography combined with Boyle's direction provide this film with a chilling realism.
  • agemoeca
    December 25, 2009
    agemoeca
    Interesting take on a new breed of "zombies"
  • VirVeritatis
    December 21, 2009
    VirVeritatis
    I've heard such good things, and part of my wants to see it, but i don't watch horror movies.
  • Phonex
    December 21, 2009
    Phonex
    I did not like it. I guess it fits horror funs.
  • erikggrep
    December 20, 2009
    erikggrep
    "Staying alive is as good as it gets."
    - Selena

    Your days are numbered. A group of animal activists break into a research laboratory and free a horde of infected primates. About 28 days later, Jim awakes from a coma in an abandoned hospital and finds out that Lond...( read more)on was evacuated and all of Britain was overrun by the murderous rage epidemic. Joining up with a group of survivors who head out farther, Jim knows that they claim to have the "answer" to infection and find any more survivors, with their chances of survival may lie in a group of Manchester soldiers.

    Directed by Danny Boyle (Trainspotting), 28 Days Later features excellent acting performances from the following cast:
    1.) Cillian Murphy (Jim)
    2.) Naomie Harris (Selena)
    3.) Brendan Gleeson (Frank)
    4.) Megan Burns (Hannah)
    5.) Christopher Eccleston (Major Henry West)

    When I first saw the trailers for 28 Days Later on TV I knew how scary epidemics would be if they were in horror movies, and I was like "They're all gonna die" in a few seconds. Once I recently watched all of the film, looks like everyone bit the dust. It was, in fact, an excellent film. The post-apocalyptic setting where the disease-infected zombies rule is perfectly used throughout, making me think if it is classified as post-apocalyptic sci-fi and not just zombie horror. The acting performances are excellent in quality; I was excited to see Christopher Eccleston playing a villain even if his role here is totally outside his heroic personality that I saw back in Doctor Who. If Mr. Boyle was probably researching on recent epidemics as well as watching other zombie movies, then I'm sure that such hard work made 28 Days Later possible.
  • eryri
    December 20, 2009
    eryri
    Britain is under siege from a new disease - a virus which turns a person who's infected into a rampaging zombie with a thirst for blood. A group of desperate survivors in London try their best to flee from the carnage in the capital.

    28 Days Later is a gritty, taut, tense and a...( read more)tmospheric horror with some genuine scares thrown in. I'd recommend this to anybody that wants to see a zombie movie with a difference.
View All Reviews

Opening This Week

Top Box Office

Upcoming Movies

New on DVD