User Comments for A History of Violence


  • MorpheusOne
    August 28, 2009
    The only thing that I didn't like about this movie was that I thought it wasn't long enough. I thought they could have done a lot more with it. Everything about the movie was great, except that it wasn't long enough!
  • miklitov
    November 10, 2007
    do not loose your time watching this
  • Yakwhacker
    April 12, 2007
    What can I say? Cronenberg is amazing.
  • ingrate24680
    January 5, 2007
    the only good thing about this movie is the con artists who manipulated you into enjoying it.
  • columbiatch
    November 2, 2006
    What are you people talking about? This movie is excellent. The ending is perfect.
  • jbpelican
    August 18, 2006
    Most films of similar genre are the same story told differently. History Of Violence is really good, delivering its brutal action sequences in brutal detail without warning. Viggo Mortenson is great at portraying a character that is changing from one man to another, putting his family through multiple traumatic experiences. Although the ending was a bit inconclusive.
    I would definately reccomend you see this at least once. If you dont like it fine. I dont really care. What am i your babysitter?

    Justins Best Bit: A punk mongrel school bully getting utterly pummeled into the ground.
  • sickgirl485
    July 4, 2006
    I thought this movie was craptacular. It was really long, drawn out and boring. Some of the plot was kind of stupid too.
  • Diadem
    June 9, 2006
    I thought this movie was awesome. Tho the ending was kinda disapointing to me, but I loved this movie.

Details


A History of Violence Summary