A scientific expedition is lead to Borneo to uncover the legendary flower The Blood Orchid to grant longer life. The expedition leads the team into the heart of the Amazon Jungle. The team soon encounters a deadly nest of the world?s most dangerous animal, the anaconda. Can the t...( read more)
KaDee Strickland, Eugene Byrd, Morris Chestnut
A scientific expedition sets out for Borneo to seek a flower called the Blood Orchid, which could grant longer life. Meanwhile, they run afoul of snakes and each other.
DVD Release Date: December 21, 2004
Stats: 5,148 reviews
Your Rating
Flixster Reviews (5,148)
-
September 29, 2008
-
May 6, 2008
"I had this friend, who had this friend who shot documentaries, and he and his whole crew went down to the Amazon, and they were all eaten by snakes, and that's a true story!"
...( read more)
The first film, Anaconda, was probably the worst monster blockbuster to hit cinemas -
November 15, 2009
Better than the first thanks to a good diverse range of characters and a great storyline. There's also more action involved as well, plus the Blood Orchid quest was a great idea and a rather interesting one too. Johnny Messner is great as the male lead, and KaDee is quite likeabl...( read more)
Critic Reviews
No recent reviews.
Comments
-
July 18, 2008hi i like this movie very much and nw i am this member fan.......... ok?????????? we will meet very soon and don't forget to look my profile. who open everybody member's and new member's,too! bye bye!!! lot's of love everybody.......:)))))))))))))))))))))
-
February 3, 2008This movie is so much better than Anaconda with Jennifer Lopez. I think this movie has a better cast although I don't actually know any of them plus it's creepier. Great movie! I remember seeing it in theatres.
-
July 27, 2007This movie was a load of crap. The special effects were terrible, the cast was bad and there are no Anacondas in Borneo! What the hell?
-
October 31, 2006That's now my favorite adventure/horror film, I don't know why this film is so underrated? One day my friend told me to watch it with him on DVD, then I said "No, this film will suck", he said "Don't trust the critics, you might like it?", I was like "OK I'll watch it for your sake" so I rented it and watched, after that I fell in love with it, the death scenes weren't too tame or too disgusting, they were perfect and normal, I wasn't disturbed. I mean this thriller film was perfect, one of the best. It's filled with Action and Suspense. It had like suspense throughout and also of course it was terrifying, so I was wrong about it sucked, I terribly underestimate it and judged it before seeing it, and I thought it'll suck just like another recent horror film When a Stranger Calls (2006), Anacondas 2 didn't even suck a bit, I loved it throughout like I said, nearly every scene of it. In USA many people and critics didn't like this film because it was rated PG-13 (Because they think it's a "kid-friendly film") for me it wasn't a "kid friendly" I would say this film is suitable for people ages 15 and over, so, if it's PG-13, many M films are loved by Australians, M is equivalent to a PG-13 rating and MA15+ to an R rating, many PG-13 films are not suitable for a 15 year old, and this film could be one of them. Anyway, this film was awesome, so if you're on the hunt for gripping entertainment, then you've found the film that delivers action, special effects and jump-out-of-your-seat thrills on a MASSIVE scale. Anacondas: The hunt for the Blood Orchid is the sequel the sequel that packs a bite. Don't miss out, first thing tomorrow - get it and watch it.
-
September 13, 2006The first one was cheesy and enjoyable, and the trend has continued with this one. Only gripe I had was that too many people lived at the end, i rekon the little black guy should have gotten eaten or crushed or something, and one of the two women should have died. Still, its worth watching for the deaths that do happen. Good fun.
Justins Best Bit: Getting crash tackled in the face by a snake the size of a couple of buses.
Critic ratings and reviews powered by RottenTomatoes.com
Fresh (60% or more critics rated the movie positively)
Rotten (59% or fewer critics rated the movie positively)
All Rotten Tomatoes content is used under license from Rotten Tomatoes. Rotten Tomatoes, Certified Fresh, and the Tomatometer are the trademarks of Incfusion Corporation, d/b/a Rotten Tomatoes, a subsidiary of IGN Entertainment, Inc.





























