Featured Audience Ratings

• Jeff "

  
  This sequel to Anaconda looks strained, tiresome and overall it's a boring film that just misses the mark. The film has a poorly written script, a bad cast and poor effects. This is very much like the first film where the filmmakers made a killer creature horror film, but they… More
  This sequel to Anaconda looks strained, tiresome and overall it's a boring film that just misses the mark. The film has a poorly written script, a bad cast and poor effects. This is very much like the first film where the filmmakers made a killer creature horror film, but they didn't care how it turned out. This one didn't do it for me and I felt it was quite horrible with nothing really going for it and it just didn't deliver anything fun or memorable. I've seen my fare share of these types of films, and this is one of the worst that I had the misfortune to see. The film is just not fun to watch, while these films are supposed to be, this was just poorly made trash that simply didn't deliver. The Anacondas series is horrible, and with this sequel you can understand why. You get a broader picture as to why these films simply don't deliver anything worth seeing. This is one of those sequels that is worse than the first. The film suffers from a bad script, a poor cast and basically everything that made the first film forgettable. As low-budget horror goes, this one misses the mark. There's nothing memorable about this. This is just a poorly executed horror film with no payoff. If you've seen the first film, then you don't need to see this film, it's all the same in the end with little substance or hint of effective terror, which in turn make these films not worth seeing. Don't expect anything if you decide to watch this film. This is standard low-budget horror that fails to deliver what it tries to do.

• Phil H

  
  Strangely enough I actually liked this sequel over the first film which was a big surprise as I really expected a complete pile of nonsense and that would look pathetic. So much to my amazement I found myself enjoying the film from start to finish, yes the plot is basic and your… More
  Strangely enough I actually liked this sequel over the first film which was a big surprise as I really expected a complete pile of nonsense and that would look pathetic. So much to my amazement I found myself enjoying the film from start to finish, yes the plot is basic and your typical group of adventurers taken down one by one but its actually made pretty well on location and it does look real. The effects are about on par with the first film but just that tiny bit better due to advancement with cgi effects no doubt, allot of the snake effects are in the dark or heavy shadow so its hard to pinpoint if they are very good or not but I guess that's how to properly deal with a creature and make it effective. As said location work really adds allot to this film and raises it above your average B-movie, the scenery looks like real jungle and what sets there are look authentic, nice boat/river work too. Casting is reasonable with no big names but all characters are fun to watch, Messner is your gruff unshaven 'Indy' type hero whilst Marsden is great as the British scientist/villain, the rest are your usual mix of stereotypes that we've seen before but always fun to see new creative teams of oddballs. This lesser known cast actually works better than the big name cast from the first film in my opinion as your not overly sure who will survive to the end and it just feels that bit more authentic. Everything about this sequel is just above the first film, believe it or not but its true.

• Ken S

  
  4 words. Exploding Snake-Ball Orgy

• Richard C

  
  This movie sucks. I like it better then the first one because I was more entertained. I actually did have fun at parts so I can't give this a horrible rating. C

• Luke B

  
  7 years after Anaconda somebody decided a sequel was needed. It's quite baffling as to why, but nevertheless here we have it. Big snakes, people getting eaten, and inexplicable explosions. This time it's an expedition for flowers that will slow down the aging process.… More
  7 years after Anaconda somebody decided a sequel was needed. It's quite baffling as to why, but nevertheless here we have it. Big snakes, people getting eaten, and inexplicable explosions. This time it's an expedition for flowers that will slow down the aging process. It's more of the same stupid fun with a few extra snakes. After all, it is mating season. The majority of the cast is outacted by the monkey, who manages to convey more fear and understanding than any of his human colleagues.

• KJ P

  
  I really enjoyed this adventure film! I was young when I first saw it and I was terrified! I can actually recommend this movie!

• Dean !

  
  A fairly good action/horror film but not as good as the first. Could have done with a bit more of the Anacondas in it.

• Rachel F

  
  Loved it. I thought it was better than the first one.

• Drew S

  
  Hahahaha. I watched this with my mom and we laughed through the entire thing. It's rare that you see a movie so dumb, contrived and awkward as this.

• Al S

  
  An endlessly enjoyable thrill-ride. Loaded with freightening action and suspense. Wildly funny and entertaining

• Jason S

  
  um... nah.

• Aaron N

  
  It's hard to be very mean on a movie like this. It's terrible, yes, but it's very good at being terrible. I like the idea of adding an 's' to make a sequel title.

• Steven V

  
  Actually pretty enjoyable. The giant snakes are still unbelievably quick, but still likeable.

• Yinalí R

  
  It was so-so.

• Sylvester K

  
  There's nothing that the first film hasn't done so: Ethnic cast, suspension, human being the real villain. This is possibly the horror film with the highest survival rate so it deserves some praise, but the predictable story line and classic B-movie formula destroyed the… More
  There's nothing that the first film hasn't done so: Ethnic cast, suspension, human being the real villain. This is possibly the horror film with the highest survival rate so it deserves some praise, but the predictable story line and classic B-movie formula destroyed the film for the viewers.

• Rose G

  
  a lot scarier than the first one...there are just to many anacondas on this film!

• FanGirl B

  
  Surprisingly good for such a cheese-ball movie.

• Laurence C

  
  Ultra-cheesy but ultra-entertaining B-movie. Could've been a little bloodier in my opinion...

• Erin C

  
  I guess I thought the second one would be better, but then the hot guy died, and that ended it for me.

Read all 19 featured audience ratings