Ben Gazzara, George C. Scott, James Stewart

A defense lawyer takes on a case of a man accused of murdering a bartender who apparently raped his wife.

Flixster Users

88% liked it

7,545 ratings

Critics

100% liked it

36 critics

R, 2 hrs. 40 min.

Directed by: Otto Preminger

Release Date: July 1, 1959

Invite friends to see

DVD Release Date: July 11, 2000

Get It:

Stats: 493 reviews

Get movie widget Recommend it Add to Favorites

Your Rating



clear rating
Share on: Facebook Twitter

Flixster Reviews (493)


  • January 8, 2009
    One of the finest courtroom dramas ever, and definitely the best exposure of the affairs in and out the courtrooms; as well as the trickeries, rapid-fire delivering and fast-talking that any efficient (not righteous) criminal lawyer should have, unbiased, detached from any inner ...( read more)conviction or moral standpoint.
    The opposite forces are masterfully played by Jimmy Stewart and George C. Scott, two individuals with an expertise in the use of every cunning, dirty scheme able to be used in order to destroy the credibility of each other's arguments and win the case no matter what is right and what is wrong; that is what, at the end, paradoxically leads the person who won the case to question about the decision, even if he doesn't show any concern.
    Sadly, justice is such a variable and obscure concept... will it prevail? Think again.
    Preminger's direction is clean and focused on the right spots; the screenplay is snappy and occasionally very funny; Duke Ellington's music is quite mellow; and Lee Remick couldn't be lovelier, what a doll.
  • June 22, 2008
    Ex district attorney James Stewart is brought in to defend a decorated soldier who murdered the man who raped his wife. Otto Preminger once more tests the boundaries of what the American censors deemed "acceptable" in this groundbreaking courtroom drama. Stewart is as reliable as...( read more) ever as the crusading attorney, and easily the best scenes are when he and George C. Scott do battle during the trial. Unfortunately some of the supporting cast do not quite measure up; Lee Remick's immature performance is more of a flirtatious Lolita than the victim of a traumatic attack, and Joseph N Welch, a lawyer and outspoken critic of McCarthy may have been a very worthy choice to play the judge, but I couldn't help thinking how much better Spencer Tracy, the originally intended choice, would've been. It's intelligently written and tackles the hypocrisies of the law, such as the fact that all are innocent until proven guilty unless you are the victim of a rape, in which case it's the other way around as well as that appearances, grandstanding and innuendo are far more important in the courtroom than facts. It's all very worthy, but courtroom dramas are inevitably following the same formula, and the clinical attention to detail makes the proceedings a little dry and predictable. Worth it to see Stewart in action and his verbal sparring with Scott, but anyone who is not a fan of this type of film will not be entirely convinced to change their mind.
  • June 22, 2008
    having already seen a court room drama directed by otto preminger i have something to compare this too and i also have to say i liked his film of four years previous... "the court-martial of billy mitchell" more than "anatomy of murder". the main and only twist was that mary pila...( read more)nt was infact the bartenders daughter. it all hinged on that and you find it out half way through the film, so there isn't any great shock at the end. i guess if you rely heavily on the word drama then this is a good solid film, but a decent twisty and turny courtroom drama it is not. as usual i enjoyed watching james stewart do his thing on screen
  • July 23, 2007
    I generally loathe courtroom dramas - (so tired!) - but this is a real good one.

    Terrific use of locations and location sound.

    One of the goofiest trailers I've ever seen:

    http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0052561/trailers
  • October 27, 2006
    Great movie and great soundtrack. Worth it just to hear Jimmy Stewart say the word "panties."
  • November 16, 2009
    My second experience from director Otto Preminger. The first, "The Moon is Blue", was something extraordinary and one of the best movies I've seen. "Anatomy of a Murder" is also absolutely fantastic with its well-written and intense trial drama. James Stewart and the rest of the ...( read more)cast is flawless. Great ending as well. It is not everyday you sit staring like an idiot on the screen for 2 1/2 hours, forgetting both time and yourself, but I certainly did it here!
  • October 29, 2009
    Un drame légal comme on les aime, qui n'a pas la concision de "12 Angry Men" mais qui s'y apparente par la force de son suspense. Le scénario est béton et James Stewart livre une de ses plus solides performances en carrière (comparable à "Vertigo"). Je n'ai honnêtement pas vu les...( read more) 160 minutes passer, et j'en redemandais quand le film s'est terminé. Les joutes verbales lors du procès sont hallucinantes.

    On a l'impression d'être privilégié, impression qui devait être encore plus forte en 1959 alors qu'il était mal vu de parler de viol et qu'on excusait souvent la chose sous prétexte que la victime était trop sexy. Et Preminger arrive avec un film qui présente des personnages tous moralement douteux, victime comme bourreaux, en posant cette question: en quoi est-ce que l'habillement d'une femme peut justifier son viol, et quelles sont les limites acceptables? Un gros coup de poing en 59, mais qui n'a perdu ni sa force, ni son actualité.
  • October 25, 2009
    One of the best court drama's I have ever watched on film. The film stars James Stewart as a lawyer defending a man who killed someone who apparently raped his wife. This is no easy job for Jimmy Stewart's character. He not only has to make a solid defense case he has to try and ...( read more)solve the truth of the matter. Jimmy Stewart is excellent in this. Between his charisma and excellent acting on screen made for a entertaining movie. Plus great performances from Ben Gazzara, Lee Remick and a very young George C. Scott. This movie was based off of a book. I never read it but this was a good film. A great film with a great cast. Well worth a watch.
  • September 11, 2009
    One of the best courtroom movies ever; it wasn't as long as most people say, but it counts with a great plot development and dedicated performances.

    87/100
  • August 24, 2009
    This is too childish to be enjoyed.

Comments


Critic ratings and reviews powered by RottenTomatoes.com

Fresh (60% or more critics rated the movie positively)

Rotten (59% or fewer critics rated the movie positively)

Official Trailer

More Like This


Click a thumb to vote on that suggestion, or add your own suggestions.

  • Witness for the Prosecution
    Witness for the Prosecution (100%)
  • Boomerang!
    Boomerang! (0%)
  • Primal Fear
    Primal Fear (0%)
  • 12 Angry Men (Twelve Angry Men)
    12 Angry Men (Twelve Angry Men) (100%)

Facts


No facts approved yet. Be the first

Anatomy of a Murd... : Watch Free on TV


Anatomy of a Murder Trivia


  • In Anatomy of a Murder, what piece of clothing did James Stewart and other male characters have trouble saying in the courtroom?  Answer »
  • In the film A Hard Day's Night, when Paul's Grandfather criticizes Ringo for reading a book, what book is Ringo reading?  Answer »
  • Who wrote the music for Anatomy of a Murder?  Answer »
  • "Anatomy of a Murder" from 1959 is one of my favorite courtroom dramas of all time. Can you name the two lead actors?  Answer »

Movie Quizzes


No quizzes for Anatomy of a Murder. Want to create one?

Recent News


No recent headlines. Got one?

Most Popular Skin


No skins yet. Interested in creating one?