Featured Audience Ratings

• Dan S

  
  An over-rated legal drama centering on one lawyer's (Al Pacino) desire to take-down the legal system that is so corrupt. While this movie features a heck of a turn from Pacino (but this is always expected), as well as a phenomenal performance by the vastly under-rated Jeffrey… More
  An over-rated legal drama centering on one lawyer's (Al Pacino) desire to take-down the legal system that is so corrupt. While this movie features a heck of a turn from Pacino (but this is always expected), as well as a phenomenal performance by the vastly under-rated Jeffrey Tambor, this film is convoluted to the max. There is just frankly way to much stuff going on packed in to a two-hour slot, topped off with an overdone Pacino speech near its conclusion that feels forced and something totally expected in a Hollywood crowd-pleasing script. A pretty bad film, and one that should have dropped one of its many side-plots and focused on only two or three of them, that way the dramatic punch it tries to swing at its conclusion would have had more weight to it.

• Anthony L

  
  This is a great film, often copyed from its still relatively unknown and very underrated. The acting is of the finest quality. Brilliant.

• Chris G

  
  Al Pacino (along with Robert DeNiro) was probably the greatest actor of the 1970's. Long before he became the yelling guy that found his start in Scarface and was awarded for his noise in Scent of a Woman, Pacino was an actor's actor. He ended his reign in the 1970's… More
  Al Pacino (along with Robert DeNiro) was probably the greatest actor of the 1970's. Long before he became the yelling guy that found his start in Scarface and was awarded for his noise in Scent of a Woman, Pacino was an actor's actor. He ended his reign in the 1970's with ... And Justice For All, a courtroom drama that wasn't a very stellar story but overcame its problems with great acting and direction. Arthur Kirkland (Pacino) is an idealistic defense attorney that tends to grate against the established legal hierarchy in Baltimore. He soon finds himself juggling two cases where the defendants don't really belong in jail, a suicidal judge (jack Warden), a girlfriend (Christine Lahti) who is investigating ethics issues in the courts, and the judge (John Forsythe) he hates who asks him to defend him in a rape trial. That's a ton of stuff to juggle and as the movie progresses Arthur becomes more and more disgusted by the way the law has turned into a car lot mentality. "Let's make a deal! Let's make a deal!" The story is just so-so. There are points that feel like pure manipulation and predictability is the standard. The thing about this film is that when you dissect it into its acting and directing you get more than what the total film really is. The acting from all levels is superb with that young Pacino leading the way. he was still a king in 1979. Jewison directs the film in a way that leaves room for comedy and a little bit of tension. He makes a bland story interesting. ... And Justice For All has been shafted for years as some of Pacino's lesser work, but when you look at it from a technical standpoint and forget about the many flaws of the script you see what a precision picture this film really is. A '70's classic that closed the decade with class.

• Alice S

  
  Wow Pacino. Wow. He makes even mundane actions like sitting on a park bench and moving his legs to make way for a line of joggers look inspired. Could've done without all the Christine Lahti scenes. I'M OUT OF ORDER?! YOU'RE OUT OF ORDER!!

• Al S

  
  An electrifying and stunning court-room drama. Al Pacino give a brilliant and extroadiary performance. Dirctor, Neil Jordans masterpiece.

• Cindy I

  
  First fell for Pacino in this film, and have loved him ever since.

• Michael G

  
  Overblown, overrated and horribly dated.

• Cameron J

  
  Wow, the poster makes this film look more like a satire on how marketing tries to cool things up too much, because they really did go out of their way to make this film look more exciting than it is, because it stars Al Pacino and has a really emphatic title (They went ahead and put… More
  Wow, the poster makes this film look more like a satire on how marketing tries to cool things up too much, because they really did go out of their way to make this film look more exciting than it is, because it stars Al Pacino and has a really emphatic title (They went ahead and put the "..." at the beginning of the title as though it really were a stinger) that sounds more fitting for a B-action film, or at least an action film that's more likely to star Arnold Schwarzenegger. Man, Schwarzenegger would make a really cool lawyer, but lord knows that I wouldn't want him to represent me, because not even a lot of the films that he's been in are credible, and I'd imagine that he would be in the middle of the courtroom gunning everyone down and saying something like, "Court adjourned", only you wouldn't be able to hear him through, well, the gunfire, but also that thick accent. No, I want a lawyer who believes in preserving justice and is firm, thorough and effective "before" he begins shooting up the place while yelling one-liners in a super thick accent, so I'm going with Al Pacino here. In case you didn't get it people, Pacino did this film a couple of years before he donned a scar and Cuban accent for "Scarface", so don't go thinking that this film started a lengthy streak of deeply dramatic films, partially because this film is mainly a satirical dark comedy, or that this film is as exciting as the scenario mentioned above. This film can drop obvious self-jokes all it wants and Pacino can scream, "You're out of order!" all he wants, but at the end of the day, if Norman Jewison doesn't have a musical about Jesus, then he doesn't really know what to do to keeps things fun. Eh, whatever, this film still makes for a pretty decent watch, and actually isn't all that dull of a courtroom film, so don't go expecting this to be like the courtroom drama that Pacino's buddy Francis Coppola went on to do with Matt Damon. I actually liked "The Rainmaker" more than this film, it's just that it seriously needed to pick up the pace, and while that's something to be said about this film, I wouldn't stress it as much, though I would still stress it, nevertheless, which isn't to say that slowness is the only fault found in this film. Based on my opener's underemphasis on the film's being a satirical dark comedy, I'd imagine that you're expecting this film to be subtle in its satirical bite, when really, it rarely gives you an opportunity to forget that it's almost mostly a comedy, yet doesn't do so in the most even of fashions. The film's level of satirical subtlety is often rather inconsistent, with the satire having points where it incorporates light but noticable absurdity into its more relatively grounded moments, then turning right around to go well over the top in a fashion that both dilutes satirical effectiveness, as things do get to be a bit too absurd, and drives a fairly off-putting unevenness into the humor. Needless to say, once dramatic aspects fall into play, they're even less organic in their incorporation amidst such obvious humor, as much of the drama gets to be really serious, yet because of the messy transition into such drama, dramatic punch goes slowed down a bit, and it doesn't help that the drama occasionally gets to be a bit sentimental. Still, if nothing else is consistent about the film, then it is, of course, slowness, as the film often quietly limps along with loosely edited moments of either dry dialogue or simply nothingness. What further slows down the film, both in oomph and even story, are a fair couple of scenes that are entirely cuttable and only drag down the momentum of the story to the point of leaving plot to all but fall out entirely for a moment. The film is a dull and limp one that drags along excessively, with only so much consistency in its should-be compensating satire for it to bite all that deeply all that often However, the film doesn't limp its messy little self down to mediocre, for although it is an absolute mess of a slow watch, it's still a watch worth sitting through, being supported by a fair couple of undeniable strengths, one of which being, in fact, the very humor that is so messily handled. As I said earlier, the inconsistency in subtlety within the humor often dilutes both the bite of the satire and amusement value of the joke, and a couple of jokes just plain fall flat on their face, yet quite often, the humor strikes, whether it be one of those slow-burn subtler ones that settle in and stick with you, or one of those unexpected broad ones that strike from out of nowhere and may even leave you laughing fairly hard. Also, while the satire's effectiveness goes held back by both the messy direction of the film and the messiness of the humor behind the satire, it does cut through from time to time and leaves your eyes to fold open to a flaw in the justice system that you never really thought about, and while this film most likely won't shake your faith in court justice too much, you're still bound to walk away with material to chew on and think about. Some of your more relatively dramatic aspects, while often handled ever so messily, will have moments where it really does pierce and supplements the thought-provoking value of the film, giving it some more weight and effectiveness. Really, there is plenty about this film that is rather forgettable, being that the film is ultimately so underwhelming, yet it still plenty of memorable aspects that do genuinely stick with you. Among the handful of memorable aspects in this film are a couple of characters, and for that, credit goes out to Valerie Curtin and Barry Levinson for writing some colorful personalities, as well as out to the performers for giving the more memorable characters such life, whether it be through charm or even some unexpected emotional intensity. Obviously, leading man Al Pacino really owns the show as Arthur Kirkland, bubbling with a very engaging, somewhat down-to-earth charisma that earns your investment in him as a charming lead, while eventual consistent bursts of incredible emotional range and layers unveil depth within our lead that makes him even more compelling and gives this film some additional weight. If nothing else, you'll walk away feeling rather charmed by the film, as it is an innocently ambitious effort that may get to be much too messy, but satisfies perhaps more of its ambitions than not. Bottom line, the film is considerably uneven, both in its tone and its level of satirical subtlety, and with extreme slowness - made so intense by a dry atmosphere, extreme looseness over dull dialogue and nothingness, as well as even the occasional lapse in plot focus - further pulling back the bite of this film, the final product comes out limping as an underwhelming experience, yet still one reasonably worth having, as it hits quite a few humorous notes, while the satire will find points in which it bites and leaves you with material worth pondering upon, and with moments of genuine dramatic effectiveness and a colorful cast of charmers - headed by an immensely charismatic and, eventually, deeply emotionally inspired and exceptionally layered Al Pacino - giving the effectiveness of the final product an extra kick of memorable aspects, "...And Justice For All" ultimately emerges a generally enjoyable, if not rather provocative darkly satirical, when not dramatically impacting portrait on the justice system, even if it, like the very justice system it's poking fun at, has quite a few glaring faults. 2.5/5 - Fair

• Logan G

  
  It's extremely misguided; There's about 7 subplots and none of them ever get fully developed. While it's not focused, it does have an ambition. It wants you to take a look at the psychiatric aspects. It wants you to fully realize how messed up living that life can be.… More
  It's extremely misguided; There's about 7 subplots and none of them ever get fully developed. While it's not focused, it does have an ambition. It wants you to take a look at the psychiatric aspects. It wants you to fully realize how messed up living that life can be. Every character hits their breaking point. The ambition is there, but the execution is heavily lacking.

• John B

  
  A surprisingly good Pacino flick that comes on once and awhile on A & E in the wee hours of the morning. Waste a couple of hours on this film when you get a chance.

• ashley h

  
  This was one of Pacino's best. A lawyer torn between ethics and his job,which alot of times do not coincide. He borders on comedic at times in this movie,but its great.Story is great,acting wonderful.

• Mike T

  
  The movie is good, but Al Pacino is great. There's definitely a cheesy '70s vibe here, but it's more than redeemed by Pacino's electrifying performance and incredible presence.

• Marcus W

  
  Credit to Pacino for a good performance but the tone and slow pacing lets the film down. One second we're hearing about how corrupt the judicial system is, then it's all fun and games in a helicopter. Either play it straight (Network/Serpico), or call in the Zucker brothers… More
  Credit to Pacino for a good performance but the tone and slow pacing lets the film down. One second we're hearing about how corrupt the judicial system is, then it's all fun and games in a helicopter. Either play it straight (Network/Serpico), or call in the Zucker brothers and take the piss properly.

• Ed Fucking H

  
  A furious and cynical little film tackling issues of ethics and corruption in the court system, problems which still unfortunantly are more alive than ever. Al Pacino delivers an impassioned performance as has come to be expected from his output from the 1970's. Surprisingly… More
  A furious and cynical little film tackling issues of ethics and corruption in the court system, problems which still unfortunantly are more alive than ever. Al Pacino delivers an impassioned performance as has come to be expected from his output from the 1970's. Surprisingly there is a good amount of dark humour to be found here as well, making the viewing expierence less heavy handed than it could have been, but no less direct. Not much else to say really, an underappreciated classic.

• Andre T

  
  courtroom drama film, directed by Norman Jewison. The movie stars Al Pacino, John Forsythe, Jack Warden, Lee Strasberg, Jeffrey Tambor, Christine Lahti, Craig T. Nelson and Thomas G. Waites. It was also 75-year-old character actor Sam Levene's final film. The movie was written by… More
  courtroom drama film, directed by Norman Jewison. The movie stars Al Pacino, John Forsythe, Jack Warden, Lee Strasberg, Jeffrey Tambor, Christine Lahti, Craig T. Nelson and Thomas G. Waites. It was also 75-year-old character actor Sam Levene's final film. The movie was written by Valerie Curtin and Barry Levinson. This film includes a well-known scene in which Pacino's character, Kirkland, shouts, "You're out of order! You're out of order! The whole trial is out of order! They're out of order!" The closing courtroom scene was filmed on the first take. The film shows many scenes of downtown Baltimore, including the courthouse area, a scene running around the Washington Monument/Mount Vernon Place, and Fort McHenry. ...And Justice For All received two Academy Award nominations, for the Best Actor in a Leading role (Pacino) and for Best Original Screenplay (Curtin and Levinson). Pacino also received a Golden Globe nomination for his performance. This film represented the second time Pacino was nominated for these awards in a movie in which he acted alongside his famed acting teacher, Lee Strasberg, the other being The Godfather Part II. Great performanece by Pacino.Good.

• Steve S

  
  A highly ironic and eccentric take on the hypocrisy and inconsistency in our justice system, which is regrettably all too accurate.

• Dimitris S

  
  Unfair treatment back then for a modern classic as of now,Jewison proved by the end of the 70's his authority in groundbreaking scenarios constructing them in romantic adventures of male idealists.Romanticism as a notion without the juicy parts,and Pacino's role is what the… More
  Unfair treatment back then for a modern classic as of now,Jewison proved by the end of the 70's his authority in groundbreaking scenarios constructing them in romantic adventures of male idealists.Romanticism as a notion without the juicy parts,and Pacino's role is what the cause prevents him from doing.Bullet with Butterfly Wings,twisted paradox for someone who breaks into the law's bargain?

• Kevin "

  
  In my opinion one of the most underrated Pacino movies ever, besides The Panic in Needle Park. The emotion that Pacino shows in this movie is astounding and the end courtroom scene by itself is some of the best acting of his career.

Read all 18 featured audience ratings