Kang-ho Song, Ok-vin Kim, Hae-sook Kim

A failed medical experiment turns a man of faith into a vampire.

Flixster Users

72% liked it

11,367 ratings

Critics

83% liked it

94 critics

R, 2 hrs. 13 min.

Directed by: Park Chan-wook

Release Date: April 30, 2009

Invite friends to see

DVD Release Date: November 17, 2009

Stats: 510 reviews

Get movie widget Recommend it Add to Favorites

Your Rating



clear rating
Share on: Facebook Twitter

Flixster Reviews (510)


  • November 21, 2009
    Last year, the antidote to the Twilight phenomenon was Let the Right One In. This year, Thirst steps forward to show how a vampire movie should be made. It's dark, disturbing and creative in ways that such a generic and overused idea needs to be. Thirst covers the themes one want...( read more)s to see in a Vampire tale. Faith, obsession, guilt, and most importantly, love and lust and the thin divide between the two. Park uses his slow and subtle techniques to gradually let his story unfold. Viewers should keep in mind that this is NOT a horror. There isn't a single scene that could even be described as scary. It deals with the moral dilemmas of being a vampire and has two characters dealing with transformations in their own way. The effects are also incredible and never put centre stage. The super-human jumps and strength look so natural, and Park doesn't bother with slow-motion or extreme close-ups to announce "LOOK AT THIS". It's a film that doesn't seem so great while you are watching, but it's something you reflect upon just as it ends. Park is a true filmmaker. One scene has our protagonist encounter the object of his desire whilst she is out running barefoot. He lifts her with great ease and places her into his shoes. This one moment was more romantic and emotionally powerful than all the bland characters and turgid dialogue in the teen shitstorm of Twilight.
  • November 10, 2009
    We had a THIRST party and we're all sitting there silently in shock and awe for the first thirty minutes or so and then someone asks "Why is this film so annoying?" Another responded: "For one thing, the sound design is childish at best." What's with all the slurping sounds? Some...( read more)one else offered: "If they don't kill that one guy pretty soon they better at least teach him to wipe his nose or I'm gonna puke." Well, one of those things happened. I won't spoil it by saying which one, suffice to say it had no impact at all. This film has low-budget written all over it. Sure, Park spent a few bucks on a couple scenes but overall it feels cheap. And don't go suggesting that someone drive in here with the metaphor assistance team to give it some depth and all will be well, because it is still unpleasant to endure. The only good part is Ok-bin Kim's lust towards her newfound lifestyle but then even that comes too late and plays itself out way too long to the point of indifference. Yike-o-rama! This film is awful.
  • August 28, 2009
    After a failed medical experiment (presumably for the good of mankind,) a young Catholic priest is subjected to the evils of the underworld. This is a premise that is meant to elicit the kind of curiosity that will keep you intrigued to find out more. And, for the most part, my a...( read more)ttention was captured during the entire length of this Korean-vampire flick.

    What starts out as an exercise in standard vampire metamorphosis, turns out to be a bizarre series of events that unfolds in front your very eyes and you can't look away despite its unconventional approach at the vampire genre. It's not that the movie is bizarre in a bad way. It's just that it is so unorthodox in its execution and in its plot, that it unsettles the unprepared viewer.

    As I had never seen a Park Chan-wook film before, I was one of those viewers who didn't know what to expect aside from what I'd seen in the film's trailer. Let's just say that the clip really under-sells this film. Or, depending on your point of view, oversells it. It's definitely not for everybody.

    The film definitely turns from typical vampire flick into a meditation into the essence of evil, love and the battle for maintaining a balance between this world and the netherworld that eludes us. What does being evil truly mean? And what about those who would, seemingly, be impervious to such evil infiltrating their soul? What happens when someone who is supposed to fend off the malevolent forces in the world is precisely the person who fall victim to its seducing allure?

    This movie really has so many layers; but its brutish style and storytelling may put some people off. For me, it works. After all, the characters in this film technically cease to be human at one point or another, so it would be foolish for us, the audience, to continue expecting them to behave rationally and within the realm of expected behavior.

    When you're going through hell as a living entity on Earth, what awaits you in the actual eternal pit of doom? Or does this mythical burning soul orgy actually exist? As one of our protagonist ponders, maybe "when you're dead, you're dead." But if you're part of the walking dead, this point of view seems rather skewed, no?

    And what of love? Or, as depicted in this movie, lust? Is that an evil greater than that of being consumed by a wicked force of the undead? Which deed is more lascivious and worthy of eternal damnation? The act of taking life to sustain your own appetite for blood? Or laying in the arms of a person who's all wrong for you and whom you're doomed to be in love--lust--with?

    Essentially, this movie brings up a lot of valid moral and spiritual implications (if you care to watch the film from a strictly philosophical stance.) But if you're looking for a straight vampire fright, this movie provides plenty of goosebump-inducing moments (i.e. a brilliant subplot of spousal drowning,) as well as quirky humor that you'd only find in a foreign-language film (which this movie is, in case I didn't mention that or in case you failed to surmise it from my review.)

    And from a cinema enthusiasts side of it, the technical aspects of this movie are nothing to sneeze at. The cinematography is breath-taking and all-too-real. Especially in instances where the reality becomes torrid fantasy. It isn't a day-and-night switchover, despite the night-only shenanigans our vampires get into.
  • October 8, 2009
    The slow, deliberate pacing at the beginning and the typical Chan-wook Park surrealism may throw some people off, but a great statement about waning faith in a modern world as well as a pretty cool vampire flick. It certainly isn't "Let The Right One In", but it is definitely an...( read more) original, sexy vampire romp!
  • August 17, 2009
    OK so I thought this would be amazing from what I had heard and the trailer looked good too. However it really "sucked" pardon the pun. I couldnt get past the fact that the main actor was so ugly! He just put me off. The sex scenes and the blood was all pretty gross and disgust...( read more)ing and the movie just moved along sooo slowly. It's very uncomfortable and boring to watch the for the most part. The girl was cute though and when she turned into a vampire it improved a little and the ending wasn't too bad. Disappointing overall though.
  • November 23, 2009
    Brought new ideas to a bored genre overrun by hormonal teens and television fads.
  • November 21, 2009
    fascinating and very original! HIGHLY RECOMMENDED!!!
  • November 21, 2009
    am i become too subjective,or Chan wook really is brilliant?? It's just,every work,and i mean,every work of his that i already seen is always great.and this one is no exception.Looks like he is my new Kubrick

    This time,he moves forward from his revenge trilogy,and takes a vampir...( read more)e genre as his main palette.supported by his favorite actor,Song Kang-hoo (JSA,sympathy for mr vengeance) and an ex beauty pageant model Kim Ok-vin (which,her beauty,resemblance one of my favorite actress from my country) as a unusual couple of much complexities.

    it is in this film,that Chan Wook shows all his touch into the screen (he himself told the media,that THIRST is his most accomplished film to date). there are violence,controversial image,wild romance,darkly humor,beautiful scenery,wonderful cinematography,you tell..

    So,while not as great as his masterpiece,such as Oldboy,or JSA,but i thought this is still an above average vampire movie,thanks to that gifted hand of chan wook craftmanship
  • November 20, 2009
    It wasn't Parks best, but it was a great story. Some things nearly turned me away, like the horrible slurping sounds when the two would kiss. The ending redeemed the movie though.
  • November 17, 2009
    I'm in limbo with this film as well. The acting is there it's just the journey that is a little too heavy on me... It feels longer than what it actually is which isn't always the best thing for me. The characters I don't really have a problem with but it's the interactions they s...( read more)hare that seem too fake or jumbled...

Critic Reviews


October 16, 2009
Nigel Andrews, The Financial Times

Once on course, he is uncontrollable. I don't mean the hero, I mean the director. Park's gallows wit and visual inventiveness keep us alert for an hour amid the ramshackle story structuring. full review

August 20, 2009
Ty Burr, Boston Globe

Thirst keeps coming up against the limitations of its various inspirations like a bumper car on a crowded court. On almost every other level, the film's audaciously entertaining, at times even quite m... full review

August 13, 2009
Roger Ebert, Chicago Sun-Times

Movies exist to cloak our desires in disguises we can accept, and there is an undeniable appeal to Thirst. full review

August 3, 2009
Kurt Loder, MTV

Just when we've set our brains on ponder, the picture muddies all hope of contemplation with flashes of the fearlessly eccentric imagery for which Park has become famous, and some of the slurpiest sex... full review

July 31, 2009
A.O. Scott, The New York Times

Soaked in blood though it is, Thirst leaves some essential cravings unsatisfied. full review

July 31, 2009
Claudia Puig, USA Today

Thirst is at least a half-hour too long. The story goes off course with pointless distractions and feeds on non-stop grisliness. full review

July 29, 2009
Armond White, The New York Press

One can't take Thirst seriously, even with its ironic cha-cha music cues, when Park sets up his usual elaborate sentimental ending -- further variation on his typical self-flagellation and mortificati... full review

July 27, 2009
David Edelstein, New York Magazine

It's fun (if overlong), but for all the noisy slurping, there's no fresh blood. full review

View more Bakjwi (Thirst) reviews at RottenTomatoes.com

Comments


  • fearnet
    July 29, 2009
    Check out this exclusive interview with Park Chan-Wook at Comic-Con 2009 talking 'Thirst'

    Should be one to die for!

    http://www.fearnet.com/videos/b16118_sdcc_2009_park_chan_wookrsquos_thirst.html
  • alicerose07
    April 15, 2009
    The trailer in Flixster didn't come out with subtitles, the one in youtube did, rats!
    it looks really interesting and i love the background music in the trailer

Critic ratings and reviews powered by RottenTomatoes.com

Fresh (60% or more critics rated the movie positively)

Rotten (59% or fewer critics rated the movie positively)

More Like This


Click a thumb to vote on that suggestion, or add your own suggestions.

  • Pleasantville
    Pleasantville (0%)
  • The Twilight Saga: New Moon
    The Twilight Saga: New Moon (100%)
  • In the Realm of the Senses
    In the Realm of the Senses (0%)
  • Interview with the Vampire
    Interview with the Vampire (0%)

Facts


No facts approved yet. Be the first

Bakjwi (Thirst) : Watch Free on TV


Movie Quizzes


No quizzes for Bakjwi (Thirst). Want to create one?

Most Popular Skin


No skins yet. Interested in creating one?