I thought the first one was really good, but I have a bad feeling about this, just doesn't sound as promising, so I think I'll save myself the disappointment and just stick to the first !!
Didn't really liked this movie. Moved too fast. Didn't really understand it and it just bored me to death. The same ol' "we're americans, we save the world"
The original disappointed me alot even though it had a decent cast. This time the decent is gone so I'd expect this would be a crappy movie and moreso than the original.
Slightly cheesey but blunt enough in parts to keep me interested. Nice suspense in parts and a few twists & turns along the way. Don't expect too much and you won't be let down.
rough start, the editing is horrible. Quick choopy cuts and bouncy camera can add a sense of speed but way to much almost get motion sickness. I almost turned it off, but thats sad because it actually an ok movie once that stops.
Hello! why did we need another Behind Enemy Lines. The first one with Owen Wilson was fantastic. There is no need for this sequel, I think the writers and producers are running out of ideas for films. lol!
If I could give it a score, it'll probably be 0. Possibly THE worst movie I watched so far. It has no character development whatsoever. Bad scene clipping and unrealistic acting, coupled with confusing dialogues which made no reference to any relevant aspect of the plotline. (eg: "okay, we've landed here by accident. lets go blow up some north koreans..") With the constant barrage of 'white house fickleminded decision-making', the show (at the very least) earns itself the badge of dreary boring 'realism'. This was reflected by the actual grueling debates that goes on the background of every important international/political decision. However, realism works in both ways, to this movie, it gives a basis to label it as an equivalent to 'watching a bunch of pointless arguement going no where'.
well nothing out of the extraordinary like all second parts!! and well not agood plot more of the same acting fair and characters not so well performed!!
There's not too much to say about this movie, as there isn't much going on about it. Navy SEALs are prepared for a mission inside the North Korea to resolve a nuclear crisis that's appearing on the horizon. During the drop, the mission gets aborted and several SEALs get stuck in the enemy territory. Things turn sour quickly, but before you know it, the forlorn have to save the world. The idea itself is nowhere near original, and only a good execution can save a plot like this, as it can go both ways. Let's see if it does.
The acting is average and the best players got the side roles, in particular the Koreans. The main hero could've been a better choice than Nicholas Gonzalez. Interesting thing to notice is that no real bad guy is present in this movie.
The camera work is one thing that's noticeably professional. The camera seems to move around in every way physically possible, with a wide zooming range, using tricks like multiple layers (when you see zoomed-in content on a zoomed-out background).
The sound has been given some thought and the music ranges from exciting symphonic trips to soul-scratching folk singing. It fits relatively well so there's not much to say about it.
The movie survives thanks mainly to camera work, some actors and perhaps a large budget. It's an average action flick that can entertain if you have nothing better to do, but I wouldn't make it a central movie at a big event.
Awesome action, sweet effects, and grea overall feel. One problem though the constant fast-forwarding used get's annoying. Besides that this movie is a great one. With some interesting camerawork, and characters. Recommended.
This was not some amazing movie that blew me out of the water. Although I did enjoy some of the characters the pace was kind of slow and boring. The action was really frustrating because they did this camera trick where they would shake it during gun fights. Some would think they were having seizures watching this movie. I was kind of annoyed with some of the deaths though, it was not fair in my opinion. I also mistaken this movie for a enemy at the gates sequel. I probably would have liked it more then.
2 has a better effect in terms of the technology of the making. i got a bit confused with the story line. however, it's still a good production. find it outstanding but still, i prefer to the first.
Tema muy actual, pero desde un punto de vista muy gringo, donde los soldados latinos son la carne de caņon y las elites politicas hacen lo que les viene en gana. La accion si es bastante buena.
MCT:June 27, 2008
MCT:May 11, 2008
MCT:April 10, 2008
MCT:March 30, 2008
MCT:October 23, 2007
MCT:August 18, 2007
MCT:April 2, 2007
MCT:March 18, 2007
