Blindness

Blindness

49% Liked It
liked it

Blindness

Julianne Moore, Mark Ruffalo, Alice Braga, Yusuke Iseya, Yoshino Kimura

A doctor's wife becomes the only person with the ability to see in a town where everyone is struck with a mysterious case of sudden blindness. She feigns illness in order to take care of her husband a...( read more  read more... )s her surrounding community breaks down into chaos and disorder. Based on a novel by Nobel Prize winner Jose Saramago.

Id: 10887648

Do you want to see this movie?

My Friends Said...


Register or sign-in to see your friends' reviews !

Recent Reviews


  • October 7, 2009
    ''The only thing more terrifying than blindness is being the only one who can see.''

    A city is ravaged by an epidemic of instant "white blindness". Those first afflicted are quarantined...

    Yusuke Iseya: First Blind Man

    On release, Blindness was strangely labeled...( read more) the new Children of Men, even comparisons were drawn to the dystopia I Am Legend. Even though it has actresses from both (Julianne Moore and Alice Braga), it results as being worse than both combined, it is safe to say, Blindness shouldn't even be mentioned in the same sentence as Alfonso Cuaron's exceptional Children of Men. The quality speaks for itself if you compare these projects, and even I am Legend had it's CG flaws and unoriginal strains.

    However, that doesn't mean not to miss out on Blindness as it is a decent enough drama with some solid performances. The film opens very intriguingly, an Asian man in an unnamed city goes blind at the wheel, this is the unknown start of the epidemic and traffic chaos has already erupted around him. Obviously then director Fernando Meirelles' view of the worlds morality in this film is shown as a man appears to help him, only to kick him out of his own car and drive away.
    Perhaps this is where the main fault lies, the film tries so hard to hammer home a message that society has lost sight, using literal blindness as a metaphor for all that is bad in human thought and action. No wonder various foundations have protested against the concept and story itself.
    It might have been wiser to let the viewers decide for themselves how this city would react and keep things relatively ambiguous. People going blind doesn't necessarily mean they will become selfish, indifferent and aggressive yet overall the film puts this point across repeatedly. An example is the doctor played by Mark Ruffalo, he completely changes in character, and even in the middle of the crisis, he cheats on his wife.

    I think what saves Blindness overall though, and the reasons for me giving it 3 stars is that it is nicely structured and evenly paced while looking visually stunning, it is supposed to be set in an unidentified city and there are no clues at all to where it is filmed which is successful, and adds to the experience. The ruined and deserted city caused by the aftermath is also terrifically done.

    The performances are definitely worth a mention, Julianne Moore is an excellent emotional core as one of the few humans immune to the blindness and carries the film. I also liked Alice Braga, Yuseke Iseya and Gael García Bernal who has fun as one of the quarantined victims who tries to take over the wards for everything they have to achieve personal profit. However, I was disappointed with Mark Ruffalo who is normally a fine actor (Collateral,Zodiac) but he struggles with the material and delivering his character here. Danny Glover isn't great either and his clunky voice-overs don't help matters any further.

    You will enjoy this film more if you can see past the over emphasized moral message and plot-holes. It would take too long to go through them all but for example: everyone is blind yet not once does anyone call each other by name, it would surely help the situation! I can't understand what Meirelles was trying to achieve with the non-use of name calling for the characters.
    Overall, Blindness is an average standard drama, that is worth seeing for the visuals and mediocre performances. However, if you want something similar and in my view much better, watch the superior Children of Men. Let's face it, anything Fernando Meirelles ended up doing after his masterpiece City of God, would have had serious problems living up to the imposed pressure of equaling such an achievement. Blindness doesn't even come close to the shadow of greatness City of God basks in, which to me, shows complacency and a lack of utilizing the same potential. Possibly the source material is to blame in Meirelles favour, only time will tell when we see the work from his next conjecture.

    So Fernando Meirelles, a film about Blindness...I don't see a point, thats for sure.
  • August 22, 2009
    I really hope civilization wouldn't fall apart if we all went temporarily blind - I mean give blind people some credit, movie.
  • July 26, 2009
    For a dystopian "end of society" flick, there are far better entries. The movie quickly isolates itself to a small quarantine area (probably for budget reasons) of those afflicted with the "blindness". Within the quarantine, the social order quickly breaks down when it becomes ov...( read more)ercrowded and chaos ensues with one faction of men controlling food and threatening the other residents.

    The film does okay at communicating the blind affliction, but there are many flaws in what the people can and can't do (for example, one would still be able to wipe their own ass but a main character says that he can't).

    Just a very lukewarm film, and if it weren't for the great scenes that take place after the quarantine camp, I would give it 2 and 1/2.
  • July 22, 2009
    Julianne Moore stars as the only woman who can see, when everyone else in the city, including her husband are struck with a sudden blindness epidemic and are forced into quarantine.
    I found this film to be particularly hard to sit through. I kept looking for excuses to get up, b...( read more)ut I eventually got through it all. It was long, it seemed to drag on without ever really getting anywhere and I found the rape and abuse scenes difficult to take. I also didn't care for the way the film was shot, in flashes. I know that they were trying to get us to see what they saw, but it just seemed pointless after the first time.
    This story has been done a thousand times before, Dawn Of The Dead, Outbreak, 28 Days Later... The story it self was lacking. They never really explained anything about why or how this was happening. I was disappointed with the acting as well, from this cast of well known actors.
    Blindness in one word...excruciating. At least those who suffered this horrible fate would be spared the pain of having to actually see this film.
  • July 19, 2009
    For a film listed with a playing time of 1 hr. 58 min., Blindness seemed to play on endlessly. This film was supposedly a parable and the parable was lost in the acting and bad direction. Not even Moore, Glover and Ruffalo could save this film from itself. Overuse of a white m...( read more)ilky screen to represent the infection suffered by the characters became annoying. Blindness plays like a bad B film.
  • December 10, 2009
    I cannot decide if I enjoyed it, or if I was just bored at the time. the ending was a bit disappointing.
  • December 8, 2009
    Rubbish film, I somehow watched it from start to finish.

    Avoid this one.
  • December 8, 2009
    I love the concept, I am a huge fan of Day Of The Triffids. However, Blindness is a wasted opportunity. I hated the camera filters. Watching human stripped naked of their morals and relying on human instict never got dirty enough for me. And the ending? One of the worst endings i...( read more)n movie history. The writer should have spared me the moral of the story and wrote a proper damn ending.
  • November 30, 2009
    So boring and pointless your left with so many unanswered questions: why did they go blind? what caused them to go blind? how did they suddenly get there sight back? and how on earth is julianne moore the only one who can see?

    Crap storyline that just leaves you frustrated, ir...( read more)rated and wanting something dramatic or exciting to happen!
    This movie has nothing apart from some really good actors that make you wonder why on earth they did this movie!?

    Everyone seems to be affected by this blindness where they only see white but only one person can see thats julianne moore then ttowards the boirng and never ending movie everyone gets there sight back! boring!

    It has black moments where you see nothing and white moments where you see nothing i guess trying to give the effect of blindness but to be honest its just irratating even more!

    Really not worth the watch!
  • November 30, 2009
    50 minutes left of this film and i'm loathing every minute of it! To be fair, i started to hate this film 10 minutes in! Its extremely slow, unengaging and pointless springs to mind! The performances were ok, nothing exactly special when you can't see past the blandness of this f...( read more)ilm!

Opening This Week

Top Box Office

Upcoming Movies

New on DVD