Jonathan Pryce, Robert De Niro, Katherine Helmond, Ian Holm, Bob Hoskins ...( see more  see more... ) , Michael Palin , Ian Richardson , Peter Vaughan , Kim Greist , Jim Broadbent , Barbara Hicks , Charles McKeown , Derrick O'Connor

Terry Gilliam's 1985 film is a surrealist nightmare of a low-level bureaucrat in a dismal world of the near future.

Flixster Users

90% liked it

77,979 ratings

Critics

98% liked it

40 critics

R, 2 hr. 22 min.

Directed by: Terry Gilliam

Release Date: February 20, 1985

Invite friends to see

DVD Release Date: March 31, 1998

Stats: 7,209 reviews

Your Rating



clear rating

Flixster Reviews (7,209)


  • January 6, 2010
    ''Yes... No... I don't know. I don't know what I want.''

    A bureaucrat in a retro-future world tries to correct an administrative error and himself becomes an enemy of the state.

    Jonathan Pryce: Sam Lowry

    One of the truest statements about originality in art com...( read more)es from T.S. Eliot: "Immature poets imitate; mature poets steal." Terry Gilliam is one of cinema's mature poets. His Brazil features homages to numerous other films, ranging from Modern Times to The Empire Strikes Back, and its plot is broadly similar to Nineteen Eighty-Four. Yet the result is intriguingly fresh, creative and visionary.


    It's the type of sci-fi film with an almost childlike fascination using strange sights and happenings. Rarely has a film so pessimistic been this much fun. Many sci-fi films since Brazil have attempted a similar approach, usually with little success. The chief problem with most such films (e.g. "The Fifth Element") is that they get bogged down in plot at the expense of emotional resonance. "Brazil" avoids this fate: while the movie possesses psychological and thematic complexity, its plot is fairly simple, and the humor, quirky as it is, never relies on throwaway gags. Even the oddest moments have a certain poignancy.

    The story seems to take place in a fascist alternative world. It isn't the future exactly. The technology is weird-looking but hardly superior to anything in our world. Money transactions are sent through pipes similar to the ones they use at retail places. (One of the film's several nods to silent movies occurs after a character tries to stuff one of these pipes with wads of paper.) The pop culture references are positively retro; from the title song to scenes from the film Casablanca.

    The evil of the government in this film is driven not so much by cruelty but also by bureaucratic incompetence; much of which is utilized for laughs. But some of the scenes look eerie today; in our post-9/11 world, and are great fare for conspiracy theorists. Pay particular attention to the scene where the official boasts that the government is winning its war against the terrorists. The movie is ambiguous as to whether there are any real terrorists, and we have a sneaking suspicion that the explosions are caused by the government itself. The plot is set in motion by a typographical error leading an innocent man to be arrested instead of a suspected terrorist. The movie is not about this man but about a meek government worker, Sam Lowry (Jonathan Pryce), whom is observing from the sidelines.
    Robert De Niro has a cameo as the wanted terrorist whose crime, from what we see, consists of doing home repairs without the necessary paperwork.

    I have noticed that most of the classic dystopian tales are fundamentally similar to one another in terms of style and story. Yet Brazil approaches the genre in a uniquely psychological way. Sam Lowry is different from the standard protagonist whom rebels against the government due to noble intentions. He doesn't seem to have any larger goals than his own personal ones. He isn't trying to make the world a better place. He's only longing for a better life for himself; one more exciting and romantic than the humdrum existence he currently occupies, where he's beset by an overbearing mother, a pitiful boss, and a dull job. In the midst of this bureaucratic nightmare state, he cares only about such matters as getting his air conditioning fixed and stalking a female stranger who physically resembles his fantasy woman--or so he perceives. The woman, as played by Kim Greist, appears in his fantasies as a helpless damsel with long, flowing hair and a silky dress who sits in a cage while he battles a giant Samurai warrior. The real-life woman he pursues, also played by Greist, sports a butch haircut, drives a large truck, and has a cigarette dangling from the corner of her mouth.

    It's a testament to Pryce's performance that he commands our total sympathy the whole time. We feel for him and go along with the romantic adventure he attempts to create for himself. His nervous, stammering personality is one that would have been easy to overdo, yet Pryce strikes just the right note, especially as we begin questioning the character's sanity. At one point, another character tells him that "You're paranoid; you've got no sense of reality." But who wouldn't be paranoid in such a setting? The scene brings to mind the old joke that goes "You're not paranoid. Everyone really is out to get you." The movie inhabits such a whacky, surreal world full of strange people and sights that Sam Lowry almost seems sensible by comparison. Creating a character like this was a fresh, innovative twist on a genre that normally loses sight of its own humanity.
  • December 2, 2009
    Brazil is one of my favourite movies of all time. Going into the top ten, because I see it as a si-fi. Its a Sci-Fi with credibility and honesty. Pure British and then Rober De Niro (what the frak? But god damn it works) . I'll be waiting for the big budget re-release.
  • August 27, 2009
    One of the greatest films ever made in my opinion and definitely Gilliam's best work.
  • April 27, 2009
    It's my personal opinion that Terry Gilliam is the worst filmmaker ever, in the history of time. A bold statement. And yes, I think he's worse than Uwe Boll, who's terrible but at least can admit to it; and yes, I think he's worse than Michael Bay, who's a terrible douchebag an...( read more)d host of countless shitty movies but at least knows how to make things go "boom". Terry Gilliam has no redeeming qualities. Everything he touches turns to shit. He can't make a single scene in any of his movies remotely visually appealing or enjoyable to watch - not only that, but he's a self-proclaimed, arrogant, conceited douche who really does think he's amazingly wonderful (as evidenced on the Tideland DVD, where he filmed himself before the movie started saying that many of us wouldn't like the film, but those of us with INTELLIGENCE will probably love it....he was saying all this BEFORE any of us had seen the film itself!!!). I hate him. I loathe him. All of his movies are so weird, so bizarre, so unrelentingly depressing and annoying and infuriating and so aesthetically ugly and unpleasant that no enjoyment or entertainment can be derived from any of them. Hell, he even managed to ruin Monty Python with his insipid animations and that long 20 minute sketch about the old man pirates in Meaning of Life, which went on for so long without any point or punchline I actually stopped watching the movie as soon as the sketch was done.

    Wow. That's a lot of bitching, and without having even yet mentioned the film I'm reviewing. But there's not a frame of this film that went by where I wasn't reminded by Terry Gilliam of how great Terry Gilliam is. He shoots everything with wide angle lenses, distorting the shots. He never uses deep focus, so usually everything in the frame is seen vividly, which isn't easy on the eyes. His camera usually moves in unpleasantly for closeups, then shakily draws back, then goes back in again, over and over. Simply put - he's never once filmed anything I thought was impressive or halfway decent (the overall movie of 12 Monkeys was pretty good, admittedly, but even then that was because the acting and screenplay were so strong they almost overpowered Gilliam's shitty directing...as hard as he tried). This visual approach is used throughout Brazil, which I believe was his breakout film. A sad indicator of things to come.

    Let it be said that the movie is rife with ideas. An endless amount of ideas, really. Brazil is a science fiction epic, set in a futuristic London I believe (no idea where the title of the movie came from). But all of these ideas are completely without a unifying purpose, or theme, or need, or point. They're just ideas for the sake of being ideas. Stuff like the satirical attacks on cosmetic surgery and the powerful police state are all pointed and interesting, sure, but what's the context? Why have them in there? Because Gilliam thought they were funny, I guess, or because he figured he was being much more clever than he really is. In the whole agonizingly long 2.5 hours of this movie, I probably only enjoyed myself for about 5 minutes (there is one clever segment, where Gilliam pays homage to the Odessa Steps sequence of Battleship Potemkin....but even then, Brian De Palma did it better in The Untouchables).

    I don't want to talk about the story, because I could hardly follow it. I don't want to talk anymore about the technical stuff, because Gilliam so desperately ruined almost all of it for me (even though I must admit the set design is incredible). I really don't want to mention the acting, especially considering that Robert fucking De Niro is even in the movie, for about 6 minutes. What I want to mention is this - why? Why tell this story, this way? This large amount of sci-fi ideas, and indeed many of them are with merit and interest, deserved a filmmaker with conviction, someone who would attempt to make a great film using a story, characters, and dialogue that is worth watching - not just endlessly unfunny characters acting so completely "British" and flipping a big middle finger in the face of logic or reason. You can say it all "means something", or that it's all "metaphorically significant", but to me, when I watch a movie, I want to either be educated or entertained, and this film did neither.

    So that's my rant on Brazil, I guess. I'm frustrated. I'm frustrated that I wasted so many hours of my life watching this shit. I'm frustrated that Terry Gilliam still gets work, even after destroying everything he touches from Brazil to Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas to the aforementioned, so-bad-I-couldn't-even-finish-it Tideland. I'm frustrated how popular this movie was and is, how most critics loved it, and how people still seem to think it's some sort of landmark in science fiction. But it isn't. There isn't a single solitary idea or theme (well, except maybe the obsessive attention to duct work) that hadn't already been done, far better, in movies like Blade Runner, A Clockwork Orange, and Metropolis. The story rambles on forever, the plot is damn near incomprehensible, every scene is littered with so many annoyances, contrivances, and arrogant waving-of-the-arms by Gilliam that it gave me a headache. And then after putting us through all this, the ending decides to throw everything concievable even in this sci-fi world out the window by giving us guys being eaten by garbage and escapes through coffins (I know the very last scene explains all this, but it's so pointlessly pessimistic that I just choose to ignore it). I have given a name to my pain, Bob, and it is Terry Gilliam.

    Final Note: This is also the first time I've ever actually had to stop a movie, go to the DVD Chapters menu, and see how many chapters were left before continuing my agony and finishing the film. If there had been more than a couple chapters left, I probably would've given up.
  • April 11, 2009
    Terry Gilliam has always been a unique director - a man with a vision determined to let nothing get in the way of his quest to make movies the way he wants to. 'Brazil' is his greatest achievement (though many of his other films come close) and brings a breathtaking Orwellian fut...( read more)ure society to life on the screen. Featuring a fantastically creepy performance from Mr Nice-Guy Mr. Michael Palin and a memorable somewhat low-key performance from Robert DeNiro 'Brazil' is not to be missed. Recut by the studios in a shocking attempt at making the film more upbeat, this feels HAS to be seen in this, the original version. Over twenty years old but as fresh and original as the day it was released...
  • February 7, 2010
    These kinda film has it all. Most profound entertainment. Thank you Terry Gilliam.
  • February 3, 2010
    Something between 1984 and Kafka...
  • February 1, 2010
    Magical Terry Gilliam.
  • January 31, 2010
    A mark of a great sci-fi or any other films in any genre is a great creation of its own universe, and although confined in the screens, would not resist and grab the audience and let him/ her explore it himself, that's what "Brazil" is. "Brazil is a moody film, sometimes showing ...( read more)uncommon beauty, but more frequently a sardonic nightmare. All the themes and deep explanations regarding the film are endless and can only be caught after several more viewings, but as a film-goer wanting to give the film a first try, just watch it for what it is, and enjoy the ride. Yes, apart from it being a heavily surrealist film, it is an entertaining one, containing en exhilirating performance by Jonathan Pryce, whose knack for physical comedy was just amazing. Terry Gilliam has since left his good old Monty Python days, but little subtle sketches can still be seen here, which added to the delight of viewing it. "Brazil" can evoke different feelings from the viewer, whether it is awe, disgust, amazement, or shock, only one thing can be left engraved to the mind: That this is a great film by any means. If one would want to see Terry Gilliam at his freshest and most unique, this is it, his best film in his career.
  • January 31, 2010
    While I don't think it's my favorite Terry Gilliam film, it is undoubtedly a work of art. I think my favorite aspect was the dream sequences, they just looked incredible. The idea is really interesting and extremely cynical, it's very similar to the outlook in 12 Monkeys. The ton...( read more)e of the film fits in nicely with the cast and their oddball performances.

Critic Reviews


January 1, 2000
Roger Ebert, Chicago Sun-Times

Very hard to follow. full review

View more Brazil reviews at RottenTomatoes.com

Comments


This board looks lonely. Be the first to talk about "Brazil" !

Critic ratings and reviews powered by RottenTomatoes.com

Fresh (60% or more critics rated the movie positively)

Rotten (59% or fewer critics rated the movie positively)

Official Trailer

More Like This


Click a thumb to vote on that suggestion, or add your own suggestions.

  • Monty Python and the Holy Grail
    Monty Python and the Holy Grail (52%)
  • The Matrix
    The Matrix (57%)
  • Being John Malkovich
    Being John Malkovich (66%)
  • Monty Python's The Meaning of Life
    Monty Python's The Meaning of Life (64%)

Facts


No facts approved yet. Be the first

Brazil : Watch Free on TV


Brazil Trivia


  • In what country does the movie Touristas take place?  Answer »
  • "The city of god" is set in which country?  Answer »
  • Which member of the comedic Monty Python troupe directed films such as Brazil, The Fisher King, and The Brothers Grimm  Answer »
  • Which South American country do the young americans visit in the horror movie "Turistas"?  Answer »

Recent News


No recent headlines. Got one?

Most Popular Skin