Jonathan Pryce, Robert De Niro, Katherine Helmond

Terry Gilliam's 1985 film is a surrealist nightmare of a low-level bureaucrat in a dismal world of the near future.

Flixster Users

90% liked it

73,011 ratings

Critics

98% liked it

40 critics

R, 2 hrs. 22 min.

Directed by: Terry Gilliam

Release Date: February 20, 1985

Invite friends to see

DVD Release Date: March 31, 1998

Stats: 7,093 reviews

Get movie widget Recommend it Add to Favorites

Your Rating



clear rating

Flixster Reviews (7,093)


  • August 27, 2009
    One of the greatest films ever made in my opinion and definitely Gilliam's best work.
  • April 27, 2009
    It's my personal opinion that Terry Gilliam is the worst filmmaker ever, in the history of time. A bold statement. And yes, I think he's worse than Uwe Boll, who's terrible but at least can admit to it; and yes, I think he's worse than Michael Bay, who's a terrible douchebag an...( read more)d host of countless shitty movies but at least knows how to make things go "boom". Terry Gilliam has no redeeming qualities. Everything he touches turns to shit. He can't make a single scene in any of his movies remotely visually appealing or enjoyable to watch - not only that, but he's a self-proclaimed, arrogant, conceited douche who really does think he's amazingly wonderful (as evidenced on the Tideland DVD, where he filmed himself before the movie started saying that many of us wouldn't like the film, but those of us with INTELLIGENCE will probably love it....he was saying all this BEFORE any of us had seen the film itself!!!). I hate him. I loathe him. All of his movies are so weird, so bizarre, so unrelentingly depressing and annoying and infuriating and so aesthetically ugly and unpleasant that no enjoyment or entertainment can be derived from any of them. Hell, he even managed to ruin Monty Python with his insipid animations and that long 20 minute sketch about the old man pirates in Meaning of Life, which went on for so long without any point or punchline I actually stopped watching the movie as soon as the sketch was done.

    Wow. That's a lot of bitching, and without having even yet mentioned the film I'm reviewing. But there's not a frame of this film that went by where I wasn't reminded by Terry Gilliam of how great Terry Gilliam is. He shoots everything with wide angle lenses, distorting the shots. He never uses deep focus, so usually everything in the frame is seen vividly, which isn't easy on the eyes. His camera usually moves in unpleasantly for closeups, then shakily draws back, then goes back in again, over and over. Simply put - he's never once filmed anything I thought was impressive or halfway decent (the overall movie of 12 Monkeys was pretty good, admittedly, but even then that was because the acting and screenplay were so strong they almost overpowered Gilliam's shitty directing...as hard as he tried). This visual approach is used throughout Brazil, which I believe was his breakout film. A sad indicator of things to come.

    Let it be said that the movie is rife with ideas. An endless amount of ideas, really. Brazil is a science fiction epic, set in a futuristic London I believe (no idea where the title of the movie came from). But all of these ideas are completely without a unifying purpose, or theme, or need, or point. They're just ideas for the sake of being ideas. Stuff like the satirical attacks on cosmetic surgery and the powerful police state are all pointed and interesting, sure, but what's the context? Why have them in there? Because Gilliam thought they were funny, I guess, or because he figured he was being much more clever than he really is. In the whole agonizingly long 2.5 hours of this movie, I probably only enjoyed myself for about 5 minutes (there is one clever segment, where Gilliam pays homage to the Odessa Steps sequence of Battleship Potemkin....but even then, Brian De Palma did it better in The Untouchables).

    I don't want to talk about the story, because I could hardly follow it. I don't want to talk anymore about the technical stuff, because Gilliam so desperately ruined almost all of it for me (even though I must admit the set design is incredible). I really don't want to mention the acting, especially considering that Robert fucking De Niro is even in the movie, for about 6 minutes. What I want to mention is this - why? Why tell this story, this way? This large amount of sci-fi ideas, and indeed many of them are with merit and interest, deserved a filmmaker with conviction, someone who would attempt to make a great film using a story, characters, and dialogue that is worth watching - not just endlessly unfunny characters acting so completely "British" and flipping a big middle finger in the face of logic or reason. You can say it all "means something", or that it's all "metaphorically significant", but to me, when I watch a movie, I want to either be educated or entertained, and this film did neither.

    So that's my rant on Brazil, I guess. I'm frustrated. I'm frustrated that I wasted so many hours of my life watching this shit. I'm frustrated that Terry Gilliam still gets work, even after destroying everything he touches from Brazil to Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas to the aforementioned, so-bad-I-couldn't-even-finish-it Tideland. I'm frustrated how popular this movie was and is, how most critics loved it, and how people still seem to think it's some sort of landmark in science fiction. But it isn't. There isn't a single solitary idea or theme (well, except maybe the obsessive attention to duct work) that hadn't already been done, far better, in movies like Blade Runner, A Clockwork Orange, and Metropolis. The story rambles on forever, the plot is damn near incomprehensible, every scene is littered with so many annoyances, contrivances, and arrogant waving-of-the-arms by Gilliam that it gave me a headache. And then after putting us through all this, the ending decides to throw everything concievable even in this sci-fi world out the window by giving us guys being eaten by garbage and escapes through coffins (I know the very last scene explains all this, but it's so pointlessly pessimistic that I just choose to ignore it). I have given a name to my pain, Bob, and it is Terry Gilliam.

    Final Note: This is also the first time I've ever actually had to stop a movie, go to the DVD Chapters menu, and see how many chapters were left before continuing my agony and finishing the film. If there had been more than a couple chapters left, I probably would've given up.
  • April 11, 2009
    Terry Gilliam has always been a unique director - a man with a vision determined to let nothing get in the way of his quest to make movies the way he wants to. 'Brazil' is his greatest achievement (though many of his other films come close) and brings a breathtaking Orwellian fut...( read more)ure society to life on the screen. Featuring a fantastically creepy performance from Mr Nice-Guy Mr. Michael Palin and a memorable somewhat low-key performance from Robert DeNiro 'Brazil' is not to be missed. Recut by the studios in a shocking attempt at making the film more upbeat, this feels HAS to be seen in this, the original version. Over twenty years old but as fresh and original as the day it was released...
  • April 11, 2009
    Photobucket




    The film centers on Sam Lowry (Jonathan Pryce), a young ...( read more)man trying to find a woman who appears in his dreams while he is working in a mind-numbing job and living a life in a small apartment, set in a dystopian world in which there is an over-reliance on poorly maintained (and rather whimsical) machines.

    Review coming soon...
  • March 14, 2009
    Although the uncut version of the film was justly praised, it was the awful "Love Conquers All" version that dominated U.S. screenings. When the film flopped in the U.S., it was its' critical success abroad that brought American critics to the uncut version. In the years since ...( read more)this post-production interference, Brazil has become a cult film, in no small part due to the reputation Gilliam developed as the lone iconoclast who stood up against Hollywood compromise.

    That being said, this futuristic vision is a movie now considered a 20th century masterpiece of the imagination, on par with Fritz Lang's Metropolis. Brazil is a "love it or hate it" experience, but whatever your opinion, one can't argue that it's a unique film from an imaginative director. Gilliam's original vision was to extend a view of the future as seen from the past. Just like all of those "Popular Science" magazines in the 40s and 50s which pictured the world we would someday live in coupled with beauracracy. Surely one of the most original films ever made, Terry Gilliam's Brazil remains his most influential work. It's not only a collection of marvelous images, it's a thinking person's movie that has things to say about individualilty.
    Photobucket
  • November 20, 2009
    Brazil?... the movie that I saw had a post-apocolyptic feel with random scattered scenarios, a directionless plot, and circular writing. DeNiro played a two minute part in 142 min movie (mistake... You dont bench your strongest players Gilliam!) that revolved around a guy named S...( read more)am who couldn't get a grip... I am talking about the same movie right?...... This movie was a waste of my time and an embarrassment to a bureaucratic paradox. One long and painful movie to watch... I'll usually add some highlights to my reviews but I am at a loss for words.
  • November 16, 2009
    Best Cinematography 1985 - Best Directing 1985 - Best Editing 1985
  • November 9, 2009
    Review coming someday...

    98/100
  • November 5, 2009
    What an awesome movie!
  • November 2, 2009
    weird, but different

Critic Reviews


January 1, 2000
Roger Ebert, Chicago Sun-Times

Very hard to follow. full review

View more Brazil reviews at RottenTomatoes.com

Comments


This board looks lonely. Be the first to talk about "Brazil" !

Critic ratings and reviews powered by RottenTomatoes.com

Fresh (60% or more critics rated the movie positively)

Rotten (59% or fewer critics rated the movie positively)

Official Trailer

More Like This


Click a thumb to vote on that suggestion, or add your own suggestions.

  • Monty Python and the Holy Grail
    Monty Python and the Holy Grail (52%)
  • Monty Python's Life of Brian
    Monty Python's Life of Brian (54%)
  • Being John Malkovich
    Being John Malkovich (66%)
  • Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets
    Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets (0%)

Facts


No facts approved yet. Be the first

Brazil : Watch Free on TV


Brazil Trivia


  • In what country does the movie Touristas take place?  Answer »
  • "The city of god" is set in which country?  Answer »
  • Which member of the comedic Monty Python troupe directed films such as Brazil, The Fisher King, and The Brothers Grimm  Answer »
  • Which South American country do the young americans visit in the horror movie "Turistas"?  Answer »

Recent News


No recent headlines. Got one?

Most Popular Skin