[center][img]http://img157.imageshack.us/img157/6408/photo174zn.jpg[/img][/center]
[font=Arial][color=darkred]Confessions of a Dangerous Mind (2002) - The premise is undeniably amusing: game show host and creator Chuck Barris (Sam Rockwell) in between escorting [i]Dating… More
[center][img]http://img157.imageshack.us/img157/6408/photo174zn.jpg[/img][/center]
[font=Arial][color=darkred]Confessions of a Dangerous Mind (2002) - The premise is undeniably amusing: game show host and creator Chuck Barris (Sam Rockwell) in between escorting [i]Dating Game[/i] couples and introducing [i]Gong Show[/i] losers, was a hired killer for the CIA. The directorial debut by George Clooney is a technical marvel. Clooney is highly inventive with scene changes, camera angles, lighting, editing, color palettes ... I don’t know whether to champion him or credit his excellent cinematographer, but hat’s off to whomever designed the look of this movie. Rockwell is great and carries the film well, though I think he lacks the proper ability for self-loathing that the character needs. Drew Barrymore and Julia Roberts have small parts as the women in Barris’ life. I normally hate each actress but they come across as palatable, so that is another achievement. The brilliant weirdness of the story is tempered by famed scribe Charlie Kaufman’s astute sense of the intricately bizarre. Kaufman is a master of the offbeat, but he does more with his story structures and the ability to keep surprising than any other screenwriter. [i]Confessions of a Dangerous Mind[/i] is a cheeky diversion into the “unauthorized autobiography” written by Barris himself. The movie itself is one big joke and Clooney tells it like a pro.[/color][/font]
[font=Arial][color=darkred]Nate's Grade:B+[/color][/font]
[font=Arial][color=darkred]Better Luck Tomorrow (2003) - This film shows a fascinating side to the underbelly to suburban malaise. The story centers on a group of Asian American friends that are social delinquents and petty criminals that can get away with it because they’re star students. It’s an interesting dichotomy in Justin Lin’s directorial debut. The cast is strong and the pacing is brisk. The opening 5 minutes yanks you into this world and places you in the hands of a confidant voice. Familiar elements abound like unrequited love, jealousy, crashing lows, but [i]Better Luck Tomorrow [/i]gives them a mildly fresh spin. The film’s familiar territory gets the better of it in a languid final act, but the ride is still an enjoyable and entertaining one at that.[/color][/font]
[font=Arial][color=darkred]Nate's Grade: B[/color][/font]
[font=Arial][color=darkred]Bulletproof Monk (2003) - This is one of the dumbest movies you will ever see. I don’t mean to sound overly sensational or alarmist, but this is the honest truth if you sit and watch all of [i]Bulletproof Monk[/i]. Item #1: The bad guys in the film are –get this– the grandchildren of Nazis. Yes, that’s right, Nazis. We had to have Nazis as the bad guys. There’s actually a scene where a blonde-haired blue-eyed grand daughter wheels her decrepit Nazi grandpa around. Oh yeah, and one of the Nazis runs the –get this– Museum of tolerance. Oh stop it, you’re killing me. Item #2: The titular monk (Chow-Yun Fat, pray for him) recruits pick-pocket Kar (Seann William Scott) to be his apprentice. Kar is an idiot. The Monk doesn’t help. His big mystery is –get this– why hot dogs and hot dog buns come in different numbers? Man, haven’t heard that one since the third grade. I could swear the screenwriters of this are third graders. That would heartily explain why a character is called “Mr. Funktastic.” Item 3#: The monk teaches in stupid opposite talk (“You cannot be free until you have been taken. You cannot be cold until you are hot. You cannot die until you have lived,” you try some). One of the monk’s lessons is that the laws of physics, mind you the LAWS of physics, can be bent just by putting your mind to it. He says gravity can be overcome if you just don’t believe in it. This is insane. At least in [i]The Matrix [/i]it had some plausibility. Item #4: The movie is a complete rip-off of [i]The Matrix[/i]. I’m not just talking style, no, I’m talking everything. There is a scene where the monk and Kar run through a street and building, defying gravity, being chased by men in suits and sunglasses, and they get to a roof where they must combat a helicopter. What movie does this sound like, hmmm? Item #5: The visual effects are done by –get this– Burt Ward’s effects house. Yes, that’s right, the guy who played Robin on the campy 60s [i]Batman [/i]show has an effects company. And they did the horrible work on [i]Bulletproof Monk[/i]. This movie is so terrible at every level of filmmaking that it becomes hilarious to watch, in the same vein as 2001’s stinker [i]Dungeons and Dragons[/i]. I defy anyone to find merit in any of it. Sometimes you have to wonder what Hollywood was thinking.[/color][/font]
[font=Arial][color=darkred]Nate's Grade: F[/color][/font]