Cache (Hidden) Reviews and Ratings



  • June 3, 2008
    A psychological suspense drama of the utmost rigor and originality.
    Whether viewed as a political allegory or a domestic drama, this is the most accessible film yet from one of Europe?s very finest filmmakers.
  • June 3, 2008
    The worst of all possible scenarios is when a director sets out to intentionally and patronizingly bore the audience and succeeds. There is no story here, the plot incomplete. It takes a stab at trying to implicate 'bourgeoise' life in ... in what, I'm not sure.

    This film is not...( read more) strong enough in character(s) to be a personal story--man against himself. Troubled pasts are not a class exclusive. There was no one and nothing to care about, fear, or empathize with in this film. None of which is absolutely necessary but it might have been sufficient.
  • June 2, 2008
    Cryptic, twisted and violent, both psychological and physically. To fully understand it you must decrypt some scenes.
  • May 27, 2008
    A nice little film that goes places you never thought it'd go. A simple story told in a very interesting way, which leads the view to no particular conclusion. I love that the director doesn't want to sum up the film and give you nothing to think about or talk about once the stor...( read more)y concludes. A masterful work made by a filmmaker with integrity.
  • May 26, 2008
    The one word I can think of to describe this movie: taut. It keeps you curious throughout the whole 2 hours and, because it doesn't have a distinct resolution (although it is implied), it will keep you curious for long afterwards. Cache also has one of the most unexpected, sho...( read more)cking scenes that I have ever watched in a movie. A fantastic film.
  • May 22, 2008
    how old is this flick like 1976
  • May 17, 2008
    Another perfect film from the almost always reliable Haneke.
  • April 28, 2008
    This movie is really something else...it's amazing how there is no need for special effects of any kind...and how repeating certain things can really get under your skin. The actors are amazing in here, regardless of how well known they are/aren't.

    But really...and the certain e...( read more)vents in here are SO IN-YOUR-FACE....and you wonder what the hell happened....jump back and then tune in anticipation wondering if that was just now...what's going to happen next.

    It seriously scared me, intensely. Just wow.

    The sad thing was...when it ended...it stopped making sense...and I didn't get it. Maybe it's something that needs to be watched again and again to get it...but overall the atmosphere was just phenomenal to really make you think.

    More review...later.
  • April 5, 2008
    Excoriating, brutal, intense, unrelentingly harsh and cynical, and I love every second of it. Haneke is an epic genius.
  • March 23, 2008
    I found this movie really easy to watch and very interesting. A few scenes were scary in a clever kind of way for example the glimpse of the child with blood on his face and then the scene with the rooster. The only thing negative about this film for me was i thought i understood...( read more) the movie but the final scene with the son on the steps outside the school confused me and now i am wondering if i got the movie at all.
  • March 19, 2008
    POINTELESS

    BORING...
    wasting time....totally
  • March 9, 2008
    Negative half a star for the lack of a conclusion. It was an excellent movie through and through though. Excellent acting, a well thought out plot, and it of all things seemed spooky in theory and execution. I'm so glad they didn't turn it into a cheap horror film, but I guess th...( read more)at's the magic of Haneke. I recommend this, albeit it that it leaves a lot up to your imagination through the entirety of the movie.
  • February 26, 2008
    My second favourite french film of the last few years. It's not for everyone, you either love it or hate it. But if you love it you REALLY love it.
  • February 18, 2008
    Effective head-scratcher. Don't watch if you don't like clear-cut resolutions. A very deliberate, suspenseful movie with a creepy premise involving mysterious tapes of a couple's house, and then get more creepy from there. At turns frustrating, thought-provoking, and shocking,...( read more) it's a well-done movie. Watching the interview with the director will help give you more context of the film if it leaves you a little confused as it did me.
  • February 6, 2008
    A very subtle and yet disturbing film. Haneke does a great job in creating suspense in what could be (potentially) a plausible situation--not an everyday situation, but one that everyone can relate to.
  • February 1, 2008
    confusing and brilliant at the same time
  • February 1, 2008
    Yok, this film is disgusting full of self righteousness and pointing fingers. The actors are pathetic and the camera work boring.
  • January 26, 2008
    To describe Caché is almost as difficult as watching and understanding the film itself. But the first thing to keep in mind is that Michael Haneke isn't exacly an entertainer. I knew that since La Pianiste, one of the most painfully depressing films I've seen to dat...( read more)e, but perhaps most didn't. That must be the reason why so many people (who probably only watched it because of all the 'buzz' around it, of all the awards in Cannes) didn't quite get the brilliance of this film. That's why most of the comments I saw here, or the 3 star rating for that matter, doesn't surprise me at all. Those same people's only motivation watching it was to find out the 'whodunnit', who was the stalker, when the whole point of the film wasn't about the tapes! Of course Haneke creates that illusion, the illusion that the voyeur is the villain, the one terrorizing the couple. Is filming the outside of a house terror? Or did Georges Laurent saw in those tapes what he wanted to? What his repressed and hidden guilt told him to? Basically what Haneke does is to play with our minds, only giving us what he wants to. He is a master of mental manipulation...

    Photobucket

    So, Caché isn't something pre-programmed. It's what we see in it. Some saw a psychological thriller that desappointed them at the end, I saw a social critique, a uniquely/brilliantly shot, written and acted piece of cinema about guilt, paranoia, alienation, and about the impossibility of hidding from our past doings and our conscience. A film way ahead of its time!
  • January 18, 2008
    Pretty good french film. The plot was very interesting, but I was still a little confused at the end. I would definately watch this again, maybe I'll understand it the second time through.
  • January 14, 2008
    i really like michael haneke's work. he always tries to bring the most painful emotions to the light of day and he explores the human nature in a magnificent, dark and obscure way. caché has many hidden secrets and as a viewer, i think i will need to rewatch it to get a better op...( read more)inion of it. but, so far, although i can't understand everything that took place on my screen, i did like what i saw. great performances by all the cast!
  • January 5, 2008
    Michael Haneke's slow, creepy and tense thriller.
  • January 5, 2008
    eloquent and "geneous" on the theme and subject matter of the story. It never drowns in the deepest tomes of this story.
  • January 3, 2008
    Very creepy and slightly odd thriller about a couple who receive a video tape through the post of someone watching their house and them. Their investigations reveal secrets long hidden but the ending leaves many questions unanswered. Involving, but a slightly frustrating film. Da...( read more)niel Auteuil and Juliette Binoche are always watchable, but a little unsatisfactory.
  • January 3, 2008
    It was going great, ready to be an easy 4.5+ star film for me. But the sender of these tapes is never revealed, which really pissed me off. I guess it might be fun for some to guess who sent them, but what damn difference does it make if you can never find out who's right.
  • January 1, 2008
    bare dutty brap!...ending is well annoying though.....
  • December 31, 2007
    i wish this was easier to follow. i think the director, in his interview, was pretentious and a nob.
  • December 31, 2007
    Is it that hard for Haneke to actually go and make a solid statement about anything at all? I'm tired of all his gimmicks and tricks, i didn't loathe this as i did with The Piano Teacher and Funny Games, but like those two, i felt i wasted my time after the film ended. Go get a r...( read more)eal job Mr Haneke, you are as pretentious and as clueless as your euro-trash collegue Lars Von Trier.
  • December 22, 2007
    Michael Haneke is not your average director, and this is definitely not your average thriller. Whether that's a good thing or a bad thing is a matter of opinion, and from comments I've read on Flixster, opinions vary widely on this film. The plot concerns a French husband and wif...( read more)e, Georges (Daniel Auteuil) and Anna (Juliette Binoche), whose peaceful existence is disrupted when videotapes begin arriving at their door, indicating that their house is under surveillance. Subsequently, disturbing drawings start arriving as well, and the couple begins to feel they are being threatened, and that their family, which includes a young son, may be in danger. Eventually, Georges comes to the realization that he may know who is terrorizing his family, and that it may be connected to an incident from his youth. Since no crime has been committed, the police refuse to get involved, so Georges attempts to solve the problem himself, with shattering results. The film is an examination of the effects of guilt, and how painful truths are hidden from ourselves and others, so that we can carry on our everyday lives. Is the film successful? In my opinion, it isn't. But there are many who consider it brilliant, and see Haneke as some kind of cinematic genius. I think the long stationary camera shots that are used (overused?) to indicate we are seeing things from the viewpoint of the video camera, do nothing more than slow down an already slow pace, and emphasize the fact that we are watching a movie, thus preventing us from entering into Georges and Anna's world and caring what happens to them. Juliette Binoche has some good moments in the film, but otherwise the acting left me cold, as did the ambiguous ending. I've read that the ending needs to be watched very carefully for clues that reveal answers to mysteries left unsolved by the rest of the film. But, for me it was a struggle just to get to the ending in a semi-conscious state, and I have no plans to visit that state again.
  • December 18, 2007
    Brilliant and haunting. A slowly paced film that really pays off in the end. The performances are absolutely perfect from everyone involved.
  • December 14, 2007
    fantastic film from haneke
    just make sure you are paying attention!
  • December 13, 2007
    no, really, maybe i'm stupid or retarted or something but i just don't get it why it's so good
  • December 12, 2007
    "Caché" é bem mais do que um mero filme de suspense sobre espionagem residencial. Até porque esse tema já tinha sido incidentalmente tratado pelo estranho (e ótimo) "Lost Highway".

    Mais do que a tensão de sentir sua intimidade filmada, a família protagonista se sente ameaçada ...( read more)por algumas conseqüências originalmente não imaginadas.

    As fitas fazem com que os personagens reencontrem e reavaliem histórias antigas até então esquecidas ou evitadas.

    As gravações também causam desconforto ao mostrar os personagens ações que eles escondiam uns dos outros, afetando, assim, a estrutura da confiança familiar.

    A mais séria conseqüência da exposição desses cotidianos - e a maior qualidade do filme - é, no entanto, o embate que os personagens têm com suas próprias ações. Eles são confrontados com seus lados sombrios, causando desconfiança em si mesmos - e não só ao espectador - sobre caráter e integridade.
  • December 9, 2007
    An absolutely amazing film. It doesn't offer easy answere and it is somewhat slow paced. But I loved that about it. It breaks down the conventional "thriller" and offers something so fascinating. Haneke's direction is unconventional when compared to most Hollywood directors and i...( read more)t's terrific. He offers a view into the characters' world and mind that reaches far deeper than anything we usually see. Please Hollywood, don't remake this!
  • December 8, 2007
    Apparently, this is too deep and dark for me to understand and enjoy it.
  • November 25, 2007
    An interesting moral study on guilt.
    However, this movie has a very relaxed pace and would definitely not be for everyone (especially those with short attention spans).
  • November 16, 2007
    This movie is strange. has no ending and i'm still wondering who send those movies.
  • November 7, 2007
    This psychological thriller is a bit bland for my taste but the whole idea behind it makes you wonder about your own self.
  • October 28, 2007
    so many details to look.. did i miss something from this movie?? someone tell me, please.. this feels absurd.. maybe i should watch Haneke's other films..
  • October 27, 2007
    Riveting! This movie has an "In the Bedroom" flavour to it as far as its pace, so the scenes are subtle, yet significant and luring. I was glued to my seat for two hours, helplessly begging for answers.
  • October 14, 2007
    led to believe it was awesome. maybe i missed something.
  • October 13, 2007
    Seen the original in french becauuse it was given 5 stars by everyone. Didnt understand a lick of it and im not exactly a stupid person as somebody already said you will want your two hours back.Horrific viewing well worth avoiding, I only gave it half a star for the gorey bit wh...( read more)ich also made no sense
  • October 8, 2007
    Haneke has his own unique style.
  • October 3, 2007
    never heard of it in my life!

Summary


Cache (Hidden) Summary