Arnold Friedman, David Friedman, Elaine Friedman

The Friedmans are a seemingly typical, upper-middle-class Jewish family whose world is instantly transformed when the father and his youngest son are arrested and charged with shocking and horrible cr...( read more  read more... )imes. Caught up in hysteria and with their community in an uproar, the family undergoes a media onslaught. The film inquires not just into the life of a family but into a community, a legal system, and an era.

Flixster Users

87% liked it

7,335 ratings

Critics

97% liked it

143 critics

R, 1 hr. 47 min.

Directed by: Andrew Jarecki

Release Date: May 30, 2003

Invite friends to see

DVD Release Date: January 27, 2004

Stats: 507 reviews

Get movie widget Recommend it Add to Favorites

Your Rating



clear rating
Share on: Facebook Twitter

Flixster Reviews (507)


  • September 29, 2009
    Shocking documentary, filmed almost by mistake as Andrew Jarecki was doing a film about kids entertainers at the time. Don't watch alone as you will want someone to talk about it with straight after!
  • August 9, 2009
    Umm... I don't really quite know what to say. Interesting? Odd?
  • May 20, 2009
    It?s dvd cover describes this documentary as ?thought provoking?. Even the most open minded of people are probably thinking ?why?? this seems like an open and shut case.

    As the documentary unfolds, you realise just how complicated the case actually is, how the family appears ...( read more)to show biased support to the family members accused of these unthinkable crimes, how they filmed themselves continuously through years as a family ? (in fact supplying most of the footage on this documentary), how the evidence is challenged and what in fact is or isn't true in connection with the case.

    Questions pop into mind throughout the documentary, many are answered within the film, others have been answered in the very lengthly special features and of course there may be questions that will never be answered.
  • February 14, 2009
    First-time filmmaker Andrew Jarecki, who was a cofounder of Moviefone (yes, that Moviefone), set out to make a documentary about the best clown in New York City, David Friedman. Slowly, however, Jarecki's interests began to divert when David brought up his family's past with grea...( read more)t hesitance. Suddenly, the story once about a clown became a story about a family crumbling, the incompetence of the legal system, and the psychology of communities.

    In 1987, police officers busted down the door of the Friedman house in the wealthy area of Great Neck, New York, and charged Arnold Friedman, a computer teacher, of child molestation. Not only did Arnold have hidden stacks of adolescent pornography in the house, it had been said that Arnold and his son, Jesse, raped the children Arnold tought from home. One former student recalls a gruesome game of Leap Frog in which Arnold and Jesse would make children strip down so that they could penetrate each of them as they leaped from boy-to-boy. Anyone thinking critically will have problems with this story already. How did this information take so long to surface? There wasn't traces of blood on the clothing of the boys? How, exactly, do you viciously rape dozens of children in a classroom environment and send them home to unsuspecting parents?

    David, the clown, was an obsessive documentarian and recorded his family fall apart under the pressure and uncertainty of this legal battle. Arnold's wife, Elaine, is surprised by the revelation and doesn't dismiss it as quickly as the children do. Because of this, she's the outcast and the traitor of the family. We watch home videos of Elaine and the children screaming at each other, with Arnold mostly walking around looking miserable and guilty, and realize just how significant and unique this piece is.

    I love documentaries, but I will admit that this one made me uncomfortable at times. There's something about the scene where David reveals his video diary to the public that made me cringe. He starts the tape off by telling us that nobody but him is permitted to see this footage. He then goes on to weep and pour his heart out to what he anticipated as only an audience of one. That voyeurism will never be comfortable to watch, however this story is so fascinating that everytime we want to pull back we just get sucked further in.

    The reason that "Capturing the Friedmans" lingered with it's audiences to such an extent (there are stories of people not leaving the theater so that they could discuss the film) is that it's not conclusive. We'll never know what happened in the Friedman basement, and it's impossible to know just who to trust in the film. There's a scene near the end where Jesse and his lawyer give talking head segments that are completely contradictory. That's pretty much how the rest plays out. To every argument, there is an easy rebuttal. "Capturing the Friedmans" is challenging and frustrating, however it's such a fascinating story that it's impossible to overlook. NetFlix members can watch it on Instant View.
  • September 28, 2007
    Harrowing and thought provoking. Hard to review since I was left on the fence. A documentary about a possible child molester, that looks at both the family involved and the police/lawyers. Soooo well edited with old and new footage, and as honest as it can be, but still a gritty ...( read more)subject to digest. Personally, I hate the guy. See the DVD extras to make up your own mind. Heavy stuff.
  • November 12, 2009
    Best Documentary Feature 2003
  • September 20, 2009
    another strange one. a Mocumentary that was somewhat enticing. possibly too long. about family disfuctions in new york. quite an upper-middle-class New York style film. very jewish. very OK.
  • August 14, 2009
    Well done documentary that leaves you with as many questions as answers. I don't know how they were able to make this film without demonizing the principals. Home video footage makes the story.
  • May 28, 2009
    Shattering documentary of a family on a path to hell. innocent or guilty? The film makes it impossible to decide.
  • April 27, 2009
    Didn't finish. Didn't want to. I thought it was a little to sensationalized.

Critic Reviews


June 20, 2003
Moira MacDonald, Seattle Times

A fascinating meditation on truth-telling, and on the flickering nature of memory. full review

June 13, 2003
Ty Burr, Boston Globe

A devastating and tragic tale of one suburban family's meltdown as played out on the 6 o'clock news and in private home videos. full review

June 6, 2003
Roger Ebert, Chicago Sun-Times

Disturbing and haunting. full review

June 6, 2003
David Edelstein, Slate

In some respects, Jarecki just scratches the surface of the material, and the film is often coy and withholding. Yet it's also riveting and so suggestive that you can't consume it passively: You have ... full review

May 22, 2003
Peter Travers, Rolling Stone

This movie will pin you to your seat. full review

View more Capturing the Friedmans reviews at RottenTomatoes.com

Comments


This board looks lonely. Be the first to talk about "Capturing the Friedmans" !

Critic ratings and reviews powered by RottenTomatoes.com

Fresh (60% or more critics rated the movie positively)

Rotten (59% or fewer critics rated the movie positively)

Official Trailer

More Like This


Click a thumb to vote on that suggestion, or add your own suggestions.

  • Paradise Lost 2 - Revelations
    Paradise Lost 2 - Revelations (100%)
  • Dear Zachary: A Letter to a Son About His Father
    Dear Zachary: A Letter to a Son About His Fat... (100%)
  • Tarnation
    Tarnation (62%)
  • Deliver Us From Evil
    Deliver Us From Evil (83%)

Facts


No facts approved yet. Be the first

Capturing the Fri... : Watch Free on TV


Capturing the Friedmans Trivia


  • Which of these is NOT a moc-umentary?  Answer »

Movie Quizzes


No quizzes for Capturing the Friedmans. Want to create one?

Video Clips


No video clips yet. Want to upload one?

Recent News


No recent headlines. Got one?

Most Popular Skin


No skins yet. Interested in creating one?