Featured Audience Ratings

• Bruce B

  
  A very good movie about a women seeking revenge for the death of her husband when she see's the man responsible for his death and her daughters death back on the streets. A thriller and drama with many twist and turns. 4 stars 7-3-12If your a World War 2 film lover don't… More
  A very good movie about a women seeking revenge for the death of her husband when she see's the man responsible for his death and her daughters death back on the streets. A thriller and drama with many twist and turns. 4 stars 7-3-12If your a World War 2 film lover don't miss this one. A very good film showing the German side of the war and to my surprise James Coburn plays lead as a German enlisted man who gets the job done. A Clint Eastwood role for sure, Some very good actual film footage in this one. 4 stars. 7-7-12

• Chris W

  
  With this film, the legendary master of violent action Sam Peckinpah made his only (strict) war film. The story takes place along the Eastern Front of World War II in 1943, and follows a hardened, weary corporal (later sargeant) named Steiner who, besides battling Russian forces, gets… More
  With this film, the legendary master of violent action Sam Peckinpah made his only (strict) war film. The story takes place along the Eastern Front of World War II in 1943, and follows a hardened, weary corporal (later sargeant) named Steiner who, besides battling Russian forces, gets into a battle of wills with Capt. Stransky- a member of the Prussian aristocracy who vows to win the coveted Iron Cross (the highest medal one in the Germany army can win)at all costs. So yeah, besides being a big war film, this deals with class conflict, cultural issues, and has typical Peckinpah themes such as masculinity, honor, and the corrupting influence of violence. It's some good stuff. The film had a pretty low budget, and the shoot was troubled, but all in all, this is a pretty decent and satisfying film. It is pretty obvious that the film's creating was plagued by torubles and limitations, especially in the end where it just seems really rushed, sloppy, and tacked on. I do dig the ending, but I can't help but imagine what the real end result could have been like had the film had a bigger budget. The casting is quite nice, with James Coburn (doing his best Lee Marvin) in the lead as Steiner, and Maximilian Schnell as the well to do Stransky. James Mason and David Warner also show up and do some stuff, although their story doesn't really go anywhere. Still though, everyone does a pretty decent job. The real highlight are the fantastic battle sequences. This should be a given since Peckinpah helmed it, but, even though he's topped what's in here by a great amount in his otehr works, the action is gritty, raw, and has everything you'd expect fromhim. I especially loved the neat silent scenes that show up once in a while . All in all, this is a pretty fine war film. It's somewhat messy and maybe slightly draggy, but it's entertaining, and gives you exactly the sort of gritty, bitter, and angry depiction of vioence and combat that Peckinpah is famous for.

• Randy T

  
  Have you ever noticed how often war films (including anti-war films) center around incompetent officers? <i>Paths of Glory</i>, <i>'Breaker' Morant</i>, <i>Gallipoli</i>, etc., etc., etc... Even films that don't revolve around… More
  Have you ever noticed how often war films (including anti-war films) center around incompetent officers? <i>Paths of Glory</i>, <i>'Breaker' Morant</i>, <i>Gallipoli</i>, etc., etc., etc... Even films that don't revolve around impotent leadership generally feature it in one or more supporting characters. After viewing at least 200 genre pictures and serving eight years in the military myself I have subscribed to the hypothesis that most commissioned officers, and some enlisted men, are continuously promoted until they reach the point where the responsibilities exceed their capabilities. <i>Cross of Iron</i> is Peckinpah's interesting version of said circumstance, enhanced by James Coburn's inspired performance. Four stars.

• Tim S

  
  Peckinpah is a nut. The thing about him is that he can orchestrate one hell of an action sequence. The war sequences in this film are fantastic and some of the most realistic I have seen in recent memory. The brutality of war and what it does not only to the body, but also to the mind… More
  Peckinpah is a nut. The thing about him is that he can orchestrate one hell of an action sequence. The war sequences in this film are fantastic and some of the most realistic I have seen in recent memory. The brutality of war and what it does not only to the body, but also to the mind are explored really well here. James Coburn gives a great performance, but there are moments that are a little over the top even for a war movie. I understand the controversy of it considering it is told from the point of view of the Nazi's and I am surprised this film hasn't been locked in a vault somewhere in this day and age, but it's a pretty straight forward war movie all the same. There are some strange moments that took me out of the film and I really didn't understand them (the ending is just plain weird). At the end of the day, the cast and the war scenes really save this movie because otherwise it's all over the place. Another Sam Peckinpah trademark.

• Ken S

  
  One bad ass war movie. Far more complex that I had expected.

• xGary X

  
  Sam Peckinpah's war story from the perspectives of professional german soldiers knowingly fighting a lost cause at the whim of selfish, arrogant commanding officers is an interesting if flawed (mainly because of studio butchery) film. Rather depressing and lacking in the usual… More
  Sam Peckinpah's war story from the perspectives of professional german soldiers knowingly fighting a lost cause at the whim of selfish, arrogant commanding officers is an interesting if flawed (mainly because of studio butchery) film. Rather depressing and lacking in the usual spectacular violence associated with his work it's more a curiosity than entertainment, but worth a look.

• Daniel P

  
  Not one of Sam Peckinpah's best films - it's oddly structured, features some less than great performances and is very brash. Nevertheless, it has a very strong anti-war message.

• Patrick D

  
  You won't see another war film like this one. And I don't even like war films for the most part (though there are exceptions). But this one really is something else. I would say to just watch it and see that something for yourself. Definitely expect Peckinpah direction as it… More
  You won't see another war film like this one. And I don't even like war films for the most part (though there are exceptions). But this one really is something else. I would say to just watch it and see that something for yourself. Definitely expect Peckinpah direction as it is full of his amazing and awful violent, but it's not simple that. The film along isn't, however, gonna tell you how great it is, it's not one of those, if that makes any sense. But if you have sense you'll sense it. Just to confuse you a bit there.

• Barry L

  
  Dark, intuative and deep. Fantastic acting and a great performance throughout.

Read all 9 featured audience ratings