Rate It

Seen it:    
Not seen it: 
Review: 
 
clear rating

Share It

Rating Averages

My Friends Not rated. () Want To See Not Interested
All Flixster 3.0 Stars (999) Want To See 410 Not Interested 2455
Female 3.5 Stars (474) Want To See 194 Not Interested 1166
Male 3.0 Stars (524) Want To See 216 Not Interested 1288

More Like This

Tip

If you liked this, then you'll also probably like...

Got another recommendation for someone who liked this movie? Add it to the list!

Got an opinion? Use the buttons to vote on all the suggestions people have added.

If lots of people vote, the best suggestions will rise to the top.

Dr. Who and the Daleks (100%)
The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy (100%)
Dr. Who: Daleks' Invasion Earth: 2150 A.D. (100%)

Plot: The newly-regenerated Doctor takes on the Master on the turn of the millennium, 31 December 1999.

Post it anywhere Link it anywhere

Recent Reviews

  • 4.5 Stars
    MCT:
    August 6, 2008
    Even though, it wasn't the direct BBC take on the Doctor. It still held it's own. With an intriging storyline, and being the first appearance of the Doctor during his somewhat diminshed appearances untill the newer series, it was a good dose.
  • No rating.
    MCT:
    August 3, 2008
    Brilliant t.v. movie. Shame that this was the only appearance we got to see of the 8th incarnation of the Doctor which was well-played by Paul McGann. Good movie overall.
  • 3.5 Stars
    MCT:
    July 8, 2008
    Interesting take...had some issues...but nice version of classic show. But new series by RTDAVIES is better.
  • 4.0 Stars
    MCT:
    July 8, 2008
    not as good as the tv series but even so an absolute must for the die hard doctor who fans including me!!
  • 3.5 Stars
    MCT:
    July 6, 2008
    paul mcgann makes a really interesting doctor! the first thought i had when the movie started was that it look REALLY REALLY american. the chasing and everything. not that its bad.. its just weird. I love the doctor's character here.
  • 1.0 Star
    MCT:
    July 5, 2008
    I thought this film was very poor, it didn't have the backround or the enviorment of doctor who, it was like a home made channel 5 version. It was a cheap rip off spoiling doctor who, thank good a lot of people dont know about this film!
  • 2.5 Stars
    MCT:
    June 23, 2008
    An Americanized version of Doctor Who. Gun fights, car chases. Didn't like this movie much but I own it anyway.
  • 3.0 Stars
    MCT:
    May 11, 2008
    Not as good as the TV series but an ok attempt for an american market. Glad the BBC got the rights back from FOX.
  • 3.5 Stars
    MCT:
    April 18, 2008
    This TV movie, the only on-screen Doctor Who in a 15-year stretch except for the mostly-dreadful charity clip Dimensions in Time, is about 80% of what it should have been. Paul McGann was brilliant as the Eighth Doctor, Sylvester McCoy was fun to watch one last time as the Seventh, and even Eric Roberts as the Master had his good points. The story was marred, however, by several troublesome moments, most notably the Doctor claiming to be half-human, and the Master agreeing this was so. Discontinuities can be disconcerting sometimes!l
  • 2.0 Stars
    MCT:
    March 24, 2008
    try the fourth doctor from the late 70's...maybe early 80's...he's by far the most amusing, i think.
  • 4.0 Stars
    MCT:
    March 13, 2008
    The Doctor visits San Francisco, an enjoyable, action adventure style movie with more special effects than the classic series, but the current series is better. However, the movie does set up some themes that are referenced in the new series since 2005, like a more complex relationship with the companion and the Master.
  • 5.0 Stars
    MCT:
    December 17, 2007
    It's cheesy, it's badly written and fussily directed. But, it is a damn sight better than some of those final serials. Six, *shivers*
  • 4.5 Stars
    MCT:
    December 9, 2007
    A wonderfully high-spirited sci-fi romp that, while suffering from some plot problems, has some very sharp dialogue and energetic performances. Despite the American pedigree, this really does capture the spirit and enthusiasm of the classic science fiction series.
  • 3.0 Stars
    MCT:
    November 29, 2007
    The 1996 movie didn't really bring the Doctor back to us as being made in America it didn't have the British feel which makes Doctor Who what it is. McGann played an excellent Doctor though and it's a shame he couldn't play the part for a longer part of the Time Lord's lifetime.
  • 3.0 Stars
    MCT:
    November 4, 2007
    Underrated; Paul McGann was a good Doctor, but I'm glad he only did it the one time. Eric Roberts is hilarious.
  • 2.0 Stars
    MCT:
    October 21, 2007
    not really keeping with the doctor who tradition they had to make it in to a big hollywood thing, bad move i think
  • 3.0 Stars
    MCT:
    September 4, 2007
    If you hate this movie, you won't automatically hate the actual TV series. The series is awesome- one of the best shows I've ever seen. The movie... not so much.
  • Not Interested
    MCT:
    August 25, 2007
    I was always an old-school Dr. Who fan. I grew up watching the show back in the early 80s on PBS when I was in grade school. Any remake movie with friggin' Eric "B-Movie" Roberts in it just makes me want to hurl.
  • 3.0 Stars
    MCT:
    August 19, 2007
    Pretty solid for anything doctor who related that takes place in america. couldve done with a bit more britishness but what can you do? eric roberst was pretty awesome, channeling a lot of terminator into the master. one thing that was cool was the tardis. it looked awesome. and huge.
  • 3.5 Stars
    MCT:
    August 17, 2007
    It's good, sort of. Paul does a good job. But in the future never ever let the Americans do the Doctor again!
  • Want To See
    MCT:
    August 11, 2007
    It's ok, I guess. the Americans wern't quite sure how to handle this I think.

    We get the expected performance from Eric Roberts..... ie: wooden.

    The doctor has a snog huh? well good for him.

    the usual Hollywood vein, 3 or 4 endings, pretended as just rounding up.

    Is there no good writers in America? no it's justthe horrible formularic thing, but hey

    This is Doctor Who & this is the first time in about 6 months that I've seen somthing American which dosn't begin with "& there was a big explosion" & end with "& there was a big explosion" so if we can get people to think that we want something more than "& there was a big explosion" then it's got to be good.
  • 5.0 Stars
    MCT:
    August 11, 2007
    Brilliant update of the classic series. To bad not enough Americans tuned in, would've been a great start to a new series.
  • 3.5 Stars
    MCT:
    July 18, 2007
    A must see for all Doctor Who fans out there. It dose a great job one ending the original series. And they bring the Master in really good.
  • 3.0 Stars
    MCT:
    July 6, 2007
    This is the only Doctor Who movie on here. That is depressing. Sorry, but I guess I'm just a sucker for the television series because this movie doesn't do much for me. I find the plot to be a little sparse.

My Friends Said...

Doctor Who Recent Reviews

Register or sign-in to see your friends' reviews !

Comments

  • hatoola12
    this film was too shirt but good. like a long apisod....the serios is the best!! my favorit!!
    posted 269 days ago

Details

  • Rated: (Unrated)
  • Directed by: Geoffrey Sax
  • Genres: Action & Adventure, Television, Science Fiction & Fantasy, Drama
  • Released: May 12, 1996
  • DVD Released:

Movie Skins

Doctor Who Skins & Layouts

No skins yet. Interested in creating one?

Movie Quizzes

Doctor Who Quizzes