Alex Frost, Carrie Finklea, Elias McConnell

A tale about high school violence that unfolds on an ordinary school day, inside an American high school, filled with schoolwork, football, gossip and socializing. For each of the students we meet, hi...( read more  read more... )gh school is a different experience: stimulating, friendly, traumatic, lonely, hard.

Flixster Users

80% liked it

51,374 ratings

Critics

71% liked it

139 critics

R, 1 hr. 21 min.

Directed by: Gus Van Sant

Release Date: October 24, 2003

Invite friends to see

DVD Release Date: May 4, 2004

Stats: 3,976 reviews

Get movie widget Recommend it Add to Favorites

Your Rating



clear rating
Share on: Facebook Twitter

Flixster Reviews (3,976)


  • August 19, 2009
    Disturbingly realistic and a controversial topic to tackle. Certainly through the first half, it was very mundane and I found it difficult to keep watching, but of course in hindsight it?s certainly worth staying with to feel the impact of the finish.

    Filmed in a sort of Docu...( read more)mentary style, it?s certainly unique in it?s delivery, any other way would probably have disrespected many of the true events that have taken part in schools across America.

    One of a kind.
  • June 7, 2009
    Unforgettable. Dealing with a high school shoot out, the film has uncommon insight in the lives and minds of the teenage killers. Brilliant. Winner of the Cannes Film Festival. The second installment in Gus Van Saint's Death series.
  • March 31, 2009
    Gus Van Sant must be taleneted because he made what is essentially an hour and ten minutes of kids walking around a high school given this whole other depth - a lot like paranoid park.
  • January 19, 2009
    Girl in Cafeteria: "What are you writing?
    Alex: Uh, this? It's my plan.
    Girl in Cafeteria: For what?
    Alex: Oh, you'll see."

    ...( read more)//i172.photobucket.com/albums/w25/EarthlyAlien/elephant.jpg" border="0" alt="Photobucket">

    Gus Van Sant's Elephant, at first blush, seems on an inexorable path to controversy. The film that put a stop to the nine-year absence of American cinema from the list of Palme d'Or winners, it is a quietly horrifying, fictional exploration of a Columbine-like school shooting... but one with little - or absolutely no - moralizing about its subjects. The film projects a cavernous, labyrinthine American educational system that has little understanding of the deeper social forces affecting its students. Perhaps most provocative, the two male killers share a pre-annihilation kiss. Add political fire-storm, mix well, and serve.

    These details, however, misrepresent the undeniably compelling nature of Van Sant's mesmeric film. Told in sparse, improvised dialogue that erupts between longer, langorous passages of time, Elephant strips the tragic sentimentality from this particular social catastrophe, allowing viewers to look reflectively at a larger context. It is moving, yes, and sad too. But it's also fine, magnificent work that makes one re-consider preconceived notions about Columbine?s massacre and its causes. It is important, timely, and visionary cinema.

    Considering that Van Sant revelled in unchecked sentimentalism when he directed another story about two mixed-up boys (Good Will Hunting), the cool, even tone of Elephant is refreshing and unexpected; it is, perhaps not surprisingly, the best film of his career. His cast, comprised of over a dozen untrained teenagers in Portland, Oregon, reach astonishing heights under his direction, inhabiting their high-school trajectories with disarming honesty and adolescent ritual. Improvised dialogue can often be indulgent and grating, but here the cast?s personal experiences imbue it with a clarity no screenwriter could have attained. Particularly outstanding are John Robinson as a social butterfly who must care for his alcoholic father, and Alex Frost as the social outcast who takes solace in classical piano and internet gun websites.

    Unhurried and unconstricted, Van Sant follows a very particular and personal vision, reflected most exquisitely in the cinematography of Harris Savides. The camera floats ethereally around the campus, a seemingly endless connection of nondescript hallways, vacant gymnasiums, and personality-beige classrooms. Savides fills each frame with a classical grandeur, a rolling beauty that underscores both the banal commonality of high school life and the missed opportunities in every moment. It is as if the camera is telling us that life is precious... and no one is there to listen. Savides' images are complemented by an outstanding score - a collection of songs chosen by Van Sant himself - that enhances the elegiac quality of the filmmaking. The music of Beethoven, in particular, resonates superbly in the film's atmospheric aura.

    Much was made of the details of the story, where controversy would always find plenty to rear its ugly head about. The final strength of Elephant, however, is not in these particular plot points, but in its steady, sharp focus on the larger picture. The murders, we all know, are horrific. But the blissful, unaware hours that precede them - which make up the majority of the film - are even more so. The minutiae of high school life becomes electrically charged by the misery we know is imminent, but Elephant never tips its emotional hand to exploit this. The tension stays firmly in us, and not the students - they are dramatically unprepared for cataclysm when it occurs. When tragedy finally does arrive, even we who knew what was coming are unprepared for its impact. What in the hands of a lesser director might have become overwrought or maudlin is instead a cool, dispassionate sadness at the inevitably of a culture gone awry.

    Elephant's greatest achievement is to remove the veil of history from these events, making the unreal real again. Great art undoes its viewer, in order to remake us. On that score, Van Sant has scored an unreserved triumph. And I'm sure that Béla Tarr was proud to have influenced such fine cinema.

    "So foul and fair a day I have not seen."
  • September 25, 2008
    "I came to realize since I had no need to make a lot of money, I should make films I find interesting, regardless of their outcome and audience."

    This is a quote from director Gus Van Sant, who, after achieving success from directing Good Will Hunting, has mostly (especially aft...( read more)er the horrible Psycho remake experiment) decided to remain in the indie scene, making different, experimental films. This is a film that leaves a bad taste in your mouth but is admirable for a few reasons.

    Girl in Cafeteria: What are you writing?
    Alex: Uh, this? It's my plan.
    Girl in Cafeteria: For what?
    Alex: Oh, you'll see.

    The film is a fictitious retelling of the Columbine High School Murders, in which two male students walked into school on an ordinary day, armed with an assortment of weapons, and proceeded to kill a number of students. No conclusive motive was found, besides the fact that the students were considered "social outcasts."

    John McFarland: Hey, what are you guys doing?
    Alex: Get the fuck out and don't come back! Some heavy shit's going down!

    In this film, we are shown the perspective through the eyes of a number of characters before the event occurs and during. These scenes are all done with long tracking shots, where mainly nothing happens besides watching students walk around the school with little dialog. The dialog that does transpire is mainly improvised and consists of random high school chatter.

    I am not really gonna explain what I believe the point that I got out of this is, but the film certainly does not try to explain any of the characters actions, in favor of letting audiences feel out to what they believe happened.

    Now with that being said, knowing that the film will not offer any sort of opinion and knowing what actually happened in real life, what is the point of this movie in the first place? It is of course very slow placed, since nothing really goes on until the violence starts, and knowing that this violence is going to happen does and doesn't help the film in terms of feeling the building dread that will occur.

    Still, this film is well made in terms of what its doing. It goes against most conventions besides the convention of being different because its an art house film. And it is effectively creepy at certain points.

    John McFarland: Excuse me sir, don't go in there!
  • November 8, 2009
    Nice cinematography but the plot fails to impress as it actually did not really focusing on the 2 school shooters.
  • October 27, 2009
    Such a shocking, evil, dark film, but honest and brilliant in that it provides no answers.
  • October 21, 2009
    The movie is not original just the fact somebody was brave enough to tackle such a controversial movie. I thought it was realistic in every sense and I didn't mind the extremely long regular scenes. I felt a big relativity to it though in the people, not the scenario at the end...( read more). I thought it was quite interesting and realistic the way the people don't take the noises at the end very seriously. Finally though somebody was able to convey the emotional strain that people recieve during school now people will know why high school kids are so miserable.
  • October 13, 2009

  • September 12, 2009
    Van Sant tries the American art-filmmaking type and succeeds. Contrary to popular opinion, I believe this little film is absolutely great and terrifying just because of its realism, but not boring (although it may be slow, but it was intended) nor pointless. The rhythm of the fil...( read more)m helps us to feel like we were in a typical school day with totally normal and common characters that we may find in our everyday life, just for it to end up in tragedy portrayed in such a realistic way. This one is a very decent effort by Gus Van Sant, perhaps his best, after Good Will Hunting. Underrated and undervalued American gem.

    87/100

Critic Reviews


May 3, 2005
Nick Schager, Lessons of Darkness

A morally dubious waiting game. full review

November 7, 2003
Roger Ebert, Chicago Sun-Times

It simply looks at the day as it unfolds, and that is a brave and radical act; it refuses to supply reasons and assign cures, so that we can close the case and move on. full review

October 27, 2003
David Edelstein, Slate

Elephant hurts you in ways you don't see coming; its combination of the orchestrated and the raw gets past your defenses. full review

October 23, 2003
Peter Travers, Rolling Stone

Unique and unforgettable. full review

View more Elephant reviews at RottenTomatoes.com

Comments


  • Alyyeta
    July 25, 2008
    Its just walkin....walkin walkin walkin...kill kill kill. I didnt like it, especially the extremely open end!
  • Wotanraven
    April 18, 2008
    This movie is brilliant. very original in its making. wow.
  • misscorleone87
    January 9, 2008
    i think that is a very nice film from gus van sant...you know...that minimal style from van sant's camera(36mm i think!don't shoot me!).it's a trilogy elephant-gerry-last days. and i thought that gus van sant was a "queer"director but...he did his best work on that films...which (he named them) the circle of death.
  • sofianungaray
    August 9, 2007
    wow
  • jess633
    March 30, 2007
    It was really great and it portrayed something that could really happen and that was great. The thing that bugged me was that when the shooting was going on everyone seemed so calm "oh no! He's been shot. Lets all smile and not try and find the quickest was out of the school" Other than that it was a flippin good movie!
  • echmindless2001
    March 2, 2007
    This movie gave me the creeps! It scared the holy heeby jeebies out of me..... I would never let my children watch such a movie! I can't believe so many people like this movie. I gave it 2.5 stars for the effect that it left me with but, not the story line. This movie is probably very painful to a lot of people! Crazy movie, that's for sure.
  • tijwij
    August 8, 2006
    It was good but Zero day was WAY better!
  • LandoMcFly
    June 2, 2006
    Achingly dull garbage that ploddingly meanders through 80 mins of sheer boredom with no character insight or anything of interest. It raises no new issues but instead chooses to ape tired stereotypes about these kind of shootings. It gets lost up it's own arse.

    Plus, everyone in the school is a grade A moron.

Critic ratings and reviews powered by RottenTomatoes.com

Fresh (60% or more critics rated the movie positively)

Rotten (59% or fewer critics rated the movie positively)

Official Trailer

More Like This


Click a thumb to vote on that suggestion, or add your own suggestions.

  • 2:37
    2:37 (88%)
  • Paranoid Park
    Paranoid Park (90%)
  • Japon
    Japon (100%)
  • Bowling for Columbine
    Bowling for Columbine (50%)

Facts


No facts approved yet. Be the first

Elephant : Watch Free on TV


Elephant Trivia


  • What was the name of the elephant in the film "tarzan"?  Answer »
  • What´s the name of the song Evan Mcgregor and Nicole Kitman sing at night on an elephant? (moulin rouge)  Answer »
  • In The Lion King where was Simba not allowed to go?   Answer »
  • What couple in which movie, had to wear harnesses because the Elephant was dangerously too tall?  Answer »

Video Clips


No video clips yet. Want to upload one?

Recent News


No recent headlines. Got one?

Most Popular Skin