Critic Reviews
-
Tim Grierson, Village Voice
Treat it like a wobbly, precocious demo from a 24-year-old with mighty aspirations, filled with hints of what he would become, and you'll be properly enthralled.
-
Janet Maslin, New York Times
If Fear and Desire is uneven and sometimes reveals an experimental rather than a polished exterior, its over-all effect is entirely worthy of the sincere effort put into it.
-
Henry Northmore, The List
It's an unconventional but compelling film as four soldiers find themselves trapped behind enemy lines during an unspecified war.
-
John Semley, Slant Magazine
There's no reason for Kino's welcome release of Kubrick's impressive debut to feel like anything but an overdue, completists-only offering.
-
Donald J. Levit, ReelTalk Movie Reviews
Although some visuals are striking chiaroscuro, the film still comes across as tyro self-conscious, a belaboring of theme by one not yet sure of his art.
-
Nick Schager, Slant Magazine
For all its heavy-handed gloom and stylistic unevenness, Fear and Desire has a certain fierceness that's hard to shake.
-
Fernando F. Croce, CinePassion
Kubrick's lugubrious, arresting, disavowed feature debut
-
Dennis Schwartz, Ozus' World Movie Reviews
Its sole distinction is that it's a Kubrick film.
-
, TV Guide's Movie Guide
[A] highly promising first effort by one of America's premiere filmmakers.
-
Phil Hall, Film Threat
Stanley Kubrick's long-unseen first feature film, recommended solely as a curio.
-
Shane Burridge, rec.arts.movies.reviews
It's probably the film's metaphorical riffs that Kubrick found most pretentious
Read all 11 critic reviews
Featured Audience Ratings
-
Kubrick's first (and little seen) feature is clunky and mishandled. It's fair to see that he loathed this film and did his best to keep it out of circulation forever; however, much like Killer's Kiss, one can really see the seeds of a budding phenom at work -- how he… More
Kubrick's first (and little seen) feature is clunky and mishandled. It's fair to see that he loathed this film and did his best to keep it out of circulation forever; however, much like Killer's Kiss, one can really see the seeds of a budding phenom at work -- how he plays with chiaroscuro lighting, the unorthodox cutting between shots with different eye levels, and the instinctual way in which he always knows where to put the camera to inform not only the narrative, but his character's motivations, and by extension, their development. These early works signify a legendary director who perhaps hadn't quite figured it all out yet, but whose potential is through the roof.
-
Stanley Kubrick's first feature film is also his least seen, mainly because until Kubrick's death, the film had been locked away in the vaults at his request. This should give you some idea as to the film's quality. It's not that Fear and Desire is a bad movie,… More
Stanley Kubrick's first feature film is also his least seen, mainly because until Kubrick's death, the film had been locked away in the vaults at his request. This should give you some idea as to the film's quality. It's not that Fear and Desire is a bad movie, it's just that it's still very amateurish (Kubrick was only 24 when he made it). Obviously, expectations wouldn't normally be high for a low budget, fifties movie about soldiers trapped behind enemy lines, but "directed by Stanley Kubrick" changes the nature of things quite a bit. Four soldiers from an "undetermined" country attempt to return to base after their plane goes down while on a reconnaissance mission. The four are of disparate personalities: the leader is pragmatic, the private is scared and on the verge of cracking, and then there's the gung ho sarge, who wants to take down a general. The group attempts to build a raft out of logs, they also kidnap a girl who was washing clothes in the river. They also kill some enemy soldiers with their bayonets and take their guns and dinner. They do some other things too. The characters with the disparate personalities do things and then react according to their personalities. It's weird, but the entire film feels like an extra long version of "The Twilight Zone" or perhaps "The Outer Limits" (two shows that would come about ten years after this film). Kubrick directs the action with a photographer's eye, but sometimes the acting just doesn't cut it and brings things down to unintentionally comical levels of maudlinism. It's all pretty standard fifties B-movie stuff.
-
I saw this ten years ago and I remember not being impressed. You could easily tell it was Kubrick's first film, but his technique was poking out. I was glad I saw it but I wouldn't recommend killing yourself to get a copy.
-
"It's better to roll up your life into one night and one man and one gun." - Sgt. Mac (Frank Silvera) in Fear and Desire
Stanley Kubrick ended his feature filmmaking career with the underappreciated Eyes Wide Shut and started it with the now nearly extinct Fear and… More
"It's better to roll up your life into one night and one man and one gun." - Sgt. Mac (Frank Silvera) in Fear and Desire
Stanley Kubrick ended his feature filmmaking career with the underappreciated Eyes Wide Shut and started it with the now nearly extinct Fear and Desire. Of course in between Kubrick became an undisputed master of cinema; commanding film classics like Paths of Glory, A Clockwork Orange, The Shining and many more. His departure from being a Look Magazine photographer and exposition into his 'Odyssey' of narrative films was this story of four soldiers behind enemy lines.
Set in an unnamed forest and transpiring during an unknown war, the movie opens to four men in the woods. It is revealed that these men are soldiers who have crashed their plane behind enemy lines. The leader of the group Lt. Corby (Kenneth Harp) wants to lead his men to the river build a raft and escape during night fall. The situation is tense as the men's very own fears and sometimes their desires collide with one another. Sgt. Mac (Frank Silvera) has a slight pessimism, Fletcher (Steve Coit) actually isn't that well characterized and Sidney (Paul Mazursky) is swiftly descending into insanity.
The film was made for only $50,000, and it really shows in the way that there are few actors and even fewer settings. But there is very apparent bits of Kubrickian genius that poke through its rough exterior. For instance his name is all over the credits. Like many of his later films, Kubrick's perfectionism shines through with all the duties he took charge of being the film's director, cinematographer, producer and editor. There is also the earliest evidence of the trademark "Kubrick stare" shots like the ones with Malcolm McDowell in A Clockwork Orange, Jack Nicholson in The Shining and Vincent D'Onofrio in Full Metal Jacket. The stares occur during a scene between a crazed Sidney and the young girl (Virginia Leith) he has kept hostage.
Fear and Desire is strictly for Kubrick fans, and devoted ones at that. Tracking down a copy of this flick is harder to find then a corn hater in Iowa. My experience in viewing the movie was reduced to a computer on my lap with a lucky-it-was-all-there, but horrible in quality YouTube video playing on my lap. Much like his other second short film Killer's Kiss, Fear and Desire is a buried treasure that Kubrickophiles will feel rewarded to have seen.
Grade: C+
Reviewed by Ben Pieper on August 20th 2011
-
In Fear and Desire," four soldiers are shot down behind enemy lines and crash land in an unnamed war. Lieutenant Corby(Kenneth Harp) proposes building a raft but fears they may have been spotted by enemy aircraft on the way to a cottage across the river where they spot an enemy… More
In Fear and Desire," four soldiers are shot down behind enemy lines and crash land in an unnamed war. Lieutenant Corby(Kenneth Harp) proposes building a raft but fears they may have been spotted by enemy aircraft on the way to a cottage across the river where they spot an enemy general. In fact, they run into a native young woman(Virginia Leith) who Corby puts Sidney(Paul Mazursky) in charge of keeping an eye on while they reconnoiter.
Contrary to what he might have felt later, Stanley Kubrick has nothing to be ashamed with his first film, "Fear and Desire." Here, strangely enough he is influenced by "The Tempest" to take a psychological angle by using internal voices and dreamlike imagery in exploring the horrors of war on an intimate and haunting scale(again proving that sometimes it is best not to know what you are doing), foreshadowing his later work in "Full Metal Jacket."
-
Somewhat confusing and emotionally distant, the only truly unique or interesting thing about this film is that it was Stanley Kubrick's first (and probably his worst).
-
After hearing for years about Kubrick's "Fear & Desire" being disowned and buried, I wasn't nearly as turned off by this infamous film as expected. It often reminded me of one of Rod Serling's anti-war teleplays, with the issue being examined through… More
After hearing for years about Kubrick's "Fear & Desire" being disowned and buried, I wasn't nearly as turned off by this infamous film as expected. It often reminded me of one of Rod Serling's anti-war teleplays, with the issue being examined through boiling down a large, mythic conflict to just a few introspective characters who represent this or that soldier archetype. The topical reasons for the war don't matter -- it's all about human nature on a grander, philosophical scale. The most "embarrassing" aspect is some of the heavy-handed narration and interior monologues. And OK, Paul Mazursky's squirrelly, battle-fatigued character is a bit over the top. But these flaws are forgivable. Really, this film is worth seeing. Just don't expect to see much of Kubrick's signature directing style.
I saw a 61-minute and a 72-minute cut of the film, but had a hard time perceiving what was extra in the longer version. More dour reflections from the drunken enemy general near the end? Otherwise, just a lot of extra moments trimmed from shots.
-
Though undeveloped and drawn-out, "Fear and Desire" features solid production value, fair performances and a fine first direction job by Kubrick to make it not extremely special, but still a decent film buried in history and one reasonably worth digging up.
-
A very interesting morality tale that already showcased well the talent of Kubrick to explore the darkest recesses of humanity and it's complexity. It's very amateurish looking and poorly executed/acted but it features some pretty interesting scenes and the lighting is… More
A very interesting morality tale that already showcased well the talent of Kubrick to explore the darkest recesses of humanity and it's complexity. It's very amateurish looking and poorly executed/acted but it features some pretty interesting scenes and the lighting is already superb (something Kubrick would perfect later on).
Worth a shot for fans of the director.
Read all 9 featured audience ratings
Currently unavailable on Flixster
Also available on
Other Retailers
Subscription Services