Antonio Banderas, Edouard Montoute, Eriq Ebouaney

A contemporary film noir about an alluring seductress named Laure Ash. A sultry former jewel thief and con woman trying to live the straight life, Laure is suddenly exposed to the world--and her enemi...( read more  read more... )es--by a voyeuristic photographer, Nicholas Bardo, who takes a sudden interest in her. Seen as a dangerous individual dressed in black, Nicholas is always hounding her, attempting to reveal Laure for what she really is--a born manipulator. As Nicholas tries to determine her true intentions, he begins to uncover some dangerous secrets. Her shadowy life of deceit had also spawned vengeful co-conspirators who will neither forget, nor forgive her lies. Laure's shady past comes back to haunt her, and soon thereafter, Nicholas becomes ensnared in her surreal quest for revenge.

Flixster Users

51% liked it

4,511 ratings

Critics

48% liked it

133 critics

R, 1 hr. 50 min.

Directed by: Brian DePalma

Release Date: November 8, 2002

Invite friends to see

DVD Release Date: March 25, 2003

Get It:

Stats: 529 reviews

Get movie widget Recommend it Add to Favorites

Your Rating



clear rating
Share on: Facebook Twitter

Flixster Reviews (529)


  • June 2, 2009
    A pretty decent sultry thriller directed by Brian DePalma. A jewel thief tries to cover her past but a chance photo of her alerts the people she has crossed before. Enjoyable if not quite a classic but I do like the ending and Rebecca Romijn suits the role to a T before her succe...( read more)ss as Mystique in the X-Men series.
  • April 15, 2009
    Underrated De Palma thriller. Inventive, elegant, fun, intoxicatingly sexy, violent, self-indulgent and maddening. The film has the high-buffed gloss and high-octane jolts you expect of De Palma, but what makes it transporting is that it's also one of the smartest, most pleasurab...( read more)le expressions of pure Film love to come from an American director in years. Nearly surreal, dabbling in French, this is no simple film, and you'll be taking a risk if you choose to see it. I enjoyed the ride (bumps and all), creamy depth, and ultimate theme. It's erotic, kinky, preposterous, labyrinthine, and aesthetically superb. Romijn drinks sexual sweat in with every breath.
  • August 17, 2008
    "Femme Fatale" is best understood as a game played by Brian De Palma and appreciated by knowing cineastes. It's not about story or characters, but about the construction and manipulation of art.

    Antonio Banderas plays Nicolas Bardo, a photographer who has turned his back on ph...( read more)otographing celebrities. He now spends his time living in an apartment, making huge composite images by arranging tiny photographs. The Bardo character, in many ways, is Brian De Palma. At war with Hollywood storytelling (which is fuelled by celebrity) De Palma takes these multiple images and weaves them into a tapestry until a final image is made. The point is that the final image is not reality. It is the artists recreation and completely false.

    At the end of the film, Bardo completes his masterpiece by inserting a little white figure (of Laura) onto his wall. The figure doesn't belong there, Bardo simply chooses to put it there. Thematically, "Femme Fatale" ends on the same note. Noir fatalism is thwarted by a completely arbitrary, totally ILLOGICAL and cosmically IMPOSSIBLE moment of editing whereby De Palma redeems his hero and kills off her opponents.

    Critics call this sequence implausible. But De Palma's point is that it doesn't have to be plausible. Bardo puts the white figure on his wall because he wants to. Similarly, De Palma ends the film as he does, because he wants to. He shows us Laura's depressing noir dream and then rescues her from it. He makes it clear that he is redeeming her and willing this positive ending into existence solely because he as an artist (noir God), has the power to do so.

    This flips the usual noir logic. If Kubrick's "The Killing" highlights the deterministic law of the universe (Clay's plan crumbling to pieces all because of a random poodle), De Palma's "Femme Fatale" highlights the power of the artist, able to do recreate a universe entirely devoid of cosmic law.

    This theme is also highlighted by the use of the name "Bardo", a Tibetan word meaning "intermediate state". A state between life and death. Over the course of the film, Bardo will be caught between life and death, as De Palma toys with killing him. Bardo's existence or artistic merit is down to an artist's mere whim.

    Everything else about De Palma is present in Femme Fatale: the voyeur and his object, the representation inside the representation, the original and its fake copy, the doubled characters, key episodes built from multiple points of views, the elaborate camera work.

    Watch as De Palma's camera continuously misleads our eyes, giving the hidden predominance over the shown, until we are forced to separate in our minds the real from its representation and to connect the different pieces into a "sense".

    This technique comprises the film watching experience as a whole, and is what De Palma's films are essentially about, from Jack Terry's reconstruction of a truth with the aid of montage in "Blow Out", to Santoro's investigations of a crime from partial testimonies in "Snake Eyes".

    This theme, the division between reality and image, has grown increasingly important for De Palma. His last five movies ("Redacted", "Dahlia", "Mission Impossible", "Snake Eyes," and "Mission to Mars,") were all concerned with how we see and watch movies. He is obsessed with reminding us that information is not the same thing as knowledge.

    "Snake Eyes" opened with an unbroken tracking shot that laid out the plot. The rest of the movie was a demonstration of why everything we had seen in that sequence was a lie. The opening sequence of "Mission: Impossible" showed us Tom Cruise's crew of agents being picked off one by one. We had already seen each of those murders, though, in nearly subliminal blips during the movie's credit sequence (information without knowledge). "Black Dahlia" and "Redacted" similarly deal with a search for truth amongst an image bank of lies.

    "Femme Fatale" begins with a long heist sequence. Throughout this sequence, allusions are made to "Snake Eyes" (eg- the literal "serpent camera" and the object of the heist, a snake shaped piece of gold), De Palma effectively saying: "I'm lying to you. The camera is a snake and not to be trusted." Note the film "Est - Ouest" showing as the heist goes on. Another stream-of-consciousness film with an unreliable narrator.

    The rest of "Femme Fatale" takes a "dream within a film" approach, (foreshadowed in opening shot). De Palma sets the dream sequence up with careful details: the storm, the clock (Time: 3:33), the water running, Laura sinking. Signs that would eventually emerge all the way through, emphasising the surreal atmosphere of Laura's adventure.

    From here on, logic will be put aside as De Palma's mise-en-scene develops into pure form. Everything is disconnected, dialogue makes no sense (at some points it's dubbed without even following the actors' lips), time jumps back and forth etc.

    During the dream, Laura will embody different female archetypes, all traceable in film history and particularly in De Palma's films. She's Kim Novak in "Vertigo" and also Melanie Griffith's prostitute of "Body Double" and so on and so on.

    The majority of De Palma's films have dream sequences. Even a "serious" film like 'Casualties of War' ends with a character waking up on a train, realising that the whole film was a nightmare. Why does De Palma feel the need to insert this? My guess is that he doesn't want his films to be seen as "real". They exist in a wholly metaphysical space.

    As usual with a De Palma film, critics and audiences rejected Femme Fatale. But this is a brilliant film, it's only flaw being an unimaginatively shot (by De Palma standards) heist sequence.
  • January 24, 2008
    This is, without doubt, one of Brian De Palma's greatest achievements, an incredibly rich and playful movie which immeasurably rewards repeated viewings. Basically, you get out of it what you put in. If you've got your wits about you, an open mind and a keen pair of eyes, you're ...( read more)in for a treat. Beneath its ludicrous exterior there lurks as intelligent a film as you could wish to see, a film which, refreshingly, credits its audience with the ability to understand it without spoon-feeding. If you've been paying close enough attention, the controversial late twist triumphantly validates innumerable carefully laid glimpses of the truth; you ought to feel exhilarated rather than cheated, eager to hit the rewind button in search of further clues. In De Palma's enchanted world: fish-tanks mimic overflowing baths, advertising posters offer vital pointers, casually seen faces become woven into the story and time stands still. As a Parallel Universe thriller, it's smarter, wittier, more inventive and more skilfully told than "Run, Lola, Run" et al. Ironically, this masterpiece sank without a trace in the UK and is hard to locate on DVD.
  • January 14, 2008
    I know I liked this more than most. I also know that DePalma can overdo it, however I thought he kept this one together and made it work. Recommended for those who like a bit of suspense and some twists.
  • October 31, 2009
    the best was scene on the billiard table
    but sexy generally
  • October 18, 2009
    Well, there is beauty to be found in the scenery and the cast (looks expensive) - but in the end the plot is just weird.
  • October 9, 2009
    I was fascinated with this movie at the age of 17.
  • September 21, 2009
    Sexy noirish and boring.
  • September 3, 2009
    love this film. glad Ive see this from start till end scene was brilliant so do not blink an eye. perfect sequencing worth watching and perfect ending for the story shes really pretty. now im thinking is she a lesbian. when Antonio pretend to be a gay was my fave part.

Critic Reviews


November 9, 2002
David Edelstein, Slate

De Palma has provided enough ripe flesh, split-screen mayhem, and dreamlike imagery to power six films noir. full review

November 6, 2002
Claudia Puig, USA Today

More tawdry than titillating, what should have been sultry is more often skanky. full review

November 6, 2002
Peter Travers, Rolling Stone

De Palma -- a master of kinky, delirious visuals -- hooks you good. full review

November 6, 2002
A.O. Scott, The New York Times

Far more absorbing and tantalizing than most of the plodding, overworked thrillers the studios churn out these days. full review

November 6, 2002
Liam Lacey, Globe and Mail

A uniquely De Palma kind of effluence, an exercise in auteur self-parody. full review

November 6, 2002
Roger Ebert, Chicago Sun-Times

This is pure filmmaking, elegant and slippery. full review

View more Femme Fatale reviews at RottenTomatoes.com

Comments


This board looks lonely. Be the first to talk about "Femme Fatale" !

Critic ratings and reviews powered by RottenTomatoes.com

Fresh (60% or more critics rated the movie positively)

Rotten (59% or fewer critics rated the movie positively)

Official Trailer

More Like This


Click a thumb to vote on that suggestion, or add your own suggestions.

  • Kill Bill: Volume 1
    Kill Bill: Volume 1 (33%)
  • Kill Bill, Volume 2
    Kill Bill, Volume 2 (41%)
  • Lonely Hearts
    Lonely Hearts (33%)
  • Entrapment
    Entrapment (100%)

Theater Showtimes & TV Listings


Femme Fatale Trivia


  • In The Black Dahlia, who played the enigmatic 'femme fatale', Madeleine Linscot?  Answer »
  • Who play as the bad girl in femme fatale?  Answer »
  • Who plays Mystique in X-men series? she was also in Femme Fatale, The Alibi, and Godsend.  Answer »
  • Name the actress who plays Meredith Johnson, the Femme Fatale, who causes much trouble for Michael Douglas in Disclosure (1994)?  Answer »

Movie Quizzes


No quizzes for Femme Fatale. Want to create one?

Video Clips


No video clips yet. Want to upload one?

Recent News


No recent headlines. Got one?

Most Popular Skin


No skins yet. Interested in creating one?