First Knight (1995)

47% of critics liked it
(43 reviews)
59% of users liked it
(150,270 ratings)

The tale of King Arthur and the Knights of the Round Table is always ripe for retelling. In this rendition, the sexy Richard Gere is Sir Lancelot, threatening to supersede the aging King Arthur (Sean Connery) by winning the love of his young wife Guinivere (Julia Ormond). This update of the age-old… More The tale of King Arthur and the Knights of the Round Table is always ripe for retelling. In this rendition, the sexy Richard Gere is Sir Lancelot, threatening to supersede the aging King Arthur (Sean Connery) by winning the love of his young wife Guinivere (Julia Ormond). This update of the age-old legend succeeds on the strength of Gere's happy-go-lucky sex appeal, Ormond's gorgeous period costuming, and Connery's unbeatable wry nobility. The script focuses on the triangle of the three principals: the older man's reluctance to relinquish his love and power to the younger man destined to supplant him; the young woman torn between her loyalty to her aged husband and her love for his rival; the young man balancing the demands of loyalty to his sovereign with the rewards of true love. This beautiful production forgoes the legend's usual elements of magic and fantasy, leaving Merlin the Magician completely out of the picture. ~ Laura Abraham, Rovi

Play Trailer

Rating, Runtime: Unrated, 2 min.
Directed By: Jerry Zucker
Genres: Drama, Action & Adventure, Romance, Comedy

In Theaters: Jul 7, 1995 Wide
On DVD: Oct 7, 1997
Studio: Sony Pictures Home Entertainment

Critic Reviews

Peter Travers, Rolling Stone
Whenever Zucker stops piling on battle scenes as if he were directing Braveheart, his film casts a romantic spell.
Todd McCarthy, Variety
Aside from casting Richard Gere as Lancelot, First Knight marches out as an agreeably intelligent, mature and well-mounted telling of the legendary King Arthur story.
Kenneth Turan, Los Angeles Times
The problem for him[Gere], and the film, comes when the non-physical acting begins.
Roger Ebert, Chicago Sun-Times
The movie is entertaining enough in its own way, and Sean Connery makes a splendid King Arthur, but compared with the earlier films[Rob Roy and Braveheart] this one seems thin and unconvincing.
James Berardinelli, ReelViews
Bad acting, dumb dialogue, and confusing cinematography abound, creating one of the most shoddy Camelot stories to date.
Sean Means, Film.com
...lots of action and chivalrous pomp, but no magic.
Brian Webster, Apollo Guide
Extras include a commentary by director Jerry Zucker and producer Hunt Lowry, along with a second commentary that focuses on the Arthurian legend behind the film's story.
Brian Webster, Apollo Guide
While director Jerry Zucker seems to have been intent on dragging the film to the mushy middle, it's still more entertaining than most comparable Middle Ages-set movies.
Peter Canavese, Groucho Reviews
Goes for a pass as a shallow but occasionally rousing swordfighting flick with a handful of thoughtful scenes...has something those other pictures don't have: Sean Connery as King Arthur.
James Plath, Movie Metropolis
This one is pure Hollywood.
Emanuel Levy, EmanuelLevy.Com
Director Zucker is unsuccessful in trying to put a fresh angle on the familiar story, and he is not much helped by his romantic leads, Richard Gere and Julia Ormond.
Michael Dequina, TheMovieReport.com
The out-of-place [Richard] Gere doesn't do justice to the fine performance of [Julia] Ormond.

Read all 12 critic reviews

Critic ratings and reviews powered by RottenTomatoes.com

Fresh (60% or more critics rated the movie positively)

Rotten (59% or fewer critics rated the movie positively)

Featured Audience Ratings

Mike S

Starts off mediocerly, but once Sean Connery enters the stage as the fabled King Arthur, the quality level is instantly raised. Richard Gere looks a bit misplaced as the fearless Sir Lancelot, and wouldn't have been my first pick for the role, but he still takes it on to the best… More
Starts off mediocerly, but once Sean Connery enters the stage as the fabled King Arthur, the quality level is instantly raised. Richard Gere looks a bit misplaced as the fearless Sir Lancelot, and wouldn't have been my first pick for the role, but he still takes it on to the best of his abilities. As for Julia Ormond, she's quite lovely as Princess Guinevere, altough I would have very much liked to see her put a little more energy into her performance. What speaks for the film in positive terms, however, is the atmosphere and action, along with a highly enchanting music score by the brilliant Jerry Goldsmith. It's so good, in fact, that I've made it a part of my inspirational music library. If there is one thing I could change though, it would be the costumes. They look a little plain and cheap for what is essentially a period piece. Maybe they ran out of money when it came to clothing the actors? Apart from said maladies though, it remains a captivating tale of love, chivalry and sweeping adventure. Easily one of the better renditions of the Arthurian legend.
Conner R

Another terrible rendition of King Arthur. Turning the story into nothing more than a romantic threesome is just pure slander. To change the story to fit a movie is one thing, but this should've just left Arthur's name all together. The acting is terrible, quite possibly… More
Another terrible rendition of King Arthur. Turning the story into nothing more than a romantic threesome is just pure slander. To change the story to fit a movie is one thing, but this should've just left Arthur's name all together. The acting is terrible, quite possibly Sean Connery's worst performance and the usual Richard Gere treatment.
Jon L

I saw this one in the theatre and can't quite remember the whole film, but I do remember enjoying it.
Jason O

"First Knight" is a version of the Camelot legend. I'm not familiar at all with the legend of Camelot, but I do know one thing, I really like "First Knight." Sean Connery plays the part as King Arthur, Julia Ormond is the Queen, and Richard Gere plays as Sir… More
"First Knight" is a version of the Camelot legend. I'm not familiar at all with the legend of Camelot, but I do know one thing, I really like "First Knight." Sean Connery plays the part as King Arthur, Julia Ormond is the Queen, and Richard Gere plays as Sir Lancelot. Lancelot is a wanderer who doesn't have a home or any place to stay, but he is satisfied living alone with just his superior sword-fighting skills. That is, until he meets the soon to be Queen and falls in love with her. Will Lancelot be successful in making the Queen change her mind about who she wants to be with, or will her top priority still be King Arthur? Don't get me wrong, "First Knight" is not only a love story. There is a lot of exciting fighting, mostly with swords, it's easy to tell the movie is an epic with the huge castles and the many knights on horses, and throughout the whole movie, everybody, especially the three main stars (Ormond, Connery, and Gere), all do a great job of acting to make the movie captivating and believable. The bottom line is, "First Knight" is an exciting epic about the story of Camelot, and all the while with all the fighting and other conflicts, there's an underlying love story to make it even more interesting. Even if you're not that crazy about epic films, give "First Knight" a chance. If you are a big fan of great epic movies, I recommend purchasing "First Knight" as soon as possible! NOTE: That was my Amazon review from the year 2001. To this day, this is still one of my absolute favorite epic films, and my favorite Sean Connery flick.
Film C

Its ok but i didnt finish it all but its ok but not as good as the old braveheart
Red L

It is always fun to watch another version about Camelot. This one suffers the indignity of having Richard Gere looking like he is from the 20th century playing Lancelot. Sean Connery does a tremendous job playing King Arthur. The ending is just too hokey - one minute Aurthur is… More
It is always fun to watch another version about Camelot. This one suffers the indignity of having Richard Gere looking like he is from the 20th century playing Lancelot. Sean Connery does a tremendous job playing King Arthur. The ending is just too hokey - one minute Aurthur is sentencing Lancelot to death and the next minute bequeathing his kingdom to him.
Bobby H

Pretty good movie. No disrespect to Richard Gere or Sean Connery, because there both wonderful actors but there not convincing as these legendary men. The story carries on awhile to but nothing ever progresses, and its only a few well done fight scenes and the end of this movie that… More
Pretty good movie. No disrespect to Richard Gere or Sean Connery, because there both wonderful actors but there not convincing as these legendary men. The story carries on awhile to but nothing ever progresses, and its only a few well done fight scenes and the end of this movie that makes it pretty good. It's worth watching, if your interested in this period. If not, then you probably dont want to see it because there are a lot better films of this period and of these men out there that can give you a loving of this legend and time.
Lenny M

I don't know why critics hated this movie, Sean Connery as King Arthur, amazing, forget Richard Gere it's Sean Connery.
Dean M

Apart from the anachronistic performance by Richard Gere as a kung-fu fighting Lancelot, this is a memorable retelling of the King Arthur legend, with its emphasis on a historical, romantic approach as opposed to fantasy. Director Jerry Zucker keeps it big and impressive, developing… More
Apart from the anachronistic performance by Richard Gere as a kung-fu fighting Lancelot, this is a memorable retelling of the King Arthur legend, with its emphasis on a historical, romantic approach as opposed to fantasy. Director Jerry Zucker keeps it big and impressive, developing his characters in a believable fashion.
Candy R

Another great cast and period costume movie about Guinevere who is torn between Arthur and Lancelot.
Curtis L

lame.
Dan S

For a Gere movie, not too bad, but I wouldn't see it again.
Summer W

cheesy...I think you'll enjoy this if you're 12. A horrible retelling of Aurthurian legend.
Dean !

A pretty good swordplay film with a strong cast....but this type of film has been done better, many times since.
xGary X

Uniformly dreadful retelling of the Arthurian legend full of wooden performances, laughably anachronistic production design and illogical plotting. One for Seans nest egg, I suspect.
Jason S

I liked it but it was meant for the ladies.
Steven V

Great movie. Nicely paced action and brilliant performance by Sean Connery. The story seem short but it lift up to the legend of King Arthur.
Nicolas K

Quite uninspiring film for a tale that has fascinated so many...
Henrik S

For what it's worth, I found First Knight to be a good movie if you take it for what it is instead of trying and forcing your own interpretation of the Arthurian legend upon it. A few minutes in the movie, I understood what the filmmakers were trying to create, a film in the… More
For what it's worth, I found First Knight to be a good movie if you take it for what it is instead of trying and forcing your own interpretation of the Arthurian legend upon it. A few minutes in the movie, I understood what the filmmakers were trying to create, a film in the spirit of classic adventure and swashbuckling movies of the 30-50ies, think Errol Flynn in medieval England. No serious contemplation about British History (or pseudo-history), no gritty and brooding tale of the dark ages but shiny knight in Armour and evil (evil !) villains. At one point, Richard Gere and Julia Ormond are riding on a horse through the pouring rain, finding shelter under a tree, that is all you need to know about this movie ! Yet, it reminded about those innocent and tenderly low-budget fairy tale movies one might catch on TV on Sundays or during Christmas time. If you are in the right mood, the movie might just hit your spot, of course if you expect another Braveheart, look elsewhere. Richard Gere is puppy-eyed and his shy handsomeness makes for a good loner, although his transition to being a hero towards the end of the movie is not reflected in his performance and not really based within the narrative except for some vague reference to a troubled past. Sean Connery puts on the Role of Arthur like a glove and mumbles and smirks behind his mighty beard to recreate a truly "legendary" Arthur, legendary as in fairy-esque. One nice thing about this movie are the locations and beautiful landscapes. That is, if you like to gaze upon the breathtaking British countryside (Oh Mother England !). All in all, a romp and adventure movie with loots of cheesy schmonsens thrown in for good measure. HX
shane h

Good gravy this was kinda an awful movie but I watched it anyways. It was like combining Pretty Woman with Excaliber. Richard Gere is Lancelot in this corny version of the King Arthur Trilogy. Lancelot is a rogue swordsman roaming the countryside challenging towns people to sword… More
Good gravy this was kinda an awful movie but I watched it anyways. It was like combining Pretty Woman with Excaliber. Richard Gere is Lancelot in this corny version of the King Arthur Trilogy. Lancelot is a rogue swordsman roaming the countryside challenging towns people to sword matches for money. He is a total mocheese mo throughout the whole film. I am a little upset at the character written because Lancelot would never be so douchy. Anyways Lancelot comes to Geneviere's aid in the forest and after he saves her he says stuff like "it's ok that you want to sleep with me. I can tell by the look in a woman's eyes when she wants to sleep with me." Not so much.....