Naomi Watts, Tim Roth, Boyd Gaines
Two psychotic young men take a family hostage in their cabin.
DVD Release Date: June 10, 2008
Stats: 5,610 reviews
Flixster Reviews (5,610)
-
September 16, 2009
Awful, Sick, Awful, Sick. Tim Roth, Naomi Watts not bad. Rest of cast especially the villians, awful.
-
August 14, 2009
Movie makers nowadays are seeking a new way to attract audience which is by making disturbing imageries that will intrigue the viewers. We can't deny the fact that it clearly works with some movies even if their quality wasn't that good (The "Saw" series) and some others have gre...( read more)
-
July 30, 2009
Very strange and wierd movie.I wanted to like it but in the end got tired of it.There are sences of just plain boredom.I no this is a remake but have read that there is no differents to either movies accpect for the actors.Im sure there are a lot of people who enjoy this but for ...( read more)
-
May 3, 2009
What if I told you that you could see a modern horror film blatantly defy all typical Hollywood conventions, ignore the use of jump scares in favor of classical suspense, and use gore only sparingly and therefore more effectively? That sounds wonderful, doesn't it? There's only o...( read more)
-
April 24, 2009
A strange film with not very much plot or explanation as to what is going on, although some might like this more because of that. It's a very gritty, raw, rather bleak film as a couple of psycho's decide to play games with a family in the holiday home. Just need to watch a comedy...( read more)
-
November 4, 2009
Freaky. I love the acting, directing, and silence instead of music. Creepy. Very well done.
-
November 1, 2009
Only watched 23 mins then left because it was boring and slow. hmm not funny at all is it?
-
November 1, 2009
it was not funny...
i felt di anger rise in me...
even in films, i hate to treat pets & kids cruelly... -
October 29, 2009
good remake.
idk why i love this kind of disturbing movies.. :)
(michael pitt is awsome in this charactere) -
October 28, 2009
I just recently watched this movie.. and i thought it was pretty good. a little twisted but good..
Critic Reviews
In addition to being borderline unendurable, Funny Games is inexplicable, and I don't mean in any philosophical sense. Who thought the world needed a shot-for-shot English-language version of Mr. Hane... full review
While Haneke is attacking our culture for being drawn to violent fare, he is also relishing in presenting it to us, in prolonged and detailed fashion. full review
There's no denying Austrian director Michael Haneke's skill as a filmmaker, but Funny Games is just a vile cinematic exercise. full review
...brilliant and terrifying and borderline-unwatchable... full review
The worst of the violence occurs off-screen, but Funny Games is still a vicious, vicious movie. full review
Even if you're already aware that violence is sickening, thank you very much, Haneke's confrontational film stirs up distressing emotions and leaves you to resolve them as best you can. Good luck. You... full review
Funny Games, Michael Haneke's first English-language film -- and a compulsively faithful replica of his notorious 1997 German-language feature of the same title -- subjects its viewers to a long spect... full review
The only ambiguity in Funny Games lies in who's most abused here, the characters or the audience? full review
I would absolutely defend Haneke's right to relaunch his broadside on our voyeuristic vices, but he's not keeping up with the times; he's behind them. full review
Comments
-
September 17, 2008Rubbish. The opening was 20 mins for starters. Another self obessed filmmaker, just what the world needs.
-
August 27, 2008im happy the made a remake of it because english is the only language i know and i hate subtittles
-
-
July 7, 2008Ten years later, Michael Haneke revisits an old film, and does it again.
It is exactly the same.
But the thing is, what would you change? When I say "does it again", I don't just mean remade it, I mean he made a great remake. What's more, considering the content of the film, doing it again, exactly the same way, is rather appropriate, considering the metafictional tone.
I generally really really hate remakes, but something about this one gives a feeling of honesty and verve, whereas 99% of remakes today are just lazily produced fluff. -
March 27, 2008the film addresses the filmmaker/audience relationship, that was the main thesis of the film. The film is meant to "play a game" with the audience, and break the rules of traditional hollywood cinematic grammar. Thereby interupting you're expecation of what is SUPPOSED to happen. This point is blatantly spelled out at the end of the film during the conversation on the boat, that is if you did'nt get it already. Filmicly, it was brilliant. The plot line was fragmented, and intentionally done that way. I have never seen a widely distributed, feature length film that critiques film making so aggressively. Though it has been done countless times in the art film world (by art film i don't mean indie movies btw). One of the best big budget features I've seen in a long time.
-
March 18, 2008Is a frame for frame of Michael Haneke original film from '98 but in English language.It starts getting funny with the psychos playing these silly & mind games but after awhile this perverse tale of sadism gets boring.The film could've been interesting if there was more to the story instead of seeing the reaction of people being tortured & potential to see few effective scenes if it wasn't off screen.As the film progresses it feels like is taking too long to get to the point besides can't help thinking of "A clockwork Orange" which is more violent & perverse than this one.
-
-
March 12, 2008I haven't seen the original, but this movie looks really good. :) Can't wait to see it this friday. The movie poster is so pretty!
-
September 17, 2007I hear the remake is going to be exactly like the original... check out the trailer on youtube, the scenes match up perfectly and it looks really good.
-
Critic ratings and reviews powered by RottenTomatoes.com
Fresh (60% or more critics rated the movie positively)
Rotten (59% or fewer critics rated the movie positively)
All Rotten Tomatoes content is used under license from Rotten Tomatoes. Rotten Tomatoes, Certified Fresh, and the Tomatometer are the trademarks of Incfusion Corporation, d/b/a Rotten Tomatoes, a subsidiary of IGN Entertainment, Inc.




























