Daniel Day-Lewis, Leonardo DiCaprio, Cameron Diaz

In 1863, Amsterdam Vallon returns to the Five Points area of New York City seeking revenge against Bill the Butcher, his father's killer.

Flixster Users

76% liked it

254,277 ratings

Critics

76% liked it

189 critics

R, 2 hrs. 44 min.

Directed by: Martin Scorsese

Release Date: December 20, 2002

Invite friends to see

DVD Release Date: July 1, 2003

Stats: 12,013 reviews

Get movie widget Recommend it Add to Favorites

Your Rating



clear rating

Flixster Reviews (12,013)


  • September 7, 2009
    Not a bad film but it didn't feel like a Scorsese movie. Had some great lines in it, although some are very questionable. Thank you to Mr Scorsese though for getting Daniel Day-Lewis out of retirement! Well worth a watch!
  • June 24, 2009
    Gangs of New York is just perfect entertainment. It is an enthralling, bloody, melodramatic epic that more than justifies its two and one half hour running time. In Gangs director Martin Scorsese spins another tale of the New York underworld but with a twist. Instead of the mid-t...( read more)wentieth century organized crime milieu of Goodfellas, Scorsese ventures back to the 19th century to show us the origin of the modern street gang.

    It's the early 1860s and the notorious Five Points slum is ruled by the savage `Bill the Butcher'. The viciously nationalistic Bill terrorizes all the immigrant masses jammed into his slum but seems to harbor a particular hatred for the Irish population. Into this seething cauldron wanders mysterious young Amsterdam Vallon who soon works his way into the trust and affection of Bloody Bill. Amsterdam, however, has a past with the unsuspecting Butcher and sports an agenda not unlike a certain Prince of Denmark. Bloody vengeance and dark betrayal soon come to pass, all played against a backdrop of corruption and unrest that lead to up to the horrors of New York Civil War draft riots.

    Daniel Day-Lewis is marvelous as Bill the Butcher. His Bill is both recognizably human and a full bore, moustache-twirling villain. Day-Lewis strides his savage and profane way across the screen and steals the whole of the movie. The only other actor to approach Day-Lewis' level is Jim Broadbent as William 'Boss' Tweed. Broadbent is Tweed's spitting image and he makes the grasping old pirate so winning we find ourselves rooting for Tweed against the gaggle of reformers that infest his domain. Though Leonardo DiCaprio is the nominal lead of the picture he is overshadowed by his co-stars. Large, slope shouldered and vaguely brutish looking, DiCaprio is physically perfect for Amsterdam. While he could have used some of the fire and rage of a young James Cagney, DiCaprio's acting is superior throughout the movie. The problem is that Amsterdam just isn't as flashy a role as Bill or Tweed and, as good as DiCaprio is; Day-Lewis operates on a whole other level. Cameron Diaz as the beautiful pickpocket Jenny, never convinces that she is a product of the slums. Despite having considerable screen time, Diaz fades into the background when compared to her more powerful co-stars.

    Just as important as the actors are to Gangs is the period atmosphere that drips off the screen. The amazing old New York set has an air of lived in reality that you could cut with a knife. You can almost smell the vermin. Gangs is entirely free of the embalmed feeling you get from most modern period movies. The cast handles the period argot as if it were their true speech and wear their costumes like lived-in clothing. You come away convinced that this is how the world looked and sounded in 1862.

    Scorsese does eschew all nuance and subtlety in Gangs. Instead he tells his tale in wide, bold, exploitive and melodramatic strokes that make the movies two and a half hours fly by. Be warned that if you are waiting to see Gangs on DVD you are making a huge mistake. Gangs has to be seen at the theater. The detail and scope of the film cries out to be viewed in all its wide screen glory. This movie is a fantastic achievement.
  • April 26, 2009
    A cruel, depressing movie about the dark side of the birth of America. As the union ended slavery and fought the South to uphold its values, New York city was a slum controlled by gangs where even the fire brigades would rather fight each other than put out a fire. It makes you w...( read more)onder how such a icon of civilisation emerged so quickly from such barbarity, and worth seeing for this reason alone. Though, for a simple revenge tale it is too long; I fell asleep during the middle half-hour and the plot hadn't moved on.
  • April 6, 2009
    Never expect Martin Scorcese to drift far from gangs and bloodshed. And of course, throw in history, politics, corruption, religion, racism and steak knives.... and then its not quite different from his other films, just set back 100 years earlier.


    Strong performances all aroun...( read more)d, though Leo's irish accent is unconvincing, he did a better South African one in Blood Diamond (and allround better movie) What I dont get about this film is the music, it was seriously out of place and didnt quite suit it.

    Setting, costumes, the tension and build up of the story was very good, it just gets better and better as it movies until the end. What we are seeing is the rise of New York, and how much blood was shed... and though there have been many changes to this day, gangs havn't in theory and practicality... and ironically enough, New York was created on the blood filled streets.

    war and conflict gives way to the rise of people and nations... you can't help but understand the Native American's fight for independance and ownership and solidarity, and on the other hand are the immigrants looking for a new life in "America." Then Uptown are the pissant aristocrats which everyone hate, but forced to deal with.

    When it all boils down to the basics, civilisation in the end becomes as simple when the blades and blood flow take over where words are lost. Nothing is more forecful to get your ideals and voice heard than fighting for power and dispatching your enemy to God or hell.


    Very good movie... but I think Leo was kinda miscast in this... he did okay, by virtue of is talent, but it wasn't really for him. Colin Farrell or a pure bred englishman would have done much better, as Day-Lewis was gold.

    Enjoy.
  • December 12, 2008
    A hugely impressive film from Martin Scorsese, everything in the movie is on such a grand level, acting, scenery, it?s epic length.

    A great cast from both sides of the pond, where there were Irish with an American accent and Americans with an Irish accent.

    Personally, I?m...( read more) not too much of a fan of Award ceremonies, as I don?t like them to influence my film choices, but it?s easy to see where all the awards came from in the making of this film, Daniel Day-Lewis was outstanding and there's no doubt of him earning his award for this role.
  • November 20, 2009
    Great movie, excellent acting
  • November 17, 2009
    Set in New York City, 1840-1863, a young man named Amsterdam (Leonardo DiCaprio) seeks vengeance against Bill "The Butcher" Poole (Daniel Day-Lewis), the man who killed his father. Though he secures the help of pickpocket Jenny Everdeane, the task at hand may be more dangerous th...( read more)an Amsterdam ever imagined when he realizes that his father was murdered as a result of gang warfare between the powerful Manhattan gangs. Amid the crooked cops and corrupt politicians of the Tammany Hall era, political enforcer Bill Poole stands out as only one scoundrel in the crime-plagued Five Points section of lower Manhattan in the early 1860s.

    also stars Cameron Diaz, Jim Broadbent, Liam Neeson and John C. Riley.

    directed by Martin Scorsesse.
  • November 12, 2009
    Best Actor 2002 - Best Sound Mixing 2002 - Best Sound editing 2002 - Best Costume design 2002 - Best Adapted Screenplay 2002
  • November 7, 2009
    Killing killing killing...
    Nothing special
  • November 5, 2009
    This film is highly expressive! the atmosphere is well thought out, and the acting is great (Daniel Day-Lewis)... Martin Scorsese has made an amazing and intense piece of art, which many should be appreciative.

Critic Reviews


January 9, 2003
Peter Travers, Rolling Stone

A triumph of pure craft and passionate heart. full review

December 27, 2002
David Edelstein, Slate

It's a magnificent achievement -- holes, tatters, crudities, screw-ups, and all. full review

December 20, 2002
Moira MacDonald, Seattle Times

Bill the Butcher is a coiled monster with a guttural voice and a sharply thrown knife; Day-Lewis brings him to glittery, intense life. full review

December 20, 2002
Mick LaSalle, San Francisco Chronicle

I doubt I'll ever be able to look at a smirking fellow in old daguerreotype, with rolled-up sleeves and a mustache, and not think of Daniel Day-Lewis and all that vitality lost to time. full review

December 20, 2002
Stephanie Zacharek, Salon.com

The world needs more filmmakers with passionate enthusiasms like Martin Scorsese. But it doesn't need Gangs of New York. full review

December 20, 2002
Roger Ebert, Chicago Sun-Times

All of this is a triumph for Scorsese, and yet I do not think this film is in the first rank of his masterpieces. It is very good but not great. full review

December 19, 2002
A.O. Scott, The New York Times

This is historical filmmaking without the balm of right-thinking ideology, either liberal or conservative. Mr. Scorsese's bravery and integrity in advancing this vision can hardly be underestimated. full review

View more Gangs of New York reviews at RottenTomatoes.com

Comments


  • eishbee
    June 7, 2008
    Undoubtedly one of the greatest movies ever made in any language!! I have seen it five times and it is getting better with each show....
  • MorpheusOne
    February 7, 2008
    This movie is absolutely blood thirsty!
  • TheOreo
    July 8, 2007
    simply brilliant.
  • jbird77
    June 25, 2007
    I absolutely loved this movie but it always hangs over my head. After i saw it, i read that Willem Dafoe was considered for the Butcher, although Daniel Day-Lewis did an outstanding job, i would have loved to have seen Dafoe in that role.
  • nuttyscotsman
    March 31, 2007
    it was good but abit confusing for me at times

Critic ratings and reviews powered by RottenTomatoes.com

Fresh (60% or more critics rated the movie positively)

Rotten (59% or fewer critics rated the movie positively)

More Like This


Click a thumb to vote on that suggestion, or add your own suggestions.

  • V for Vendetta
    V for Vendetta (53%)
  • The Aviator
    The Aviator (55%)
  • The Last of the Mohicans
    The Last of the Mohicans (56%)
  • Michael Collins
    Michael Collins (100%)

Facts


No facts approved yet. Be the first

Gangs of New York : Watch Free on TV


Gangs of New York Trivia


  • Martin Scorcese & Leonardo Dicaprio have collaborated on 2 films. They are...  Answer »
  • "Ears and noses will be the trophies of the day... but NO ONE SHALL TOUCH HIM!!" This line comes from which movie?  Answer »
  • Which movie has this tagline : " America Was Born In The Streets "  Answer »
  • in the film, gangs of new york, the character william cutting is also known as what?  Answer »

Recent News


No recent headlines. Got one?

Most Popular Skin