J.T. Walsh, Jack Wallace, Joe Mantegna

Flixster Users

80% liked it

4,843 ratings

Critics

96% liked it

25 critics

R, 101 min.

Directed by: David Mamet

Release Date: October 1, 1987

Invite friends to see

DVD Release Date: December 19, 2000

Get It:

Stats: 360 reviews

Get movie widget Recommend it Add to Favorites

Your Rating



clear rating
Share on: Facebook Twitter

Flixster Reviews (360)


  • October 14, 2009
    Cheesy, dated and more of a film made for tv, yet, there was something quite interesting about this film, that left me enjoying it.
  • March 21, 2009
    Okay, first things first:
    David Mamet is THE SHIT.
    Joe Mantegna is the man.
    Lindsay Crouse is a stupid bitch who can't act.

    Predictable script, decent execution - I was let down with this one. It turned out to be an OK movie...but damn it all was Crouse one GIGANTIC BLOCK OF WO...( read more)OD. She couldn't act for shit. It was like Mamet told her...no no no Goddamnit Lindsay, you did something in that scene. Try it again, except this time, turn to fucking stone when you should be reacting to something, you crazy whore.
  • August 10, 2008
    Lindsay Crouse is an eminent psychologist who is desperate for adventure. One day she'll meet Joe Mantegna's character, a swindler that will provide her a few tricks to reach a little excitement in her life. There will be, of course, a few bumps on their way.
    A tight and thoughtf...( read more)ul writing and direction along with Juan Ruiz Anchia's stylish photographic work, construct a rich and atmospheric hitchcockian tour de force with no room for gratuitousness, not even in Mamet's notorious use of coarse words. David Mamet's first and easily best film.
  • February 20, 2008
    Mamet and Mantegna, perfect together. Highly Recommended.
  • January 18, 2008
    Okay, so could Lindsay Crouse be any more awful? I know pretty much everyone hates her in this movie but Jesus Christ, that was a dull performance. I don't know if she was attempting sociopathy by way of emotional stunting, but what she really accomplished was sheer tedium. Joe M...( read more)antegna wasn't too much better, playing some unctuous cipher for the real star of the movie - the con.

    Mamet's a pretty damn good writer, lack of range and self-indulgent style notwithstanding, and here he has developed a screenplay that starts out riveting but becomes predictable and floppy. I had the entire half hour of the movie mapped out before it even started; how's that for a disappointing ending? I think we can blame Lindsay Crouse for that too. God, she was bad. But yeah, the first and most of the second act are this great psychological clash between a woman and a man, both of whom make their living working out the human brain in very different ways. The cons themselves are a lot of fun to watch...just not that last one because you know what's coming. I don't know if it's a product of the movie's age or just straight-out simplicity, but it was a bust.

    Not a bad movie per se, but the payoff was a mess.
  • July 17, 2009
    I tried watching this about 5 times without being able to watch more than 5 minutes because of the horrific acting. Once I finally got past that initially, and the plot got introduced, I managed to make my through and it wasn't that bad.

    The main actress was horrible, I honestly...( read more) don't remember the last time I saw acting that bad. Ugh. Anyway, Joe Mantegna, though I have no idea who he is, was alright. The plot, although extremely predictable, was fun to watch anyway.
  • June 13, 2009
    Now I think most of us will agree that The Sting is one of the greatest con movies ever made. It's a film that cheats you and then rewards you in the end. Having said that, the rug has never been so completely pulled from my feet as it was in House of Games. Like The Sting, if yo...( read more)u think you know what's going on one minute the next minute you will probably be the victim of a great sucker punch. The unpredictability in the film is what makes it so great. As each con gets more and more intricate, you will feel that you have been duped as a viewer-in an enjoyable way of coarse. The plot really can not be dicussed at all because that would not do you or the film justice at all. I can talk about the brilliant writing and direction of David Mamet. He writes in such a way that you feel that you are in the conversations. He writes how people talk and that is so rare in Hollywood these days.It usually does not turn out well for a screenwriter to take the reigns and direct the movie himself but Mamet does not take a single misstep here. His shots are always interesting and his pacing of the cons themselves are the most important and he does that to perfection too. The performances of Crouse(Mamet's real life wife) and Mantegna are top notch and don't waste a single line of their juicy dialogue. Check this overlooked classic out and see what con baffles you.
  • April 6, 2009
    Predictable. I'm sure it was the shit in its day. Well done, despite Crouse. Is this why I'd never heard of her?
  • December 20, 2008
    as a story and overall concept, I really liked it. a seedy conman crime drama with characters who are unapologetically human. it's a little bit of The Sting, a little bit of Dirty Rotten Scoundrels, and completely David Mamet. technically, though, I thought it was downright aw...( read more)ful. the acting was frighteningly bad considering Mamet's standards, and the dialogue was sparsely sprinkled with high points at best. characters finally start to gain a little depth toward the end, but otherwise they're quite wooden. as an intellectual concept, I really enjoyed this movie. as a movie, I thought it was discouragingly mediocre.
  • November 28, 2008
    This was terribly disappointing. I'd heard that it was brilliant, but it's nothing of the sort. Mamet's writing is forced and obvious, with twists so blatant and telegraphed it's almost laughable (*spoilers* how could she NOT have realised Billy Hahn was in on the con? Why would ...( read more)he say he owed 25 grand when he only owed 800? Any reasonable person would ask this question immediately, and yet this apparent professional psychologist fails to even twig slightly until it's much too late. And then she just hands over 80 grand after all she's learned? Please! As soon as she did that, I actually said out loud, "Lady, you've just been conned." Awful. *end spoilers*) To make things worse, the main character is one of the most shallow stereotypes I've ever seen on film. Did Mamet do even the slightest bit of research? Any psychologist who hugs their patient and consoles them with "It's all right, darling" should be fired immediately. Also Lindsay Crouse is a fucking atrocious actor, and the film has dated very, very badly. Crouse looks like a bad caricature from a book that I just made up called "Why the Eighties Sucked". Also some other things which I can't be bothered typing. Stay away.

Critic Reviews


Comments


This board looks lonely. Be the first to talk about "House of Games" !

Critic ratings and reviews powered by RottenTomatoes.com

Fresh (60% or more critics rated the movie positively)

Rotten (59% or fewer critics rated the movie positively)

Official Trailer

More Like This


Click a thumb to vote on that suggestion, or add your own suggestions.

  • Edmond
    Edmond (83%)
  • Following
    Following (71%)
  • Nine Queens (Nueve reinas)
    Nine Queens (Nueve reinas) (50%)
  • Derailed
    Derailed (25%)

Facts


No facts approved yet. Be the first

House of Games : Watch Free on TV


House of Games Trivia


  • This con film involves a psychologist, poker, murders and a squirt gun. It was directed by a writer famous for his dialogue.  Answer »
  • At the end of the movie "SHAUN OF THE DEAD", what did Shaun did to his friend Ed?  Answer »
  • Erin and Terry bought Rhett alot of video games to make him happy in The Glass House ?  Answer »

Movie Quizzes


No quizzes for House of Games. Want to create one?

Video Clips


No video clips yet. Want to upload one?

Recent News


No recent headlines. Got one?

Most Popular Skin


No skins yet. Interested in creating one?