Charlton Heston, David Warner, John Glover

An insurance investigator begins discovering that the impact a horror writer's books have on his fans is more than inspirational.

Flixster Users

75% liked it

18,769 ratings

Critics

48% liked it

29 critics

R, 95 min.

Directed by: John Carpenter

Release Date: February 3, 1995

Invite friends to see

DVD Release Date: February 8, 2000

Get It:

Stats: 1,172 reviews

Get movie widget Recommend it Add to Favorites

Your Rating



clear rating

Flixster Reviews (1,172)


  • November 2, 2009
    Quite good despise it's flaws. Carpenter's last decent film and proof that you can create creepy material without the need of using buckets of blood, or making all your characters into idiots that give their backs to derranged killers.
  • October 15, 2009
    The idea of such lowbrow horror spawning such madness, is a hard one to go along with. It's also never really clear how serious the film is about it's themes. The story of a man trapped inside a horror novelist's world is a great one for Carpenter. It means he can use all his ski...( read more)lls and visionary tactics, to assemble some wonderful creatures/vignettes, even if the film as a whole fails to really capture. Neill is a fantastic lead, making his sane-man in an insane world (or vice-versa) easy to associate with. It does seem older than it is, probably because this really feels like Stephen King territory.
  • September 22, 2009
    As a huge Lovecraft reader, I think the best film versions of his work are movies like these where the script is essentially fantastic fanfic.

    This film is hypnotically creepy and I loved every second of it. Mind you, in addition to my Lovecraft love, I am also fascinated with ...( read more)films about novel authors and love the possibilities of a sanitarium setting done to delightful melodrama proportions like this one.

    Those goodies said, this is not an accessible film because it is essentially set inside the mind of a madman. If you hate dream sequences come alive and living scenes descending into nightmare, with all the odd and inexplicable dream logic intact, you will find yourself swamped by WTF? moments and not be able to enjoy the creepiness on display here.

    The ending for me is one of the few "twist" endings I find satisfying. The effects are top notch as one would expect from Carpenter. THE BIG FX EXCPETION: On principle, I disagree with showing full "Old Ones" or any such Lovecraft "deities" or "indescribable" creatures because they are MEANT to be indescribable and thusly impossible for us to even comprehend were one ever to be real and appear to a human, much less be possible for any human to replicate the experience - and to IMAGINE what these creatures could look like is an insult to Lovecraft's central driving theme of fear of the unknowable. In this film, the Old Ones on display are not an exception to this rule of "Don't show the top tier Lovecraft nasties" - they aren't indescribable horror finally and unbelievably realized, but instead just the exact sort of effects installation style you would expect from John Carpenter. I LIKE his style so I'm not as offended by what was done here to Lovecraft creatures so much as the horrendously awful CGI Dagon in Stuart Gordon's Dagon.

    To me, this is undeniably a horror classic and every horror fan should have this on their to-see list or objective "Best of Horror" lists. The real test of genuine greatness is that my dreams the night after screening this film were looping bits from the film with tiny touches of my own subconscious added details.
  • May 23, 2008
    If you haven't seen this yet then you're totally missing out. This is one of John Carpenter's best!


    "The story follows private investigator John Trent whose specialty is insurance fraud. He is called in by a publisher to investigate the alleged disappearance of the phenomena...( read more)lly popular horror novelist, Sutter Cane. Having vanished with his most recent novel unfinished, Cane's publisher asks Trent to retrieve the work at stake. Trent thinks the whole thing is a publicity stunt but agrees to take the case.

    Trent, accompanied by Cane's editor, Linda Styles, eventually tracks the writer to the remote New England town of Hobbs End, previously thought only to exist in Cane's stories. There it soon becomes clear that the wall between fantasy and reality has blurred."


    This film pays tribute to the work of horror novelist H. P. Lovecraft. I just love anything that deals with Lovecrafts's work, he has so much that's going on with his stories, all the key elements(along with many great creepy characters), that make a horror story get the well worth attention it deserves.

    This movie is heavy on atmosphere. I'm talking about drenched in, all out, spooky ass atmosphere. Like I have said in another review, one of the most important key elements in a horror film is definitely the atmosphere. There are many creepy characters in this as well...a disfigured and angry police officer, a ghostly old and pasty faced man riding a bicycle, deformed and demonically evil little children, an old creepy woman who sprouts creature-like legs while chopping her husband up with an axe, and lots and lots more! This movie is just completely insane. It's an all out fun film to watch. The ending in this is completely brilliant too. It totally blew my mind.

    In the Mouth of Madness is a spooky and darkly atmospheric fun film to watch. If you're a horror fan and you haven't seen this one yet, you must get your hands on it as soon as possible. Even if you're not a horror fan...to anyone who hasn't seen this movie, Watch it Soon! Great film!

    Other Reviews:

    "In the Mouth of Madness combines excellent screen writing and superb acting with the psychosis of Lovecraft and the brilliant direction of Carpenter to create memorable psychological horror."
    - Best-Horror-Movies.com


    "In the Mouth of Madness made me sit back and say "Wow, this guy is amazing." The music, the monsters, the story, the ending-the film is just a genuinely solid movie all-around."
    - Oh, the Horror!


    "Another awesome film by Sam Neil and a great story by John Carpenter."
    - Obscure Horror


    "Man, oh man! The movie that kept me up at nights for a year, the movie I foisted upon my friends knowing all the while they'd never appreciate it like I do, the movie people keeps saying "Huh?" to when I tell them my favorite films."
    - The Cavalcade of Schlock


    "This was a great movie. I love these kind of what-if movies. I mean, what if what we read was real or somehow the line between fiction and reality was blurred? What if reality was just what everyone agreed upon? What is reality, anywho? All these questions are raised in the film."
    - Fatally Yours


    "In the Mouth of Madness might be one of the best things that Carpenter has done to date."
    - Evil Dread

    Photobucket
  • May 20, 2008
    Great ensemble of b-movie actors, and awesome John Carpenter special effects. Otherwise, it was okay.
  • November 6, 2009
    This movie was better than I expected. An usual Lovecraft history and an ever awesome job by Carpenter. A negative point is the acting by the lead role actress. Some scenes she seems ridiculous.
  • October 31, 2009
    This John Carpenter movie from the mid nineties is said to be his last successful effort before dedicating his career to crap like Ghosts of Mars. I?m not sure I can agree that this is a success, but it does have some good ideas, most of which can probably be attributed to scree...( read more)nwriter Michael De Luca. The movie skirts around interesting notions of fiction becoming reality and reality becoming fiction, but the logic it uses about this is fuzzy and not as well realized as it could have been. Additionally it has a lot of the same B-movie shortcomings that seem to ruin a lot of Carpenter flicks, namely over the top acting and inelegant dialogue. Generally it doesn?t feel like Carpenter is putting his heart into this one, which is unfortunate because one gets a sense of just how good it could have been with a little more love. On the bright side, it?s got some pretty cool animatronic creatures and it is able to work pretty good for about twenty minutes late into the second act and early in the third. This momentum is mostly wasted on an odd ending that goes on for a good fifteen minutes after the movie?s true climax.
  • October 25, 2009
    As an aspiring author seeing this film was something magical and at the same time extremely disturbing. In the Mouth of Madness is not your typical horror, it may look like that from the trailer but let me tell you first hand that this film, as the title suggest, is pure an...( read more)d unflinching madness.





    In the Mouth of Madness has to be one of the most effective and well thought out horror pictures of the 90's maybe even today. It draws it's brilliance and dark theme straight from the minds of John Carpenter and Stephen King. It's morbid, dark, ingenious and oh so spooky. It's a film that resonates with the earlier works of John"Spooky" Carpenter and without him this film would have failed miserably to really induce any real madness or scares. It's a brilliant and severely underrated film that if you watch it It will driver you mad.


    San Neill(Who does good here.) has some charm and great skill to be in horror as in half the movie once he get's to Hobbs End he is almost always petrified with fear at the horrific things he seems. It's quite amazing to watch and see how your fear can mount and grow into your worst paranoiac nightmare when you least expect it. But none the less the cast does great in this dark psychological horror film.




    This film is to me what Titanic is to romance fans. It's a horror gem the likes you have never really quite seen it's the type of film that will haunt your dreams and it will bleed into your reality making everything around you into something horrifying. it's a great film to see, but I have just one request if you do, be careful because if your not I can promise you this film will drive you absolutely mad.
  • October 23, 2009
    Love it. Not far from the truth about what this world has become in terms of following the new and popular. Every time I'm driving down/driven down a dark empty road in the middle of nowhere, I joke about how messed up it would be to see the boy on the bike in the movie.
  • October 19, 2009
    Yet another gem I've viewed on the Sci-Fi channel lately. I'm so down with John Carpenter, that dude from Jurassic Park and HP Lovecraft. Good stuff. Anybody know if that actor John Glover is related to great Irish actor Danny Glover?

Critic Reviews


January 1, 2000
Roger Ebert, Chicago Sun-Times

One wonders how In the Mouth of Madness might have turned out if the script had contained even a little more wit and ambition. full review

January 1, 2000
Mick LaSalle, San Francisco Chronicle

Cheesy horror celebrating the power of cheesy horror, while pretending to be appalled. full review

View more In the Mouth of Madness reviews at RottenTomatoes.com

Comments


  • livesayjd
    April 24, 2009
    I think the overall point was to represent Pickman's image. Mrs Pickman was simply a stand-in to catch the viewer's attention. As the painting changed, so did she. Hobbe's End was essentially the typical New England town, but as Sutter Cane's influence became stronger, even the "sweet old bat" had to be molded and changed like the clay that Pickman used to accurately depict the monstrosities that served to inspire him.
  • IRONMANBLAST
    March 10, 2008
    I TRY NOT FOLLOW OR DELVE INTO HYPE ABOUT MOVIES OR ANYTHING IN GENERAL WHEN I FIRST FOUND THIS I TREATED IT LIKE A BEST KEPT SECRET BACK IN 95' I SEE THERE ARE MIXED OPINIONS HERE I WONT SAY IT IS CARPENTERS GREATEST EFFORT OR IT SUCKS OR THIS AND THAT BUT I WILL SAY THAT THIS MOVIE ALWAYS HOLDS A CORNER OF MY MIND AND WAS SEEMINGLY WAY BETTER THE VERY FIRST TIME I SAW IT THAN ANYTIME SINCE MAYBE BECAUSE OF ALL THAT HAS C0ME TO PASS IN THE LAST 13 YEARS, STILL I LOVE IT.
    "DO YOU READ SUTTER CANE?!"
  • nachtlichschrecken
    December 29, 2007
    I was wondering if anyone could answer something for me: On this commentary, Carpenter said that the old woman at Hobb's End was taken from Lovecraft's story "Pickman's Model". It is a very scary story, but there is nothing like that woman in it. The only thing I could think that would be related is the painting. (Pickman painted certain creatures.

Critic ratings and reviews powered by RottenTomatoes.com

Fresh (60% or more critics rated the movie positively)

Rotten (59% or fewer critics rated the movie positively)

Official Trailer

More Like This


Click a thumb to vote on that suggestion, or add your own suggestions.

  • El Laberinto del Fauno (Pan's Labyrinth)
    El Laberinto del Fauno (Pan's Labyrinth) (46%)
  • Silent Hill
    Silent Hill (59%)
  • End of Days
    End of Days (0%)
  • House (Ding Dong, You're Dead)
    House (Ding Dong, You're Dead) (0%)

Facts


No facts approved yet. Be the first

In the Mouth of M... : Watch Free on TV


In the Mouth of Madness Trivia


  • which actor starred in the horror movies The Omen: Final Conflict, In The Mouth Of Madness and Event Horizon?  Answer »
  • Which movie is Horror ?  Answer »
  • Director John Carpenter has what he calls an Apocalypse Trilogy. The 2nd and 3rd films are "The Prince of Darkness" and "In the Mouth of Madness". What was the name of the 1st film of this "Trilogy"?  Answer »
  • which actor plays 'john trent' in john carpenters 1995 movie 'in the mouth of madness'?  Answer »

Video Clips


No video clips yet. Want to upload one?

Recent News


No recent headlines. Got one?

Most Popular Skin