Albert Dupontel, Jean-Louis Costes, Jo Prestia

After a fight with her coked-up boyfriend Marcus, Alex leaves a party to go home. She never gets there; instead she's raped in a desolate tunnel. Her angry boyfriend, and her buddy Pierre decide to ta...( read more  read more... )ke justice into their own hands and hunt down the rapist themselves.

Flixster Users

83% liked it

35,881 ratings

Critics

55% liked it

119 critics

Unrated, 1 hr. 34 min.

Directed by: Gaspar Noe

Release Date: January 1, 2002

Invite friends to see

DVD Release Date: August 5, 2003

Get It:

Stats: 3,581 reviews

Get movie widget Recommend it Add to Favorites

Your Rating



clear rating
Share on: Facebook Twitter

Flixster Reviews (3,581)


  • September 30, 2009
    Hard to watch in places due to the experimental cinematography, hard to watch in places due to the graphic and horrific rape and violence. I know that's not much of a recommendation but this is a powerful film with superb acting, direction and story and is not to be missed or mis...( read more)understood!
  • June 26, 2009
    Told in the tradition of that in "Memento" i.e the storyline is played backwards, the film opens with a very visually dark scene accompanied by a pretty bizarre sound (that's still running through my head!! ha ha), along with some very dizzy filming, the viewer isn't particularly...( read more) aware of what is going on straight away, but within the first couple of scenes the storyline developes and of course you are intrigued to know, how it all began.

    The married couple, Cassel and Bellucci are great together on screen in this unique, bizarre and very entertaining film. One scene in particular is very daring and controversial.

    Another great performance from Cassel who seems to manage to express every emotion possible throughout the process of the film.
  • June 12, 2009
    A young woman is brutally raped in a subway tunnel provoking huge discussions between beret wearing chin strokers as to whether or not it's art. This film is most definitely well acted, particularly I'd have to say by Monica Belucci who I never really considered a great actress b...( read more)efore, but she is totally believable which is why the ordeal she endures is even more difficult to stomach. The rape scene is truly horrific; I genuinely believe that sensationalism was not the aim, and its brutal realism is almost unbearable. But what of the rest of the film? The story is told in reverse, but I couldn't really see the reason why beyond disguising the minimality of the plot. Were we supposed to be MORE horrified by what we'd seen after we'd gotten to know some personal details about the victim? That makes little sense in the context of a film where realism rather than manipulation is supposed to be the key to the reaction to what we are seeing. I do believe that there was a point to making this film beyond commercial shock value, but whatever the message was, it is lost in a morbid sea of erratic camera movements and sexual violence. I could just as easily dismiss any attempts at intellectualizing it and just describe it as Cloverfield with rape instead of a monster. When I was at art college, a fellow student decided to illustrate the horror of rape, and how he chose to do it was draw, well, a rape. We thought it was a powerful and challenging piece of work at the time, but now I look back I see it was rather naive and immature to the point where it could be construed as another form of dumbing down; as if witnessing the act itself is the only way a viewer could understand that "rape is bad". This film reminded me of that illustration. It is easy to illicit a gut reaction; the job of art is to provoke thought. In that, this film fails. The sensation is rather more like having your nose rubbed in somebody else's filth.
  • March 7, 2009
    Standard tale of vengeance told in a VERY non-standard way. The film begins with an ending and ends with a beginning. As a result, you're confronted with the brutality of revenge before you've experienced the motive behind it.

    Irreversible is an ingenious bit of film-...( read more)making that manages to be both cerebral and, at times, unrelentingly violent. A fantastic film that I never, never, never want to see again.
  • December 8, 2008
    This is a hypnotic film utterly self-contained and deserving of the proclamation as genius.

    I was skeptical of this film, as I am skeptical of any movie that uses rape to sensationalize itself and gain publicity. Most films like that, the rape scene is the only decent part and t...( read more)he rest of the film is dreck. Well, this whole film is just astonishing, blinding, and mind-warping.

    The camerawork had me in a trance state, and it is some of the most amazing cinematography I've seen in ANY recent film. For people who clearly do not know anything about film technique and openly admit that with their negative reviews of the cinematography: this isn't the handheld crap you gobble up at the box office, you just think that because you think "oh camera's moving and that means they mustn't have bothered setting up the shot", when actually these are some of the most cleverly coordinated sequences in film history.

    I love the reverse linear implemented here, as it really drives home the film's spoken point: "Time ruins everything".

    There is NO excuse for anyone serious about film not to view this entire work.

    Hot Gay Sex commentary: another one on the list wherein the hot gay sex is a minor detail in a large shock/exploitation plot centered on rape. Still, the third scene of the film is entirely set in an uber butch leather/BDSM sex den, and features some quite memorable snippets, especially the guy begging to get fisted. There's also loads of male frontal nudity here - something Americans know next to nothing about.

    "So Fucked Up" highlight: Bashing in the guy's face - it's one of the greater special effects achievements in history; it's HOW ONE DOES practical and CG together.
  • November 18, 2009
    dare,monica totally,,act and naked!!!
  • November 12, 2009
    Best Actress 2002 - Best Art Direction 2002
  • November 12, 2009
    alucinante, horrible, molesta... una gran pelicula
  • November 8, 2009
    Somehow it just flows so naturally; which is very weird since it's backwards.
  • October 30, 2009
    This brutal backwards journey into the darkside of human nature is well acted, creative and recommended.

Critic Reviews


April 22, 2003
David Edelstein, Slate

There is nothing moral about Irreversible -- only sneeringly superior and nihilistic, like Johnny Rotten at his most fatuous. full review

March 14, 2003
Moira MacDonald, Seattle Times

It's shock for shock's sake, and Noé seems to enjoy rubbing our noses in it. full review

March 14, 2003
Steven Rea, Philadelphia Inquirer

Excruciating exercise in voyeurism, provocation and pretentiousness. full review

March 14, 2003
Roger Ebert, Chicago Sun-Times

The reverse chronology makes Irreversible a film that structurally argues against rape and violence, while ordinary chronology would lead us down a seductive narrative path toward a shocking, exploita... full review

February 24, 2003
Peter Travers, Rolling Stone

Noe's considerable accomplishment is to examine the relationship between life and art, time and memory. full review

February 9, 2003
Nick Schager, Filmcritic.com

Irréversible has virtually nothing unique to say about 21st century human relations or society. full review

View more Irreversible reviews at RottenTomatoes.com

Comments


  • genewiev
    August 27, 2007
    after having seen almost every rape movie there is...that is...films involving this sick crime..after having gotten sick to the stomack sitting trough some bluerayed sexy fucked up rapescenes that make this look exciting and in a way enjoyed by the woman person.like she or they have got some dark sexual fantasy come true..this is what i have bin waiting for.this is the real brutallity in your face....its sick...but about time some one had the nerve to show it in this light..the right light...thank you gaspar noe..thank you actors...every one should see this movie.
  • tanath
    June 23, 2007
    This one is hard to recommend. It's not entertainment. It is by far the most difficult movie to watch. It's brutal and disturbing (consider yourself warned). But if you can stomach it enough to put yourself through it, and see past the brutality, it's a masterpiece. Violence like this happens every day in real life and it blows past you. Not after this movie.
  • nickyjefferz
    April 15, 2007
    True Art. Realistic Portrayal Of Life. The Rape And Violance Isnt Just The Bullshit Comedy Of Films Such As "Last House On The Left" - This Is The Way It Is.

    OK, So Im Not A Great Writer, But Please See This Film For What It Realy Is.And How It Changes Your Opinion On Life, Instead Of Hearing That A Woman Was Raped And Murded In The Paper, Now You Know How Bad Rape Realy Is.
  • darkphoenixwing123
    December 7, 2006
    *laughs at the people who can only define it as a "sick movie" and not see it for the masterpiece it is.* :)

Critic ratings and reviews powered by RottenTomatoes.com

Fresh (60% or more critics rated the movie positively)

Rotten (59% or fewer critics rated the movie positively)

Official Trailer

More Like This


Click a thumb to vote on that suggestion, or add your own suggestions.

  • Memento
    Memento (59%)
  • Deliverance
    Deliverance (0%)
  • Stay
    Stay (67%)
  • Straw Dogs
    Straw Dogs (25%)

Facts


No facts approved yet. Be the first

Irreversible : Watch Free on TV


Irreversible Trivia


  • Sandurz: I can't, it's irreversible. Skroob: Like my raincoat . . .  Answer »
  • Which non-linear movie featured the tag-line 'Time destroys everything'?   Answer »
  • In the film "Irreversible" what does "Marcus" use to kill Philippe?  Answer »

Movie Quizzes


No quizzes for Irreversible. Want to create one?

Recent News


No recent headlines. Got one?

Most Popular Skin