Nikolai Cherkasov, Lyudmila Tselikovskaya

A biography of the first czar of Russia was the final movie project of the great Sergei Eisenstein's life. It would be his undoing, as Stalin was not pleased with part II of this epic. But Ivan the Te...( read more  read more... )rrible, Part I still stands as a magnificent, rich, and strange achievement. This is a "composed" film to make Hitchcock look slapdash; every frame is arranged with the eye of a painter or choreographer, the mise-en-scène so deliberately artificial that even the actors' bodies become elements of style. (They complained about contorting themselves to fit Eisenstein's designs.) If you don't believe movies can be art, this could be (and has been) dismissed as ludicrous. But Eisenstein's command of light and shadow becomes its own justification, as the fascinating court intrigue plays out in a series of dynamic, eye-filling scenes. This is not a political theorist, but a director drunk on pure cinema. --Robert Horton

Flixster Users

90% liked it

3,261 ratings

Unrated, 96 min.

Directed by: Sergei M. Eisenstein

Release Date: March 8, 1947

Invite friends to see

DVD Release Date: October 28, 1998

Stats: 133 reviews

Your Rating



clear rating

Flixster Reviews (133)


  • July 23, 2008
    Visually stunning.
  • November 27, 2009
    *Eisenstein and Ivan! Amazing. And Barthes fasination with his beard is just as good!
  • August 6, 2009
    Part one of what was supposed to be a three part series. The director died before he could finish part three (he shot scenes for it but odds are he would never have been allowed to finish it because the Russian government wasn't happy with part two.) Anyway, this movie follows ...( read more)Ivan's life up to the point where he turns his back on his people and leaves them to be ruled by the Boyers (I think that's what they were called.)
    I loved it. I loved the way Sergei Eisenstein set up shots, the everything looks in the movie, how he uses shadows. It's a beautiful movie.
  • July 3, 2009
    Sé que se supone que esté megaimpresionado con todas las cosas Eisenstein. Puedo decir que el tipo era un maestro estilizando sus tiros y generando una atmósfera épica... mas, como película, la encontré excesivamente teatral. Las actuaciones y la orquestación de muchas secuencias...( read more) pertenecen a la época silente. La música de Prokofiev ayuda muchísimo. / I know that I should be ultra-impressed with all things Eisenstein. I can say the guy was a master in styling his shots and generating an epic atmosphere... but, as a movie, I found this excessively theatrical. The performances and the orchestration of many of its sequences belong to the silent era. Prokofiev's music helps a lot.
  • March 21, 2009
    If you haven't seen it you must
  • December 16, 2008
    nikolai cherkasov was awesome in this movie. i love how expressive he was in his 'death scene' and the use of lighting and camera work is pretty impressive
  • July 26, 2008
    I kind of want to kick my own ass for loving Russian epics. I know that I swim with the pretentious from day-to-day, but there is no way that I ever thought that I would really dig this movie.

    It is a little hard to review this movie without taking into context Ivan the Ter...( read more)rible -Part II. This movie isn't exactly a sequelized movie, but really one story broken up into two parts. Kind of like Kill Bill, but not at all. (Honestly, I wanted the be the first reviewer ever to compare Ivan the Terrible to Kill Bill. I'm a turd.) This one is really the set up of the film. The amazing this is that Eisenstein is giving this great background on the character for non-Rusisan viewers. But I can imagine that most Russian viewers had at least a basic knowledge of this man and the polticial situation at the time. (For some reason, I think that only Americans aren't aware of their history.) Really, the meat of the story is in part two, but you can't deny how great part one is.

    I first noticed Eisenstein when I watched Alexander Nevsky. That movie impressed the living daylights out of me. I purchased the Eisenstein Sound Years box from Criterion excited to see this one. The thing about Alexander Nevsky is that it is far more accessible than you'd imagine. Ivan the Terrible isn't as accessible, but it still is fairly straightforward with the clarity of direction that Eisenstein offers. But there is one really noticable thing that Eisenstein has as part of his method of directing and that is an extremely creative use of visuals. He has this epic scope to his films. While most directors would be happy with simply throwing hundreds of extras on screen and filming how much spectacle is going on, Eisenstein goes a different direction and frames his spectacle in a perfect way. I'll cite one example, but please understand that there are many scenes that reflect Eisenstein's visual genius. There is a scene in the latter end of the movie where Ivan's armies are moving to their new location as Ivan overlooks their exodus. Rather than simply allowing for the traditional shot of everyone moving by, we get a closeup of Ivan's face juxtaposed with the moving army's straight line off into the horizon. The movie is full of these moments.

    I'm going to address this more when I get to discussing part two, but there's a real Hamlet contrast in this story. There are people making power plays and the movie really plays up the corruption and greed of individual clans. In this case, the evildoers are the Boyars. Eisenstein does a really good job of making these characters look villainous. Considering that the titular character's name describes him as "terrible," the antagonists really are physically and emotionally evil. We see the evil makeup that almost make them look vampiric or demonic in nature. They are scary people and not to be pitied by any means. Also, people in this movie are really represented as cliches of their characters. I mean, he made the dumb guy look dumb. Perhaps that has to do with casting or perhaps it is with makeup, but it's very effective. The odd choice in design is Ivan. Perhaps we aren't necessarily meant to be on his side the entire time, despite the direction and text because he looks extremely demonic. We see the level he goes through and his makeup goes through the darkness that his soul does.

    Again, I have to stress that this movie really needs to be seen with Part 2, but it is a fantastic movie in its own right. Get over your issues with watching artsy movies and just enjoy this one. Also, stop looking down on me. I watched this with Harold and Kumar Escape from Guantanamo Bay, so we know I watch everything.
  • January 16, 2008
    of course in this film , Sergei M. Eisenstein
    shows that first of all he is a huge filmmaker
    please visit the page of the film , there is an interesting analysis by Horton
  • July 6, 2007
    J'adore. Tres bon film. Long donc il faut etre dans une ambiance de renouveau. L'acteur est genial de plus qu'il est super difficille sur le plateau, ce qui cree une dynanique tout autre au film.
  • June 9, 2007
    It's very good and it's easy to see why Eisenstein is important. I couldn't get into it much.

Critic Reviews


No recent reviews.

Comments


This board looks lonely. Be the first to talk about "Ivan the Terrible - Pt. 1" !

Critic ratings and reviews powered by RottenTomatoes.com

Fresh (60% or more critics rated the movie positively)

Rotten (59% or fewer critics rated the movie positively)

More Like This


Click a thumb to vote on that suggestion, or add your own suggestions.

  • Ivan the Terrible - Pt. 2
    Ivan the Terrible - Pt. 2 (100%)
  • Aleksandr Nevskiy (Alexander Nevsky)
    Aleksandr Nevskiy (Alexander Nevsky) (100%)
  • Secha pri Kerzhentse
    Secha pri Kerzhentse (100%)
  • Andrei Rublev
    Andrei Rublev (100%)

Facts


No facts approved yet. Be the first

Ivan the Terrible... : Watch Free on TV


Movie Quizzes


No quizzes for Ivan the Terrible - Pt. 1. Want to create one?

Video Clips


No video clips yet. Want to upload one?

Recent News


No recent headlines. Got one?

Most Popular Skin


No skins yet. Interested in creating one?