Featured Audience Ratings

• jay n

  
  Ordinary western has good actors and nice scenery but nothing you have seen many times before. Still if you like Clint and westerns this will work fine for you.

• Conner R

  
  No, it's not one of the best westerns ever made, but it's really fun. Clint Eastwood gives a great performance and really plays a different western hero than usual. It's also sort've odd to see Robert Duvall as such a scumbag. It's got a really great style… More
  No, it's not one of the best westerns ever made, but it's really fun. Clint Eastwood gives a great performance and really plays a different western hero than usual. It's also sort've odd to see Robert Duvall as such a scumbag. It's got a really great style that makes up for the uneven plot.

• xGary X

  
  Bizarrely sloppy by-the-numbers Clint Eastwood western, particularly considering the talent involved. There seems to be little logic involved in any of it; only Clints charisma and the loosely associated bouts of screen violence demand attention; the "plot" is… More
  Bizarrely sloppy by-the-numbers Clint Eastwood western, particularly considering the talent involved. There seems to be little logic involved in any of it; only Clints charisma and the loosely associated bouts of screen violence demand attention; the "plot" is inconsequential.

• Dean M

  
  Average western film, but I'm such a fan of Clint Eastwood.

• Jim W

  
  Joe Kidd has Clint Eastwood as a moody cowboy who's a man of few words yet again. He's on no ones side but his own, but he has morals. So when a rancher played by Robert Duvall threatens to kill 5 innocent people every hour until a rebel (John Saxon) hands himself in, that… More
  Joe Kidd has Clint Eastwood as a moody cowboy who's a man of few words yet again. He's on no ones side but his own, but he has morals. So when a rancher played by Robert Duvall threatens to kill 5 innocent people every hour until a rebel (John Saxon) hands himself in, that doesn't sit well with Joe Kidd. Eastwood is good of course even if he basically gives the same bad-ass performance in every western he has done. But the name Joe Kidd is just a ridiculous name for him. It works better when he's just a mysterious guy with no name. Still the movie has some decent action and it did keep my attention. It's not the best Eastwood western, but it's not bad either.

• Henrik S

  
  Clint Eastwood is one of those magic ingredients that make any movie worth watching. His stoic screen presence is nearly unmatched and although he can act, he usually does not need do. Thus is the case in Joe Kidd, the story of a righteous but broody gunman who gets mixed up in a war… More
  Clint Eastwood is one of those magic ingredients that make any movie worth watching. His stoic screen presence is nearly unmatched and although he can act, he usually does not need do. Thus is the case in Joe Kidd, the story of a righteous but broody gunman who gets mixed up in a war for land rights in US borderland. It all comes down to a suave showdown and Clint taking center stage once more. Robert Duvall adds some much needed depth into the supporting cast, but all in all, the movie is not much more than a pulp western story.

Read all 6 featured audience ratings