Rate It
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
Not rated. () |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
(14622) |
|
|
|
|
(4513) |
|
|
|
|
(10109) |
|
|
If you liked this, then you'll also probably like...
Got another recommendation for someone who liked this movie? Add it to the list!
Got an opinion? Use the buttons to vote on all the suggestions people have added.
If lots of people vote, the best suggestions will rise to the top.
| Thirteen (64%) |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| This Is England (100%) |
|
|
| Ken Park (2002) (89%) |
|
|
| Visitor Q (Bizita Q) (100%) |
|
|
| Gummo (77%) |
|
|
Plot: An amoral, HIV-positive skateboarder sets out to deflower as many virgins as possible while a local girl who contracted his disease tries to save his next target from her same fate.
Interesting movie, has a very real feel to it. It shows just how messed up teens really are. Definately worth seeing.
larry clarks directorial debut about new york city teenagers and the way they act.was called exploitation by a lot of critics and viwers because of the amount of sex and drugs.exploitation?? obviously the viewers that called it exploitation are either very naive or are the kind of parents that the film warns about. trash that let there kids do whatever they want. the film is about nyc skaters and skaters are crazy motherfuckers. anyone that watches the film and says kids dont act that way i guarantee there kids are out doing the same thing or worse. when the film came out i was 16 and i remember defending it against someone that was saying that kids dont act that way. i know the way i acted when i was a teen and i wasnt an angel. but the films teens are a little crazier but they are also skaters and u know how crazy skaters are from seeing jackass. so instead of calling it exploitation maybe you need to take it as a warning.maybe u should take it as a wraning as to what your kids are really up too instead of thinking your kids are angels and because they tell you they dont do anything bad you need to know that they are really doing things behind your back. smarten up america. what did u do when you were a teen. did you lie to your parents?????
Doesn't pull any punches, or take an elitist standpoint on teenage behavior. It simply showcases it along with it's consequences and tragedy.
Really, Guiys? Really? The most disturbing thing about this movie is the acting. Truly horrendous. This is not an accurate depiction of most teens. If it is, then teenaged girls are especially stupid and naive. Even more frightening, is the rating most fellow flixsters are giving this piece of crap.
Larry Clark turns out a prophetic teen drama asbout inner city oversexed, druggie children in this grim HIV is bad message tale.
This was a disturbing little piece of cinema. The performances are so naturalistic that you'd think it was a documentary.
An unflinching look at young people in the world, today...not for the faint of heart. The antithesis of the "world of Disney".
Another crappy teenage movie. It left me wanting more. It was like a big orgy going bad. The movie has no message or point.
Larry Clark tackles the material in the script he's given with unfiltered ruthlessness. This is one of the most shocking films I've ever seen, depicting a culture that holds nothing sacred and lives in a world without moral boundaries. It's a film full of emotionless sex, brutal violence and careless substance abuse. It doesn't search for poetic meaning or cinematic potential in the subject matter. We're given the facts in all their ugly reality. This is a great film.
I had forgot about this movie till recently. A peak into lives of a group of inner NYC kids. One who is set out to deflower as many virgins as he can, while not aware that he is HIV positive. Very realistic and very scary.
How does director Larry Clark expect anyone to care about his characters when they don't care about themselves?
12 year olds fucking eachother and buying coke and Marijuana from a jamaican in the public fucking park?!? I hate you so much Larry Clark you need to stop hanging around 12-year olds, its kinda pedophelic.
Kids is one of those films about teenagers and is made for teenagers but doesn't seem to give a sh*t about teenagers. This problem relates directly to the director Larry Clark. So what does Clark care about? Letting people know how edgy he is and how he's willing to be so provocative, which I like in a filmmaker when it's done to tell an honest story. Nope here Clark just wants to look edgy while showing the world that people my age are careless *ssholes (Not even the *ssholes I know aim to give girls AIDS.) While I give credit to the cast particularly Chloe Sevigny and Rosario Dawson for trying with the material they have, there's nothing about Kids that my grandmother couldn't tell me. So more or less thanks for nothing Larry Clark.
low budget indie effort from larry clerk, concerning kids who are well into there drugs and unsafe sex, very eye opening, with a ending that is very controversial, but very relevent, and needs to be seen, show this film to kids in schools, itll clear up a few problems
Whether it's Clark's excuse to film child porn or his attempt to portray the "real lives" of teenagers, this film fails on all fronts. While the acting is pretty good, that can mostly be attributed to the actors pretty much portraying either themselves or people they have known. It's an ambitious bit of filmmaking, but it's certainly not a wake-up call to the world; it's a wake-up call to parents and gives such people a reason to be even more restrictive on their kids. As a kid watching this, it was interesting and a good movie. As a parent myself, it's scary and unneccessary in a lot of ways.
Most shocking and very weird of the reckless teen (under 18s only) I ever watched. Director Larry Clark made an impact in 1995 with this confronting controversial look at American youth, and has since crafted a body of work capturing portraits of troubled teens with uncomfortably voyeuristic detail.
This is the film debut for Chloë Sevigny and Rosario Dawson.
After seeing Larry Clark's film Bully for the first time a few years ago, I bought into the stuff on the internet about him being perverted/exploitative, etc, and wrote him off as a filmmaker. Upon seeing Bully again several months ago, I shed the burden of such claims and realized it really is a great film. So now that I'm past that, I decided to check out the film he is most known for, Kids. Like Bully, Kids is an unflinchingly honest look at the lives of American teenagers in the 90s. Sure, it also has its fair share of teenage sexuality, but it's not arbitrary nor is it exploitative. The film involves a HIV-positive teenager (Leo Fitzpatrick) who is on a mission to deflower virgins in his area, carelessly endangering them. A girl (Chloe Sevigny) who slept with him in the past discovers she is now HIV-positive and sets out to find him. It's an unsettling and disturbing story, no doubt, but Clark shows us what intrepid filmmaking is about by presenting the sad reality of these kids' lives, refusing to shy away no matter how ugly the subject matter, which is as close to reality as possible, becomes. Several actors started out in this film who have gone on to be successful in the business, including stars Fitzpatrick (who also appeared in Bully, and was a recurring character in the amazing HBO television series The Wire) and Sevigny (who has appeared in several wildly successful films such as Boys Don't Cry or American Psycho), and also Rosario Dawson (Sin City, Clerks 2). One of my favourite characters in the film was Casper, who, I've just discovered from his IMDB page, sadly committed suicide at 25. The film had a pretty cool soundtrack, also. This is a landmark cult film, and a very interesting one, and it's worth seeing for that alone.
Very realistic, very disturbing. I'm glad I'm no parent because people...this is basically what your kids are doing when your not around.
Less explicit than "Ken Park" but still at the 'will somebody PLEASE think of the children?' state. It's also more meaningful, whereas, "Ken Park" becomes a completely unlikeable pseudo-philosophical anthology. Reading the synopsis, though, I gave "Kids" too much of an expectation. Having the premise of an ignorant, promiscuous HIV-positive teen on the loose gives too many opportunities for a decent screenplay. Also, kids may do the darndest things, but they also get on your last nerve with the colloquialism - almost forcing you to input subtitles.
Omg hue - i cant believe you know about this movie! Amy Halley-Wright was always talking about it - saying how it was her favourite movie of all time - and we were like are you crazy? And she said Yeah, and I dont think there's anything wrong with what he did though - can you beleive that!? I may have told you that story already dont remeber. But what star rating did you give this? It just says - I want to see it.
Impressive in its fearlessly honest nature. Falters a little bit with some contrived dialogue and forced acting though.
Superior incluso a Ken Park, "Kids" es la mejor película de su autor que con un título tan abierto como kids (chicos) nos muestra una realidad comprometida, extraña con el valor de la amistad y la enfermedad del Sida como telón de fondo. Nadie se la debe de perder. Una obra maestra.
Register or sign-in to see your friends' reviews !
This board looks lonely. Be the first to talk about "Kids" !