Nicolas Cage,
Chandler Canterbury,
Rose Byrne,
Adrienne Pickering,
Ben Mendelsohn
...( see more
)
A teacher (Cage) opens a time capsule that has been dug up at his son's elementary school; in it are some chilling predictions -- some that have already occurred and others that are about to -- that l...( read more
)
DVD Release Date: July 7, 2009
Stats: 35,260 reviews
Am I missing something ? Ok the acting is abysmal and the plot predictable but it has two jaw dropping sequences and style oozing from every frame. It may lack originality ('Pi' covered similar number theories) but it at least feels fresh in its blend of apocalyptic paranoia and ...( read more)
OUAINNN !!! EEEE.... Quoi dire ??? Une histoire qui semble mélanger deux mondes, des effets spéciaux À CHIER! et un fin très ordinaire.
Rien à dire de plus! C'est complètement n'importe quoi! Selon moi, ce n'était pas des dessins que les enfants avaient encapsulés, mais le scr...( read more)
At some point in his career, perhaps just after the finish of Face/Off, I lost touch with NIcholas Cage. And he lost touch with me. He went from being one of my favorite actors to someone whose work I dread taking any kind of chance on seeing. It is with that same dread...( read more)
I really, really, really wanted to like Knowing. There are so many interesting ideas that the film wants you to think about, and the disaster set pieces are incredibly staged and photographed. Nicholas Cage isn't too bad either.
The problem is that the film juggles too many ide...( read more)
SO creepy and SO scary!!! But I LOVED the religious tidbits they added to this movie. Very creative and moving. This movie is definitely Nicolas Cage's best-acted movie. Not a movie for children. They will be scared,in the simplest sense.
Knowing really looked like a good movie. But after watching it im so very dissapointed. Knowing suffered from many of the things i hate to see in movies. Predictable plot, and bad acting. (Nicolas Cage I expect better from you). This movie does however question you. Is life a ser...( read more)
This movie just seemed really hokey, over dramatic and not very interesting. The lighting drove me nuts, seriously I understand the effect, but I don't think I saw Nic Cages whole face during the entire movie, it was always shadowy and dark over half of it.
If Alex Proyas' Knowing were reasonably entertaining -- instead of just dour, pointless and tedious -- it would be a camp classic. full review
An exciting , if not entirely plausible, sci-fi thriller. After this one, 'Next' and the 'National Treasure' movies star Nicolas Cage clearly likes 'Knowing' things before the rest of us. full review
A big creepy sci-fi thriller -- or two-thirds of one, anyway. full review
The movie begins shameless, grows stupid and winds up silly. If the ending had less of the air of a crackpot religion and more pretentiousness, you could almost call it Shyamalanish. full review
The draggy, lurching two hours of Knowing will make you long for the end of the world, even as you worry that there will not be time for all your questions to be answered. full review
If you're of a mind to believe a dreary and far-fetched thriller about numerology-crazed alien life forms, then you may find the movie mildly diverting. full review
The resolution of the mysterious visitors' mission and John's crisis of faith feels more like an excuse to stage some hellacious cataclysms than the product of a genuine belief in anything at all. full review
A weird and gloomy existential thriller. full review
The promise that Alex Proyas showed with 1998's Dark City is only very sporadically evident in Knowing, the director's second sci-fi saga. full review
Knowing is among the best science-fiction films I've seen -- frightening, suspenseful, intelligent and, when it needs to be, rather awesome. full review
It was a... weird movie. I don't really like Nicholas Cage and I didn't really like this movie. It kinda reminded me of the Simpsons episode when Homer thinks he has predicted the end of the world. I may watch it again but not for a while. Maybe If I can't remember what happened. And the cycle of confusion will begin again
This was a great movie if you believe in angels as our "beings" that overlook us "human beings". The universe is full of energy beings and the only way to try to explain this to humans is utilizing an outer space ship to transport us. You have to look at the movie in a different way. It is not destiny, however; all of human beings have a purpose and talents and the future time frames were that child's gift of "knowing". A must see if you open your mind.
kl movie but i expected more then that.. the things abt numbers and dates and location etc.. it was very good and mysterious.. i just didn't like the end :S .. it seems like something fantasy .... aliens .. i hate movies abt em ...
A very good Nicolas Cage movie. One of the biggest reasons I went to see it was because of him. I love him and he is a great actor.
Although I would like to talk about how Nicolas Cage has not aged very well and will not look good when his hair is gone, I must say the predictableness of the movie almost turned me away from it in the beginning.
I'm normally good at reading movies anyway but this one was especially predictable.
Not only were the commercials a big give-away but about half-way through the moive, the ending was easy to see.
Despite the predictableness, the story itself was very sci-fi with a tough of fantasy in the whole number reading thing.
(spoilers) It has a sad ending becuase everyone dies but lovable characters which the directers and writers used to make an easy tear-jerk at the end.
It almost got me...almost. If I hadn't been so concerned with critisizing the movie, I would've been sucked in myself.
All-in-all, I was moderately impressed but only
Astrophysics Professor John Koestler (Nicolas Cage) teaches students at MIT & Phil Beckman (Ben Mendelsohn) is a Cosmologist work @ Massachusetts Observatory in Wayford, Massachusetts.
Diana Wayford (Rose Byrne) is the Daughter & Abby Wayford (Lara Robinson) is the Granddaughter of decreased Author Lucinda Embry-Wayford (Lara Robinson) who wrote encoded numbers in 1959 put in time capsule for 50 years earlier in 2009.
http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20090318/REVIEWS/903189991
In 1958, The dedication ceremony for a new elementary school, A group of students drawing of the future in a time capsule is buried on the grounds & scheduled to be unearthed on the school's 50th Anniversary. A mysterious girl scribbles a series of random sequence numbers instead drawing on her paper to put in time capsule before it is buried. 50 years later, 1 of those students named young Caleb Koestler (Chandler Canterbury) opens the letter with the mysterious sequence of numbers falling into his possession when he hands it to his father, Professor John Koestler (Nicolas Cage) to study statistic analyzes pinpoint cryptic numbers are encoded message the precise dates, death tolls, & coordinates of every major disaster since the time capsule was buried. Professor Koestler is able to track down Author of the prophecies' Daughter: Diana Wayland (Rose Byrne), & Granddaughter Abby agree to aid in the investigation to prevent destruction on a global scale.
Critic ratings and reviews powered by RottenTomatoes.com
Fresh (60% or more critics rated the movie positively)
Rotten (59% or fewer critics rated the movie positively)
All Rotten Tomatoes content is used under license from Rotten Tomatoes. Rotten Tomatoes, Certified Fresh, and the Tomatometer are the trademarks of Incfusion Corporation, d/b/a Rotten Tomatoes, a subsidiary of IGN Entertainment, Inc.
Click a thumb to vote on that suggestion, or add your own suggestions.
