Edouard Dermithe, Jacques Bernard, Maria Cyliakus

After teenager Paul (Edouard Dermithe) is injured in a schoolyard fight and ordered to bed rest, his doting sister, Elisabeth (Nicole Stéphane), assumes the lead role in his care. But when Elisab...( read more  read more... )eth takes on a boarder (Renée Cosima) who strongly resembles Paul's boyhood crush, the siblings' close relationship is threatened. Director Jean-Pierre Melville also penned the screenplay to this black-and-white drama, based on a novel by Jean Cocteau.

Flixster Users

76% liked it

587 ratings

Critics

75% liked it

8 critics

Unrated

Directed by: Jean-Pierre Melville

Release Date: July 28, 1952

Invite friends to see

DVD Release Date: July 24, 2007

Stats: 75 reviews

Get movie widget Recommend it Add to Favorites

Photos


None yet... Got one?

Your Rating



clear rating

Flixster Reviews (75)


  • March 30, 2009
    far from being one of melvilles better films, the film suffers from intolerable characters and a dull and pointless story through 3/4 of the film. thankfully melville did a lot with a little, redeeming the otherwise dull story with an interesting and tragic final act. the techn...( read more)ical points also save the film with great direction, interesting camera angles, and great lighting choices, especially in the gallery scenes. overall somewhat disappointing but still very worthwhile, especially for melville fans.
  • December 1, 2008
    Les Enfants Terribles was my first Cocteau film, soon (I hope) to be followed by Orphe. Though not technically a Cocteau film in its entirety, as it was directed by Melville, it is said that the influence Cocteau exerted over the film was not limited to mere script writing or nar...( read more)ration; in fact, he played a major role in the casting process, and presumably added more than a few directorial touches to the film.

    I have to say that from the very opening, the film gives the impression of a universe within a universe, at the same time integrated in and separated from the world we know. It?s not so much through the power of the two protagonists that we are transported into this special place, but through that of the magic spell weaved by the cinematography, with its deep shadows and silver sheens, and the music, with its undulating, hypnotic accords that seems bent on whisking you away to a place only known by them.

    Back to the two protagonists, the two brothers living closely together, sharing a room and a world of their own, where the meaningless becomes meaningful and all worldly coordinates as the others perceive them are thrown off balance. The driving force of this universe is Elisabeth, she is the one who sets everything in motion and who magnetically draws everyone near, but the center of her world is her brother Paul. Together, the two form an impenetrable and, to outsiders, difficult to understand whole, to which though, the former are drawn in an overtly tragic manner. To the two siblings, everything is possible, not because it is made possible through a series of means, but simply because it is. Elisabeth is from the beginning, as revealed through both her actions on screen and narration, a favorite of the narrator. The adjectives used to describe her, the way she is portrayed set the scene to her becoming the perfect tragic heroine. She is proud, passionate, fearless, in opposition to her brother who is described as feeble, weak, effeminate, character traits which will, in the end, bring forth their downfall.

    The film is riddled with beautiful sequences, some illustrating the playful childishness of the character, some dreamlike, eerie and almost magic, but throughout the whole film, even in the lightest of moments, the feeling that there is more than meets the eye is ever present.

    The problems I had with the film consist mostly of some scenes and relationships which I felt were poorly developed. I read a review of the Ashes of Time Redux by Roger Ebert a while back, and in that review he was making the point (paraphrased very loosely here) that sometimes an author can get into the heads of their characters in such way that they lose focus of what they are or aren?t rendering on screen. I might be sorely mistaken but it somehow seemed to me that it was a bit the case here. Some of the scenes and relationships weren?t properly set up, and details were left to the voice over to be filled up. Now this could very well have been an attempt of centering the film on the two protagonists, but in a few instances, this happened in situations that were precisely trying to establish and illustrate reports from within the aforementioned universe of the two protagonists, so with that in mind, I have to stick to the idea that the film would have been better served by the better development of a few scenes.

    Overall, a beautiful, tragic film, which I will most likely be thinking about for a while to come.
  • April 5, 2008
    A powerful film about the bond between a brother and sister.
  • November 7, 2009
    It is one of the best movie adaptations of a book I've seen. It is also one of my favorite children's tales. Oh, and the book was written by Jean Cocteau, that should be enough of a reason to watch it.
  • April 20, 2009
    Je sais pas pourquoi, ce film m'attirait depuis longtemps, mais je n'avais jamais pris la peine de le louer. C'était peut-être aussi bien comme ça, parce que j'ai été immensément déçu. C'est du Melville, c'est du Cocteau, on sait plus trop. Mais c'est plutôt du Cocteau. En fait ç...( read more)a se bagarre tout le long à savoir qui des deux artistes l'emportera...

    En gros, c'est 1h45 d'engueulade puérile de deux enfants rois avec un accent énervant. Je n'y ai vu aucune "poésie", aucune finesse ou rien de ce dont les fans de Cocteau se réclament. Les personnages sont mous, creux, sans psychologie, à l'exception des deux protagonistes qui doivent être dans le panthéon des pires petites merdes de tous les temps.

    Ça a beau être du Melville, ça a beau être du Cocteau, mais en tant que film, est-ce vraiment intéressant? En tous cas ce n'est pas ma tasse de thé. On peut bien reconnaître une certaine qualité de réalisation et deux ou trois scènes intéressantes, mais l'ensemble m'a paru plutôt plat, ou en tous cas loin de mériter toute l'attention qu'on lui donne.
  • December 4, 2008
    Simply....a masterpiece
  • February 16, 2008
    Macabre is one way to describe this, a macabre masterpiece that strikes as one of the most beautiful movies on relationships, its obsesive and destructive nature. The way a dominant and subdued individual just slide and crash head-on. I loved this movie a lot, it brought out the ...( read more)brutality and the sublime nature of two people onto screen.

Comments


This board looks lonely. Be the first to talk about "Les Enfants terribles (The Strange Ones)" !

Critic ratings and reviews powered by RottenTomatoes.com

Fresh (60% or more critics rated the movie positively)

Rotten (59% or fewer critics rated the movie positively)

More Like This


Click a thumb to vote on that suggestion, or add your own suggestions.

  • Beauty and The Beast (La Belle et la bête)
    Beauty and The Beast (La Belle et la bête) (100%)
  • The Dreamers
    The Dreamers (100%)
  • Dead Ringers
    Dead Ringers (100%)
  • Jeux Interdits (Forbidden Games)
    Jeux Interdits (Forbidden Games) (100%)

Facts


No facts approved yet. Be the first

Les Enfants terri... : Watch Free on TV


Les Enfants terribles (The Strange Ones) Trivia

Movie Quizzes


No quizzes for Les Enfants terribles (The Strange Ones). Want to create one?

Video Clips


No video clips yet. Want to upload one?

Recent News


No recent headlines. Got one?

Most Popular Skin


No skins yet. Interested in creating one?