David Brunjes, Hugh Edwards, James Aubrey

In this classic 1963 adaptation of William Golding's novel, a planeload of schoolboys is stranded on a tropical island. They've got food and water; all that's left is to peacefully govern themselves u...( read more  read more... )ntil they're rescued. "After all," says choir leader Jack, "We're English. We're the best in the world at everything!" Unfortunately, living peacefully is not as easy as it seems. Though Ralph is named chief, Jack and the choristers quickly form a clique of their own, using the ever-effective political promise of fun rather than responsibility to draw converts. Director Peter Brook draws some excellent performances out of his young cast; the moment when Ralph realizes that even if he blows the conch for a meeting people might not come is an excruciating one. Well acted and faithfully executed, Lord of the Flies is as compelling today as when first released. --Ali Davis

Flixster Users

59% liked it

27,182 ratings

Unrated, 90 min.

Directed by: Peter Brook

Release Date: August 13, 1963

Invite friends to see

DVD Release Date: March 14, 2000

Stats: 938 reviews

Get movie widget Recommend it Add to Favorites

Your Rating



clear rating

Flixster Reviews (938)


  • August 15, 2009
    a story about some little people on a little planet (not far from wherever you are now), and how they learned how to love one another by banding together and killing whomever was dumb enough to stand in their way...sound familiar?...no, it's not your grade school homeroom, it's s...( read more)ome brit kids on a island! chilling in the implications that we possibly aren't nice people.
  • August 15, 2009
    I haven't read William Golding's novel since Miss Rayburn's senior english class but, with a few exceptions, this is the story pretty much as I remember. A dark allegory that remains faithful to the source material, sometimes at the expense of the film itself.
  • July 29, 2009
    Amazing book, great movie. Delivered with unmatched accuracy, which might not actually work as a plus, since it feels like you're reading the book twice. But the performances are great, the direction splendid, and even though some themes of the book might get lost in translation,...( read more) the general point shines through in all its kingdom. A great movie-study of the depths of the human soul, of love, hatred, seclusion, loneliness and coming in terms with yourself.
  • July 3, 2009
    This movie is fucked! I didnt like it, not cuz it was fucked doh. Alot of the imagery is amazing especially for a black and white, The way the movie is filmed is also pretty effecting if you're in2 it.

    I guess its really just too old for my taste, I hate the way English kids ta...( read more)lk back then alot of little shit like that bugged me about it. It is a good story and i say if your interested give it a view its not a bad movie, it just wasn't 4 me.
  • October 6, 2008
    The closest adaptation of William Golding's literary masterpiece.
    Peter Brook was mainly a theater director, perhaps that is why his cinematic skills may appear flat, and his handle of kid actors is also average. Despite that, his naturalistic approach is a strength.
    The power of...( read more) the film comes exactly from the allegory, the core of the story, a sour and ultimately devastating microcosmos about death of humanity and reason, and the embrace of anarchy and savagery as the only means of survival.
  • September 10, 2009
    it was good just like the book
  • August 27, 2009
    I cant compare it to the book cause I havent read it yet (shame shame) but I might give it a try after watching the movie. Actors are pretty bad and I was expecting something better for 1963... still, the story is great. So, if you re too lazy to read....
  • August 26, 2009
    I've never read the book, so I don't really have anything to compare it to but it's a good, yet kind of messed up movie.
  • August 19, 2009
    Such a chilling masterpiece. It holds up so strongly even today and the whole atmosphere of it seems all too common and realistic.
  • August 15, 2009
    I'd always heard that this is the better of the two movies adapted from the classic book by William Golding. It's definitely better than the American 1990 update and stays truer to the book, but I wasn't that wild about this one either.

Critic Reviews


No recent reviews.

Comments


This board looks lonely. Be the first to talk about "Lord of the Flies" !

Critic ratings and reviews powered by RottenTomatoes.com

Fresh (60% or more critics rated the movie positively)

Rotten (59% or fewer critics rated the movie positively)

More Like This


Click a thumb to vote on that suggestion, or add your own suggestions.

  • Return to the Blue Lagoon
    Return to the Blue Lagoon (40%)
  • Battle Royale (Batoru Rowaiaru)
    Battle Royale (Batoru Rowaiaru) (67%)
  • The Blue Lagoon
    The Blue Lagoon (67%)
  • Stand by Me
    Stand by Me (46%)

Facts


No facts approved yet. Be the first

Lord of the Flies : Watch Free on TV


Lord of the Flies Trivia


  • In the movie 'Lord Of The Flies', what was the thing they agreed to have to hold in order to speak?  Answer »
  • How did Piggy die in the movie 'Lord of The Flies'?  Answer »
  • Add together the missing words to make a film title. ____ of the Flies Shaun __ the Dead Pirates of ___ Caribbean The Postman Always _____ Twice The ______ of Jafar Shaun __ the Dead Pirates of ___ Caribbean ____ Arthur  Answer »
  • who wrote the book lord of the flies  Answer »

Movie Quizzes


No quizzes for Lord of the Flies. Want to create one?

Recent News


No recent headlines. Got one?

Most Popular Skin


No skins yet. Interested in creating one?