Metropolis

Alfred Abel, Brigitte Helm, Fritz Rasp

Fritz Lang's Metropolis belongs to legend as much as to cinema. It's a milestone of sci-fi and German expressionism. Yet the story makes minimal sense, and the "theme" belongs in a fortune cook...( read more  read more... )ie; to experience the film's pagan power, you have to see the movie. But for decades we couldn't, not really--not with so many versions, all incomplete, often in public-domain prints like smudged photocopies. This Murnau Foundation restoration changes all that. Some shots, scenes, and subplots may be lost forever, but intertitles indicate how they fit into the original continuity and the characters' individual trajectories. Most crucially, the images are crisp, vibrant, and three-dimensional instead of murky and flattened. The composite sequences (the Tower of Babel, a sea of lusting eyes) have been restored to their hallucinatory ferocity. And there's one moment when you can see a bead of sweat roll down a man's cheek--in medium long-shot. --Richard T. Jameson

Flixster Users

90% liked it

Critics

99% liked it

Unrated, 2 hrs.

Directed by: Fritz Lang

Released: March 13, 1927

Invite friends to see

DVD Released: February 18, 2003

Recommend it Add to Favorites

Your Rating



clear rating

Top Flixster Reviews


  • July 3, 2009
    often considered cinema's first great masterpiece, its a shame that some of the scenes from this fritz lang classic are lost to us forever. i feel that the film only preserves so well despite its missing pieces because it is a silent film and can be filled in with text screens, ... ...( read more )
  • June 28, 2009
    Kind of a like a Michael Bay blockbuster, except more technically impressive (for its time). The sets are the stars rather than the actors, which give some incredibly histronic performances even for a silent. No matter how much I was impressed by the visuals and the avant garde p... ...( read more )
  • May 28, 2009
    Fritz Lang's groundbreaking landmark remains one of the biggest mysteries in the world of cinema. How can a movie that'll soon turn 80 years old still look so disturbingly futuristic?? The screenplay by Thea Von Harbou is still very haunting and courageously assails social issues... ...( read more )
  • January 25, 2009
    ok I adore silent films but i jsut COULD NOT GET TROUGH THIS ONE! idk what it was, it was just so,,,, SLOW! and usually idont find silent classics tha way. i felt like there was something i wasnt getting,.....
    all in all-?????
  • September 18, 2008
    *Review coming soon*

Critic Reviews


View more Metropolis reviews at RottenTomatoes.com
September 19, 2002
David Edelstein, Slate

A great artist contains multitudes, and Lang packed a host of contradictory longings into a single allegory. full review

September 5, 2002
Steven Rea, Philadelphia Inquirer

The eye-popping design and sense of scale remains as fresh and vital as it was in 1927. full review

August 23, 2002
Mick LaSalle, San Francisco Chronicle

A masterpiece of art direction, the movie has influenced our vision of the future ever since. full review

July 12, 2002
A.O. Scott, The New York Times

Far from a historical curio, Metropolis arrives, three-quarters of a century late, like an artifact from the future. full review

January 1, 2000
Roger Ebert, Chicago Sun-Times

Few films have ever been more visually exhilarating. full review

Comments


  • MorpheusOne
    July 17, 2008
    I have this movie on vhs and I've tried to watch it, BUT IT LOOKS LIKE SHIT....

    I could barely get thru the first 5 minutes without wincing from the pain of not knowing WTF was going on... If there was something, like subtitles & maybe music to follow, then that might make it bearable. They need to re-release it appropriately, with music from Pink Floyd & Led Zeppelin, since it was first released as a silent movie, in nineteen twenty freaking seven!!!
  • FidelioRoo
    July 8, 2008
    http://www.moviemake-out.com/2008/07/04/original-1927-cut-of-metropolis-found/

    I get so much happiness from this.
  • TinionMaster
    January 25, 2007
    A fantastic movie that felt very unusual to me when I first watched it. I have a 2 hour version, but there is text missing compared to the version the flixster's video clips come from. Some people may not understand Metropolis and what it is about, but many scenes have been cut out. The original was 3 hours, but the american experts cut it so only 1 hour remained. I have read somewhere that there was a character, named Hel, that was cut out because they did not like her name. She is the reason why the mad professor creates such a robot.
    The movie is very, very well done as a movie during the 1920's. I will never forget it. The version I watched seemed older than the 'restored authorized edition', it was dark in the corners of the picture and brighter in the middle, and dust in the picture, but that made the movie even more special as I watched it. I feel like watching this movie again.

Critic ratings and reviews powered by RottenTomatoes.com

Fresh (60% or more critics rated the movie positively)

Rotten (59% or fewer critics rated the movie positively)

Video Requires Latest Version of Adobe Flash:

Get Adobe Flash player

Official Trailer

More Like This


Click a thumb to vote on that suggestion, or add your own suggestions.

  • Click
    Click (14%)
  • Dark City
    Dark City (70%)
  • Blade Runner
    Blade Runner (76%)
  • Babylon A.D.
    Babylon A.D. (0%)

Theater Showtimes & TV Listings


Most Popular Skin