Alfred Abel, Brigitte Helm, Fritz Rasp

Fritz Lang's Metropolis belongs to legend as much as to cinema. It's a milestone of sci-fi and German expressionism. Yet the story makes minimal sense, and the "theme" belongs in a fortune cook...( read more  read more... )ie; to experience the film's pagan power, you have to see the movie. But for decades we couldn't, not really--not with so many versions, all incomplete, often in public-domain prints like smudged photocopies. This Murnau Foundation restoration changes all that. Some shots, scenes, and subplots may be lost forever, but intertitles indicate how they fit into the original continuity and the characters' individual trajectories. Most crucially, the images are crisp, vibrant, and three-dimensional instead of murky and flattened. The composite sequences (the Tower of Babel, a sea of lusting eyes) have been restored to their hallucinatory ferocity. And there's one moment when you can see a bead of sweat roll down a man's cheek--in medium long-shot. --Richard T. Jameson

Flixster Users

90% liked it

48,485 ratings

Critics

99% liked it

74 critics

Unrated, 120

Directed by: Fritz Lang

Release Date: March 13, 1927

Invite friends to see

DVD Release Date: February 18, 2003

Stats: 3,312 reviews

Get movie widget Recommend it Add to Favorites

Your Rating



clear rating
Share on: Facebook Twitter

Flixster Reviews (3,312)


  • July 3, 2009
    often considered cinema's first great masterpiece, its a shame that some of the scenes from this fritz lang classic are lost to us forever. i feel that the film only preserves so well despite its missing pieces because it is a silent film and can be filled in with text screens, ...( read more)because i was still engaged in the story from start to finish. the only real critique of the film is that some of the actions of the characters didnt fit the story that well, but overall this film is highly effective in its scale as it tells a great science fiction story for its era. an impressive film that any true film fan should see.
  • June 28, 2009
    Kind of a like a Michael Bay blockbuster, except more technically impressive (for its time). The sets are the stars rather than the actors, which give some incredibly histronic performances even for a silent. No matter how much I was impressed by the visuals and the avant garde p...( read more)arts of the film (probably the closest we can get of an Art of Vision remake by Michael Bay) I can't quite get past the nonsensical mess of a plot even though a lot of the film is missing, and the naive ideology of the film. And I hated the Heart-is-the-Mediator-between-Brain-and-Hand bullshit and that ridiculous ending. The band 3epkano did a great job though just like last year with Sunrise, so overall it was a very enjoyable experience.
  • May 28, 2009
    Fritz Lang's groundbreaking landmark remains one of the biggest mysteries in the world of cinema. How can a movie that'll soon turn 80 years old still look so disturbingly futuristic?? The screenplay by Thea Von Harbou is still very haunting and courageously assails social issues...( read more) that are of all ages. The world has been divided into two main categories: thinkers & workers! If you belong to the first category, you can lead a life of luxury above ground but if you're a worker, your life isn't worth a penny, and you're doomed to perilous labor underground. The further expansions and intrigues in the screenplay are too astonishing to spoil, so I strongly advise that you check out the film yourself. It's essential viewing, anyway! "Metropolis" is a very demanding film-experience and definitely not always entertaining. But, as it is often the case with silent-cinema classics, the respect and admiration you'll develop during watching it will widely excel the enjoyment-aspect. Fritz' brutal visual style still looks innovative and few directors since were able to re-create a similarly nightmarish composition of horizontal and vertical lines. Many supposedly 'restored' versions have been released over the years (in 1984 and 2002, for example) but the 1926-version is still the finest in my opinion, even though that one already isn't as detailed and punctual as Lang intended it. "Metropolis" perhaps is THE most important and influential movie ever made. "2001: A Space Odyssey", "Star Wars" and "Blade Runner" owe their existence (or at least their power) to it.
  • January 25, 2009
    ok I adore silent films but i jsut COULD NOT GET TROUGH THIS ONE! idk what it was, it was just so,,,, SLOW! and usually idont find silent classics tha way. i felt like there was something i wasnt getting,.....
    all in all-?????
  • September 18, 2008
    *Review coming soon*
  • November 19, 2009
    This is groundbreaking cinema at its best. Pioneering visual effects, grand scope and a fantastic orchestral score, this is truly the birth of epic sci fi on the pearl screen. Decades ahead of Forbidden Planet, 2001 and Star Wars, the only failing which this film has, is that the...( read more) story is almost too simple compared to its production design and epic scale, but since this is a silent movie, there will always be a trade off. But a visual treat, this stands tall, along with the afore mentioned Sci Fi flicks and every major epic to have been shot before or since. Truly cinema at its best...
  • November 10, 2009
    Uhhh. ok? I've seen silent films in the past and don't get me wrong Metropolis die-hards but this movie needs to be reconcidered by the IMDB critics who place it so high on their lists. I understand that this movie was incredibly innnovative at the time... but only at that time. ...( read more)Its horribly dry and should be ranked with movie within its time period.
  • November 8, 2009
    It's an epic poem of urban dystopia (and class warfare) by a misanthropic director who, in his Weimar Republic phase, had a taste for spectacular imagery that, for all our modern digital wizardry, has not been aesthetically surpassed. And his imagined world remains, after all the...( read more)se years, eerily prescient.
  • October 26, 2009
    A great benchmark and something to aim for when it comes to science fiction or fantasy films. It is sad that some of it was lost, but good that the pieces that are still there have survived. I generally do not like silent movies (it is sad to be born in an era of great technology...( read more)) and the music drove me nuts. The story is beautiful and it played out well on screen. The sets were amazing and I don't want to imagine how long it took them to accomplish all of this back then. Some of the cinematography is astounding even for today's standards. I almost want to see a re-make of it....but afraid that it would ruin the story of this one and never reach the heights like this one has.
  • October 21, 2009
    Such a beautiful movie and my favorite silent feature.

Critic Reviews


September 19, 2002
David Edelstein, Slate

A great artist contains multitudes, and Lang packed a host of contradictory longings into a single allegory. full review

September 5, 2002
Steven Rea, Philadelphia Inquirer

The eye-popping design and sense of scale remains as fresh and vital as it was in 1927. full review

August 23, 2002
Mick LaSalle, San Francisco Chronicle

A masterpiece of art direction, the movie has influenced our vision of the future ever since. full review

July 12, 2002
A.O. Scott, The New York Times

Far from a historical curio, Metropolis arrives, three-quarters of a century late, like an artifact from the future. full review

January 1, 2000
Roger Ebert, Chicago Sun-Times

Few films have ever been more visually exhilarating. full review

View more Metropolis reviews at RottenTomatoes.com

Comments


  • MorpheusOne
    July 17, 2008
    I have this movie on vhs and I've tried to watch it, BUT IT LOOKS LIKE SHIT....

    I could barely get thru the first 5 minutes without wincing from the pain of not knowing WTF was going on... If there was something, like subtitles & maybe music to follow, then that might make it bearable. They need to re-release it appropriately, with music from Pink Floyd & Led Zeppelin, since it was first released as a silent movie, in nineteen twenty freaking seven!!!
  • FidelioRoo
    July 8, 2008
    http://www.moviemake-out.com/2008/07/04/original-1927-cut-of-metropolis-found/

    I get so much happiness from this.
  • TinionMaster
    January 25, 2007
    A fantastic movie that felt very unusual to me when I first watched it. I have a 2 hour version, but there is text missing compared to the version the flixster's video clips come from. Some people may not understand Metropolis and what it is about, but many scenes have been cut out. The original was 3 hours, but the american experts cut it so only 1 hour remained. I have read somewhere that there was a character, named Hel, that was cut out because they did not like her name. She is the reason why the mad professor creates such a robot.
    The movie is very, very well done as a movie during the 1920's. I will never forget it. The version I watched seemed older than the 'restored authorized edition', it was dark in the corners of the picture and brighter in the middle, and dust in the picture, but that made the movie even more special as I watched it. I feel like watching this movie again.

Critic ratings and reviews powered by RottenTomatoes.com

Fresh (60% or more critics rated the movie positively)

Rotten (59% or fewer critics rated the movie positively)

Official Trailer

More Like This


Click a thumb to vote on that suggestion, or add your own suggestions.

  • Click
    Click (13%)
  • Dark City
    Dark City (70%)
  • Blade Runner
    Blade Runner (76%)
  • MirrorMask
    MirrorMask (50%)

Facts


No facts approved yet. Be the first

Metropolis : Watch Free on TV


Metropolis Trivia


  • Which classic silent film stars Brigitte Helm in the roles of Maria, The Machine Man, Death, and The Seven Deadly Sins?  Answer »
  • Who directed 'M', 'The Big Heat' and 'Metropolis'?  Answer »
  • I played a superhero in Metropolis, a dead beat ex-boyfriend in a movie with six teams competing for two million dollars, and a murderous husband who killed his pregnant wife in 2003.  Answer »
  • Which city doubled for Metropolis in Superman Returns?  Answer »

Most Popular Skin