Featured Audience Ratings

• Randy T

  
  An astronaut returns from space as a mutated giant. ...or does he?? I'm sure I would have enjoyed this one more if I'd caught the MST3000 version (there is an MST3000 version, right?). As it is, <i>Monster A Go-Go</i> is a study in how NOT to make a movie.… More
  An astronaut returns from space as a mutated giant. ...or does he?? I'm sure I would have enjoyed this one more if I'd caught the MST3000 version (there is an MST3000 version, right?). As it is, <i>Monster A Go-Go</i> is a study in how NOT to make a movie. Everything is bad in this one, and I do mean everything. Bad acting, bad directing, bad editing, bad lighting, bad sound, bad score, bad wardrobe, bad writing, There are three or four brief moments that are unintentionally funny, otherwise your time would be better spent watching paint dry. Currently, there are about a hundred people on flixster that admit to having seen this film. Those self-deprecating souls deserve some kind of award for sacrificing an hour of their lives so that others won't have to suffer the same fate.

• AJ V

  
  Does this movie have anything to do with a monster? Presumably, but we're not sure. Does this movie have anything to do with go-go dancers? Not really, no. What's the plot? We're not sure. This is the worst movie of the sixties, I think, maybe even the worst movie… More
  Does this movie have anything to do with a monster? Presumably, but we're not sure. Does this movie have anything to do with go-go dancers? Not really, no. What's the plot? We're not sure. This is the worst movie of the sixties, I think, maybe even the worst movie ever made? It's on imdb's list of worst movies, and if you've seen it you know why. If you really want to see a bad movie, watch this one.

• Derek D

  
  Nothing good at all about this film except that it's short and is over quickly (although not painfully). Bad sound, worse lighting, a horrible script with bad acting...on and on and on. Lots of scenes with nothing and even worse lots of scenes with dialogue...boring dialogue. The… More
  Nothing good at all about this film except that it's short and is over quickly (although not painfully). Bad sound, worse lighting, a horrible script with bad acting...on and on and on. Lots of scenes with nothing and even worse lots of scenes with dialogue...boring dialogue. The "monster" isn't even seen for most of the film and it ends in question: what happened? Who cares. It's over, at least enjoy that part.

• Cindy I

  
  Q: What do you get when you cross bad acting, cheapo visual effects, dropped plotlines, pointless scenes, poor camera work, a completely unnecessary narration, a lame theme song, a monster that looks like Lurch with teenage acne, a vocal track that sounds like the mic was in a bucket,… More
  Q: What do you get when you cross bad acting, cheapo visual effects, dropped plotlines, pointless scenes, poor camera work, a completely unnecessary narration, a lame theme song, a monster that looks like Lurch with teenage acne, a vocal track that sounds like the mic was in a bucket, and an ending that seems like they were running short of film so just quickly wrapped things up? A: Monster A Go-Go! A piece of crap Ed Wood would be proud of. The quality of the production only warrants one star, but I gave it an extra one for entertaiinment value, as it was a hoot to sit through. One of those "so bad it's good" flicks. UPDATE! -- Found out (thanks IMDB) that this film was only partially made by Bill Rebane, in 1961. Seems Rebane ran out of money. H.G. Lewis (of Blood Feast fame) picked up the pieces in 1965 and completed it. That explains the pointless scenes and dropped plotlines at least. Lewis even supplied the narration. The mind reels at what it would have been like had Rebane finished it on his own....