Andre Gregory, Jean Lenauer, Roy Butler

A conversation between a globe-trotting theater director and a playwright playfully explores ideas about art, theater, and daily life.

Flixster Users

87% liked it

1,052 ratings

Critics

89% liked it

18 critics

Unrated, 1 hr. 50 min.

Directed by: Louis Malle

Release Date: October 11, 1981

Invite friends to see

DVD Release Date: February 13, 2001

Stats: 322 reviews

Get movie widget Recommend it Add to Favorites

Your Rating



clear rating
Share on: Facebook Twitter

Flixster Reviews (322)


  • July 5, 2009
    For almost three months, Wallace Shawn and Andre Gregory recorded lengthy conversations a few times a week. Over the course of the next year, the material was shaped into a script. Shawn and Gregory would play "themselves", or atleast versions of their personalities, and simply s...( read more)hoot a film that involves nothing but a conversation. The action sequences here are the waiters coming by with the next course - it's nothing but largely unbroken conversation about philosophies and the intricacies of life, the ways of finding oneself, the ways of finding "truth". You don't necessarily need to leave the comfort of your own home to find "truth" and "meaning", there's no sabbaticals necessary for self-discovery. Perhaps, for you, the meaning of life is the pleasure of waking up to last night's coffee sans dead cockroaches.

    Wally is a struggling playwright and actor. He was born with a silver spoon in his mouth as the son of the editor of New Yorker - as he grew up, all he had to worry about was art and culture. Now, all he worries about is money. He's about to sit down and have dinner with a man he's been avoiding for years, the successful theater director Andre Gregory. Gregory's recent history is largely a mystery - there have been rumors of him "traveling", and recently he had been seen crying because of a line spoken in Ingmar Bergman's "Autumn Sonata". Because Wally is dreading the evening, he decides that the simple way out is to ask a lot of questions, keep a smile on his face, and get through the night as quickly as possible.

    The early moments of the conversation are precisely that. Wally asks Andre, who initially comes off as a bit of a snob, questions about his recent travels. Andre tells him stories of adventures everywhere from Tibet to Poland, from being buried alive to encountering people who persuade bugs to not eat their crops. Wally's only words in response are "wow", "gosh", and the like. Then, at some point, about forty minutes into the film, Wally finally has something to say. He disagrees with the notion that one needs these extremities to "find themselves" and "live in the moment". His argument is that some people don't have that luxury, and it doesn't make them less of a person if they can't travel to the highest peak of Mount Everest. Wally defends the life of the bourgeois, and argues that it's no less fulfilling than the life of the radical adventure-seeker that Andre has painted himself to be.

    This is a film that's obviously not for everybody, and when I say "not for everybody" I mean not for most. On the most plain and unsophisticated level - this IS a two hour movie that involves nothing but a conversation over dinner. While I did find the first forty minutes incredibly dull, I was sucked in when Wally started getting words in and the focus of the film shifted from Andre's adventures to the debate between the two intellectuals. The last hour of the film is profound, moving, and incredibly stimulating - a level of involvement that you'll never see in most pictures. Whether or not you have the patience is up to you, but those who have an interest in philosophy will certainly find the film incredibly rewarding.
  • April 7, 2006
    One huge star for Wally Shawn. He earns it--and I mean EARNS it--not for his acting ability--although I love him as an actor--but for sitting there and patiently and politely listening to the interminable droning of Andre. The prototypical "dinner from hell."
  • April 6, 2006
    I'm sure it's very interesting and thought provoking, but they made me watch this in high scool philosphy class and all I wanted to do was flirt with the girl next to me. I was bored. Would watch again now with more maturity.
  • April 24, 2007
    A great dialogue movie. I love that Wallace Shawn couldn't quite make it through the script without saying "inconcievable."
  • August 13, 2009
    It was interesting because as a film with two people just having dinner and talking it opened up even more ideas as we listen to what they're saying. I got interested to what they were talking about. You have to bring out your empathy for a film like this in order to appreciate i...( read more)t, but if it bores you to watch two people talk about stuff than don't watch it. Just BE warned they talk a LOT.
  • August 4, 2009
    I'm endlessly intrigued by the dynamics that get played out between the 2 characters. Yes, this is a movie that is almost entirely comprised of one dinner conversation. And yes, the first hour gets a bit tedious but there IS a point to it. Don't give up on it. You have to see it ...( read more)all the way through.
  • June 25, 2009
    2 great performances from the 2 leads, as they talk over dinner, about life and meanings, both actors havegood lines to chew on
  • April 18, 2009
    fantastic suspension of disbelief. Assumed to be shot in real time in a real restaurant. Actually filmed over a series of weeks, on a set.

    While it's two hours of Gregory talking to Shawn, it's an amazing view into the world of these two people - as if you're eavesdropping on t...( read more)heir conversation. Very cool.
  • April 2, 2009
    a very engaging conversational film; I'm just a bit torn on my final verdict. part of me finds it incredibly fascinating and thought-provoking, while another part of me finds it to be a lot of pseudo-intellectual new age mumbo-jumbo. either way, it's entertaining and stimulatin...( read more)g and a very unique indie film.
  • January 23, 2009
    Roger Ebert Felt that this was the best film of the year...I have no idea why. Honestly, this film absolutely fails to display anything that would help to qualify this as even a good film. There is some interesting discussion to eavesdrop on, but that doesn't make it a good film....( read more) The film grade is poor as well as the interaction between the actors and even the waiter. The narration is annoying and virtually unnecessary. In the end it's obvious to me that this should have been somebodies essay rather than a film.

Comments


This board looks lonely. Be the first to talk about "My Dinner with Andre" !

Critic ratings and reviews powered by RottenTomatoes.com

Fresh (60% or more critics rated the movie positively)

Rotten (59% or fewer critics rated the movie positively)

More Like This


Click a thumb to vote on that suggestion, or add your own suggestions.

  • The People
    The People (0%)
  • Andy Kaufman: I'm from Hollywood
    Andy Kaufman: I'm from Hollywood (50%)
  • Waking Life
    Waking Life (0%)
  • Swimming To Cambodia
    Swimming To Cambodia (0%)

Theater Showtimes & TV Listings


Video Clips


No video clips yet. Want to upload one?

Recent News


No recent headlines. Got one?

Most Popular Skin


No skins yet. Interested in creating one?