On Her Majesty's Secret Service

< Previous Trailer  |   Add to My Scrapbook  |   Next Trailer >
On Her Majesty's Secret Service

62% Liked It
liked it

On Her Majesty's Secret Service

George Lazenby, Diana Rigg, Telly Savalas, Gabriele Ferzetti, Ilse Steppat, Angela Scoular, Lois Maxwell, Catherine Schell, George Baker, Bernard Lee, Bernard Horsfall, Desmond Llewelyn

James Bond woos a mob boss's daughter and goes undercover to uncover the true reason for Blofeld's allergy research in the Swiss Alps that involves beautiful women from around the world.

Id: 10903362

Do you want to see this movie?

My Friends Said...

On Her Majesty's Secret Service Recent Reviews

Register or sign-in to see your friends' reviews !

Recent Reviews

On Her Majesty's Secret Service Recent Reviews
  • SirPant
    September 23, 2009
    SirPant
    Great film. Poor old George Lazenby though, he was never going to be excepted even though he was quite good!
  • sanjurosamurai
    August 26, 2009
    sanjurosamurai
    lazenby gets a bad wrap, having to follow connery, as he pulled of the role of bond for this film just fine. the film is an excellent one with great chase scenes, an interesting story, and more emotion than we're used to from a bond film. it was a bit too long for a bond film a...( read more)nd the final scene was executed very poorly, but overall this is another solid addition to the bond legacy.
  • hypathio7
    February 4, 2009
    hypathio7
    OK, I've re-viewed this sixth official Bond film. I remember my gut reaction from the first time I saw it being that it wasn't very good, and that still stands. So what do I think is wrong with it? I'll try to explain. I think it was just a bad mix of new director, new Bond, ...( read more)and new story. It's a scrambled mess of trying to be too much like a Sean Connery Bond movie and at times trying to be different (more focused on the love story less on gadgets). It starts confusingly with M and Q and Moneypenny wondering where Bond is with Q presenting the ridiculous radioactive lint. Then Bond, in a fedora again (did Connery really wear one that much after Dr. No?), is out for a leisurely drive when he has to save a suicidal Diana Rigg. Of course the filmmakers obscure giving us a really good look at him til he says "Bond, James Bond." It's anticlimactic and it's only the beginning. Rigg plays Tracy and her father, who happens to be a mob boss, had some of his men follow her, and they pick a fight with Bond. I was bothered by the technical limitations of the filming in this one too. In the late sixties almost seventies external shots don't always look so good. Even with digital improvements it still looks grainy and too shadowy. I thought most of the fight scenes were edited terribly and the director, Hunt, had even been an editor on several of the previous Bond films. The cuts for the fights particularly and the car and bobsled chases are really choppy and fast and made me think of Daniel Craig's Quantum of Solace that I saw recently, but just not as good. Lazenby had only appeared in a couple TV commercials, he had modeled, but never acted before. The director mistakenly thought you could put any man who looked like Bond in the role and make a successful picture. Lazenby trying to change his Australian accent to British ends up mumbling a lot and is stiff. After Rigg runs away from him, before the opening credits, Bond delivers the line "This never happened to the other guy." Heresy, I say! Bond is timeless and the actors shouldn't acknowledge that someone else has played the part.

    The opening credits are a series of images from the past Connery films and I did not enjoy the song. Goldfinger also used images from the couple of previous films in it's opening credits according to IMDb trivia, but this seemed like a cheap attempt to keep on referring to Connery. Lazenby is then at a casino and plays the same card game and is shown in many of the same camera angles and situations as Connery was in in Dr. No. Lazenby tries to deliver a few humorous quips throughout like Connery had done before, but a couple times he walks out of a room or turns away from the camera when giving the lines so you can't really appreciate them. Blofeld's fortress in the Alps with lush living quarters that have sliding doors with no controls on the interior mirrors where Connery had to stay in Dr. No's lair too. And Lazenby is childlike and whiny when M tells him he's no longer on the case to find Blofeld, it's surprising that that's all it takes for Bond to threaten to quit. But that whole scene is just an excuse for Bond to start packing by pulling out old gadgets and mementos he has kept in his office.

    Well Moneypenny has fixed it so Bond gets a vacation instead. He runs into the thugs who work for Tracy's father and they take Bond to see the man. What sinister plot could this villain have in store? He wants to arrange for Bond to date and marry Tracy because she disobeys her father and she needs a man to dominate her. Oh my! Lazenby has said in interviews that he wanted to play Bond as more feeling, understanding, with pop music under the scenes, as less of a beast, but that the filmmakers didn't agree with this. He thought that Bond might not last in the new culture of the 70s. Well some of that sentiment made it into the movie with Bond falling in love with Tracy and the love song montage of the two of them frolicking around taking as much time as it did. Then eventually Bond does get married and his honeymoon ends before it begins. But I think Bond falling in love with Vesper and losing her and seeking revenge in the newest additions to the series handle that sort of thing better.

    There were a couple other special effects that were used for the first time in this film that showed that they were trying to do something different and push the envelope beyond what had been done in the Connery Bonds. But I'll remember this one more for Lazenby wearing the ruffly shirt (two of them actually), a kilt, another silly undercover disguise for traveling to the Alps, and pretending to be ambiguously gay at first when meeting the 12 international, mind controlled women of Blofeld's world domination scheme. George Lazenby is not James Bond.
  • sononothing
    January 25, 2009
    sononothing
    Does anybody here remember George Lazenby? He was the first actor to take over the role of James Bond from Sean Connery, who had had enough by 1969 and wanted to end his reign as Bond (though he would come back one more time officially when they offered him an ungodly sum of mone...( read more)y). Lazenby had the impossible task of following someone who defined a role. That's like replacing Indiana Jones or if they try to replace Heath Ledger in the next Batman movie- whoever takes that role will forever be compared to the "original".

    On Her Majesty's Secret Service is Lazenby's only Bond film, sandwiched in between two Connery films (You Only Live Twice and Diamonds Are Forever). It's main plot is that a gangster (Gabrielle Ferzetti) is willing to pay Bond one million pounds to wed his indulgent daughter. The film follows their budding relationship while Bond investigates Blofeld's (Tell Savalas) allergy clinic and what it's a cover for.

    While interesting the story is a little lackluster with the entire "Marry my daughter" storyline feeling a little pushed. The cast is adequate, though being a child that remembers Kojak it's a bit difficult for me to see Telly Savalas as Blofeld. The film ends up being an average Bond/espionage film that delivers on action (Lazenby is probably the biggest ass kicker out of all the Bonds). Even with Connery I don't think OHMSS would have been better than Goldfinger or From Russia With Love.

    Which brings us to Lazenby because any review of On Her Majesty's Secret Service is essentially a review of Lazenby as Bond. Is he better or worse than Connery? The answer is he's different. Just like Roger Moore was different. And Timothy Dalton. And Pierce Brosnan. And Daniel Craig. And Barry Nelson. And David Niven. Bonds are like General Motors. Yeah, there's a bunch of different styles and makes, but they're all built essentially on the same frame. The character is the frame. The actor is the one who fills it out.
  • zillionaire
    November 7, 2008
    zillionaire
    My fave 007 movie..great story,nice christmassy settings and an unusually downbeat ending for a Bond film..everybody get off Lazenby's back,he's faultless!
  • sayguh
    December 1, 2009
    sayguh
    George Lazenby was a great Bond in this single film that he did. Most similar to Daniel Craig's portrayal. Too bad he never did another.
  • CosmicEd
    November 27, 2009
    CosmicEd
    Cool early Bond film. Follows sumwhat the book. Made more credible by having an actor portraying bond who I hadn't seen before. Refreshingly familiar yet unfamiliar plot. Kilts rule ! Also Telly as a 007 big bad boss is classic!
  • minhvanl
    November 2, 2009
    minhvanl
    This an Excellent movie to watch.
  • roydonm0526
    October 1, 2009
    roydonm0526
    the worst of them all, its only in my favs cause its still bond
  • latinorick71
    September 28, 2009
    latinorick71
    I have never wanted to see this bond filmb but so glad i did. so much better then any of the Roger Moore bond versions and George looks somewhat like Sean. shame they never let George make another one.













    This is the one and only b...( read more)ond film I haven't seen but plan 2.
View All Reviews

Opening This Week

Top Box Office

Upcoming Movies

New on DVD