Recent Reviews for Pathfinder

  • 2.0 Stars
    MCT:
    October 5, 2008
    I enjoyed the cinematography a lot - it was pleasing to look at - but as a film, it can't stand on its own. The dialogue was sparse, and just not as great as I think it could have been.
  • 2.5 Stars
    MCT:
    October 5, 2008
    Not as bad as it could have been. Not as good as it could have been.

    There are plenty of things wrong with this film, such as lack of dialogue, lack of character depth, plot holes and inconsistencies, so-so acting, etc.
    Then there is the obvious lack of accuracy in the portrayal of the Vikings (No one should look at this movie as a history lesson!). But I let that one go, because the movie is fiction and they did make the vikings look pretty cool.

    The best part of the movie is the visuals. It is a cool movie to look at. The plot had so much potential to be interesting, but yet nothing was done with it.

    So much more could have been done with this movie. I am generous by giving it 2 1/2 stars, and that is because it was very visually appealing.
  • 2.0 Stars
    MCT:
    September 26, 2008
    I was really dissapointed with this film. Good story, but people said it was like the most brutal movie ever. The bllood and gore seemed like it was kept to a minmum and it was no where close to being violnet as they said i was
  • 3.5 Stars
    MCT:
    September 21, 2008
    This movie was better near the end. Those Vikings were scary SOBs! The movie was violent and sickening in parts. It was ok, not the best movie though.
  • 2.0 Stars
    MCT:
    September 16, 2008
    The way that the Vikings were portrayed in this film was a bit lacking, but it's worth one viewing, I guess. I wasn't too impressed with it.
  • 4.0 Stars
    MCT:
    September 9, 2008
    Very cool! Intense fight scenes! Definitely worth watching. Best to watch it in the dark. Again, really cool movie.
  • 2.0 Stars
    MCT:
    September 9, 2008
    I have to force myself to finish this movie...
    the beginin wasnt bad, but no intensity in plot...
    violence action is good, sound effects are good too, but overall it is a boring movie...
    the ending is just too stupid...
  • 2.5 Stars
    MCT:
    August 25, 2008
    Really thought it was going to be different with better action scenes and more character development. The camera work was just plain bad, too many closeups and skipping on the action. Sometimes you couldn't tell who was who or where the characters where. It had some good action scenes but sadly buried in closeups.
  • 3.0 Stars
    MCT:
    August 17, 2008
    Really good violence. Heard so many bad reviews that I expected a piece of crap and I didn't think it was that bad.
  • 4.0 Stars
    MCT:
    August 8, 2008
    BRILL...my type of action film...builds up your hatred for the bad guys...all the weapons like maces...wtf?
  • 3.5 Stars
    MCT:
    August 8, 2008
    It?s a Viking action movie, which is inspired from a well-known Norwegian movie from 1987 called Veiviseren (which means pathfinder!). The new version of Pathfinder from Hollywood is a more stylish version with cool visuals and action scenes. The visuals actually remind of 300, which also used comic book look.
  • 3.5 Stars
    MCT:
    August 4, 2008
    Good Movie only skewed a little. Acting was weak, but fight scenes were great. OK plot and story, great scenery. Not-that-bad-flick.
  • 2.5 Stars
    MCT:
    July 28, 2008
    I was hoping for a bit more from this film than just a bunch of people killing each other with swords, but for a straight forward action film you're not going to be disappointed. Personally I thought that some of the characters didn't have enough character to make you care what happens to any of them.
  • 2.5 Stars
    MCT:
    July 27, 2008
    The story is lacking and some of the acting is weak, but it's an impressive looking low budget film.
  • 4.0 Stars
    MCT:
    July 26, 2008
    Brilliant movie, has some minor flaws, such as Karl Urban always being in the wrong place when others are dying, and the fact he barely talks, but apart from that, I enjoyed it.
  • 4.0 Stars
    MCT:
    July 25, 2008
    The extremes of vengence. Portrays vikings as they were i think, cold blooded killers, and the will of a man to overcome hs past. nice
  • 3.5 Stars
    MCT:
    July 24, 2008
    story is growing so fast.i cant catch the movie.otherwise its very actiony.very similar to 300 and 10,000 B.C..
  • 2.0 Stars
    MCT:
    July 15, 2008
    Sub par acting and horrible production value (way too dark to see anything that happens) makes this could have been great movie dull and boring, the script didn't help much either, just the idea had potential.
  • 2.0 Stars
    MCT:
    July 11, 2008
    hilariously bad. the only thing REALLY wrong with it is the soundtrack. Instead of standard orchestral stuff, they should have done a heavy metal sound. It would have been SOOO much more appropriate.
  • 3.0 Stars
    MCT:
    July 3, 2008
    is ok. Different meanings of 'Pathfinder' which adds to something of value to the movie. Dont know what old language they used and if its real but it still sees into two very different cultures.
  • 0.5 Stars
    MCT:
    June 29, 2008
    Judging from the posters and the synopsis I was expecting something more... breathtaking? Something that would make me feel as if it really is legendary. End up the movie is unoriginal and completely lacking in soul. Pointless and damn straight boring. But it shouldn't be that bad if you're only looking for non-stoppable actions, and nice cinematography too, just that its used in all the wrong places.
  • 1.5 Stars
    MCT:
    June 26, 2008
    unoriginal and instantly forgetable. The only thing it has going for it is the amount of action but too much slow mo where it is totally unnessecry makes what could have been gripping scenes seem boring. Last of the mohicans is miles above this.
  • 3.0 Stars
    MCT:
    June 21, 2008
    I was somewhere in the middle on this one. It was a decent film with good action and a decent story but something left me wanting. Im still not sure what.
  • 0.5 Stars
    MCT:
    June 16, 2008
    The Movie has a pointless and meaningless story. The preview makes it out to be something it is not. Weak cast and the plot is wack. Its conclusion simply made no sense.
  • 3.5 Stars
    MCT:
    June 15, 2008
    I don't know why everyone gave this movie a hard time... it was beautifully shot, well acted and very dramatic. And it starred one of my husbands, so...

Summary

Pathfinder Summary