Paths of Glory Reviews and Ratings



  • August 4, 2008
    Troisième long métrage de Stanley Kubrick, alors âgé de seulement vingt-neuf ans. Se déroulant à l'époque de la première Guerre Mondiale, on y raconte l'histoire d'un colonel qui se rebelle contre ses supérieurs après que ceux-ci aient envoyé ses hommes dans une mission suicide, ...( read more)puis condamné trois d'entre eux à mort pour leur échec. Y est ainsi révélée toute l'absurdité du système de justice interne de l'armée.

    Les fans de Kubrick reconnaîtront sa griffe, mais ceux qui n'ont pas apprécié son travail plus connu pourront quand même se délecter de cette oeuvre intelligente et sans fioritures. Le style de réalisation un peu impersonnel du cinéaste n'était pas encore tout à fait installé, ce qui plaira ou déplaira. J'ai beaucoup apprécié le travail de caméra, atteignant son paroxysme dans la scène de l'attaque suicide tournée avec brio. Il s'agit plutôt d'un film sur la guerre que d'un film de guerre, à l'instar de Full Metal Jacket. Kirk Douglas y est excellent. À voir.
  • July 27, 2008
    DO I REALLY NEED TO SAY SOMETHING ABOUT A KUBRICK MOVIE?

    let me just say two words about this one: DELICIOUSLY DIRECTED.
  • July 26, 2008
    Por alguna razon pensaba que esta pelicula iba a ser aburrida y una de las mas debiles de Kubrick, pero resulto siendo una pelicula muy interesante y con una fuerte direccion.-
  • July 21, 2008
    A great movie, i understand why its a classic
  • July 20, 2008
    War, what is it good for? Absolutely nothing.

    An early masterpiece by Kubrick with an incredibly moving ending.
  • July 15, 2008
    a great war movie from kubrick. douglas puts in a great performance and the story was well told and very profound. this doesnt play like an anti war film as many claim, it plays more like a film on the evaluation of the philosophy of war. i was drawn into the dilema and emotio...( read more)n stirred as an injustice was served. great film.
  • July 5, 2008
    Profoundy intense and a great work of art, even though a bit negative.
  • June 26, 2008
    ''Colonel Dax, you're a disappointment to me. You've spoiled the keenness of your mind by wallowing in sentimentality. You really did want to save those men, and you were not angling for Mireau's command. You are an idealist - and I pity you as I would the village idiot. We're...( read more) fighting a war, Dax, a war that we've got to win. Those men didn't fight, so they were shot. You bring charges against General Mireau, so I insist that he answer them. Wherein have I done wrong?''

    ''Because you don't know the answer to that question, I pity you.''


    When soldiers in WW1 refuse to continue with an impossible attack, their superiors decide to make an example of them.

    Kirk Douglas: Col. Dax

    Paths Of Glory was not anti-war more a case of against men playing God among many. Stanley Kubrick shows this and executes in a manner suitable for a film with a great point to make.

    The time is World War I, French and German armies are stuck in an entrenched draw. Col. Dax played by Douglas is ordered by his overbearing superior Gen. Mireau, as George Macready, to take a German high position known as the Ant Hill. Mireau is pushing for a promotion, so when Dax's soldiers are pushed back, he takes it personally and orders soldiers under Dax's command executed for cowardice. Dax takes their defense.

    There are those who say director Stanley Kubrick had difficulty in his films with understanding and harnessing human feelings. Paths Of Glory proves them wrong. It's less than 90 minutes from beginning to end yet detailed throughout with a kind of raw emotion that pulls you in.

    This is best displayed in the film's shocking ending. Great scenes throughout, whether it's Dax leading his doomed command across No-Man's Land or two soldiers in the evening asking each other earnestly if it's better to be shot or alternatively blown to pieces.

    You never glimpse so much as one German soldier in the entire film, even during the big attack. The underlying of the movie may be war is hell to go through but it doesn't help when you are led by those with their own selfish agendas.

    Douglas is perfect of course, and impressive presence throughout, whether bucking up his men or bandying words with slick Gen. Broulard as Adolphe Menjou.
    But Macready is the one who leaves the strongest imprint. Clearly nuts at the start, Mireau seems utterly blissful in his ignorant selfishness, proclaiming himself ''the only completely innocent man in this whole affair". The shame of it is that compared to Broulard, he ends up being so.

    Great supporting performances, too, by Ralph Meeker, Joe Turkel, and especially Timothy Carey as three condemned soldiers.
    Wayne Morris as a slippery lieutenant and Richard Anderson, later Steve Austin's tan boss on The Six-Million-Dollar Man, as Mireau's unctuous chief of staff, dedicated to seeing the men executed yet showing some understated remorse at the end.

    No attempts are made by any of the cast at French accents, the only accents audible here are Brooklynese. Like another screen classic Amadeus, this makes the story feel less exotic, which I wouldn't of minded, it's all to make it more natural to Americans sadly.

    Ultimately and to conclude, this is Kubrick's film though. In shot after memorable shot, he serves up a classic tale that has economy, raw emotional power, and the drive for justice and right.

    Kubrick made many exceptional films, but this Paths of Glory is definitely among them and one of his earliest.
  • June 21, 2008
    War films are a Hollywood staple starting somewhere back when All Quiet on the Western front gained prominence for being a great adaptation of the famed novel by Erich Maria Remarque. This 1957 film continued that great tradition with another look at the insanity aroused by war. ...( read more)In this instance it explores the insanity that can be aroused within an armies own ranks and the blind obsessions and principles of some individuals. Kubrick is never one for pulling punches in his films and with a classic star at his disposal in Kirk Douglas; he goes for the jugular of the issue. The humanity of the issue and corruptness, but the great aspect of the film is that it never loses site of the fact that everyone can make mistakes and that humanity of everyone in the army is necessary.

    The backdrop of this film is based in fact. A certain General George Broulard, played with his usual air by Adolphe Menjou, comes to another commanding officer whom he manipulates into ordering a suicide run on the enemies? position. General Paul Mireau, played with a particularly hateful attitude by George Macready, then carries down the orders to his brilliant Colonel Dax, Kirk Douglas. Mireau in turns forces Dax to ready his men for the insane attack run. This is the setting, what follows of course is the utter failure of the attack and the anger of the superiors especially Mireau. Mireau wants to kill some hundred troops as an example of the men?s cowardice, because during the attack he sees about roughly half of Dax?s troops refusing to advance out of the trenches.

    The film?s strength is not in the message so much as the human face Kubrick gives the soldiers zeroing first on a moment of true cowardice committed by Lieutenant Roget. The Lieutenant is ordered to go on a reconnaissance mission the night before the attack by Dax, and, whether out of fear of going into No Man?s Land or just a bad drinking problem, he gets drunk before going out with two of his men. As the trio goes out, he makes rash decisions, splitting up the party and fleeing at the first signs of trouble in the process letting fly a grenade that kills one of his men. The other man on the mission stays behind to see this and makes it back alive. This seemingly smaller story inside the big story is key though I think because it shows the humanity of the issue. What gives the commanding General up in his safe booth the authority to call his men cowards? He cannot possibly have a feel for the issues of the moment as Colonel Dax does in seeing his men bottled up in the trenches because they will be slaughtered upon going over the top.

    The last third of the film is devoted to the court-martial of three of Dax?s men over the issue of cowardice because Dax has managed through his form weight of being a premier lawyer to get the Generals to agree to settle for just three men?s life at steak instead of the hundred originally discussed to show an example. The three men in question are either chosen by the commanding officers by random of because they are generally in disfavor as is Corporal Philippe Paris, the man who witnessed Roget?s cowardice. Each falls apart as the date of their never in question execution approaches.

    I will not reveal much more about the plot and the ending, but I will say that this film stands as a stellar war film dealing with great issues of warfare and the horrors it creates. The performances are gripping and the story gives a fair tone to the whole issue although as is usual of a Kubrick film the protagonist is generally in opposition to the authority throughout the film a effort that Kirk Douglas does with his usual ferocity, nobody can quite getting as seemingly hot tempered as Douglas. He is a yeller of extraordinary talent. Despite being roughly 51 years old this film still holds up quite well with great cinematography work and art direction.
  • June 19, 2008
    Love or hate him, Stanley Kubrick was a very talented director. He has covered and conquered a wide range of genres from political satire, to artsy sci-fi, to flat out horror, but it was a war movie that really got him noticed when he made the devastating "Paths of Glory". Not ...( read more)an epic like some of his others, but instead, Kubrick elects to go straight for the jugular with a powerful anti-war message. Based on a novel, the movie takes us to World War I as French Colonel Dax (Kirk Douglas) is ordered to send his troops on an attack to capture a key enemy stronghold. Even though it is practically a suicide mission, Dax follows the orders from his higher ranking officers, which is one example here of the struggle between chain of command and personal ethics. The attempt is short-lived as many soldiers are barraged by enemy fire, and it forces the others to hastily retreat, but this is not taken lightly by General Mireau, as it prompts him to court martial three soldiers for cowardice. What ensues is a compelling court drama that examines the difference between bravery and sensibility. This is a somewhat similar movie to Clint Eastwood's "Letters From Iwo Jima", in it's promotion for human dignity, and while it isn't as personal or descriptive, it is very moving in it's stance that men should not be simply disposable. To add depth, there is also an underlying story of callousness and personal triumph by the French generals, who pose well as unsympathetic antagonists. From a technical stand point, it is well shot, especially during the trench scenes, and although the battle scene wasn't anything spectacular, Kubrick makes up for it with his visual capturing of emotion, particularly towards the end. With the help of a great dramatic performance by Douglas and a timeless anti-war study, this has been ranked as one of the best war movies ever, and is definitely worth seeing.
  • June 14, 2008
    La mejor cinta antibélica en la historia, el gran Stanley nos regala otra entrega con grandes actuaciones, y sobretodo la historia, un general es ordenado a llevar a cabo una misión imposible, sólo para despues poner en el ojo del huracán la moralidad del ejército americano. Un f...( read more)inal impactante acompaña a esta (otra vez!!!) obra maestra
  • June 14, 2008
    Kubrick's best film. From the narrow, noisy and dirty trenches to the opulent, wide and silent high rank officers' estates. One of the most compelling and touching anti-war statements. Kirk Douglas is simply amazing here. The ending magnifies even more this true cinematic marvel.
  • June 11, 2008
    A film that basically tells us that the men who control and start the wars are evil human beings without conscience or a moral barometer. Probably my favorite Stanley Kubrick film. The image of Kirk Douglas as Col.Dax readying his men as we get a front shot of him walking through...( read more) the trenches with bombs going off over head makes the film even better. Great camera work and truly a depressing story of the reality of war.

    Soldiers, not only are you fighting for your lives against the enemy, youre fighting against your generals as well. Maybe thats the main point here: in war, were only fighting ourselves.
  • June 8, 2008
    Watched it at school. The big funny guy who starts crying is the only memorable part. An okay movie.
  • May 29, 2008
    great kubrick filmdealing with a true incident in world war 1 involving french soldiors who refused to go charge to there deaths when ordered, and there eventual trial by french goverment, and kurk douglas as sergent defending them, very controvershal for france and was banned fo...( read more)r many years, great direction showing typical kubrick tricks, the war scenes look terrific, and photoghraphy as usual top form, possible conteder best film of the 50s with twelve angry men, and my second fav kubrick after dr strangelove
  • May 25, 2008
    Arguably, Kubrick's best film. Definitely up there as one of the best anti-war movies ever made. Its message still is applicable to today's current events.
  • May 15, 2008
    Kubrick's first work of genius, and the first film with a percussion only score. Kirk Douglas is brilliant as a pragmatic idealist fighting a futile battle for justice in wartime.
  • April 27, 2008
    one of the best from both Kubrick and Douglas. the last 10 minutes or so of this film are absolutely perfect.
  • April 27, 2008
    It's really incredible to watch this after seeing the others first. All the trademarks are there, if a little less obviously, and it's just as moving and compelling as everything else he's ever done. I love this man.
  • April 15, 2008
    You see a lot of similarity between this and Full Metal Jacket. For one, the score is repetitive in a good way and the movie ends with a song. Secondly, Kubrick also shows in detail how war can cause people to breakdown. The cinematography of the battle scenes was amazing for its...( read more) time, but the visuals and sound effects were another story. For some reason, rapidly fired bullets were made to sound like a Stormtrooper blaster on automatic. Also, you can't really see bullets or see who is getting hit on the battlefield, they just drop dead. You can't really blame the movie for this though, as this was relatively low budget as well as 50 years old.
  • April 15, 2008
    Corporal Paris: See that cockroach? Tomorrow morning, we'll be dead and it'll be alive. It'll have more contact with my wife and child than I will. I'll be nothing, and it'll be alive.
    [Ferol smashes the roach]
    Private Ferol: Now you got the edge on him.

    Here's a great movie th...( read more)at is a war film / courtroom drama / political commentary all rolled into one great Stanley Kubrick movie.

    It combines strong acting, solid direction (love those tracking shots), an excellent war sequence, a great story with a solid script full of memorable lines, all into a wonderfully executed film.

    Kirk Douglas stars as Col. Dax. The film is set on the French side of WWI. A general orders the siege of a German combat site, but due to impossible odds, the men under Col. Dax's command all fall back.

    Because of this, the general seeking greater fame and protection for himself orders one man from each unit, chosen at random to be executed on charges of cowardice.

    Douglas, seeing the lunacy in this must now try and fight for the rights of these men.

    One thing that made me happy right off the bat was something that should always be done. If you make a movie taking place in another country where the men would normally speak another language, what is the point of having them have the accent of that area, opposed to either having people speak the language or just not bother. Kubrick recognizes this and has everyone speak naturally, no fake accents.

    What really matters here is how good this movie is on every other front. Douglas is great. The men on trial are all very good. The movie looks great, doing what it can on its small budget, and confined areas in the trenches.

    The movie is only 85 minutes long, but moves so quickly yet resonates so strongly. And it doesn't even cop out at the end, the whole thing just comes together so damn well.

    Great movie.

    General Mireau: I can't understand these armchair officers, fellas trying to fight a war from behind a desk, waving papers at the enemy, worrying about whether a mouse is gonna run up their pants leg.
    Colonel Dax: I don't know, General. If I had the choice between mice and Mausers, I think I'd take the mice every time.
  • April 7, 2008
    Two Kubricks movie back to back & it was like experiencing masterful & versatile film-making.. I'm now his avid fan..

    Set in World War I, Paths of Glory is about the trench war-fare between France & germany.. It's about an impossible assault on a heavily-fortified enemy posit...( read more)ion by one of the commanding general - who believes this outcome would gain him a promotion..

    It is realistically shot & beautifully photographed.. Kirk Douglas as Col. Dax was terrific & the two generals were also fantastic.. The Final court-martial execution was just simply mind-blowing..

    Paths of Glory can be rightly be described as one of the greatest anti-war film. Truly a masterpiece..Terrific watch..
  • March 27, 2008
    Mi pelicula de guerra favorita. Si no te conmueve, deja de ver peliculas y suicidate...
  • March 10, 2008
    This isn't a war film - it's an anti-war film. As such, it's completely subordinated to making it's point and portaits all characters as single-dimensional, good or bad. Having said that, it's a great work of cinematography with very powerful filming.
  • March 7, 2008
    It was one of the best old movies I've seen.
  • March 4, 2008
    Great anti-war film and a fantastic morality play.
  • March 3, 2008
    Paths of Glory by the impeccable Kubrick is the the ultimate anti war flick. The movie is emotionally charged up and the fabulous direction by Kubrick only adds to the immense effect this movie creates, the trench war scenes were superb and so was that firing squad sequence. Kirk...( read more) Douglas's performance as Colonel Dax was top draw.
  • February 26, 2008
    An engaging exploration of the hypocrisy and inhumanity of war. Beautiful b&w cinematography and some of the most american sounding frenchman ever comitted to screen.
  • February 16, 2008
    Ce serait de mentir effrontément que d'affirmer qu'il s'agit là du film le plus formidable de Stanley Kubrick. Mais ce serait tout aussi effroyable si l'on taisait qu'il s'agit là d'un accomplissement incroyable pour l'un des tout premiers films d'un réalisateur. Quoique, dois-je...( read more) l'avouer, la réalisation ne m'a pas spécialement marquée, même si certains éléments et certains plans dictent clairement le début du perfectionnisme de Kubrick. Dans ce cas-ci, il faut avouer que c'est plutôt le mixte du scénario et d'un acteur aussi incroyable que Kirk Douglas qui accouche d'une aussi agréable écoute.

    Paths of Glory soulève son lot de questions morales, évidemment, comme n'importe quel autre film de Stanley Kubrick. Et ce n'est pas une mince tâche que de s'attaquer au fervent patriotisme en 1957, là où l'emblème américaine suffit à faire rêver des millions de jeunes hommes qui ne demandent qu'à crever sur le champ de bataille pour espérer servir ce bon vieil oncle Sam. C'est pourtant le début d'un réalisateur ingénieux qui, à travers les âges, ne se gênera jamais pour remettre en question les conventions établies et, par le fait même, pour faire renaître l'être humain dans un bain de moralité et d'immoralité.
  • February 14, 2008
    Impressive antiwar diatribe from Kubrick with a cutting script. Let down slightly by its setting amongst the french army played by plummy british actors. 'BlackAdder Goes Forth' will seem more poignant now.
  • February 14, 2008
    The irony of the title of Stanley Kubrick's powerful anti-war film cannot be missed. Kirk Douglas plays a colonel in the French army of WWI who is ordered to make a futile attack by an arrogant and effete general for his own personal and ambition fuelled reasons. When the offensi...( read more)ve inevitably fails, he orders the execution of three men picked at random for cowardice. This film contains none of the usual flag waving and macho heroics, Kubrick preferring to make a blistering attack on the hypocrisy of the politics of war and those who wage it from behind their lines, luxuriating in chateaus and attending costume balls while the men they so casually send to their deaths suffer under impossible conditions. It is much an attack on the class system as anything, as the aristocratic officers can perpetrate appalling acts of cowardice with impunity while innocent fighting men are made "examples" of or treated with disdain when suffering from shellshock (which "does not exist"). A powerful and intelligent examination of how war is fought from one of the true masters.
  • February 10, 2008
    This is a very expressive and powerful wartime film that examines the up close and personal horrors of trench warfare and questions what it truly means to be courageous, dignified and honorable to your fellow compatriots when faced with a life-or-death situation. A failed attempt...( read more) by French regiments to secure a enemy stronghold during WWI leads to a devistating request to display a public execution for insubordination. With three randomly chosen soldiers representing hundreds of their fellow men, Col. Dax (Kirk Douglas) uses all his power and persuasion to abort this futile display of corporal punishment. Kubrick (who was still new to the scene at the time) gives us breathtaking photography (especially the opening raid) and a gripping plot that resonates with questions of honor and integrity that is still influencing films today.
  • January 11, 2008
    An anti-war war movie that denounces its absurdity with innocent lives taken only to help glorify a general on a power trip. George Macready is memorable in the role of the evil general Mireau and Kirk Douglas plays the genuine hero who defends his fellow soldiers and make us res...( read more)pect men who fight for their convictions rather than for their benefits. A metaphor for life where power, hypocrisy and a lack of respect for life make humans abuse their own kind. One of Kubrick's finest.
  • January 10, 2008
    This looks pretty good.
  • December 29, 2007
    I'm not really sure. I'll just keep this on the shelf for awhile.
  • December 23, 2007
    emotional, realistic,beautiful,...masterpiece
  • December 19, 2007
    This is another one of those war movies that isn't about the special effects as it is about the characters and the war experience. It is quite a powerful film and it will not bore you, unless you're really picky about your movies.
  • December 19, 2007
    Kubrick is Lord, Kubrick is Lord.
  • December 13, 2007
    This WWI movie is most excellent. Kirk Douglas is a colonel in the French army. His orders are impossible to follow and he lets his superiors know. This is a great antiwar movie.

    Although it is in black and white, you can still see the magnificence of the French palaces and t...( read more)he brutality of the battlefield. The acting is flawless. Such hardcore emotions!

    This goes to the top of my favorite war movies. Right next to Enemy at the Gates and Saving Private Ryan.
  • December 2, 2007
    ew, i had to watch this for history class!
  • November 25, 2007
    Il primo Kubrick antimilitare nel 1957. C'è parecchio da imparare
  • November 22, 2007
    Un général français joué par Kirk Douglas doit organiser une mission suicide.
  • November 15, 2007
    The expression 'Loving a movie' has never been so true. Paths of Glory is the kind of movie that every film enthusiast would love. The script is great, the acting is perfect (Kirk Douglas is really something). Oh, and Kubrick directed it. It means that I don't have to mention tha...( read more)t the direction is flawless.

    Some of the scenes (particularly the combat scene) are perfectly shot. I think Paths of Glory is a forgotten classic, directed by a young and refreshing Stanley Kubrick (He was only 29 years old at the moment).
  • November 14, 2007
    Brutal and sadly true in its way... War is the greatest of depravations.

Summary


Paths of Glory Summary