Providence poster & wallpaper

David Warner, Dirk Bogarde, Elaine Stritch

Flixster Users

86% liked it

568 ratings

Critics

88% liked it

8 critics

R, 1 hr. 44 min.

Directed by: Alain Resnais

Release Date: January 1, 1977

Invite friends to see

Stats: 32 reviews

Get movie widget Recommend it Add to Favorites
report incorrect info

Photos

None yet... Got one?

Your Rating


clear rating
Share on: Facebook Twitter

Flixster Reviews (32)

  • bort16
    May 1, 2009
    bort16
    From the opening scenes of Providence it is evidently clear that we're in the skilled hands of Alain Resnais. His trademark slow, wandering pan shots wander turned up towards tree branches, around magnificent buildings and so on. A patrol roams the forest, shooting into the brush...( read more). One man wounds and old man, then shoots him he says out of pity. The old man is turning into a werewolf, apparently. The military man is Kevin Woodford, and he is prosecuted in court by Claude Langham, as his wife watches. She is sympathetic to Woodford, and after he is acquitted, shows up to lunch with him. She leaves with him and takes him to their home where she attempts to seduce him. All the while a voice narrates, somewhat confused. We learn it is a dying author, Clive Langham, Claude's father, struggling to hammer out the plot to a novel while he lays in bed, drinking, suffering through the pain.
    The author depicts his characters, based on his family, as cold, adulterous, and spiteful. Claude and his wife quarrel, as he takes on Woodford as he hangs around their home, share drinks, and so on. It's for the most part a detached battle of passive aggression. Woodford seems a layman to Claude's bourgeoisie. In traditional fashion, Resnais constructs conflicts for the most part through discussion, double entendre and suggestive and layered dialogue. Bombs and gunshots go off from the army and apparant terrorists, but none strike so sharply as the dialogue.
    Many have complained that Providence, like Marienbad, are too confusing, too inaccessible to truly enjoy. Certainly, Resnais hides the point of his films deep within, but that is one of their most endearing qualities. Also especially enjoyable is the construction of his films. Resnais, like his Italian counter part Antonioni, was always obsessed with architecture, and used it frequently as a mammoth point of symbolism in his films. In Providence sets and locations change with the mood of the author's interpretations, from stately hotels and restaurants, to courtrooms, forests, and at one point a white cottage on a beach that is intentionally done with matte paintings to accentuate the lucid dreaming of the author's drunken and possibly hallucinatory mind. The construction of the characters dialogue also highlights the wandering mind. Often characters in a discussion with each other seem to be on about entirely different subjects.
    The film's big pay off comes at the end when the author's real life family come to visit him on his birthday. It's here we found out why the author's perception of his characters are filtered as they have been. It may seem something of a mystery, and certainly is not going to spelled out for you, however.
    Alain Resnais is often overshadowed in history by his Nouvelle Vague counterparts such as Jean-Luc Goddard (though Resnais is more closely associated with the Left Bank of artists in France). Yet his influence and importance to equally, if not more, significant to the evolution of filmmaking. His additions to the arts, stylistic and intellectual, are extraordinary. His abstractness and impenetrability have made him something of a fringe filmmaker in comparison to others. But though his most well known works were his first three (Night and Fog, Hiroshima Mon Amour, and Last Year at Marienbad - all three revolutionary achievements in narrative assembly), Resnais had a long and fruitful career, and still does: his latest film will debut at this years Cannes film festival.
  • harrycaul
    December 13, 2008
    harrycaul
    Struggling to finish his last novel before cancer finishes him, Clive Langham (John Gielgud), a celebrated writer, concocts an elaborate and spiteful fantasy featuring the members of his immediate family. Where to begin... Both in form and content, this has to be one of the most ...( read more)forbiddingly complex movies I have ever seen! Make no mistake, this is a difficult piece of work, and I won't pretend to have fully digested it after just a single viewing. I'm fumbling in the dark here but I'll try my best...

    Punctuated by false starts, digressions and revisions, Langham's dreams - which begin as an impotent revenge on his disapproving son (Dirk Bogarde) - are every bit as restless as the ailing author himself, whose spasms of pain seem to manifest themselves as sinister incidental details: an old man collapses in the street, people are rounded up by the military, we see glimpses of concentration camps and there are ominous rumblings of terrorism in the distance. The most startling moment, in a film filled with surprises, comes when we finally get to meet Langham's relatives outside the confines of his imagination, roughly 3/4 of the way through the film; they bear little or no resemblance to the people Langham has introduced us to! This is surely the major theme of the movie: the extent to which Langham's perception of his family has been distorted by pain, guilt and alcohol.

    My two criticisms of the movie are as follows: 1) Whereas in a film like Céline and Julie Go Boating there is an infectious joy to all the formal experimentation, because the subject matter of Resnais' movie is so dark, Providence manages to be playful without ever being much fun. 2) The scatological vein of humour running through the film undermines much of the sophistication. Bogarde and, especially, Gielgud are brilliant. Miklós Rózsa contributes a gorgeous, darkly romantic score.
  • RThornhill
    July 1, 2009
    RThornhill
    recommended by bort16.
  • lebulltaurus
    February 14, 2009
    lebulltaurus
    what a cast can't really go wrong
  • MECreviews
    March 24, 2008
    MECreviews
    This movie had potential, but fell through the cracks. To bad.

View All Providence Reviews

Critic Reviews

No recent reviews.

View more Providence reviews at RottenTomatoes.com

Comments

This board looks lonely. Be the first to talk about "Providence" !

Post A Comment | View All Comments

Critic ratings and reviews powered by RottenTomatoes.com

Fresh (60% or more critics rated the movie positively)

Rotten (59% or fewer critics rated the movie positively)

All Rotten Tomatoes content is used under license from Rotten Tomatoes. Rotten Tomatoes, Certified Fresh, and the Tomatometer are the trademarks of Incfusion Corporation, d/b/a Rotten Tomatoes, a subsidiary of IGN Entertainment, Inc.

Cast

More Like This

This list looks lonely.
Add a suggestion!

Facts

No facts approved yet. Be the first

Providence : Watch Free on TV

Providence Trivia

  • "Making sex is like a Chinese dinner: It ain't over 'til you both get your cookies." is a line from what movie?  Answer »
  • Which actor played mousy in Outside Providence?  Answer »
  • Where is K C Higgens from in Take Me Out To The Ball Game ?  Answer »
  • Outside Providence is based on a book written by whom?  Answer »
More Providence Trivia

Movie Quizzes

No quizzes for Providence. Want to create one?

Video Clips

No video clips yet. Want to upload one?

Meet Other Fans

Add Providence to favorites

Recent News

No recent headlines. Got one?

Recent Lists

Make a List |

View All Lists

Most Popular Skin

No skins yet. Interested in creating one?