[Rec] poster & wallpaper
Get movie widget Recommend it Add to Favorites

Claudia Font, Javier Botet, Manuel Bronchud, Maria Lanau, Martha Carbonell ...( see more  see more... ) , Vicente Gil , Manuela Velasco

A team of local TV reporters are following a squad of firemen on night duty. The footage is completely live and their task is to make show about on the life of these professionals who work while we ar...( read more  read more... )e sleeping. The first job of the night is to rescue an old lady who is trapped inside her apartment but the routine rescue soon takes a sinister turn. Something evil is spreading throughout the building, out of control. Trapped inside, the firemen and the TV crew have to confront an unknown and lethal horror. Now, the only thing that matters is hiding, surviving and trying desperately to escape. They must keep on recording. No matter what happens. Until the very last moment...

Flixster Users

76% liked it

36,219 ratings

Critics

91% liked it

22 critics

R, 1 hr. 18 min.

Directed by: Jaume Balagueró, Paco Plaza

Release Date: November 23, 2007

Invite friends to see

DVD Release Date: July 14, 2009

Get It:

Stats: 5,403 reviews

report incorrect info

Photos

[Rec] hurt woman [Rec] movie caption [Rec] [Rec] movie poster [Rec] [Rec] [Rec] [Rec] journalist and firefighter hearing screams journalist when lights went off [Rec] [Rec] Barcelona firefighter and journalist entering the building [Rec] Jennifer
Upload a Photo |

View All [Rec] Photos (25)

Your Rating


clear rating

Flixster Reviews (5,403)

  • ScoopOnline
    December 11, 2009
    ScoopOnline
    Great Movie with some creepy scenes in the dark. It was disturbing especially because of the Camera.
  • garyX
    November 1, 2009
    garyX
    [Rec] is a Spanish horror in which a camera crew following the local fire department stumble on an outbreak of a lethal virus and find themselves quarantined in an apartment building with the resulting flesh eating victims. It actually manages to side step many of the usual flaws...( read more) of this kind of camcorder style horror film in that it has decent actors speaking real dialogue within a well engineered, structured plot line. It even uses the format to interesting effect, the cameraman often being brushed aside and forced away from the action, leaving us to hear and imagine what is going on off-sceen which is actually quite effective and adds to a genuine documentary-style experience. The effects are convincing without getting too gratuitously gory and technically, it is very accomplished. Unfortunately as is the case with all of these point and record style films, the story is obviously seen from only one point of view and is therefore very linear and simplistic and has no surprises whatsoever, right through to the inevitable conclusion. If this footage had been intercut with scenes of what was happening on the outside or flashbacks to previous events it could have been really interesting, but as it is there's absolutely nothing here you haven't seen before. And Diary Of The Dead did it better.
  • stopitgoaway
    October 26, 2009
    stopitgoaway
    #30: [REC]
    There's a lot of these shaky-cam movies around at the moment, and among your "Cloverfield"s and "Diary Of The Dead"s this low budget Spanish movie may seem like the underdog, but it's punching way above its weight.

    Filmed by a TV crew stumbling upon something very nas...( read more)ty happening in an apartment block, the movie is shot and acted brilliantly, the sense of unease gradually giving way to all out terror. While it's obviously derivative of movies like "The Last Broadcast" and "The Blair Witch Project" it manages to deliver in a way that those movies couldn't thanks to some brilliant set-pieces. It's not even out in the UK yet and Hollywood have already remade it (the inevitably inferior "Quarantine") but do yourself a favour and spend an evening in the dark with the original. You'll regret it, but in the best possible way. Terrific.

    Best bit: The climactic night vision only stand-off against... well, whatever the hell that thing was.
  • DrZeek
    October 25, 2009
    DrZeek
    Ángela: [to the camera] It's nearly 2 A.M. and we're still sealed in this building that we came to with the firemen earlier this evening, to assist an elderly woman who later attacked a policeman and a fireman. They're both in critical condition. The police won't let us leave and...( read more) are giving us no explanations.

    A quality Spanish horror film, using the live camera style effectively to further enhance the premise. There are a few issues, but the general impact of the scares and solid filmmaking work well to keep the viewer on this ride through a terror filled night.

    The film begins with a local reporter and her camera man filming a segment on firefighters and what there job on night duty involves. Soon, the firemen are called to duty at an apartment building, where someone is said to be trapped in their room.

    Upon arriving, the firefighters and police officers inside find the room with the problem, however things take a turn for the worse as the resident, an old woman, viciously attacks the men trying to help. Attempting to leave with their wounded, the people inside the building find that they are being prevented from escaping by professionals on the outside. Now everyone must wait inside for some supposed "help" to arrive and hopefully inform them about what is going on.

    I can see why this film was remade for America as 'Quarantine.' The film was successful enough, where I believe more people should get to watch this kind of quality horror. The premise is intriguing and it capitalizes off of the live camera technique. The film was successful enough, where I believe more people should get to watch this kind of quality horror. There needs to be a bit of belief suspension to think that someone would continue to operate this camera, but the film certainly never feels gimmicky with its camera use. I've also learned that the remake it is pretty much a shot for shot remake, so I don't plan to see that version.

    I must also point out how great a lot of the camera work is throughout this film. A lot of very long shots, that are more complicated to pull of than it would seem. The use of the single location is effective and the film does a good job of laying out the geography of the area. This is important, because the way the film generates scares based on what you know about the characters surroundings functions as a great way to build tension and not feel cheap.

    The third act is interesting, as night vision becomes key, but reveals of plot information is also handed to the viewer. The mix leads to great scares and exposition, and its a success I give to the filmmakers that the scares outweighed the randomness of having answers be provided.

    Quality horror.

    Sergio: [upon seeing Jennifer] What happened to her eyes?
  • ceWEBrity
    September 17, 2009
    ceWEBrity
    I think the ever-present danger with first-person perspective films is that of realism. It's as if the director is making a contract with the viewer, promising to immerse them to the best of their ability by cutting out the "filmed" aspect of their movie. The problem is that as s...( read more)oon as something betrays the movie's attempt at being realistic, the house of cards just tumbles; you remember that this is just some guy pointing a camera at a bunch of shrieking adults. [REC], more than any first-person film I've encountered (except the disastrous Diary of the Dead, but I'm not sure that quite counts), falls prey to this time and again.

    To be fair to the film, it is horrifying. I watched this in broad daylight and it still gave me the willies. The problem is that I spent just as much time rolling my eyes at it as I did being terrified of it. The movie is filled to the brim with contrivances, just-right movie moments, and horror tropes, so much so that you watch the characters flounder and wonder to yourself if they've ever seen a horror movie before. That guy choosing to stand in front of a glass door, behind which he knows there's a zombie? And right as he's telling everyone how to get out of the building? Dumb. Angela finding the right key amidst a stack of about 100 in less than a minute's time? Yeah, okay. Stuff like this completely sells the movie out much more than a typically filmed movie, because something like [REC] strives to include the viewer in the experience, instead of presenting an experience to the viewer. In your typical horror movie, a cliche might simply roll off of you, because what you're seeing is an alternate universe. In something like [REC], heavily plotted moments are all the more painful. The point of all this is simply to highlight that [REC] is good, but flawed, and could have been so much better. First-person horror has the potential to be incredibly effective, as this film demonstrates. The atmosphere is well-built and the sound design is great, and though the scares are primarily of the jump variety, the wave of fear you ride to them on makes them really count.

    I also had a problem with the lead character, sprightly and cute but deeply irritating. She's initially painted as a plucky, take-charge reporter, but she brings no skills or insight to the survivors and generally just whines about how much they need to film what's going on. Anyone there could have taken her place. The performance itself is likely the problem, as Manuela Velasco comes across as whiny rather than self-assured. It's not that I need a likable or competent protagonist to guide me through a movie, but in a tale of survival, I'd like to care if the character actually survives.
  • drdakovas
    February 7, 2010
    drdakovas
    I love this movie. It's creepy, thrilling and actors are very convincing. thanks to the camera it looks very real. i saw it three times in one week and that says it all :)))
  • blackcecily
    February 7, 2010
    blackcecily
    amazing story, kind of cloverfield, blair witch project feel the remake Quarintine cant touch this movie with a ten foot pole though its all in subtitles it adds to the freakieness of it and the overall movie is just way better
  • caffeinatedalex
    February 4, 2010
    caffeinatedalex
    [Rec] does a number of things well. It keeps itself short and sweet, something many horror movies can't manage to do these days. It stays committed to its style throughout, something District 9 failed miserably to do much to its discredit. And it builds an outstanding sense of...( read more) atmosphere which keeps its audience balancing on its heels the entire movie. Even as the movie's scares become more and more predictable, there's fun to be found in the tension of wondering when that expected bite is going to come. And although it succumbs to the typical final act fall apart, where the a flimsy and lame plot explanation jumps in and busts up the fun for a bit, [Rec] still manages to be a terrifying and great time.
  • atuc007
    February 3, 2010
    atuc007
    buenos sustos pero también buenos ratos donde te aburres
  • SarahTheMovieLover
    February 2, 2010
    SarahTheMovieLover
    Oh my God. I am serious when I say this movie genuinely scared the shit out of me. Wow. Seriously I have no words for that. It's quite terrifying. I don't know what it is about a horror movies where the whole thing is filmed by the characters (like Blair Witch for example) but so...( read more)mething about that makes things ten times scarier. I'm honestly going to have to stay awake for a while longer and watch something happy because I really shouldnt have watched that at 3 in the morning. Wow.

    What did this movie teach me? When crazy shit is going down, stay the fuck away from it!

View All [Rec] Reviews

Critic Reviews

No recent reviews.

View more [Rec] reviews at RottenTomatoes.com

Comments

  • fearnet
    July 21, 2009
    fearnet
    Check out an exclusive clip from [REC]!!

    http://www.fearnet.com/videos/b15984_rec_exclusive_clip.html
  • rzyadat
    April 11, 2009
    rzyadat
    i havnt seen it yet ...... my sister did and she is so scared
  • katangel13
    March 14, 2009
    katangel13
    [SPOILER]

    did anyone else notice the difference with the boy in the attic and the woman in the penthouse?
  • chrismid259
    December 9, 2008
    chrismid259
    "I cant wait to watch the english version and not have to read subtitles."

    LOL!
  • hyypia
    November 12, 2008
    hyypia
    Usually I'm very horror proof, but this one made me scared like little girl. One of best I've seen, one of it's kind. It's freakin sets new level...
  • aftrs
    July 29, 2008
    aftrs
    Well I watched the film in spanish [with subtitles] ... I must say its got that creepy factor [ a little like 28 days later ], jennifer the little girl was brilliant she made the film feel scary- I cant wait to watch the english version and not have to read subtitles.
  • lovecyn4ever
    July 11, 2008
    lovecyn4ever
    If you're claustrophobic & get scared of whatever jumps or scream out of the dark,then you might find this film to be very scary but that wasn't my case.

    y

    [REC] is been getting so much hype but is similar to 28 days later,not better or scary in my opinion.The film is not intense from start to finish.The first half wasted time with unnecessary dialog in the beginning & also with the reporter making interviews with all the chaos going on.Most of the action & intense moments happens during the second half but few scenes are too dark or out of focus just because of this trend of being filmed from a cameraman's point of view which it needs to stop.I don't see what's so pleasant about a shaky camera.The leading actress who plays a reporter named Angela delivers a good & convincing performance.The best part of the movie is tours the end.The last few minutes which unfortunately it was too short,was creepy with a unexpected twist to add to the story.



  • chrismid259
    June 30, 2008
    chrismid259
    Oh my gosh. A sequel. YAY!
  • DuncanRR
    June 1, 2008
    DuncanRR
    Anyone know when this'll be available on DVD? Also, did any theaters in the U.S. show it? How have people been able to see it?
  • IzzyGibs
    March 24, 2008
    IzzyGibs
    A quick plot overview as there isn't on above:

    What appears to be a routine emergency call quickly turns to hell as a news team are trapped inside a building with no means of escape as things go from worse to worse. The only thing that matters is trying to escape while capturing everything on camera.
Post A Comment | View All Comments

Critic ratings and reviews powered by RottenTomatoes.com

Fresh (60% or more critics rated the movie positively)

Rotten (59% or fewer critics rated the movie positively)

Cast

More Like This

Click a thumb to vote on that suggestion, or add your own suggestions.

  • Cloverfield
    Cloverfield (77%)
  • Quarantine
    Quarantine (94%)
  • Resident Evil
    Resident Evil (43%)
  • Night of the Living Dead
    Night of the Living Dead (33%)

More Movies like [Rec]

Facts

No facts approved yet. Be the first

[Rec] : Watch Free on TV

[Rec] Trivia

  • Who links these movies? Rec Eye The Family Stone The Notebook Wedding Crashers Mean Girls  Answer »
  • In The Shining ('80) what does Danny see in the Rec room when no one else was supposed to be there?  Answer »
  • What is the remake of the spanish horror, REC, to be named?  Answer »
  • What was the name of the movie that the 2008 horror flick "Quarantine" was based on?  Answer »
More [Rec] Trivia

Movie Quizzes

Create a Quiz |

All Quizzes

Video Clips

Upload a Video |

All [Rec] Videos

Meet Other Fans

Add [Rec] to favorites

Recent News

Submit a Story |

View [Rec] News

Recent Lists

Make a List |

View All Lists

Most Popular Skin

BabyCham Skin by BabyCham
55 Profiles
Add to Profile

More Skins