Featured Audience Ratings

• Directors C

  
  [img]http://images.rottentomatoes.com/images/user/icons/icon13.gif[/img] It's saying something that most people would find peculiar, but I found Ringu to be very problematic and consequently inferior to Gore Verbinksi's American remake "The Ring". One of the… More
  [img]http://images.rottentomatoes.com/images/user/icons/icon13.gif[/img] It's saying something that most people would find peculiar, but I found Ringu to be very problematic and consequently inferior to Gore Verbinksi's American remake "The Ring". One of the difficulties with inspirations and remakes is you have to consider which film is superior, but sometimes it's just a matter of which film you saw first and strangely enough I couldn't decide if it was the fact that I saw 2002's The Ring before Ringu that altered the experience or whether it's down to the fact the film simply isn't as eery or atmospheric. I think the idea of Ringu is absolutely genius and inspired The Ring to go further with the premise but I felt it was more compassionate and less isolating than Verbinski's film, and it hasn't aged very well either. The remake also added some shocks to the story, Ringu has dissapointingly near to none, and I found this version ashamedly dull. I'd definetely be lying if I said that there's nothing redemptive in it whatsoever, the acting is decent, as is the script and direction, I didn't think the lighting worked very well, but if you haven't seen the 2002 version then you will probably enjoy Ringu more than I did. That said, i'd recommend it to those who haven't seen the remake as I would recommend the remake to those who haven't seen the original. It's a strange horror movie going experience when you get the weird sensation of deja vu, because the remake looked to me like it duplicated this almost entirely frame to frame. The Ring (2002) is one of the scariest films i've ever seen, maybe that's why this one didn't live up to my own personal expectations.

• Universal D

  
  Interesting blend of Victorian-esque old timey creep with some modern twists as a reporter and her college professor ex scour the Japanese countryside for clues to an urban myth that just couldn't be true, it couldn't be, that'd be ridiculous, wouldn't it? Though… More
  Interesting blend of Victorian-esque old timey creep with some modern twists as a reporter and her college professor ex scour the Japanese countryside for clues to an urban myth that just couldn't be true, it couldn't be, that'd be ridiculous, wouldn't it? Though not the scarey advertised, it'll do, all right, it'll do.

• Eric A

  
  This started it all the modern day Asian-American horror films, that definitely deserves alot of credit. The cinematography is well done, but personally the movie didn't really scare me.

• Jeff "

  
  This Asian horror film is quite possibly one of the best horror films of the last twenty years. Ringu spawned the rush of American remakes of Asian horror films. Seeing this original film, the film was truly effective at building the horror because of its effective atmosphere. Ringu… More
  This Asian horror film is quite possibly one of the best horror films of the last twenty years. Ringu spawned the rush of American remakes of Asian horror films. Seeing this original film, the film was truly effective at building the horror because of its effective atmosphere. Ringu is a phenomenal achievement in the horror genre. Ringu is a tense, atmospheric ride that delivers genuine fright. That's something that is missing from most horror films nowadays. Ringu has the ability to frighten you and keep you on the edge of your seat from the start of the film to the end credits. This is a spine tingling horror film that brings back elements of a truly scary horror film. After the release of this film, American film studios were keen on starting the wave of countless remakes. None of these remakes would be as effective as their Asian counterparts because they would rely more on cheap jump scares than actual atmosphere. Ringu is superior to its remake for that reason, this film relies on a tense, dark and haunting atmosphere to steadily build up the horror, and that's one of the key ingredients for a successful horror film. Ringu is a terrific horror film, and is still one of the best horror films to come out of Japan. This film is a modern classic of the horror medium and the terror it brings on screen is proof of that. This film takes no prisoners in delivering genuine horrifying scares. A must see for every die hard horror fan.

• Alexander D

  
  RINGU, which inspired the well-known American film THE RING, is not faithful to the Japanese novel of the same name (which was written by Koji Suzuki, author of the short story collection which inspired DARK WATER), nor is it scary at all (especially compared to THE RING), but it is… More
  RINGU, which inspired the well-known American film THE RING, is not faithful to the Japanese novel of the same name (which was written by Koji Suzuki, author of the short story collection which inspired DARK WATER), nor is it scary at all (especially compared to THE RING), but it is fantastic, well-acted, and quite thrilling.

• Lee ?

  
  An original and unsettling supernatural tale that has inspired many imitators, remakes and sequels since its arrival 12 years ago. It did come across as being a bit slow and dull at times though. It is effective enough though and creepy as hell.

• Keiko A

  
  Being someone who defines themselves freely as a person that loves horror, I usually tend to find the good Horror movies. In retrospect, had I known what Ringu would entail I would have have seen it faster then anyone out there. Not because Ringu is by any means, but because it is… More
  Being someone who defines themselves freely as a person that loves horror, I usually tend to find the good Horror movies. In retrospect, had I known what Ringu would entail I would have have seen it faster then anyone out there. Not because Ringu is by any means, but because it is singularly one of the most terrifying film I have ever seen. Ringu is a slow burner, with the action not starting until about 3/4 of the way into the film. The beginning follows Reiko Asakawa's investigation of a mystery tape that kills anyone who watches it, 7 days after their time of viewing. The investigation takes Reiko and her (somewhat gormless) ex husband Ryuji to a desolate island in Japan where they learn the story of Shizuko and Sadako Yamamura, the latter being the creator of the 'Ring' tape. Sadako's character is an interesting one, as her notions within the film are somewhat ambiguous. Whether Sadako is a lonely, repressed little girl or outright evil force is left unclear, though based on Rie Inou's superb eerie bodily contortions and ghastly presence in *that* scene, I'd opt for the latter every time. There is something unshakably evil about Sadako's character- I put a large part of it down to the inhumanity of her. Her strange bent posture, the freaky eye and the lack of articulation. Keeping Sadako silent was a fantastic directorial decision by Hideo Nakata; the shroud of mystery surrounding Sadako mean she is even more scary. For the short amount of time she is in the film, Sadako's character makes a huge impact. The simplicity of her move of choice is made terrifying by the familiarity it is contained within. We all have televisions, phones, and VCRs in our home but never expect these to be a source of terror. About. If you scare easily, don't watch Ringu; it is unspeakably eerie. I've read a few reviews calling the filming and shots amateur but I personally think the hindered view is frightening- you never see what is near; working alongside the main premise of the film- the unseen is scary. I think it is beautifully shot, well acted and superbly climatic. A film as subtly conceived as it is hauntingly realised.

• Anthony L

  
  The best contemporary horror film in ages that really bought life to a struggling genre. Absolutely terrifying and an 'Asia extreme' classic!

• Randy T

  
  I enjoyed the American remake [<i>The Ring</i>], this one is even better.

• Kylie B

  
  I love this series. It's a great adaptation of Koji Suzuki novel, with just enough details changed to make it fresh. Plus, the way 'the video' is shot looks like any home movie at the time, rather authentic. I would love to compare this to the very first adaptation,… More
  I love this series. It's a great adaptation of Koji Suzuki novel, with just enough details changed to make it fresh. Plus, the way 'the video' is shot looks like any home movie at the time, rather authentic. I would love to compare this to the very first adaptation, the TV series, but sadly it doesn't seen to be available.

• Cassandra M

  
  In 2002, Dreamworks released a movie on American theaters called THE RING, by Gore Verbenski. It expanded to great lengths around the world. People claimed they had never been so scared while watching a movie in their entire life. Critics had mixed opinions of it, most for the better.… More
  In 2002, Dreamworks released a movie on American theaters called THE RING, by Gore Verbenski. It expanded to great lengths around the world. People claimed they had never been so scared while watching a movie in their entire life. Critics had mixed opinions of it, most for the better. But while the entire world was screaming to THE RING, others decided to reach out for the original version that Dreamworks decided to "hide" while THE RING was in it's theatrical run. The 1998 Japanese phenomenon RINGU (a.k.a RING.) Based on a 1991 novel by Koji Suzuki (claimed as the Japanese Stephen King) RINGU tells the story of reporter Asakawa Reiko (Nanako Matsushima), a middle-class Japanese single mother. Her latest story is the investigation of a mysterious urban legend that circulates around high schools about a tape that kills whoever watches it seven days later. She learns that five teenagers recently died from a heart attack at the exact same time, and that they were all friends who spent a vacation on a cabin resort exactly one week before. It becomes up close and personal when she finds out one of them was her recently deceased cousin Tomoko (Yuku Takeuchi.) Reiko eventually tracks down and watches the mysterious tape, and in one of the movie's many chilling moments, receives a strange phone call confirming that the urban legend is true, an element that reminded me of the 1992's similar CANDYMAN. She finds help from her ex-husband Ryiuji (Hirouyuki Sanada), a psychic with paranormal powers (an element obviously removed from the US version). Both Reiko and Ryiuji examine the tape carefully and realize it was shot in a nearby volcanic island. With only a few days left, they travel to the island where the dark, disturbing truth remains hidden, waiting to be discovered. Taking liberties from the infilmable novel, director Hideo Nakata (DARK WATER, CHAOS) and screenwriter Hiroshi Takahashi (DON'T LOOK UP) were able to create what is perhaps one of the most impressive horror films of recent memory, challenged maybe only by the less-subliminal AUDITION. Nakata's direction already explains what makes RINGU so unique: The absence of music, limited photography, simple camera movements, and no cheap jump scares. The fear in RINGU comes from skin-deep slow burn. If you are looking for jumps, watch the American remake instead. Which brings us to the infamous RINGU vs. THE RING internet battle: A pointless one. The 2002 remake had more technological resources and a stronger desire to freak out the audience. Director Gore Verbenski decided not to copy the original and went for a less subliminal more artsy Dario Argento dreamy approach with a Nine Inch Nails vibe and a David Fischer love for rain. While THE RING improved on the upcoming flaws of the original, it had problems of it's own. Not wanting to change the subject, let me tell you the Japanese version is the one to see. The problem is that most people who watch the recent remake will hate RINGU, and vice-versa. Unlike THE RING, RINGU avoids CGI shocks and cheap jump scares like a plague. You won't find any suspenseful moments, chases, or any physical struggles between the cast here. While the remake scared you with fast zooms, weird camera tricks, and inhuman freaky bursts of weird noises, RINGU scares you with it's lack of... sadism. A good example are the videotapes. The videotape seen in THE RING is a Nine Inch Nails video, in a good way, with very weird supernatural images and weird gross-out quick glimpses. The original's videotape is shorter and maybe even weirder. It shows you different but equally impressive images that belong to a David Lynch nightmare while a "scratching" noise is heard on the background. A noise that was unfortunately omitted in the remake. The Japanese tape can be either laughable or scary depending on the mentality of whoever watches it. But what makes RINGU the phenomenon that it is today is the character of Yamura Sadako, who turns out to be pulling the strings. Not wanting to spoil the plot, I will just say that never since Hanniball Lacter has a character with such little screen time terrorized the audience as good. The American doppelganger Samara was badly used in the remake. While what made Sadako scary was that she was pure evil, the remake's screenwriter Ehren Kruger tried to turn her into a Batman-like repressed character that you are supposed to feel sorry for. This terribly reduces the impact of "the scene". Which leads me to "the scene" itself. If you ask anyone who watched either version what "the scene" is, they will probably know. Let me tell you that "the scene" is done much better in this version. I will go as far as saying "the scene" is hands down one of the scariest moments in cinematographic history, very close to the shower scene and the climax of DON'T LOOK NOW. The remake tried to hard with it's own "scene", adding CGI effects, quick cuts, and many other gross-out elements that the original didn't need. But RINGU is not without it's flaws. Either the fact that I am not Asian, or maybe that I am not familiar with psychics, but the whole Ryiuji character left me wishing for more. Maybe the subtitle translation didn't make it clear enough, but I couldn't connect to that way he always had an answer to everything. Not that Sanada's performance is lacking. He steals the scene and carries out most of the movie. Remember Bruce Lee in GREEN HORNET? Maybe not, but that is Ryiuji here. And Matsushima is equally good, although she is given less to do than her American counterpart Naomi Watts. I will give credit to the US remake by eliminating the psychic subplot. I won't forgive the fact that Ryuji's American counterpart is a pointless and boring sidekick which is what ironically gives Watts her chance to shine. RINGU is still a superior horrifying experience that you will not easily forget. Forget the sequels (RING 2), forget the spin-offs (RASEN), the rip-offs (FEARDOTCOM), or remakes (RING VIRUS and THE RING). It all rounds up to here. Be sure to watch Nakata's equally good DARK WATER, which is already getting a remake on early works. Oh, the humanity... *phone rings*

• E.J. B

  
  Ladies and gentlemen, let me introduce to you one of the greatest horror films ever made. It's scary, it's never dull, it never hits a false note. This is the Citizen Kane of horror.

• Tsubaki S

  
  Funny and ironic that the movie that started one of the biggest waves of horror flicks in recenty history happens to be a very average flick. With the Hollywood remake being equally forgettable. A film like Shutter did this way better, too bad it came out after this one.

• A.D. V

  
  Far superior to the American version

• Lafe F

  
  Not as scary as the US version "The Ring". It tried to explain the evil girl's mental powers with a scientific background, which was silly. The pacing felt really slow. This one was a bit laughable, even though it clearly came first.

• xGary X

  
  Classic J-horror that relies far more on suggestion and atmosphere than cheap shocks, and as a result action junkies may find it a little uneventful. A little over-rated maybe (although it's one of those films it's nigh on impossible to avoid finding out the ending before… More
  Classic J-horror that relies far more on suggestion and atmosphere than cheap shocks, and as a result action junkies may find it a little uneventful. A little over-rated maybe (although it's one of those films it's nigh on impossible to avoid finding out the ending before you see it...) as I much preferred Ju-On, but a suitably creepy experience.

• Megan S

  
  While it was much creepier than the American version, it was slower.

• Drew S

  
  Different from the US version. I'd have to say I like Gore Verbinski's treatment of the Ringu mythos better; this is very good, but misses the "scary" mark by a mile. What it does offer is a deeper, stronger look at Koji Suzuki's original novel, as well as a… More
  Different from the US version. I'd have to say I like Gore Verbinski's treatment of the Ringu mythos better; this is very good, but misses the "scary" mark by a mile. What it does offer is a deeper, stronger look at Koji Suzuki's original novel, as well as a plot more intent on telling a story than communicating scares. Still, the movie's lack of focus on actual horror is a huge disappointment.

• Alec B

  
  There's a few plot points that just seem to come out of nowhere, but this film is still a lot better than its American counterpart. The main reason is subtlety. Ringu doesn't overreach and saves the very best imagery for its terrifying ending.

• August S

  
  It fails to be very scary to just "okay" scary. It has the atmosphere and the story is quite interesting but it is a wee bit tedious and it saves the best for last which is satisfying but still, slow.

Read all 20 featured audience ratings