Christopher Lee, Dennis Waterman, Jenny Hanley

A young man, Paul Carlson, is on a trip and spends the night in Count Dracula's castle. Needless to say, he is murdered. When some time has passed, the young man's brother Simon comes to the small tow...( read more  read more... )n where all the traces end to look for him. Brought back from his dead, moldering remains with blood drooled on them by one of the bats he commands, Count Dracula once again spreads his evil from his mountaintop castle.

Flixster Users

46% liked it

2,450 ratings

R, 1 hr. 36 min.

Directed by: Roy Ward Baker

Release Date: December 23, 1970

Invite friends to see

DVD Release Date: August 7, 2001

Stats: 112 reviews

Get movie widget Recommend it Add to Favorites

Your Rating



clear rating

Flixster Reviews (112)


  • May 28, 2009
    The problem with Hammer's ever-popular Dracula series is that the sequels to the original classic all follow a set formula and are all therefore rather monotonous. However, luckily for this instalment Hammer have assigned one of their top directors; Roy Ward Baker, and you can al...( read more)ways count on him for an entertaining horror ride. The Quatermass and the Pit director has achieved something that didn't seem likely after seeing all the other films in the series; he's actually got Christopher Lee to appear for more than five minutes! Yes, that's right the star of the show is actually the star of the show this time; and while he doesn't actually lead the film, you do get the impression that you're watching a Christopher Lee film. His performance is the usual mix of malevolence and over the top camp; and as usual, it's very effective. Lee epitomises his character to such a degree that, Bela Lugosi aside, you can't imagine anyone else in the role. And this is all the better when you consider that he's in the movie for a while this time.

    The plot is the same "Dracula gets resurrected, wreaks some havoc and then gets defeated until next time" that all the Dracula sequels follow; but this time the surrounding story is much more interesting than usual. We follow a young upstart who flees after being accused of rape and finds himself in a place that you really don't want to find yourself; Count Dracula's castle. Then, after he's been missing for a while, his brother sets out to find him. An excellent atmosphere that is full of tension gives the film a very foreboding aura, which helps it massively in capturing a horror feel. The way that Dracula's castle is shown is fantastic, and the smoke effects and long shots of the castle itself are absolutely delicious. Adding to this is a very powerful musical score, which shows why Hammer are famous for their over the top music. Scars of Dracula is also notable for featuring most of the common vampire clichés such as the wooden stake and the cross. One the whole, I rate this as Hammer's second best Dracula film, second only to the original.
  • June 24, 2007
    This is the closest Hammer ever came to reading Bram Stoker's novel and Dracula's climb down the walls of the castle is one of the results!.
  • October 3, 2006
    The wildest entry in the Hammer Dracula series, this one is full of violence and nudity and has a wonderful performance by Patrick Troughton as Dracula's kooky man-servent.
  • May 8, 2009
    I always love a good Hammer Horror, this however doesn't fall into that category. The acting is pretty awful and the plot is nothing special. Even for a small budget early 70s film the effects are bad, although the sight of those incredible fake looking rubber bats spitting red p...( read more)aint does raise a few laughs. On the plus side Christopher Lee does get more screen time than any other of the Dracula flicks, which is always a good thing.
  • June 17, 2008
    Nice atmosphere in this excellent Christopher Lee Dracula outing.
  • September 22, 2009
    Dracula rises from the grave yet again, this time to stalk a small town and terrorise everyone who heads in his castle. The bat's rather funny though.
  • September 21, 2009
    There's a simple lesson to be learned here - don't go to Dracula's castle. Dracula wasn't really hurting anyone until people showed up where he lived; only then must they be subjected to his sadistic ways. Christopher Lee as always is the best Dracula but I hated the twist of f...( read more)ate that caused his demise. He may be the Prince of Darkness but he has some pretty rough luck
  • July 19, 2009
    Hammer´s last classic in their Dracula series, set in right Victorian/Gothic milieu with beautiful ligting, lovely score and red-dressed feminine purity with cleavage. I have never understood why Kim Newman, a critic never figting for cleaner movies, was so keen to bash this Got...( read more)hic fairytale´s "nastiness", meaning brief gore and even briefer nudity!
  • November 16, 2008
    If you enjoy Hammer horrors,and you haven't seen Scars of Dracula,there is plenty to enjoy here. Christopher Lee plays a great count,and he has lots more to do and say than in the other movies. Its also one of the more gory offering from Hammer,with bloody necks and wrists poppin...( read more)g up throughout. Good campy fun.
  • October 31, 2008
    People who enjoy Hammer horror movies seem generally to have deemed 'Scars of Dracula' to be the poorest offering in the Hammer/Lee Dracula catalogue (1958-73), based on a paucity of originality. I would disagree and whilst the film may have more flaws than most Hammer films in t...( read more)erms of not so special effects, it has considerable merit and, in my view a good deal of originality. Firstly, one is struck by the peculiar physiognomy of Lee - his face drawn and ashen, almost as though he has been drained of blood, and definitely looking more like one of the undead than in previous films. In tandem with this new image, Lee carries out unprecedented acts of violence: in one maniacal scene, repeatedly stabbing one of his female cohorts with frenzied aggression when he discovers her in bed with an equally doomed guest, and in another scene, sadistically branding his man-servant (Patrick Troughton/Klove) across the back with a glowing sword, drawn from hot coals. In another scene, we find the previously mentioned guest hung like a piece of meat on a hook, which impales his chest. Such violent visuals do not, of course, necessarily add merit to the film (and Christopher Lee later commented that he deplored the violent contents of this particular sequel), but again represent an unprecedented aspect of the Dracula perennials. Possibly the most original and pleasing merit of the film is the location of Dracula's sleeping chamber and the way in which only he can access it. The chamber is set high up in the castle and can only be accessed by a window overlooking an abyss, hundreds of feet above the ground. This literally is the only access, as inside we find that there are no internal doors - only walls of stone. Drawing inspiration from the original Stoker novel, we come to see how Dracula comes and goes from his chamber, as at nightfall he emerges from the window and defies all the laws of physics by crawling up the wall to a window above. Marvellous. There is also an interesting addition where we find Dracula to have developed an ingenious defence mechanism to prevent him being staked while he slumbers. Though his eyes remain closed, the lids are superimposed by glowing red eyes which, understandably, startle and ward off the would-be 'staker'. As said, the film does have its flaws, not least in that it contains more than its fair share of Hammer hum-drum (Carpathian landlords with Cornish accents type-of-thing) and visually there is much to evoke laughter rather than fear. Rubber bats proliferate the film from start to end and the shoe-string sets also inhibit proceedings. There is one point when the 'solid stone' wall of Dracula's sleeping chamber containing the window wobbles momentarily as an intruder (who has managed to gain ingress by means of a bed-curtain hung from the window above) rushes to it, on seeing the curtain being pulled back up. And, though we are given an original demise for the Count, as he bursts into flames whilst holding an iron rail when it is struck by lightening, this sequence is itself shot down in flames as we see that the figure besieged by the inferno is clearly not Christopher Lee, but a masked stuntman. But then it is goofs like this which elicit such affection among Hammer aficionados. This film is well-deserving of a place in a horror film collection and though not great, it does have aspects which make it good.

Critic Reviews


No recent reviews.

Comments


This board looks lonely. Be the first to talk about "Scars of Dracula" !

Critic ratings and reviews powered by RottenTomatoes.com

Fresh (60% or more critics rated the movie positively)

Rotten (59% or fewer critics rated the movie positively)

More Like This


Click a thumb to vote on that suggestion, or add your own suggestions.

  • Vampire Hunter D (Banpaia hantâ D)
    Vampire Hunter D (Banpaia hantâ D) (0%)
  • Låt den Rätte Komma In (Let the Right One in)
    Låt den Rätte Komma In (Let the Right One in) (0%)
  • 30 Days of Night
    30 Days of Night (0%)
  • Dracula A.D. 1972
    Dracula A.D. 1972 (100%)

Facts


No facts approved yet. Be the first

Scars of Dracula : Watch Free on TV


Scars of Dracula Trivia


  • Scars Of Dracula- Simon Carlson was played by Dennis Waterman. Who recommended him for the part?  Answer »

Movie Quizzes


No quizzes for Scars of Dracula. Want to create one?

Video Clips


No video clips yet. Want to upload one?

Recent News


No recent headlines. Got one?

Most Popular Skin


No skins yet. Interested in creating one?