David Caruso, Brendan Sexton III, Stephen Gevedon

Tensions rise within an asbestos cleaning crew as they work in an abandoned mental hospital with a horrific past that seems to be coming back.

Flixster Users

72% liked it

16,973 ratings

Critics

61% liked it

64 critics

R, 100 min.

Directed by: Brad Anderson

Release Date: August 10, 2001

Invite friends to see

DVD Release Date: February 26, 2002

Stats: 1,357 reviews

Get movie widget Recommend it Add to Favorites

Your Rating



clear rating
Share on: Facebook Twitter

Flixster Reviews (1,357)


  • September 15, 2009
    If Session 9 can teach anything to up and coming horror film makers, its this; If you want to make a believable and creepy movie, use good actors! Session 9 is a great psychological horror!
  • April 13, 2009
    A brooding,intense piece of work..the abandoned old mental hospital gives the Overlook Hotel a run for its money,that's for sure...the few things that might not have snapped together logistically still didn't detract from the inexorable psycho-spiritual nightmare in this movie,IM...( read more)O..if you're looking for a low-key,old-school creep-out,this one's for you..also,it's shot in a kind of hi-def you don't see a lot of,super-crispy yet organic enough to work..the acting's solid,but for me,the real star was Simon--his bubbling chuckles and demonic laissez-faire got through to me."There was a lot of blood,Doc."
  • December 31, 2008
    This was soooooooooo slow...it didn't really go anywhere.
  • November 26, 2008
    Phil: We'll take the tunnels. They're safer.
    Jeff: "Safer"?

    A simply plotted psychological thriller that makes good use of its setting, focuses on subtle scares, and succeeds as a well shot film.

    The plot involves an asbestos cleaning crew hired to work in an abandoned mental ...( read more)hospital. The crew consists of five men, all with their own ticks.

    The leader is Gordon, played by Peter Mullan, who is having issues with his wife and newborn. Second in command is Phil, played by David Caruso who has issues with Hank, played by Josh Lucas, because he stole his girlfriend. You then have Mike, played by Stephen Gevedon (who co-wrote the film), who develops an obsession with some recordings of patients he finds in the hospital. Lastly is rookie Jeff.

    Mike: I need you to go downstairs and check the breaker box.
    Jeff: ...I can't do that.
    Mike: Why?
    Jeff: I got nyctophobia.
    Mike: What?
    Jeff: Fear of the dark.
    Mike: [incredulous] Okay...

    The things that occur in this story involve tensions rising between the crew and mysterious going-ons that seem to be affecting their performance.

    Part of what makes this movie work so well is how it slowly develops itself. We know something is building, but we're not sure what and the movie toys with these aspects, while providing an intriguing watch. This isn't a good horror flick for a party setting, its much more intimate and works better on a thinkers level.

    The ending goes off a bit and there are some questionable audio and dialog choices, but the film works very well.

    Director Brad Anderson has made use of a special digital camera that gives the film a wonderfully real look and also manages to subtly inject a visual style into this film that pulls you in without seeming to imply what will occur. This is also met with a few standout camera moments in terms of how certain highlight scenes are handled.

    Its creepy without being overdone and I really enjoyed it.

    Doctor: And where do you live, Simon?
    Mary Hobbes: I live in the weak and the wounded... Doc.
  • October 18, 2008
    Pretty freaky and chilling, and even moreso if you know the full details of the hospital in Danvers. Great performances all around and the music is almost nightmarish.
  • November 9, 2009
    idea originale (sì, è preso da un cortometraggio ma sul grande schermo non si era mai visto) e una storia che scorre liscia.. forse un po' troppo "umanizzati" gli alieni, però non rovina di certo il film. Bellissimo se piace il genere (e non parlo di fantascienza)
  • October 31, 2009
    Session 9 is a fascinating, sometimes scary micro-budgeted film which has a bunch of interesting, well rounded characters, an abiding sense of atmosphere and great locations all working for it. The history of the institute is extremely well plotted, the session tapes thems...( read more)elves are intense and spooky, and the "what's going on?" factor keeps momentum going. It's therefore a bit of a shame that the reveal is a bit Scooby Doo schizoid, and a little unconvincing, even though the performances compensate (heck, David Caruso is even decent here). Brad Anderson's feature became a bit of a cult success on DVD, at the time capitalising on the resurgence in small budgeted horror films following the huge success of The Blair Witch Project, and its influence can be seen on many films following too. Never quite as successful as it could have been, Session 9 is still overall a great watch for those who prefer their horror to be built on atmosphere and character rather than cheap scares.

    "I live in the weak and the wounded, Doc."

  • October 11, 2009
    I get the plot and the premise, but it wasn't creepy or freaky in any way to me. Plus, this movie was really slow and it didn't even feel like it really went anywhere.

    It gets a star and 1/2 because abandoned mental hospitals are really intriguing to me.
  • October 8, 2009
    Having patience with the beginning pays off in the end. A masterfully subtle horror film.
  • August 31, 2009
    This has jumpy parts but thats about it! Its a bit like House on Haunting Hill and every other horror based in a mental hospital. This film has be done before and much better!

Critic Reviews


September 21, 2001
Liam Lacey, Globe and Mail

For a while there, the film has us going. full review

August 27, 2001
Peter Travers, Rolling Stone

A spine-tingler. full review

August 20, 2001
David Edelstein, Slate

The final illuminations ... are a poor return on nearly two hours of ear-buckling, eye-stabbing incoherence. full review

View more Session 9 reviews at RottenTomatoes.com

Comments


  • rainbowwitch619
    June 16, 2007
    The movie was made at Danvers State Insane Asylum in Danver's Massachusetts what used to be Salem Villiage.
  • MorpheusOne
    November 30, 2006
    A good movie, but not as good as I had hoped. Beyond the main characters there is an underlying storyline, sort of a basis for why all the horrible things happen near the end & that part of the story jumped around a lot & that sucked.
  • Bllahoney
    September 16, 2006
    Yo i haven't seen it yet cuz I dont remember watching it come out in theaters or what ever but I gotta check it out cuz I looove horror movies and this one looks mad ill!
    (hope so)
  • patnittoly
    May 21, 2006
    No one has heard of this movie a friend of mine found it in a dvd bargain bin its really scary and tense the whole way through. Its not your run of the mill thriller or horror movie I recommend this to everyone. I think it was filmed in Canada at an abandoned insane asylum.

Critic ratings and reviews powered by RottenTomatoes.com

Fresh (60% or more critics rated the movie positively)

Rotten (59% or fewer critics rated the movie positively)

Official Trailer

More Like This


Click a thumb to vote on that suggestion, or add your own suggestions.

  • The Shining
    The Shining (62%)
  • Jacob's Ladder
    Jacob's Ladder (33%)
  • Nightwatch
    Nightwatch (80%)
  • The Machinist
    The Machinist (89%)

Facts


No facts approved yet. Be the first

Session 9 : Watch Free on TV


Session 9 Trivia


  • This movie starred David Caruso and has a beautifully dark soundtrack by the Cocteau Twins. Which movie is it?  Answer »
  • What tape does 'Simon' finally show up on in the movie "Session 9"?  Answer »
  • Alot of the patients ended up where when the hospital closed in Session 9 ?  Answer »
  • There is a cemetary up behind the machine shop with old tombstones from the early 1800s in Session 9 ?  Answer »

Most Popular Skin